The Results of Professional Development About Technology West Virginias Statewide Technology Model Schools Program Brenda Williams, Executive Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

Policy Studies Associates, Inc. Evaluation of the New Century High Schools Initiative Elizabeth Reisner American Youth Policy Forum October 27, 2006.
Your Contact Information Here. Preschool Closes the Readiness Gap There is a growing recognition in California and across the nation of the importance.
ED PACE Educational Development for Planning and Conducting Evaluations West Virginia Department of Education.
21 st Century Learning Title I Technology Integration Specialists.
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Presented by: Mary LindseyDabaram Rampersad Marsha BlackDonna Kmetz Brenda Brinson HIPPY Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters.
Documenting Outcomes from Henrico County Public Schools 1-to-1 Laptop Computing Initiative: through PHASE II 2007 Data.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Success Strategies for Facilitators West Virginia Virtual School: Success Strategies for Facilitators Sharon Gainer, WVVS Registrar Office of Technology.
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
1 Maine’s Impact Study of Technology in Mathematics (MISTM) David L. Silvernail, Director Maine Education Policy Research Institute University of Southern.
Students with IEPs and the One-to-One Aide
Stanislaus County CARES Plus Information Session.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Arkansas MSP Grants: Statewide Evaluation Plan Judy Trowell Arkansas Department of Education Charles Stegman Calli Holaway-Johnson University of Arkansas.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Early Achievers Overview Starting Strong – August 15, 2012.
Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
What is Title I? Prepared by the Fairfax County Public Schools Title I office and Lorton Station ES.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: Program Evaluation Toolkit August 9, 2012.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
Leestown Middle School Title I. What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Using DIBELS and IDEL when reading instruction is in Spanish Naomi Hupert, Simon Shulman Education Development Center Liza Rael New Mexico Public Education.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
®® The Impact of Professional Development Models and Strategies on Teacher Practice and Student Achievement in Early Reading IES Research Conference Michael.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Scholastic Inc.1 Navigating Waves of Change: Driving Academic Improvement Through Challenging Times Sam Howe November 2010.
Grade 3-8 Math. 2 Regents: Raising Standards, with Extra Help to Achieve Them The Regents approved new, higher math standards in March A.
Project PROMISE A Jacob K. Javits Grant Virginia Department of Education
Cyclical Monitoring Presented to State and Local Task Force.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Projects #9, 17, 29, and 32 Mentor: Helga Bernard, Ph. D. Clark County School District School Improvement and Research.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL LAB ~ APPALACHIA The Effects of Hybrid Secondary School Courses in Algebra 1 on Teaching Practices, Classroom Quality and Adolescent.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
Presentation to the Faculty of North Surry High School September 11, 2014 Mark Fuhrmann North Surry High School, Mount Airy, NC Participant in the
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
CaMSP Science Assessment Webinar Public Works, Inc. Sharing Lessons Learned in the Development and Use of Science Assessments for CaMSP Teachers and Students.
Search the LIP database. You can search by the categories on the left or keyword. Search Welcome to the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) Local Improvement.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
2016 State Assessment Highlights
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
McKissick Elementary School
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
School Title I Stakeholder Meeting
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
Information July 15, 2015.
CSIP/Landtrust
Presentation transcript:

The Results of Professional Development About Technology West Virginias Statewide Technology Model Schools Program Brenda Williams, Executive Director Office of Technology and Information Systems

The Results of Professional Development About Technology A Three-year analysis of West Virginia's Technology Model Schools program Funded by US Department of Education and Conducted by Dale Mann, Ph.D., Managing Director, Interactive, Inc., Huntington, NY

SUMMARY The Technology Model Schools program dramatically increased the use of technology by teachers and students in classrooms That increase is associated with gains in Mathematics and Reading/Language Arts.

SUMMARY What is West Virginias Technology Model School Program? Teachers specially trained and deployed to help other teachers. Most assistance embedded in classrooms and on-demand. $150,000 training grants focused on counties and schools serving low-income children. TMS trainers assisted and managed by a staff from the WVDE.

SUMMARY Why train teachers about technology? Does professional development about technology improve test scores? Yes, in Reading/Language Arts and in Mathematics for 4 th and 5 th graders.

SUMMARY Why train teachers about technology? Does professional development about technology contribute to closing the achievement gap? In Math, Title I-eligible students in versions of the TMS program outperformed others. In Reading, Title I-eligible students did as well as others.

