Internet Exchange Points Keith Mitchell CTO, XchangePoint ICANN GAC Regional Forum Cape Town 29 th Nov 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Selecting an IXP Where to peer?. THE TOP 10 IXP SELECTION CRITERIA How do network operators choose an Internet Exchange Point? 2.
Advertisements

IXes in the AP Region Philip Smith Chair of APNIC’s IX Special Interest Group.
The Role IXPs and Peering Play in the Evolution of the Internet MENOG14, Dubai, March 2014 Stephen Wilcox, President and CTO, IX Reach.
The State of VoIP Peering: VoIP Peering Summit Internet Telephony Conference & Expo Hunter Newby Chief Strategy Officer tel x p:
© XchangePoint 2001 Overview  SLA Credibility in the ISP Market  Applying SLAs to Inter-ISP Interconnect & Peering  XchangePoint’s Interconnect Service.
Advanced Topics of WAN Compiled from Previous ISQS 6341 Project November 2003.
RIPE39 EIX WG Update Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer.
GigaBit Deployment Case Study Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer.
1 November 1999 The Internet in the UK Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman
© XchangePoint 2001 XchangePoint Update RIPE40 EIX Working Group Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer 2nd October 2001.
RIT Campus Data Network. General Network Statistics Over 23,000 wired outlets Over 14,500 active switched ethernet ports > 250 network closets > 1,000.
IXP & Neutral Colocation Symbiosis SAFNOG Data Centre definition In its simplest form, a data centre is a facility that houses IT equipment – Servers,
Importance and Benefits of IXPs
The Hardware Behind the Internet A virtual tour. Pictorial View of the Internet Backbone The “Internet Backbone” refers to the principal data routes between.
ARIN on the Road – Halifax
1 Wide Area Network. 2 What is a WAN? A wide area network (WAN ) is a data communications network that covers a relatively broad geographic area and that.
London Internet Exchange Point Update Keith Mitchell, Executive Chairman NANOG15 Meeting Denver, Jan 1999.
November 1999 Internet Exchange Points & Colocation Keith Mitchell, Executive Chairman London Internet Exchange Keith Mitchell, Executive Chairman London.
Chapter 2 The Infrastructure. Copyright © 2003, Addison Wesley Understand the structure & elements As a business student, it is important that you understand.
Scaling IXPs Scalable Infrastructure Workshop. Objectives  To explain scaling options within the IXP  To introduce the Internet Routing Registry at.
Innovating the commodity Internet Update to CENIC 14-Mar-2007.
Internet Peering in the UK Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman, London Internet Exchange 13th May 1998.
UKNOF The UK Network Operator’s Forum Keith Mitchell UKNOF Founding Chair UKIF Technical Director UKNOF 1 Meeting London 25th May 2005.
© XchangePoint Holdings Ltd 2004 RIPE 47 EIX WG Update Keith Mitchell CTO 28 th January 2004.
Optimal course of IXP development – NIX.CZ Tomáš Maršálek NIX.CZ, Director of Association , Apricot2009.
© XchangePoint 2001 Economic Differences Between Transit and Peering Exchanges Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer NANOG 25 10th June 2002.
A Scottish Internet Exchange: Benefits, Viability, Options Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman London Internet Exchange Ltd Director, NOMINET Chair, RIPE.
Internet Policy Day 1 - Workshop Session No. 2 Market structure Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
1 Internet Society Creating an Enabling Environment for the Internet: Role of IXPs ENOG 8 – 9 September 2014, Baku Maarit Palovirta, European Regional.
The Changing Peering Environment Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman, London Internet Exchange Internet Peering 3rd December 1998.
Business Aspects of Internet Exchanges AFIX Technical Workshop Session 7.
RIPE34 Meeting EIX Working Group London Internet Exchange Ltd. Keith Mitchell 22 September 1999 London Internet Exchange Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman.
Introduction to The Internet ISP Workshops 1 Last updated 24 April 2013.
Public TeliaSonera International Carrier Daniel Sjoberg, Reykjavik, August 25th Bringing knowledge, quality and stability to the communications industry.
Swiss Internet Exchange Association Wouter van Hulten InterXion.
Using Gigabit Ethernet to Extend the Internet Exchange to the Metropolitan Area Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman London Internet Exchange.
Internet Policy Day 2 - Workshop Session No. 3 Interconnection, IXPs and Voice-over-IP Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South.
© XchangePoint 2001 Growing Your IP Business by Addressing Your Customers’ Broadband Content Needs Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer Global IP Carriers.
Extending the Internet Exchange to the Metropolitan Area Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman London Internet Exchange ISPcon, London 23rd.
Policies for Peering and Internet Exchanges AFIX Technical Workshop Session 8.
Interconnection Issues Geoff Huston. Internet Service Providers Many providers in every market Many provider profiles - from small business to global.
1 February 2000 London Internet Exchange Point Update Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman NANOG18 Meeting San Jose.
1 February 2000 London Internet Exchange Point Update Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman NANOG18 Meeting San Jose.
0 HKIX Hong Kong Internet eXchange Cheng, Che-Hoo Computer Services Center The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Peering Concepts and Definitions Terminology and Related Jargon.
Internet Exchange Points (IXPs) Philip Smith E2 Workshop, AfNOG 2005.
November 1999 London Internet Exchange Keith Mitchell, Executive Chairman JPIX Meeting, July 2000.
Internet Architecture: A High-level Overview AFIX Technical Workshop Session 1.
The Internet 1.Clients, Servers, Routers, Networks 2.Broadband, Wireless & Dial up 3.Connecting backbone 4.The roles of points of presence & network access.
RONOG2 - INTRODUCTION INTERLAN & THE OPERATORS’ COMMUNITY.
Internet Society Boosting Local Content and the Internet Economy
Technical Solution Proposal
I -Point Holdings PLC A way forward for European IXPs Annette Nabavi September 2000.
Internet Exchange Points: A Business & Policy Perspective AFIX Decision-makers’ Workshop Session 1 AFIX-TF,
Rob Blokzijl. RIPE 61 Rome, November RIPE Réseaux IP Européens Rob Blokzijl RIPE Chairman
IPv4 IXP Address Policy APNIC Policy SIG Meeting Taipei, August 2001 Philip Smith.
The Changing Settlement Environment Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman, London Internet Exchange Re-Engineering the Internet, 27th Jan 1998.
Benefits and Value of an IXP The IXP Value Proposition.
© XchangePoint Holdings Ltd 2003 RIPE 45 EIX WG Update Keith Mitchell Gian Walker 14th May 2003.
Keith Mitchellhttp:// RIPE ncc IP Address Space Governance Keith Mitchell Executive Board Chairman, RIPE NCC (Chief Executive, LINX) European.
The Benefit and Need of Standard Contribution for IXPs Jan Stumpf System Engineer.
© XchangePoint Holdings Ltd 2003 RIPE 44 EIX WG Update Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer 29th January 2003.
Internet Strucure Internet structure: network of networks Question: given millions of access ISPs, how to connect them together? access.
Datacenter and international connectivity your Hub in Europe Micaël Weber, International Sales Manager, P&TLuxembourg.
London Internet Exchange Point Update
Keeping local stuff local
Architecting the Network
Ken Gunnells, Ph.D. - Networking Paul Crigler - Programming
Interconnecting IXPs: pros and cons
Internet Interconnection
Presentation transcript:

