May 20, 2015 Estimation of Destination Choice Models using Small Sample Sizes and Cellular Phone Data Roberto O. Miquel Chaitanya Paleti Tae-Gyu Kim, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
A Synthetic Environment to Evaluate Alternative Trip Distribution Models Xin Ye Wen Cheng Xudong Jia Civil Engineering Department California State Polytechnic.
The National Household Travel Survey Heather Contrino US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information.
Surveying and Modeling Long Distance Trips Stacey Bricka, TTI Erik Sabina, DRCOG Catherine Durso, University of Denver Julie Paasche, PTV NuStats Presented.
KY 4/22 Module 1a Purposes of Data Collection. Review of initial handouts Travel Survey Manual, TMIP, USDOT and EPA, 1996 Travel Survey Manual Appendices,
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
Development of a New Commercial Vehicle Travel Model for Triangle Region 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference, Columbus, Ohio May 7, 2013 Bing Mei.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning UTPS (Review from last time) Urban Transportation Planning System –Also known as the Four - Step Process –A methodology.
Advanced Modeling System for Forecasting Regional Development, Travel Behavior, and the Spatial Pattern of Emissions Brian J. Morton Elizabeth Shay Eun.
Norman W. Garrick CTUP. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning Trip Distribution Additional suggested reading: Chapter 5 of Ortuzar & Willumsen, third edition November 2004.
CONCEPTS AND FORMS OF TOURISM Philippine Experience Agenda Item 9 Milagros Y. Say 17 July 2006.
18 May 2015 Kelly J. Clifton, PhD * Patrick A. Singleton * Christopher D. Muhs * Robert J. Schneider, PhD † * Portland State Univ. † Univ. Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE. What Smartphone Bicycle GPS Data Can Tell Us About Current Modeling Efforts Katie Kam, The University of Texas at Austin.
KY 4/22 Module 1b Chapter 3 in the TS Manual Main Survey Types.
The Economic Impacts of Climate Change on Beach Recreation in North Carolina Nicholas Livy, Appalachian State University Faculty Advisor: John Whitehead,
11 May, 2011 Discrete Choice Models and Behavioral Response to Congestion Pricing Strategies Prepared for: The TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Validate - A Nationwide Dynamic Travel Demand Model for Germany Peter Vortisch, Volker Waßmuth, PTV AG, Germany.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Evaluating and Communicating Model Results: Guidebook for.
0 presented to Model Task Force Meeting presented by Vidya Mysore, FDOT Central Office Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 12/12/06 LEHD.
Trip Generation Review and Recommendations 1 presented to MTF Model Advancement Committee presented by Ken Kaltenbach The Corradino Group November 9, 2009.
National Household Travel Survey Data User Tools Adella Santos FHWA-OFFICE OF HIGHWAY POLICY INFORMATION APDU 2008 ANNUAL CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 25, 2008.
January Utah Statewide Household Travel Study Study overview and results.
TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Social Sector Statistics Department Tourism Statistics Group
For Model Users Group June 10, 2011 Kyeil Kim, Ph.D., PTP Atlanta Regional Commission.
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
Utilizing Advanced Practice Methods to Improve Travel Model Resolution and Address Sustainability Bhupendra Patel, Ph.D., Senior Transportation Modeler.
MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented to 13 th Transportation Planning Applications Conference prepared and presented by David.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Rhett Fussell, PE Craig Gresham, PE No Horsing Around, A Hole in One with Mobile Phone Data Using Mobile Phone Location Data to Support Corridor Analysis.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
National Household Travel Survey 2010 Introduction NHTS provides very valuable information for Transport Malta and other entities involved in transport.
March 13 th, 2007 by Indraneel Kumar, AICP; Spatial and GIS Analyst Christine Nolan, Senior Associate Purdue Center for Regional Development Purdue University.
Assembly David Levinson. Induced Travel S1: Supply before S2: Supply after Price of Travel Quantity of Travel (VMT) Q1 Q2 P1 P2 Demand.
Modeling and Forecasting Household and Person Level Control Input Data for Advance Travel Demand Modeling Presentation at 14 th TRB Planning Applications.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
Weighting Household Surveys By David F. Pearson, Ph.D., P.E. April 2007.
Preliminary Evaluation of Cellular Origin- Destination Data as a Basis for Forecasting Non-Resident Travel 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Presented to Time of Day Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Jason Lemp, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Thomas Rossi, Cambridge.
Presentation For Incorporation of Pricing in the Time-of-Day Model “Express Travel Choices Study” for the Southern California Association of Governments.
Student Travel: Evidence from 13 Diverse Metro Regions of the United States Guang Tian and Reid Ewing Department of City & Metropolitan.
Tianjia Tang, Ph.D., PE Chief, Travel Monitoring and Surveys Division Office of Highway Policy Information, Federal Highway Administration Washington,
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Analysis of Travel Behavior Using the ACS J.G. Berman, Siim S öö t and Susumu Kudo Urban Transportation Center, UIC.
Estimating Travel Patterns on I ‐ 95 with Automated Technology NCAMPO Conference - Asheville, NC May 3, 2012 Taruna Tayal (M/A/B) Brian Wert (M/A/B) Bill.
A Genetic Algorithm for Truck Model Parameters from Local Truck Count Data Vince Bernardin, Jr, PhD & Lee Klieman, PE, PTOE Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates,
Responses to Gas Prices in Knoxville, TN Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates Mike Conger, P.E.
Reconciliation of regional travel model and passive device tracking data 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Leta F. Huntsinger Rick Donnelly.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
ANALYSING EXPLANATORY FACTORS FOR HOUSEHOLD LEVEL TRIP GENERATION MODELLING GEO 6166 | TERM PROJECT NIKHIL MENON SPRING 2014 A CASE STUDY OF THE NETHERLANDS.
MPO DEMOGRAPHICS Public Meetings June 26 & 27, 2006 North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department.
Airport Forecasting NOTE: for HW, draw cash flow diagram to solve and review engineering economics.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department
School Travel Patterns in Utah
Improved treatment of special attractors
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting, Ch. 8 (152054A)
Trip Distribution Review and Recommendations
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Ossi Nurmi 15th Global Forum on Tourism Statistics, Cusco, Peru
Model Work Trips Appropriately Based on Travel Behavior and Change Pattern Differences 2016HTS Characteristics and Changes vs. 2006HTS 16th TRB National.
MSP Regional Travel Behavior Inventory Program
Presentation transcript:

