Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch to EVG/c/FTC/TDF  STRATEGY-PI Study  STRATEGY-NNRTI Study.
Advertisements

Switch to EVG/c/FTC/TDF  STRATEGY-PI Study  STRATEGY-NNRTI Study.
Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of DTG at W48: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to ATV/r + RAL  HARNESS Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + TDF/FTC N = 37 N = 72 ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + RAL 400 mg bid  Design Randomisation 2: 1 Open-label.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TC MONARK  LPV/r QD vs BID M M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Eron JJ, Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11: QDMRK  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
Switch to low dose ATV/r  LASA Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 200 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E) ; non-inferiority.
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
ARV-trial.com Switch to D/C/F/TAF EMERALD Study 1.
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
ARV-trial.com Switch to MVC MARCH Study 1.
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to DRV/r + 3TC DUAL Study.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to D/C/F/TAF EMERALD Study.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Presentation transcript:

Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study

ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation* 1: 1 Open-label  Objective –Primary Endpoint : proportion with treatment success at W48 Treatment failure : treatment discontinuation or modification for any cause or confirmed virologic rebound (2 consecutive HIV RNA > 50 c/mL) Non-inferiority of ATV/r + 3TC (per protocol) ; lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference = -12% Perez-Molina JA. Lancet Infect Dis 2015;15: ≥ 18 years Stable 3-drug regimen No previous treatment failure HIV RNA 6 months Switch for toxicity, intolerance or simplification No resistance to study medications HBs Ag negative W48W96 SALT Study: switch to ATV/r + 3TC SALT * Randomisation was stratified on active HCV infection and previous treatment (NNRTI, PI/r, CCR5 antagonist, integrase inhibitor)

Baseline characteristics and disposition ATV/r + 2 NRTI N = 143 ATV/r + 3TC N = 143 Female22%31% Baseline CD4/mm 3, median Nadir CD4/mm 3, median Duration of HIV RNA < 50 c/mL (months), median2927 Duration of ART prior to study entry, median4139 HCV co-infection (RNA positive)20% Reason for switching Simplification Toxicity Intolerance 80% 14% 4% 74% 22% 3% Switched treatment NNRTI PI/r 32% 66% 33% 64% Discontinued at W48, N (%)29 (20%)21 (15%) Adverse event / confirmed virologic failure10 / 43 / 5 Withdrew consent / lost to follow-up9 / 47 / 4 SALT Study: switch to ATV/r + 3TC SALT Perez-Molina JA. Lancet Infect Dis 2015;15:775-84

HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W48 (Per protocol, TLOVR) ATV/r + 3TCATV/r + 2 NRTI Confirmed virologic rebound Efficacy and Safety results ATV/r + 2 NRTIATV/r + 3TC N45 Emergence of resistance mutations 1 (M184V)0 ATV/r + 2 NRTI N = 141 ATV/r + 3TC N = 140 AEs leading to discontinuation10 (7.2%)3 (2.2%) Grade 3-4 AEs Hyperbilirubinemia Icterus Liver function test Hyperlipidemia Thrombocytopenia 78 (55%) (55%) Severe adverse events (none related to study medication) 86 Safety, N (%) SALT Study: switch to ATV/r + 3TC SALT Perez-Molina JA. Lancet Infect Dis 2015;15: ≠ (95%CI) 6 (- 5 ; 16) % 111/ / 135

 Conclusion – Switching to ATV/r + 3TC is effective, safe, and non-inferior to ATV/r + 2 NRTI in virologically suppressed HIV+ patients, who need change any antiretroviral previous triple therapy because of toxicity, intolerance or simplification Switching from a triple to a dual ATV-based regimen is not associated with an increased risk of virological failure, which was low in both groups, with most patients with virological failure with HIV RNA < 200 c/ml Frequency of blips throughout the 48 weeks was equivalent in both groups Only 1 patient (triple-treatment group) developed resistance mutation (M184V) Few patients discontinued the study in the 2 groups because of toxic effects, with treatment interruptions being significantly more frequent in the triple-treatment group No significant differences in change from baseline in neurocognitive function, renal function, bone mineral density, or fat gain or distribution between groups at week 48 SALT SALT Study: switch to ATV/r + 3TC Perez-Molina JA. Lancet Infect Dis 2015;15:775-84