Internet Exchange Points Keith Mitchell CTO, XchangePoint ICANN GAC Regional Forum Cape Town 29 th Nov 2004

Outline of Presentation  Introduction  Internet Interconnect Principles  Internet Exchange Governance Models  Internet Exchange Technologies  Setting up an Internet Exchange

Speaker’s Background  Founder of UK’s first commercial ISP, PIPEX,  Founder and Executive Chairman of London Internet Exchange, LINX,  First chair of RIPE EIX Working Group  Founder and CTO of first pan-European commercial IXP operator, XchangePoint,  XchangePoint currently operates IXPs in London, Frankfurt, Amsterdam and Hamburg

Internet Interconnect Principles

What happens at an Internet Exchange Point ?  Multiple ISPs locate backbone IP router nodes in single building operated by co-location provider  In-building connections  to shared interconnect fabric (using Ethernet LAN switching technology)  over point-to-point private interconnections  Routing information, and hence traffic, is exchanged bi-laterally between ISPs  Exchange operator may or may not be same organisation as co-location provider  Co-location provider will generally have other customers:  carriers, hosting, ASPs, content distributors

IXP Advantages Single large pipe to the IXP more efficient than many smaller pipes to many ISPs ISP IXP IXP = Internet eXchange PointISP = Internet Service Provider

