Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Introduction to the ASM project CARE-ASAS Activity 3: Airborne Separation Minima Final.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

Advertisements

1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.

Integra Consult A/S November 2005Dhaka, Bangladesh Reporting - Inspired by ESARR 2 Workshop Dhaka, November 2005.

1 Documentation Legal Framework Air Navigation Orders Guidelines ATS Manual Airport Manual Safety Management Manual ICAO Annexes Licenses / Certificates.

1 Safety Assessment July SAFETY ASSESSMENT A Safety Assessment is essentially a process for finding answers to three fundamental questions: What.

Integra Consult A/S Safety Assessment. Integra Consult A/S SAFETY ASSESSMENT Objective Objective –Demonstrate that an acceptable level of safety will.

1 Reporting April Safety Policy Regulator Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Regulator to established SRF to harmonize reporting.

Integra Consult A/S January 2006Karachi, Pakistan Severity Classification Scheme.

1 Regulation. 2 Organisational separation 3 Functional Separation.

Information Day Call 2001/1 - Brussels 19 June Call for proposals 2001/1 HOW TO PREPARE AND PRESENT YOUR PROPOSAL Willy MAES DG INFSO/F3

1 Air Traffic Quality Assurance Program The Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Gary D. Romero.

Overview of the interoperability Regulation

UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW A Comprehensive Approach to ATM Incorporating Autonomous Aircraft ATM Research Group University of Glasgow.

Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Estimating safe separations.

CARE ASAS Validation Framework. Partners CARE ASAS Board - Francis Casaux EURCONTROL - Mick van Gool, Ulrich Borkenhagen Consortium Partners Aena, Isdefe,

Whole Airspace ATM System Safety Case - Preliminary Study

CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.

Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OHA CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OHA.

CARE ASAS Validation Framework System Performance Metrics 10th October 2002 M F (Mike) Sharples.

Slide 1 of 7 / CARE Innovative Action Workshop March 2001 Could we cope with a massive growth in General / Personal Aviation? Michael Sharples Principal.

The EMERALD RTD Plan and the ASAS Validation Framework R P (Bill) Booth 10 October 2002.

Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OSED.

Slide 1 July 2004 – FALBALA/WP5/FOR1/D – CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, Sofréavia & UoG Agenda & Project Overview Thierry Arino (Sofréavia) CARE/ASAS Action FALBALA.

Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A Page 1 The ONESKY (Single-Sky) project and what it means for ASAS.

PBN ICAO HQ Activities Overview

ENAV S.p.A. ASAS TN I Workshop, April 20031/13 Airborne Spacing and Safety Alberto Pasquini - Deep Blue (ENAV)

Airborne Separation Assistance System Thematic Network An Overview Bill Booth, EUROCONTROL.

ASAS Thematic Network Workshop #2: TAGA - Traffic Awareness for General Aviation DFS Research and Development October 2003 TAGA - Traffic Awareness for.

Page 1 ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop “Safety and ASAS Applications” Progress and contents Safety and ASAS Applications Progress and Contents Ken.

ASAS TN 2nd Workshop 6-8 October ADS-B Safety Analysis (ASA & GSA) Bob Darby EUROCONTROL ADS Programme ASAS Thematic Network Second Workshop 6-8.

C ENTRE D'ETUDES DE LA NAVIGATION AERIENNE ASAS-TN, 2nd workshop - Malmö 6 ~ 8 october 2003page 1 Electronic separation Clearance Enabling the Crossing.

Safety / Performance Criteria Agreeing on Assumptions 1 BEIJING, CHINA; 30 JUN-11 JUL 2014.

A unique TOOLSET for ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILTY ASSESSMENT TESA Tous droits réservés ©net-aviation.com.

Advanced Safe Separation Technologies and Algorithms (ASSTAR) Project ASAS-TN2 Workshop #1 Malmö 26 th -28 th September 2005 ASSTAR is a Specific Targeted.

Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Time-Based Sequencing OHA CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Time-Based Sequencing OHA.

EUROCONTROLEUROCONTROL 1. CURRENT CONTEXT 2. TRENDS 3. NEW CONCEPTS Free Routing Free Routing Free Flight Free Flight JSSI FAST Paris - 28/29 June 2001.

Introduction to Risk Management C7 Slide 1. The Concept of Safety  ‘Safety’ refers to the reduction of risk to a tolerable level  Risk = Likelihood.

Page 1 Aircraft Surveillance Applications (Extracts from ASA MASPS, DO-289) Presented to ASAS-TN 3 rd Workshop Steve Koczo - Rockwell Collins Inc. Jonathan.

ASSTAR User Forum #1 Rome 4th April 2006 ASAS-TN2 Second Workshop ASSTAR Safety Approach and Preliminary Issues Dr Giuseppe GRANIERO, SICTA

CRISTAL ITP European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation CRISTAL ITP ASAS-TN, Paris Johan Martensson CASCADE CRISTAL ITPJohan Martensson ASAS-TN.

CARE/ASAS Validation Framework Guidelines & Case Studies Mark Watson NATS.

Direction générale de l’Aviation civile centre d’Études de la navigation aérienne First ASAS thematic network workshop The user’s expectations and concerns.

1 ADS-B-NRA Status ASAS-TN Malmö September 2005 Jörg Steinleitner (prepared by Gilles Caligaris) CASCADE Infrastructure WP Leader, EUROCONTROL European.

KLM - Operations at Schiphol: how does ASAS fit? ASAS TN2: final seminar, April, Paris E. Kleiboer Sr. Manager Strategy ATM.

MFF is a EC co-funded programme Rome, 3-5 Aprili 2006 ASAS-TN2 Rome, 3-5 April 2006 Maurizio Zacchei, ENAV (MFF PM) Mediterranean Free Flight Programme.

Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Time-Based Sequencing OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Time-Based Sequencing OSED.

CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.

Slide 1 Malmö, 6-8 October 2003 – ASAS TN – Session 3: Airborne spacing applications – IAPA/WP00/035/W v2.0 ACAS / ASAS interaction IAPA Project Thierry.

ASAS Crossing and Passing Applications in Radar Airspace (operational concept and operational procedure) Jean-Marc Loscos, Bernard Hasquenoph, Claude Chamayou.

European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation RFG ASPA-S&M Requirements Determination ASAS-TN th September Malmo, Sweden.

A consolidated starting point from DFS / AENA / LFV ASAS Thematic Network Workshop Toulouse, Is ASAS /ADS-B needed for ANSP strategy?

MFF is a EC Co-funded Programme  MEDITERRANEAN FREE FLIGHT Flight Trials Report ASAS TN2 1st Workshop | September 2005, Malmö Gennaro GRAZIANO 1/32.

ASAS in ATC Domain plans ADAS Initiative Dragos TONEA Eurocontrol Glasgow,13 th of September 2006 European Organisation for.

Alberto Pasquini – Deep Blue Safety Assessment in MFF ASAS TN2 3-5 April 2006, Rome MENU: COVER | SUMMARY | OVERVIEW | TASKS | ALLOCATIONSCOVER SUMMARY.

4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 rd -25 th April 2007 ASAS-SEP Applications Airborne Implementation Overall Architectural Considerations.

1 Roma, 3-5 April 2006 – ASAS TN2, 2 nd Workshop, Session 1 – When ASAS meets ACAS When ASAS meets ACAS Thierry Arino (Sofréavia, IAPA Project Manager)

ASAS TN2 Final Seminar Paris, April 2008 LEGAL ASPECTS OF ASAS Dr. Francis SCHUBERT Head Corporate Development / skyguide.

ASSTAR Overview Jean-Marc Loscos, DSNA

Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology

ASSTAR Oceanic Session Summary

Chris Shaw, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre

Ground System implication for ASAS implementation

ASEAN PBN Routes Objectives:

GTE/17 IP/6 RVSM Safety Analyses for Mexico Airspace

Safety Risk Management (SRM) Process Overview

WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Aeronautical Spectrum Workshop Preparation.

USER’S EXPECTATIONS AND CONCERNS Aena’s ADS Programme Manager

PBN ICAO HQ Activities Overview

And now the Framework WP4.

Presentation transcript:

page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Introduction to the ASM project CARE-ASAS Activity 3: Airborne Separation Minima Final Workshop 19 December, Brétigny

page 2 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Introduction to the ASM project Agenda Introduction to the ASM project (9h30) Autonomous Aircraft results Operational Service and Environment Description (OSED) Operational Hazard Assessment (OHA) Estimating airborne separation minima Autonomous Aircraft Conclusions Lunch (12h45-14h15) Co-operative application results Operational Service and Environment Description (OSED) Operational Hazard Assessment (OHA) Conclusions (until 16h30)

page 3 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Introduction to the ASM project CARE/ASAS ASM Approach Applicable methodologies Likelihood of occurrence for hazards and consequence modelling WP2/WP3 Identification of hazards (OHA) WP2 Operational Service and Environment Description (OSED) WP1 Setting evaluation criteria (Target Level of Safety) Risk estimation and evaluation (TOPAZ model) WP3 First estimation of airborne separation minima Uncertainty analysis

page 4 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Introduction to the ASM project Project organisation

page 5 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Introduction to the ASM project Selection of two applications (1/2) Criteria of selection Re-use of available work Simplicity of the application Compatible with work packages Maturity of the application Interest from ATM community Most promising for ATM community Knowledge of the CARE/ASAS Activity 3 team Address the maximum of relevant issues

page 6 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Introduction to the ASM project Selection of two applications (2/2) Autonomous Operation Application: FFAS segregated airspace with no radar coverage, no ATC support No fixed routes FFAS surrounded by MAS only Co-operative Separation Assurance Application: Time-based separation criteria Flight crew ensures responsibility for airborne separation Airborne separation minima may be lower than ATC R&D work with no implementation objectives