SUMMARY Why train teachers about technology? Does professional development increase the use of technology in classrooms? Yes, as a result of the TMS model, trained teachers used technology 22% of the classroom day compared to 1% for untrained teachers. And, TMS students used computers twice as much as students without the programs support.

SUMMARY Why train teachers about technology? How much professional development is necessary? Assistance across at least one academic year.

SUMMARY Why train teachers about technology? How should it be delivered? In schools, in classrooms, on demand.

SUMMARY Why train teachers about technology? Who should deliver it? Classroom teachers with special training to work with their adult colleagues.

SUMMARY Why train teachers about technology? How much do the technology-trained teachers use computers? One-fifth (22%) of the school day including intensive use of productivity applications.

SUMMARY Why train teachers about technology? Are there other benefits for teachers? TMS teachers used their own computers more, more expertly and for more productivity applications than others.

WAS STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN TMS SCHOOLS HIGHER THAN IN OTHER SCHOOLS? Achievement of students whose teachers had any of the three versions of the program's help was higher than students in classes without the program. Two years of TMS help is associated with higher achievement than one year or no years of TMS help.

WAS STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN TMS SCHOOLS HIGHER THAN IN OTHER SCHOOLS? Table 1: Higher Achievement for Each Year in the TMS Schools Differences after the 1 st Year (EOY EOY 2005) Differences after the 2 nd Year (EOY EOY 2006) MathYes Reading/ Language Arts NoYes

WAS STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN TMS SCHOOLS HIGHER THAN IN OTHER SCHOOLS? Table 2: Higher Achievement by How Much TMS Service Was Provided One Year of TIS Service (EOY 2006 from the first year TIS schools) Two Years of TIS Service MathYes Reading/ Language Arts NoYes

WAS STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN TMS SCHOOLS HIGHER THAN IN OTHER SCHOOLS? Math Title I students had higher math achievement in both the one-year and the two-year TMS schools than their counterparts in the control schools.

WAS STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN TMS SCHOOLS HIGHER THAN IN OTHER SCHOOLS? Reading For Reading/Language Arts achievement for one-year treatment/turnkey group (TIS in the first year only) and the control-plus- treatment group (TIS 2 nd year only) is higher than for the control group (no TIS either year).

HOW DID STUDENTS USE THEIR COMPUTERS? TMS students used computers twice as much as students without the programs support and they used them significantly more for Reading/Language Arts.

WERE TEACHERS BENEFITED IN THEIR INSTRUCTIONAL AND OTHER DUTIES? TMS teachers were much more confident in their expertise and in their independent use of technology than were the others. TMS teachers used their own computers more and used them more for productivity applications.

DID THE EFFECTS OF THE TISs SURVIVE THEIR DEPARTURE TO OTHER SCHOOLS? Yes, the effects lasted. Teachers' use of computers, in the control group schools, plummeted from 9% of the school day to 1% of the school day between the first and second years. For the TMS teachers it remained constant at 22% of the day. For the TMS teachers confidence increased from year to year but not among the other teachers.

WHAT WERE THE NEW METHODS FOR EVALUATING THE OUTCOMES OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT? Interactive, Inc. collected data using: (1) Pagers that went off at random intervals so that teachers and students could fill out a web- survey (2) Meters in teacher desktops that recorded all applications accessed (3) Student and teacher self-report web-surveys (4) Field visits, personal interviews and classroom observations.

DID THE NEW METHODS FOR EVALUATING THE OUTCOMES OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT WORK? We have the first independently verified and objective estimate of how much teachers and students are using technology in classrooms.

DID THE PROGRAM---AS A WHOLE--- WORK? Yes. The TISs performed according to plan and they got better at their work over the two years. Technology use increased due to their training. Student achievement increased in the TMS schools. Teachers have continued to use technology after the departure of the TISs. Thus, the Technology Model Schools program has helped teachers and students be more successful.

HOW TO USE TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE SCHOOLING: RECOMMENDATIONS #1: Use learning technology to improve student achievement #2: Apply a critical mass of professional development--- (1) on-site, (2) in classrooms and (3) on-demand. #3: Calibrate expectations and strategies by curriculum topics (some topics, some grade levels are easier to improve with technology than others) #4: Use technology to measure technology (get beyond self-report, smile check data). #5: Use evaluation results to improve practice.

CONTACTS Brenda Williams (304) Dale Mann (631)