IXP Advantages  Keeps domestic traffic within a country/region without having to take indirect international route  Typically 20-35% of traffic can be domestic  Reduced bandwidth costs  Improved throughput and latency performance  Economies of scale  Commercial basis of traffic exchange between ISPs across IXP usually via cost-saving peering  Critical mass of ISPs in a single location creates competitive market in provision of capacity, transit and services

Inter-ISP Interconnect  Peering:  two ISPs agree to provide access to each others’ customers  commonly no money changes hands: “settlement free”  barter of perceived equal value  simple commercial agreements  Public Interconnect:  Internet Peering Point (“IPP” or “IXP” or “NAP”)  multiple parties connect to shared switched fabric  commonly Ethernet based  open, many-to-many connectivity  traffic exchange between consenting pairs of participants  Other models exist

IXP Governance and Commercial Models

Importance of IXP Neutrality  In most markets, IXPs are a natural monopoly  problem of trust between competitors  risks of abuse and conflicts of interest  Successful IXPs are not usually:  owned, operated or housed by a single ISP or carrier  ISPs or wholesale IP transit providers  national or international backbones  Co-location facility neutrality:  normally (mainly in Europe) these are buildings operated by independent commercial companies  though sometimes (mainly in US) co-los operate IXPs  IXPs tend not to be in carrier co-lo facilities

Some IXP Neutrality Principles  Does not compete with its ISP members/customers  Does not discriminate between its ISP members/customers  Does not move traffic between cities or countries  Does not make exclusive arrangements with:  ISPs  Carriers  Co-lo Providers  Does not provide IP transit routing  Does not take share of ISPs’ transit revenues  Only interconnects between metro area co-lo sites  May be present at multiple co-lo sites and providers

Governance/Commercial Models  Operated by public sector national academic network  BNIX, GIGAPIX  Not-for-profit membership associations of participating ISPs (majority !)  LINX, AMS-IX  Service within commercial co-location operator  Equinix, PAIX, IX Europe  Companies whose shareholders are participating ISPs  MIX, JPIX  Independent neutral commercial companies  XchangePoint, JPNAP

Internet Exchanges in Europe  IXP operators are typically:  neutral  not-for-profit membership organisations  do not run hosting/co-location facilties  not same organisation as co-location provider  Major cities, e.g. London, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Paris  switch pan-European traffic  have multiple exchange operators  have multiple co-location facilties  each have several to 10s of Gb/s of traffic  Usually one smaller national exchange per country for domestic traffic

IXP Technologies

IXP Technologies History  Initially (1992-4):  10Mb/s Ethernet from ISP router to IXP switch  FDDI between IXP switches  Single switch in single location  100Mb/s mostly replaced these 5+ years ago  Some use of ATM meantime  1Gb/s Ethernet now common access technology  1Gb/s Ethernet also used in core of networks  10Gb/s Ethernet increasingly common in IXP cores  Some limited use of DWDM and MPLS

Routing and Switching at IXPs  ISPs perform Layer-3 IP routing over wide-area using routers connected by long-haul circuits  IXPs perform layer-2 switching over local/metro area, usually using Ethernet  ISPs interconnecting at IXPs exchange IP routing information using BGP (Border Gateway Protocol)

Gigabit Ethernet  Cost-effective and simple high bandwidth  Most common technology for many ISPs accessing major IPPs  Works well for local and metropolitan distances  Proven and deployed at most major IPPs  Almost universally used for IPP inter-switch links  Technology is mature and price dropping  Cost-effective high-performance switches available from various vendors:  Cisco, Extreme, Foundry

Setting up an Internet Exchange

Getting Started  Key to IXP viability and growth is critical mass  Usually need at least 5 ISPs to get started  Getting competitors to co-operate is not always easy !  But demonstrable common benefits should win out in the end  For associations, simple MoU good starting point  Commercial operators will often use discounting strategies to attract initial group of ISPs  Generally best to concentrate on getting traffic moving as first priority, and concentrate on the paperwork/ politics/PR later

IXP Customer Requirements  Your own Autonomous System (AS) number  you need this if you take service from >1 ISP anyway  Your own IP address space  need to become registry of NRO member e.g. AFRINIC, RIPE NCC  Router(s) which can do BGP  most medium/large Cisco/Juniper routers  Space in one of the co-lo facilities at which it is present

IXP Resources  RIPE EIX (European Internet eXchange) Working Group   Euro-IX Association of IXP Operators   Global IXP Directory   Packet Clearing House 

Contact Details Keith Mitchell Presentation: ● Phone: