Using Ground-Water Model Predictions and the ppr and opr Statistics to Guide Data Collection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2nd MINEO Workshop - Orléans, December 2002 MINEO Hydrology, Hydrogeology and Transport Modelling Principal investigators : Stuart Marsh and Stephane.
Advertisements

Design Parameters.
Applications of Hydrogeologic settings in Groundwater vulnerability mapping in LaGrange County, Indiana, USA Solomon A. Isiorho, PhD Dept. of Geosciences.
2 nd International Conference Graz, October 10 th, 2012 SHARP PP 2: Region of Western Macedonia Fig. 1: Vulnerability map for Florina Basin GIS-based Vulnerability.
Hydrogeology, High Lake Rob Dickin Hydrogeologist, GLL.
Alternative Modeling Approaches for Flow & Transport in Fractured Rock Douglas D. Walker, DE&S Jan-Olof Selroos, SKB Supported by Swedish Nuclear Fuel.
KELLY HAYDEN Applying GIS to Watershed Pollution Management.
Interdisciplinary Modeling of Aquatic Ecosystems Curriculum Development Workshop July 18, 2005 Groundwater Flow and Transport Modeling Greg Pohll Division.
Hydrologic/Watershed Modeling Glenn Tootle, P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas
The Calibration Process
GLY 521- Hydrogeology Modflow Packages. Block Center Flow (BCF) Package The BCF package is the central package for all solutions Specify the way each.
St. Johns River Water Supply Impact Study by Getachew Belaineh Ph. D., P.H. 1 Brian McGurk P.G. 1 Louis Motz Ph. D., P.E 2 Follow up Review meeting March,
BIOPLUME II Introduction to Solution Methods and Model Mechanics.
Evaluation of a bedrock aquitard for regional- and local-scale groundwater flow Kenneth R. Bradbury, Madeline B. Gotkowitz, and David J. Hart Wisconsin.
Profiling Transmissivity and Contamination in Fractures Intersecting Boreholes USEPA-USGS Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2 14 January 2014 Claire Tiedeman.
Quantify prediction uncertainty (Book, p ) Prediction standard deviations (Book, p. 180): A measure of prediction uncertainty Calculated by translating.
Uses of Modeling A model is designed to represent reality in such a way that the modeler can do one of several things: –Quickly estimate certain aspects.
Manager: John Daneri Analyst: Kathleen Callahan Assistant Manager: Jacob Powell Analyst: Leah Gibson.
FSA Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Model Presentation to Scottsdale Citizens Group March 19, 1999.
Groundwater Flow and Transport over Larger Volumes of Rock: Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing USEPA-USGS Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2 14.
STATISTICS!!! The science of data. What is data? Information, in the form of facts or figures obtained from experiments or surveys, used as a basis for.
IV. Sensitivity Analysis for Initial Model 1. Sensitivities and how are they calculated 2. Fit-independent sensitivity-analysis statistics 3. Scaled sensitivities.
Uncertainty Analysis and Model “Validation” or Confidence Building.
Populations, Samples, Standard errors, confidence intervals Dr. Omar Al Jadaan.
Identify Parameters Important to Predictions using PPR & Identify Existing Observation Locations Important to Predictions using OPR.
III. Ground-Water Management Problem Used for the Exercises.
AQUIFER VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT: PROJECT REVIEW COLUMBIA COUNTY June 11, 2009 Columbia County, Florida Advanced GeoSpatial Inc. Alan Baker, P.G. James.
(Zheng and Bennett) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow model & transport model) Adjust parameter values Traditional approach.
VI. Evaluate Model Fit Basic questions that modelers must address are: How well does the model fit the data? Do changes to a model, such as reparameterization,
Scenarios 1.Tidal influence 2.Extreme storm surge (wave overtopping, max. limit 200 l/s/m, period 2 h) Outlook calibration and validation of 3D model transfer.
VIII: Methods for Evaluating Model Predictions 1. Define predictive quantity and calculate sensitivities and standard deviations (Ex8.1a) 2. Assess data.
A More Accurate and Powerful Tool for Managing Groundwater Resources and Predicting Land Subsidence: an application to Las Vegas Valley Zhang, Meijing.
Application of Neuro-Fuzzy Techniques to Predict Ground Water Vulnerability B. Dixon, Ph.D. University of South Florida St. Petersburg, Florida 33701,
Proposed Tools and Approach for Ground-Water Vulnerability Assessment (GWAVA) Using a Geographic Information System and Simulation Modeling Jack Barbash.
StatisticSpelled outCalculated for each.. LeverageObs DSSDimensionless SSObs and parameter CSSComposite SSParameter PCCParam. Cor. Coef.Parameter pair.
Studying the effects of an irrigation/drainage network on groundwater table fluctuations using 3D groundwater flow modeling Mohammad Zare Manferd Koch.
Calibration Guidelines 1. Start simple, add complexity carefully 2. Use a broad range of information 3. Be well-posed & be comprehensive 4. Include diverse.
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model. Typical Site Management Problems: Site complexities  Complicated hydrogeology  Multiple contaminants of concern (COCs)
DRAINMOD APPLICATION ABE 527 Computer Models in Environmental and Natural Resources.
Experiences in assessing deposition model uncertainty and the consequences for policy application Rognvald I Smith Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh.
IX. Transient Model Nonlinear Regression and Statistical Analysis.
Development of Spatial Probability Models to Estimate, Integrate, and Assess Ground- Water Vulnerability at Multiple Scales Earl A. Greene and Andrew E.
Debra Harrington and Haizhi Chen FDEP Groundwater Protection March, 2005 PROTOTYPE FOR SPRING SYSTEM ASSESSMENTS.
Types of Boundary Conditions 1.Specified head (including constant head) h = f (x,y,z,t) 2.Specified flux (including no flow)  h/  l = -q l /K l 3.Head-dependent.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluating uncertainty in areas contributing recharge to wells for water-quality network design.
Steady-State and Transient Models of Groundwater Flow and Advective Transport, Eastern Snake River Plain Aquifer, INL and Vicinity, Idaho Jason C. Fisher,
Elise A. Striz, Hydrologist USEPA ORD National Risk Management Research Laboratory Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Div. Ada, OK US EPA Optimal.
IX. Transient Forward Modeling. Ground-Water Management Issues Recall the ground-water management issues for the simple flow system considered in the.
Arc Hydro groundwater data model: a data model for groundwater systems within ArcGIS AWRA Specialty Conference Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and.
Using the Model to Evaluate Observation Locations and Parameter Information in the Context of Predictions.
Delineation of Ground water Vulnerability to Agricultural Contaminants using Neuro-fuzzy Techniques Barnali Dixon 1, H. D. Scott 2, J. V. Brahana 2, A.
Water Management Options Analysis Sonoma Valley Model Results Sonoma Valley Technical Work Group October 8, /08/2007.
Flow to Wells - 1 Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney.
1 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE STABILITY OF GROUNDWATER FLOW SYSTEMS M.J.M. Vissers M. van der Perk, P.F.M. van Gaans Universiteit Utrecht, Centre for Geo-Ecological.
Chapter 7: The Distribution of Sample Means
Objective: conceptual model definition and steady state simulation of groundwater flow.
Chapter 12 Understanding Research Results: Description and Correlation
Bill W. Arnold, Al-Aziz Eddebbarh1, and Scott C. James2
Groundwater in Hydrologic Cycle
Mark L. Brusseau University of Arizona
The Calibration Process
Uncertainty and Non-uniqueness
Uses of Modeling A model is designed to represent reality in such a way that the modeler can do one of several things: Quickly estimate certain aspects.
Susceptibility Assessment for Public Water Supply sources
Transport Modeling in Groundwater
Water Table: is the level at which the groundwater pressure is equal to atmospheric pressure. Aquitard: is a zone within the earth that restricts.
GIS – BASED DRASTIC MODEL FOR ASSESSING
Water Table: is the level at which the groundwater pressure is equal to atmospheric pressure. Aquitard: is a zone within the earth that restricts.
Transport Modeling in Groundwater
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model
Presentation transcript:

Using Ground-Water Model Predictions and the ppr and opr Statistics to Guide Data Collection

Motivation Parameter Distribution Parameter Uncertainty Prediction Uncertainty Hydrogeologic Data Calibrated Model & Predictions Incomplete Data Ground-water model predictions are always uncertain.

What hydrogeologic data could be collected to reduce this prediction uncertainty most effectively? Motivation Parameter Distribution Reduced Parameter Uncertainty Reduced Prediction Uncertainty Hydrogeologic Data Calibrated Model & Predictions Additional Data

Approach Use calibrated model to identify parameters important to predictions. Parameter Distribution Calibrated Model & Predictions

Approach Collect hydrogeologic data: ­Parameter values ­Flow system characteristics Use calibrated model to identify parameters important to predictions. Hydrogeologic Data Parameter Distribution Calibrated Model & Predictions

Approach Collect hydrogeologic data: ­Parameter values ­Flow system characteristics Incorporate these data into the model to reduce parameter and prediction uncertainty. Use calibrated model to identify parameters important to predictions.

Approach Collect hydrogeologic data: ­Parameter values ­Flow system characteristics Incorporate these data into model to reduce parameter and prediction uncertainty. Use calibrated model to identify parameters important to predictions.

Parameter-Prediction Statistic (PPR) 1.Calculate prediction uncertainty (s Z ) using the calibrated model. 2. Assume improved information on one or more parameters, and recalculate s Z. 3. PPR statistic equals the percent decrease in s Z from step 1 to step 2. Prediction Uncertainty (standard deviations s Z ) Parameter Uncertainty Prediction Sensitivities Observation Sensitivities

DVRFS Model Parameters 9 Hydraulic Conductivities 4 Recharge Parameters

Predictions: Advective-Transport Paths Advective transport used as a surrogate for regional contaminant transport. Advective transport paths are 10 km. Predictions are the distances traveled in the N-S, E-W, and vertical directions.

Black bars: Prediction standard deviations calculated using calibrated model. Uncertainty in Path Position Advective path

Black bars: Prediction standard deviations calculated using calibrated model. Red bars: Prediction standard deviations calculated with improved information on a parameter. Uncertainty in Path Position Advective path

PPR Statistic: Individual Parameters Specify improved information on one parameter, so that its uncertainty decreases by 10 percent. Calculate resulting decrease in prediction standard deviations s Z. Repeat for all model parameters.

Parameter with Improved Information Hydraulic Conductivity Recharge PPR: Individual Parameters PPR

Parameter with Improved Information Hydraulic Conductivity Recharge PPR: Individual Parameters PPR

PPR: Multiple Parameters Specify improved information on three parameters. Calculate PPR statistic (decrease in prediction standard deviation s Z ). Repeat for all possible sets of three model parameters.

PPR: Multiple Parameters VOII on Individual Parameters VOII on 3 Parameters PPR

VOII: Multiple Parameters VOII on Individual Parameters VOII on 3 Parameters PPR

Advective Path from Yucca Flat Site K zones, layer 1 Recharge zones K1 K5 R1 10 km R4 K3 layer 2

Using the PPR Results Collect hydrogeologic data related to important parameters System State Observations Improved Predictions, Reduced Uncertainty Societal decisions Improve Model & Parameters Recalibrate Model

Observation-Prediction (opr) Statistic 1.Calculate prediction uncertainty (s Z ) using the calibrated model and all 517 observations. 2. Add or omit one or more observations, and recalculate s Z. 3. opr statistic equals the change in s Z from step 1 to step 2. Prediction Uncertainty (standard deviations s Z ) Parameter Uncertainty Prediction Sensitivities Observation Sensitivities

Predictions evaluated for assessing observations Hill and Tiedeman, 2007, fig p. 366

Which existing observations are important (or not) to predictions? Use opr (-1) to rank the 501 existing observation locations by their importance to predictions Averaged values of opr (-1) for all the predictions are used, to obtain a measure indicating the importance of a single observation to all the predictions of interest. Calculate opr (-100) by removing the 100 least important observations opr (-100) = mean prediction uncertainty increase = 0.6% Hill and Tiedeman, 2007, fig p. 368

Consider one potential new head observation in each cell of model layer 1. Determine weights for the potential observations. Here, same weighting strategy used as for weighting existing observations – weights smaller for heads in high-gradient areas. Calculate opr (+1) for each cell in the layer, even those with an existing observation, so that opr (+1) is continuous over the whole map. What new observations would be important (or not) to predictions? Hill and Tiedeman, 2007, fig p. 369

Improve Model & Parameters Recalibrate Model Hydrologic and Hydrogeologic Data Collect additional observation data Improved Predictions, Reduced Uncertainty Societal decisions Using the OPR results for potential new observations

Summary Parameters and observations most important to the predicted advective-transport paths do not necessarily lie near the paths themselves. Best to not use ppr and opr results alone for making decisions about future data collection – consider other criteria such as geologic insight about important subsurface units to investigate, maintaining good geographic and depth coverage of monitoring network, etc. The ppr and opr results are only as good as the model itself!