Handling Electronics from Radiation Areas N. Conan, D. Forkel-Wirth, T. Otto, S. Roesler, C. Theis, C. Tromel, V. Tromel, Heinz Vincke, L. Ulrici R2E,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

EDMS November th LHC Radiation Day RAMSES Induced Activity Monitors 5 th LHC Radiation Day CERN - 29 November 2005 RAMSES Induced Activity.
HAZARD COMMUNICATIONS / E N V I R O N H & S T R A I N I N G P R O G R A M HAZARD COMMUNICATION PROGRAM OSHA Standard 29 CFR The OSHA hazard communication.
Induced Activity Calculations in Support of D&D Activities at SLAC Joachim Vollaire, Radiation Protection Department.
Activation of equipment - overview Chris Theis, Helmut Vincke - DGS/RP.
Mid Term Review Meeting, 26 September 2012S. GIRON1 * The research project has been supported by a Marie Curie Early Initial Training Network Fellowship.
Handling of radioactive material and waste M. Magistris and L. Ulrici (DG/SCR)
Luisa Ulrici and Luca Bruno, on behalf of DGS/RP
ATC/ABOC Days 21-23/1/2008 Heinz Vincke for SC-RP 1.
IEFC Workshop February 2010 H. Vincke for DGS/RP 1.
Bapetco NORM Control Case Study IDENTIFY ASSESS CONTROL & RECOVERY.
H IGH L UMINOSITY LHC WP1 - CERN S AFETY R EQUIREMENTS Stefan Roesler - Phillip Santos Silva – Ralf Trant EDMS# HSE Unit April 2011.
Christophe Delamare EDMS Accelerator Consolidation Workshop GS/ASE activities.
IEFC Workshop 2011 David Mcfarlane Superintendent for SPS EN/MEF/ABA 1.
The Laboratory 530 R-005: RADMON and more A Masi, The Laboratory 530 R-005: RADMON and more The Laboratory 530 R-005: RADMON and more A. Masi 1.What??
05/05/2006P.Fassnacht - LEAF1 INB – Status report RPS, RGE: done! Zoning Traceability.
Radiation Protection LS1 - Collaboration with CERN Technical Groups - Lessons learnt Stephane Bally (CERN), Sandro Di Vincenzo (CERN) Indico
Why a course  We will try to answer the following questions:  How do know I am in a “risky” area  I design a rad-tolerant electronic system (hardware/software)?
RP PROCEDURE FOR FLUID ANALYSIS Detector Cooling Project - 16 th June 2011 Heinz Vincke, Nadine Conan DGS/RP..... based on EDMS document # prepared.
Radiation testing in facilities outside CERN EDMS document version 2.0 Heinz Vincke - RadWG meeting 6/7/2010.
ActiWiz – optimizing your nuclide inventory at proton accelerators with a computer code Helmut Vincke, Chris Theis DGS/RP 1 RSO committee – 1/3/2012 Remote.
Radiation Protection for the Beam Line 4 Schools project Robert Froeschl (DGS/RP)
PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT CERN / Oct / P.A.Schmelzbach.
Radiation Protection considerations concerning a future SPS dump design Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
Safety during LS1 EN-STI Group meeting 1st February 2013 AP.Bernardes EN/STI.
Highlights of RP activities in support of ISOLDE operation and projects Joachim Vollaire, Alexandre Dorsival and Christelle Saury with material from others.
1 EARLY SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF PROJECTS AND EXPERIMENTS HSE UNIT PH DSO EDMS No
RSSO refresher meeting J. Pedersen M. Tavlet, T. Otto.
Radiation Protection Aspects LHC Performance Workshop 25 th September 2014 D. Forkel-Wirth, P. Carbonez, A. Goehring-Crinon, D. Perrin, S. Roesler, H.
Beam loads & dump concepts T. Kramer, B. Goddard, M. Benedikt, Hel. Vincke.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
Radiation Protection in LS2 D. Forkel-Wirth, P. Carbonez, Y. Donjoux, G. Dumont, A. Goehring-Crinon, S. Roesler, C.
Radiation Protection info update C. Adorisio (DGS/RP) 17 th LTEX Meeting
ADO-PO Section Meeting Safety Group LS1 Shutdown Safety Organization.
