Status of COBRA Magnet Wataru OOTANI MEG review meeting July 11 th, 2003 PSI Switzerland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Panda Solenoid Timelines. General Layout constraints and HOLD POINTS.
Advertisements

Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
COBRA Status W. Ootani MEG Review Meeting Jul. 18th, 2007.
Zian Zhu Superconducting Solenoid Magnet BESIII Workshop Zian Zhu Beijing, Oct.13,2001.
CM-18 June The Measurement and Monitoring of the Field from the MICE Magnets Michael A Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, USA Frank Filthaut.
MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA
H. MAINAUD DURAND, A. HERTY, A. MARIN, M. ACAR PERMANENT MONITORING OF THE LHC LOW BETA TRIPLETS: LATEST RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES.
The 23 rd MICE Collaboration Meeting -1- ICST/HIT Jan.13 to 17, Harbin/China Large Prototype Coil Test and Plan Fengyu Xu Institute of Cryogenics.
Global Design Effort Detector concept # Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Name September 17, 2007.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.
Helmholtz Capture Solenoid Update Peter Loveridge STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK 2 nd Princeton-Oxford High Power Target.
Twin Solenoid Twin Solenoid - conceptual design for FCC-hh detector magnet - Matthias GT Mentink Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva Leonardo Erik Gerritse.
1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 28 June 2005.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Electrical Fundamentals
Zachary Wolf Undulator Oct 12, LCLS Undulator Tuning Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko,
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
Rotating Coils - Giordana Severino – Rotating Coils PACMAN meeting Printed Circuit Coils – Future developments.
Solenoid-Based Focusing Lens for a Superconducting RF Proton Linac Presentation prepared for AEM 11/08/20101I. Terechkine.
MICE - UK Project Progress Roy Preece 30 th April 2013.
CBM Superconducting Dipole Magnet
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
HL-LHC/LARP, QXF Test Facility Workshop– R. Carcagno QXF Test Requirements Ruben Carcagno BNL Workshop December 17, 2013.
Status of the COBRA Magnet Wataru OOTANI MEG review meeting Feb. 3, 2003 PSI Switzerland.
By J DAVID MANOHAR (08A31A0232). NECESSITY OF SUPERCONDUSTOR  Damage from short circuit is constant threat in power systems  All the power systems components.
1 W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting Feb , PSI W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting.
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IR Quad Heaters.
Some Thoughts on Magnetic Measurements for MICE Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA 94720, USA.
Superconducting IR Magnets CHEN, Fusan May 11, 2007.
1 WANG,Li/SINAP WANG Li, WANG ShuHua, LIU YiYong, SUN Sen, HU Xiao, YIN LiXin Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, CAS, Shanghai , China Shanghai.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
COBRA Magnet Status W. Ootani June 27th, 2006 MEG Review W. Ootani June 27th, 2006 MEG Review.
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
Magnet for ARIES-CS Magnet protection Cooling of magnet structure L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting UCSD January.
SCU1 Vertical Test Results Matt Kasa 9/16/2014. Vertical Cryostat Assembly Coil Training Record the current decay and the terminal voltage across the.
Status of and Installation Plan for DC Gas Control System and Target Work Scheduling Meeting 4 August 2006 PSI W. Molzon, Feng Xiao.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
PSD upgrade: concept and plans - Why the PSD upgrade is necessary? - Concept and status of the PSD temperature control - Concept of the PSD analog part.
MICE/MuCool Coupling Magnets to 22 ICST/HIT MICE/Muool Coupling Magnets Progress Li Wang for MICE Group Institute of Cryogenics.
Status of ATF Fast Kicker Experiment
MICE Prototype Coupling Coil Fabrication Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM38 - Napa California February 25, 2014 February.
1 J. Mourao (TE/MPE/CP) Enhanced DQHDS functionality  Status for 2011  Increase Magnet diagnostic capabilities  Our proposals.
FC Status MPB 1/20 April 2014 OXFORDRALDARESBURY V. BlackmoreV. BaylissT. Hartnett J. CobbT. BradshawS. Griffiths W. LauM. CourtholdI. Mullacrane R. PreeceA.
1 COBRA Magnet Status W.Ootani MEG Experiment Review Meeting, Jul W.Ootani MEG Experiment Review Meeting, Jul
A. Baldini PSI July 05 Overview of the experiment MEG is being built (Beam line, Magnet, LXe, DC, TC, Elect., Software) Delays in some items: O(months)
1 W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting Feb , PSI W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting.
Magnet Issues 1/19 Nov 2013 MICE MAGNET ISSUES Brief update on –Coupling Coils (CC) –Spectrometer Solenoids (SS) Both are US responsibilities Details of.
Physics requirements  mapping spec’s Strategy: analyze measurements to get field Mapping plan: where/how to map Engineering design: sensor, fixtures,
MICE Coupling Coil Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Illinois Institute of Technology June 17, 2013 June 17, 2013.
Physics Requirements Sensitivity to Manufacturing Imperfections Strategy  where to map field  measure deviation from ideal model  fit to error tables.
Study of the HTS Insert Quench Protection M. Sorbi and A. Stenvall 1 HFM-EuCARD, ESAC meeting, WP 7.4.1CEA Saclay 28 feb. 2013,
MICE CC Magnet Cryostat Design Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CC Cryostat Design Review LBNL, February.
Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)
MICE Coupling Coil Vacuum Vessel Fabrication Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Coupling Coil Working Group January 28, 2014 January.
Electromagnetic Devices
Results from the cold test of the first QD0 prototype
Instrumentation for status monitoring of SST-1 superconducting magnets
Final doublet: future activity plan
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
LXe Alignment with X-rays
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
Review of Quench Limits
Presentation transcript:

Status of COBRA Magnet Wataru OOTANI MEG review meeting July 11 th, 2003 PSI Switzerland

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Construction finished! Construction was finished! Construction was finished! Excitation test was done between Jun.21th and Jul.7th. Excitation test was done between Jun.21th and Jul.7th. Compensation coils Superconducting coil in cryostat Potentiometer Support frame

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Construction finished!, cont ’ d Refrigerator Instrument panel Power supply for SC Power supply for NC NC current adjustor

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Excitation test Purposes Purposes Excitations with up to 5% and 10% higher coil current for the SC and NC, respectively. Excitations with up to 5% and 10% higher coil current for the SC and NC, respectively. Intentional quench tests. Intentional quench tests. Quench propagation in the SC. Quench propagation in the SC. Temperature rise. Temperature rise. Voltage rise. Voltage rise. Optimization of the protection heater parameters. Optimization of the protection heater parameters. Stress distribution in the superconducting magnet. Stress distribution in the superconducting magnet. Interaction between SC and NC. Interaction between SC and NC. Safety circuit of the magnet control system. Safety circuit of the magnet control system. Stability and accuracy of power supply. Stability and accuracy of power supply. Test of the device for the magnetic field measurement. Test of the device for the magnetic field measurement. Installation procedure. Installation procedure. Driving system of Hall probe. Driving system of Hall probe. Test measurement of the magnetic field. Test measurement of the magnetic field. Fringe field in the photon detector region. Fringe field in the photon detector region.

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Two Troubles in Excitation Test Cold spots on the inner wall of the cryostat. Cold spots on the inner wall of the cryostat. –Dew condensation around the spots. –Radiation shield is touching the cryostat wall. –No problem in the magnet operation. –But, it might be problem for the detectors installed into the magnet or filed measurement (Hall probe stability). Protection heaters in the downstream end-coil were broken. Protection heaters in the downstream end-coil were broken. –Protection heater: When a quench occurs somewhere in the magnet, all coils are intentionally quenched using protection heaters to avoid local energy dump. –Quench without the protection heater might damage the coil due to voltage and temperature rise in the coil.

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Cold Spots Radiation shield is thermally connected to the cryostat wall due to too much superinsulation layers in narrow gap. Radiation shield is thermally connected to the cryostat wall due to too much superinsulation layers in narrow gap. Dew condensation was observed around the cold spots. Dew condensation was observed around the cold spots. The magnet will be disassembled to fix this problem. The magnet will be disassembled to fix this problem.

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Quench Test Results Voltage rise in the quench triggered by the protection heaters in all the coils except the end coil with broken heater. Voltage rise in the quench triggered by the protection heaters in all the coils except the end coil with broken heater. Coil current: 300A Coil current: 300A Voltage across the end coil with broken heater rose up to – 900V. Coil current  V (central coil)  V (end coil w/o heater)

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Quench Test Results, cont ’ d Temperature rise in the quench triggered by the protection heaters in all the coils except the end coil with broken heater. Temperature rise in the quench triggered by the protection heaters in all the coils except the end coil with broken heater. Coil current: 300A Coil current: 300A Temperature of the central coil rose up to 110K.  T (central coil)

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Excitation w/o protection heater We were increasing coil current step by step and carefully checking the temperature and voltage rise in the intentional quench tests, but we had to give up the excitation with full operating current (360A) for the SC only for safety reason. We were increasing coil current step by step and carefully checking the temperature and voltage rise in the intentional quench tests, but we had to give up the excitation with full operating current (360A) for the SC only for safety reason. We reached 300A (83% of normal operating current) for the SC and successfully done the quench test at the coil current. We reached 300A (83% of normal operating current) for the SC and successfully done the quench test at the coil current. We found the SC magnet worked well under much more severe conditions. (  V=-900V,  T=110K) We found the SC magnet worked well under much more severe conditions. (  V=-900V,  T=110K) For the NC, I=400A(111% of normal operating current) reached. For the NC, I=400A(111% of normal operating current) reached.

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Strain No strange behavior up to coil current of 300A. No strange behavior up to coil current of 300A. Mechanical strength was already confirmed in the previous excitation test of the central part of the magnet last November. Mechanical strength was already confirmed in the previous excitation test of the central part of the magnet last November.

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI External Control System of Magnet External operation of the magnet using MIDAS slow control system (MSCB) was tested in this excitation test. External operation of the magnet using MIDAS slow control system (MSCB) was tested in this excitation test. Control software based on LabVIEW. Control software based on LabVIEW. MSCB modules

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Field Measurement Device Point-by-point precision of the field map ~ 10Gauss Point-by-point precision of the field map ~ 10Gauss 3-axis Hall probe. 3-axis Hall probe. Position accuracy ~ a few hundred  m Position accuracy ~ a few hundred  m Ultrasonic motor with a rotary encoder (4000pulses/rotation) Ultrasonic motor with a rotary encoder (4000pulses/rotation) for R- and Z-motion and high-torque AC servo-motor for  -motion for R- and Z-motion and high-torque AC servo-motor for  -motion Timing belt will be used for the motion in all directions Timing belt will be used for the motion in all directions Probe position is measured by optical scale sensors Probe position is measured by optical scale sensors

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Field Measurement Device, cont ’ d Construction completed. Construction completed. Installed into the COBRA cryostat and tested during the excitation test. Installed into the COBRA cryostat and tested during the excitation test. Test measurement of the COBRA field was done with the Hall probe used in the Belle magnet. Test measurement of the COBRA field was done with the Hall probe used in the Belle magnet. Hall probe

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Test measurement of the magnetic field was done in the excitation test. –SC Coil only. –Coil current: 200A (Normal operating current 360A). –No calibration of Hall probe. –Hall probe and driving system were roughly aligned to the magnet cryostat. Field Measurement Device, cont ’ d On the axis Good agreement with calculation! Radial direction at z=0

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Fringe Field Fringe field around the photon detector region was roughly measured. Fringe field around the photon detector region was roughly measured. I SC =180A, I NC =180A (50% of full excitation) I SC =180A, I NC =180A (50% of full excitation) The fringe field in the full excitation can be estimated by simply scaling. The fringe field in the full excitation can be estimated by simply scaling. The compensation of the fringe field works very well! The compensation of the fringe field works very well! Fringe field is suppressed below ~ 50 Gauss all over the photon detector region as designed. Fringe field is suppressed below ~ 50 Gauss all over the photon detector region as designed.

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Summary Construction of the COBRA magnet was finished. Construction of the COBRA magnet was finished. Excitation test was done between Jun.21th and Jul.7th. Excitation test was done between Jun.21th and Jul.7th. –Two problems. Cold spots in the inner wall of the cryostat. Cold spots in the inner wall of the cryostat. Protection heaters in the downstream end-coil are broken. Protection heaters in the downstream end-coil are broken. –I=300A (83% of normal operating current) reached for the SC, but full excitation had to be given up because the full excitation w/o protection heater is dangerous. –I=400A (111% of normal operating current) reached for the NC. Field measurement device was completed. Field measurement device was completed. –Test measurement was done in the excitation test. –Measured magnetic field shows good agreement with calculation. –Precise field measurement will be done at PSI. Fringe field around the photon detector region was measured. Fringe field around the photon detector region was measured. –Good suppression of the fringe field.

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Summary, cont ’ d We are now strongly confident in the performance of the COBRA magnet. We are now strongly confident in the performance of the COBRA magnet. –Graded magnetic field and small fringe field as designed. –Survived under much more severe conditions (  V=-900V,  T=110K). –Good mechanical performance up to 300A (no strange behavior in strain plots). –Two problems can be easily fixed after the test. More reliable and powerful protection heater More reliable and powerful protection heater Reduce the superinsulation layers. Reduce the superinsulation layers.

Wataru OOTANI, July 11 th 2003, MEG review meeting, PSI Schedule