May 20, 2015 Estimation of Destination Choice Models using Small Sample Sizes and Cellular Phone Data Roberto O. Miquel Chaitanya Paleti Tae-Gyu Kim, Ph.D.

Acknowledgements North Carolina Department of Transportation Wilmington MPO

Introduction Travel Demand Model for Wilmington, NC Total Population ~ 260,000 Total Area ~ 405 Sq mi Visitor Attractions: Downtown and Beaches

Introduction … This enhanced model features: – Extended area – Refined TAZ system – Visitor model – Time-of-day components – Destination choice model No recent travel survey data North Carolina NHTS Add- on – Small sample size Cellular Phone Data for Origin-Destination

Cellular Phone Data Identify study area origin-destination flows by trip purpose Identify visitor trip movements in study area Identify internal-external trip movements Identify external-external trip movements Calibrate Wilmington’s trip distribution models.

Cellular Phone Data Sample One month of data (July) 475,506 unique devices 38,761 residents 5.1% sample rate Visitors and residents Daily trip tables Directional purposes

Resident Origin-Destination Flows OW (Trips > 50) HW (Trips > 50)

Visitor Origin-Destination Flows OO (Trips > 50)

Destination Choice Model Destination choice for trip distribution Model estimated using – NHTS data for trip ends – no recent survey data – LEHD data for household earnings – Household characteristics and generalized cost skims from the MPO model NHTS Trips records – few Home Based Trips Trip Purpose# Records Home Based Work Trips31 Home Based Shopping Trips67 Home Based Other trips107 Non Home Based Trips records

Destination Choice Model: Methodology Exogenous variables and Interaction variables tying in different trip purposes

Destination Choice Model: Methodology … Generalized cost=Time + Vehicle Operating Cost(VOC) + Toll Price Destination choice additionally accounts for: – Employment – Income – Earnings – Children Iterative technique - model estimation Results validated using trip tables from cellular phone data Labi and Sinha, 2011

Destination Choice Model Results

Model Validation

Summary and Conclusions Use of cellular phone data set helps to establish confidence in estimating a model using a small sample Very short trips revealed in the cellular phone data set seem consistent with behavior estimated from the NHTS Estimating destination choice models from small samples is not ideal, but is possible

Thank You Chaitanya Paleti CDM Smith Raleigh, NC Roberto Miquel, AICP CDM Smith Raleigh, NC Tae-Gyu Kim, Ph.D. NCDOT Raleigh, NC