Session 2 of ATC/ABOC Days 2008 Doris Forkel-Wirth, SC-RP Pierre Bonnal, AB-SU 1.
Risk Analysis P. Cennini AB-ATB on behalf of the n_TOF Team  Procedure  Documents in preparation  Conclusions Second n_TOF External Panel Review, CERN,
Radiation Protection at the LHC Lessons Learned D. Forkel-Wirth, D. Perrin, S. Roesler, C. Theis, Heinz Vincke, Helmut Vincke, J. Vollaire CERN-SC-RP-SL.
Application of FLUKA to fixed- target programs at CERN: a short, not exhaustive selection M. Calviani (CERN) With contributions from: M. Brugger, F. Cerutti,
HL-LHC Standards and Best Practices Workshop CERN, June 13, 2014 Best Practices for ALARA C. Adorisio and S. Roesler on behalf of DGS-RP.
New SPS scraping system: preliminary RP remarks Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
EUROnu Costing Workshop May 2011 Beta-Beam Costing Exercise Elena Wildner, CERN 25/05/11 1 EUROnu Costing Workshop, CERN May 2011.
Horst Breuker Review Oct ELENA Safety and Radio Protection ELENA TDR : Chapter 6; Safety Files in preparation; Descriptive, Demonstrative (Risk.
Horst Breuker ADUC Jan Safety and Radio Protection, Consequences for the Experiments ELENA TDR : Chapter 6; Safety Files in preparation; Descriptive,
CERN LEP3 MINI-WORKSHOP A brief recall of the LEP (radiation) history (out of my memory and published papers) Marco SILARI, DGS/RP.
1 Radiation Monitoring at CTF3 CTF3 Buildings – weak spots Radiation Monitoring system Monitoring results – First Lessons Idelette Floret, Thomas Otto,
CERN Jan 2006 Specific safety Issues for 2006 compared to 2004 P. Cennini AB Safety Requirement in case the Installation activities are going on.
ActiWiz – optimizing your nuclide inventory at proton accelerators with a computer code Helmut Vincke, Chris Theis CERN 1 RSO committee – 1/3/2012 NBI.
ALARA REVIEW WORKING GROUP (ARWG) New ALARA recommendations proposed by the ALARA REVIEW WORKING GROUP (ARWG) Heinz Vincke on behalf of ARWG LS1 committee.
Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration CERN Project Structure Edda Gschwendtner, CERN Lisbon Meeting, 22 June 2012Edda Gschwendtner, CERN2.
Radiation Protection computing tools Gérald Dumont HSE/RP.
Safety at CERN in the INB Context, J. Poole, July 2007 Safety in the INB Context and its Impact on Access John Poole AB-SU.
How to access CNGS Heinz Vincke for DG-SCR-SL RADWG3/4/
The Panorama of the Future Radioactive Areas from now to 2020 S. Roesler on behalf of DGS-RP Workshop on remote manipulations and diagnostics in radioactive.
Inquiry about Radioactive Workshops & Storage needs A status report Presented by L.Bruno Checked by P.Carvalho-Correia, M.Hatch, P.Strubin, T.Wijnands.
Procedure for Removal of Material and Waste from LHC P. Bonnal, N. Conan, I. Brunner, D. Forkel-Wirth, H. Menzel, S. Roesler, C. Tromel, L. Ulrici, with.
LS2 Safety Preparation Thomas Otto, LS2 Safety Support Officer for LHC
J. Bauer, V. Bharadwaj, H. Brogonia, A. Fasso, M. Kerimbaev, J. Liu, S
ICE SECTION The coolest place to be! Elias Métral
Radiation Protection Issues After 20 Years of LHC Operation
Safety in Construction and Upgrade Phases
Evangelia Dimovasili TS/LEA
Buffer Zones - Status Report
CATIA users meeting 07/06/2012 Material guidelines project – radiological hazard classification Helmut Vincke, Chris Theis on behalf of DGS/RP RSO committee.
Radiation protection of Linac4 M. Silari Radiation Protection Group
Quality Assurance applied to Accelerator Safety
TI8/WIC Incident & UJ87/UA87 Radiation Levels & Analysis
Radiation Protection for the Beam Line 4 Schools project
Radiation Protection for the Beam Line 4 Schools project
Radiation Detectors for the PSS1 at ESS
Presentation transcript:

Handling Electronics from Radiation Areas N. Conan, D. Forkel-Wirth, T. Otto, S. Roesler, C. Theis, C. Tromel, V. Tromel, Heinz Vincke, L. Ulrici R2E, Divonne 3 rd June 2009

Radiation Protection The protection of people from the effects of ionizing radiation, and the means for achieving this. It implies risk assessment of workplaces in radiation areas risk assessment of handling and transforming material from radiation areas The outcome of the risk assessment defines the precautions to be respected

Activation of Material 3 Beam losses result in the activation of material (beam line components, tunnel structure, electronics, etc.) Risk of external (all work) and internal exposure (destructive work)

R = Ratio FLUKA/Exp M. Brugger, A. Ferrari, S. Roesler and L. Ulrici, “Validation of the FLUKA Monte Carlo code for predicting induced radioactivity at highenergy accelerators”, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 562, p. 814 (2006) Activation of Material Similar study ongoing for electronic boards C. Theis et al. Similar study ongoing for electronic boards C. Theis et al.

Material’s Control All material and waste (electronics included) leaving CERN’s accelerator tunnels, target areas or experimental areas needs to be controlled by DG-SCR (=RP). (~ 50 km of radiation areas!) Only DG-SCR is allowed to take the decision if the material has to be considered as radioactive or not All material and waste (electronics included) leaving CERN’s accelerator tunnels, target areas or experimental areas needs to be controlled by DG-SCR (=RP). (~ 50 km of radiation areas!) Only DG-SCR is allowed to take the decision if the material has to be considered as radioactive or not

Removal of Material and Waste All material and waste leaving radiation areas have to be subject to a radiological control Subsequent handling procedures for the material and waste depend on radiological classification of the material -> non-radioactive or radioactive so-called waste zoning (for SPS, CNGS and LHC) “Zone Déchets Conventionnels, “Zone Déchets Radioactifs”

Waste Zoning (only CNGS, SPS and LHC) ZDR Zone dechets radioactifs ZDC Zone dechet conventionnels Purpose: To predict the nature and amount of radioactive waste produced at the dismantling of the facility “Zone Déchets Radioactifs” kept to the minimum LHC Good news: most of the LHC and CNGS electronics outside ZDR

Material Controls & Waste Zoning ZDR ZDC ZO Zone operationnel Individual controls of material and waste by DG-SCR not required - follow up by sampling DG-SCR controls required (comprises all CERN accelerator tunnels, target areas and experiments of SPS, PS complex, ZO of LHC experiments

Zone Déchets Conventionnels (ZDC) side galleries UAs – behind shielding! Controls at LHC Zone Opérationnelle (ZO) including Zone Déchets Radioactifs (ZDR) accelerator tunnel

Removal of Material from “Zone Dechets Conventionnels – outside ZO” Only applicable to LHC – does not exist for other machines RP controls the classification as Zone Déchets Conventionnels ZDC - outside ZO (e.g. UA) by representative measurements (sampling,  - spectroscopy mapping) as we are starting up a new, rather clean machine (LHC) material is non-radioactive, can be removed by equipment owner, equipment owner performs control measurements using “Picomur” (for 2009) In case of alarm: call SC-RP immediately Classification of area to be reconsidered, in the worst case: up-grade of cleared ZDCs to ZO Don’t bring any radioactive material into ZDC !!! Instrumentation will be upgraded in near future

