1 CHANGES TO CORPORATE INCOME TAX RULES IN THE CONTEXT OF EU INTEGRATION Sylwia Sobowiec Sławomir Boruc ( presentation prepared with the help of Baker.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 CUNA Mutual Group Proprietary Reproduction, Adaptation or Distribution Prohibited © CUNA Mutual Group Trinidad & Tobago Holding Company Transaction Summary.
Advertisements

U.S. Cross-Border Tax Arbitrage Examples. Dual Resident Corporations Without Arbitrage Structure: U.K. group earns $100 and faces U.K. tax of $30 (30%);
Foreign Holding Structures for Indian Outbound Investments
Company Tax System in Malta Presented by Rutger Kriek.
Tax Transparency Proposal on Automatic Exchange of Information on Tax Rulings Brussels, 18th March 2015.
European Tax Issues of Mergers & Reorganizations - An Overview - Geerten M.M. Michielse Technical Assistance Advisor to the IMF Georgetown University Law.
SCREENING CHAPTER 16 TAXATION Country Session: The Republic of Turkey July 2006 DIRECT TAXATION AGENDA ITEM : CORPORATE TAXES.
Int’l & EU Tax Law 2007/2008 Exam Discussion (first sit)
THOMAS HEMMELGARN AND GAETAN NICODÈME Tax Coordination in Europe: Assessing the first years of the EU- Savings Taxation Directive Rakesh NICHANAMETLA.
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING Unit 3 – COMPANIES II: Taxation, Provisions, Reserves and Liabilities Unit 31Copyright © 2010 MDIS. All rights reserved.
Benefits of Hong Kong Holding Companies for making International Investments Speaker: William Kong William Kong & Company
1 “Ireland as a Platform for European Expansion” Tax Considerations Adrian Crawford KPMG Tax Partner Dublin & New York “Ireland as a Platform for European.
(c) G.M.M. Michielse EU Harmonization: An Obstacle for Alternative Corporate Income Tax Systems? Geerten M.M. Michielse Technical Assistance Advisor,
The new Germany/UK Treaty - The German Perspective IFA Trilateral Meeting 3 November 2010 Jan Brinkmann.
1 SIICs and OPCIs Listed and unlisted real estate investment schemes in France Marc Cretté FIDAL.
CJEU CASE C-338/11 – Santander Asset Management SGIIC and Others Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 May European Tax Law 32E22000 Mikko.
Università Bocconi, A.A: Mec – Comparative public economics 1 Università Bocconi A.A Comparative public economics Giampaolo Arachi.
Parent-Subsidiary March 3 rd The dividend concept Withholding tax on dividends Joint taxation Qualified participation Brief gap analysis Introduction.
CYPRUS – LITHUANIA TAX STRUCTURING
INTRODUCTION: In recent years integration has been achieved through tax harmonisation and through European Court of Justice (ECJ) case law This integration.
EFFICIENT TAX STRUCTURES FOR INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS
Venture Capital and Private Equity Investment Models in CMB Regulations.
Case C48/11 Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö ( Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit) v A Oy Katja Tiainen Anne Koskela
Extraterritoriality of U.S. International Economic Legislation. --- Clash of Laws, Corporate Structures, Foreign Boycotts /Corruption / Taxation -- Stuart.
Maximising tax efficiency 22 November 2006 Eleanor Watts.
The Dutch B.V. For Tax Planning By Robert Hek
©2001 Prentice Hall Takeovers, Restructuring, and Corporate Governance, 3/e Weston Chapter Tax Planning Options.
General Features of Finnish Corporate Taxation
INTERNATIONAL TAX PLANNING IDEAS
The Swiss prestigious option: is there confidentiality Globalserve Seminar November 2013 By Phani Schiza Antoniou.
International Tax Structuring. Tax Structuring Tax Structuring is defined as a form into which business or financial activities may be organized to minimize.
Thin Capitalisation What is Thin Capitalisation.
Johan Boersma TAXATION OF COMPANIES IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.
CJEU Case C-231/05, AA Oy Finnish Corporate Contribution System Antti Lehtola
Free Movement and Taxation of Companies Piet Van Nuffel Court of Justice of the EC, Katholieke Universiteit Brussel 15 November th Annual Conference.
1 Belgium-China income tax treaty Marc De Mil Fiscal Department for Foreign Investments Federal Public Service Finance.
Extraterritoriality of U.S. Economic Legislation & U.S. Multinationals. --- Corporate Corruption and Governance (Export Controls & Taxation) -- Stuart.
CORPORATE EXPATRIATION IN MEXICO RICARDO LEON-SANTACRUZ Washington D. C. APRIL 16, 2009.
1 Nexia World Tax Meeting Vienna, May 31, 2008 European Holding Company Analysis by Chris Leenders, International Tax Partner at Koenen en Co, Member of.
International Taxation – Case Study Dubrovnik, 26 September
IMPROPERLY ACCUMULATED EARNINGS TAX (IAET) RA 8424 / RR
Institute of International Bankers Tax Treaty Developments & The New U.S. Model Income Tax Treaty Tuesday - June 19, : :45 AM Daniel J. RaimondoBenedetta.
Horlings is a world-wide network of independent accountants and consultants firms 6 February 2009 The Dutch co-operative Nexia European Tax Group Meeting.
Effective structures for the Russian market Holding Financing Royalty Globalserve Moscow Seminar September 2013 By Phani Schiza Antoniou.
Fiscal engineering and IPPs Discussant comments Agenda item 6.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright (c) 2003 by the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc Principles of Taxation: Advanced Strategies Chapter 12 Corporate Acquisitions, Mergers.
Comprehensive Volume C20-1 Chapter 20 Corporations: Distributions In Complete Liquidation And An Overview Of Reorganizations Copyright ©2010 Cengage Learning.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright (c) 2002 by the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc Principles of Taxation: Advanced Strategies Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Employee Compensation.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright (c) 2003 by the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc Principles of Taxation: Advanced Strategies Chapter 3 Employee Compensation Strategies.
Nexia European tax group meeting - Amsterdam 5th/6th February 2009 Daniel Althaus ABT Treuhandgesellschaft Andreas Baumann & Co. Zürichstrasse 27b 8134.
McGraw-Hill© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
KHO:2008:23 Finnish Dividend Taxation of EU Individuals.
Poland – the right location for intangible services centres.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright (c) 2002 by the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc Principles of Taxation: Advanced Strategies Chapter 12 Chapter 12 Corporate Acquisitions,
Foreign investments into Russia. Tax consequences.
Corporate Formation, Reorganization, and Liquidation
Corporate Formation, Reorganization, and Liquidation
EU tax law and tax treaties - Rights of a permanent establishment
Mechanism to separate the Group
Johan and Maria, Part II.
Discussion Group Meeting
Private Limited Company (PLC)
Corporate Formation, Reorganization, and Liquidation
EU Taxation 9. Taxation of Mergers Arvind Ashta Introduction
Jacques Malherbe Professor emeritus, Catholic University of Louvain
Corporate Formation, Reorganization, and Liquidation
Taxation of Individuals and Business Entities
Academic Year Prof. Pietro Boria
European Company Law Dorota Wieczorkowska
UNITED KINGDOM.
Presentation transcript:

1 CHANGES TO CORPORATE INCOME TAX RULES IN THE CONTEXT OF EU INTEGRATION Sylwia Sobowiec Sławomir Boruc ( presentation prepared with the help of Baker & McKenzie Amsterdam office )

2 EU LAW ON DIRECT TAXATION  Merger Directive  Parent Subsidiary Directive  Interest and Royalty Directive  Savings Directive  Arbitration Convention

3 EU LAW ON DIRECT TAXATION cont’d  Importance of the case law of European Court of Justice

4 Aims:  Enable tax free business reorganization  Safeguard fiscal interest of member states (defer taxation)  Deny benefits of the Directive in the case of tax evasion or avoidance MERGER DIRECTIVE

5 MERGER DIRECTIVE cont’d.  Merger  Division  Transfer of assets  Exchange of shares

6 MERGER DIRECTIVE cont’d. Merger (3 possibilities) Company A  Being dissolved without going into liquidation  Transferring all assets and liabilities to another existing company B  In exchange for shares (and cash) issued to the shareholders of company A

7 MERGER DIRECTIVE cont’d. Merger (first option) shareholders German GmbH B UK Ltd A Companies from two or more states (receiving company) (dissolved)

8 MERGER DIRECTIVE cont’d. Merger (other options)  same as above, only German GmbH and UK Ltd. both transfer assets / liabilities to NewCo  subsidiary merged into parent company

9 MERGER DIRECTIVE cont’d. Division  Company A being dissolved (without going into liquidation)  Transfer of all assets and liabilities to two or more companies  In exchange for shares (and cash) issued to the shareholders of company A

10 MERGER DIRECTIVE cont’d. Division shareholders NewCoAUK LtdNewCoB transfer

11 MERGER DIRECTIVE cont’d. Transfer of Assets Branch Italian S.p.A UK Ltd shares transfer

12 MERGER DIRECTIVE cont’d. Exchange of shares Italian S.p.A UK Ltd shareholders transfer

13 MERGER DIRECTIVE cont’d.  Mergers and divisions are not possible in many member states according to domestic commercial law  Companies from two or more member states  Companies listed in the annex to the Directive  Possibility of implementing min. 25% holding (10% is proposed) in the capital of the transferring company in order to benefit from the Directive

14 PARENT SUBSIDIARY DIRECTIVE  Companies from different member states listed in the Annex  Parent holds at least 25% in the capital of subsidiary (10% holding is proposed)  Option to introduce two year holding period (Denkavit case)

15 PARENT SUBSIDIARY DIRECTIVE cont’d.  No withholding tax on dividends  Dividends received exempt from tax or credit is given for corporate income tax paid by subsidiary on those profits

16 INTEREST AND ROYALTY DIRECTIVE WHT rates

17 INTEREST AND ROYALTY DIRECTIVE cont’d.  Exemption of interest and royalties from withholding tax  Interest and royalties paid by a company/PE of one member state to a company/PE of another member state  The recipient must be the beneficial owner of interest and royalties  Both the payer and the recipient must be associated (with each other)

18 INTEREST AND ROYALTY DIRECTIVE cont’d. P R 25% interest/royalty EU

19 INTEREST AND ROYALTY DIRECTIVE cont’d. R P 25% interest/royalty EU

20 INTEREST AND ROYALTY DIRECTIVE cont’d. SHAREHOLDER R 25% P EU

21 SAVINGS DIRECTIVE AIM  Taxation of savings income in the Member State in which the beneficial owner being an individual is a resident

22 SAVINGS DIRECTIVE cont’d. SCOPE  Exchange of information (almost all EU countries)  Withholding tax (Austria, Belgium, Luxembourg and non- EU countries: Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Andorra, San Marino)

23 HARMONIZATION OF POLISH TAX REGULATIONS WITH THE MERGER DIRECTIVE  Harmonization of provisions regarding: Mergers Divisions Transfer of assets  Lack of harmonization in the case of exchange of shares

24 HARMONIZATION OF POLISH TAX REGULATIONS WITH THE MERGER DIRECTIVE cont’d  Exchange of shares – a company acquires shares in another company as a result of which the first will hold a majority of voting rights in that other company in exchange for shares of the acquiring company issued to shareholders of the other company

25 HARMONIZATION OF POLISH TAX REGULATIONS WITH THE MERGER DIRECTIVE cont’d P A S P – holds shares in S with a nominal value of 100 m.u. P – contributes the shares it holds in S to A at the market price of 1000 m.u. and takes up shares in A for 1000 m.u. 100% shares 100% transfer

26 ADAPTATION OF POLISH REGULATIONS TO THE PARENT SUBSIDIARY DIRECTIVE  Exemption from withholding tax on dividends (and other revenue from sharing in profits of legal persons)  paid by Polish company  received by EU company (subject to corporate income tax)  EU company holds for at least 2 years a minimum of 25% shares in capital of Polish company

27 ADAPTATION OF POLISH REGULATIONS TO THE PARENT SUBSIDIARY DIRECTIVE cont’d  Exemption does not apply to:  profits from the redemption of shares  profits from the sale of shares for the purpose of their redemption  liquidation profits  Obligation to keep the shares for 2 years – how it will work in practice (Denkavit case)

28 ADAPTATION OF POLISH REGULATIONS TO THE PARENT SUBSIDIARY DIRECTIVE cont’d INCOME 100 CIT (19%) 19 INCOME AFTER CIT 81 DIVIDEND 81 WHT 0% 0 PAID DIVIDEND 81 P S RECEIVED DIVIDEND 81

29 ADAPTATION OF POLISH REGULATIONS TO THE PARENT SUBSIDIARY DIRECTIVE cont’d Tax Credit  Polish parent authorised to deduct from its tax any corporate income tax paid by EU subsidiary on profits out of which dividend was paid  Polish parent holds at least 25% of shares in EU subsidiary for at least 2 years  Tax credit is limited to the amount of Polish tax that relates to foreign income

30 ADAPTATION OF POLISH REGULATIONS TO THE PARENT SUBSIDIARY DIRECTIVE cont’d INCOME 100 CIT (10%) 10 INCOME AFTER CIT 90 DIVIDEND 90 WHT 0% 0 PAID DIVIDEND 90 P S INCOME 200 DIVIDEND 90 TOTAL INCOME 290 CIT (19%) 19% X ,1 CIT TO PAY (55,1 – 10) 45,1

31 HARMONIZATION OF POLISH REGULATIONS WITH THE INTEREST AND ROYALTY DIRECTIVE  No changes to the regulations were proposed  Poland has asked for transitional periods  5% withholding tax on interest for 8 years  10% withholding tax on royalties during the first 4 years and 5% tax during the next 4 years  No response from EU was reported to date  What will happen after May 1, 2004?

32 HARMONIZATION OF POLISH REGULATIONS WITH SAVINGS DIRECTIVE  No changes were proposed

33 HARMONIZATION OF POLISH REGULATIONS WITH EU DIRECTIVES  Are Polish thin capitalisation rules in line with EU regulations?