“Removal of Material from Zone Operationnel” (1) RP controls ALL material from Zone operationnel (ZO) (Procedure applies also to all other CERN radiation areas) Areas of low level radioactivity (equivalent to supervised and simple controlled radiation area): Equipment owners labels their materials (nature, origin, ZDR yes or no, destination + identification of the owner) brings the material into the buffer zone, entry into logbook Radiation Protection controls the material (regular campaigns) SC-RP gives feed back to the owner Equipment owner traces all material that is radioactive traces all material that comes from ZDR (LHC, CNGS only)

Removal of Material from “Zone Operationnel” (2) RP controls ALL material from Zone Operationnel (Procedure applies also to all other CERN radiation areas) Areas of elevated radioactivity (limited stay radiation area and above, radiation veto is applied): Handling procedure of material part of job and dose planning done in collaboration between equipment owner and RP (ALARA procedure II,III) Radiation Protection controls the material RP gives feed back to the owner Equipment owner traces all material that is radioactive traces all material that comes from ZDR (LHC and CNGS)

Removal of Material from “Zone Operationnel”= Accelerator Tunnels… See Buffer zones SPS

Waste Handling Waste from Zone Déchets Conventionnels (only LHC – does not exist at other facilities) Waste from accelerator tunnel Equipment owner labels his waste (nature, origin, ZDR yes or no – only LHC, CNGS)) Buffer zone

Transport All material from radiation areas and ZO needs to be controlled by RP prior to any transport All radioactive material needs to be properly packed – and to be traced Radioactive electronic card or unit: ▫ transport by equipment owner, CERN car, insured for transport of dangerous goods ▫ > 5 uSv/h on contact -> transport with CERN transport service (via EDH) In any case RP needs to fill in a yellow transfer slip prior to any “CERN intersite” transport of radioactive material: ▫ a copy into the box “transfer file” when leaving the area (you!) ▫ a copy for the guards at the entrance at the point of destination (you!) ▫ A copy for RP ▫ A copy for you

Shipping Only material classified as non-radioactive by RP can be shipped without special precautions. Material declared as radioactive: The receiving company, university etc. needs an authorization for handling of radioactivity by its national authority

Handling and Transforming Radioactive Electronic Equipment For the time being: work areas handling and transforming of radioactive electronic equipment will be limited to supervised or simple controlled radiation areas (for pure handling) and to Class C laboratories for destructive work. As a rough rule of thumb: Only material of up to 50 uSv/h on contact will be allowed for non-destructive handling (testing, etc.) Only material with less than 5 uSv/h on contact is allowed for destructive transformation (soldering, grinding, etc.) Special precautions need to be applied for any kind of destructive work (extraction hood, etc.)

Centralisation of Workshops Individual workshops per equipment group imply the following disadvantages and risks: Dispersion of radioactive activities, mixture of radioactive and non- radioactive activities. Dispersion of radioactive material (at least once per week radioactive items are detected in “non- radioactive” waste bins) Too resource intensive with respect to installation, maintenance and RP control of the laboratories. -> working group (L. Bruno, P. Strubin, RSOs) had been mandated by S. Myers to collect and to analyze CERN needs with respect to work areas for handling and transforming radioactive material, electronics included

Summary RP rules are complex due to the co-existence of two sets (French-INB and CERN (=very similar to Swiss) rules) But: All material that leaves CERN’s accelerator tunnels, target areas and experiments (ZO for LHC experiments) needs to be controlled by DG- SCR Handling and transforming of radioactive material requires special work areas and procedures In general an individual laboratory per equipment group will not be permitted because of ▫ Lack of control ▫ Risk of dispersion of radioactive material ▫ Too costly Contact your department representative (RSO, L. Bruno, P. Strubin (TE)) in case you need a workshop for handling and transforming electronic equipment