May 25, 2011.  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 23, 2007.
Advertisements

NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 28, 2008.
Delaware Statewide Title I Conference 1 School Improvement – The Ever-Changing Landscape – Part I June 29, 2010 Bill McGrady U. S. Department of Education.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Accountability Reporting Webinar: Parent/Guardian Communications, NCLB School Choice and SES August 23, :00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. Kenneth Klau.
Title I School Improvement in North Carolina. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determines if a Title I school goes into Title I School Improvement.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Program Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
Pershing Pershing Annual Meeting Title I AYP/School Improvement.
Educational Services and Choices: Information for Parents Florida PIRC at USF (Parental Information and Resource Center)
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Title 1 at J. Evans Middle School. Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was created to ensure that all children have a fair,
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
The New Age: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) By Don Bertucci, Chaffey Unified School District ROP.
The Basics of Title I Florida Public School Choice Consortium's Annual Conference (FPSCC) Anke Toth November 18, 2009.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement.
Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioners Bridgeport Conference Center June 9, 2008.
2011 School Improvement Technical Assistance Meeting Dr. Reginald Eggleston Assistant Superintendent Division of Federal and Special Programs October 27,
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Testing & Accountability Update TAKS, EOC, & STAAR.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Elements School Improvement District.
Ware County High School State of the school. 12 th grade 448 students entered the 9 th grade in 2003/ students have left the county or state 243.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Title I What Parents Need to Know!. What is Title I? Title I is a program that provides funds from the federal government to improve student learning.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
GUIDANCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma 555 Constitution Street Norman, OK David.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting W.H. Rhodes Elementary School School Year.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
Springs 2006 and 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress Results Potential Challenges with 2008 Annual Measurable Objectives & District Corrective Action.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting
Coordinator’s Academy Local District 6 Program Improvement Thursday October 27, 2005.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
No Child Left Behind Title I Newport News Public Schools.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Ellie Gearhart August Campus Improvement Plan Revise plan Parents School staff LEA Outside experts.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Presentation transcript:

May 25, 2011

 MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual grade levels.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are representative of combined grade levels:  Elementary (Grades 3-5)  Middle School (Grades 6-8)  High School

4

5

 The uniform bars increased significantly this year.  The uniform bar indicates that 100% of students will pass both reading and math in 2014 (3 years).

 AYP is determined by 36 different subgroups.  Currently the following sizes by subgroup are required for a subgroup to count towards AYP:  All = 10 Students  ELL = 40 Students  Special Ed = 40 Students  All other sub-groups = 30 Students  Subgroups with fewer students than necessary do not count towards AYP. They are indicated with N<Required.

Met Proficiency GoalMet Participation Goal Student GroupReadingMathReadingMath All Yes American Indian N<Required Asian/Pacific Islander N<Required BlackN<Required HispanicYesNoYes WhiteYes Limited EnglishN<Required Special Education N<Required Yes Low IncomeYesNoYes

 A school/district will not make AYP if ANY cell in ANY sub-group does not make AYP.  A school/district will move into school/district improvement, if ANY cell in any sub-group has a NO for 2 years in a row.

 Special Education Reading  Special Education Math

 Hispanic Math  Low Income Math

 A School is identified for school improvement if it has not made AYP for two consecutive years in the same subject.  WIS did not make AYP in special education, Hispanic and low income math over the last two years.  This means that WIS is currently in step one of School Improvement.  If we do not make AYP in any of the math cells this year we will move into step 2 next year (2011/2012).

 School must offer public school choice (which allows students to transfer to a school in the district that is not under improvement)  School must notify families of students, informing them of the public school choice option  District must use the equivalent of 20% of its Title I funds to finance public school choice and to pay for transportation to non- improvement schools  School must develop or revise an improvement plan  The plan must be completed three months after the school is identified for improvement  School/District must set aside 10% of building allocation for professional development.

 School must continue improvement planning  District must continue to offer public school choice  District must provide supplemental educational services (SES) to low-achieving, low-income students  Districts must use the equivalent of 20% of its Title I funds to finance public school choice and SES  School must set aside 10% of building allocation for professional development

 School must take “corrective action” by either: o Making curriculum and instruction changes o Appointing outside experts to advise on revising and implementing the school plan o Extending the school year or school day  District must continue to offer public school choice and SES  School must revise the improvement plan and include a description of the corrective action the school has taken  School must set aside 10% of building allocation for professional development.

 School must undergo “school restructuring” by reorganizing the school’s governance  District must prepare a restructuring plan  Parents and teacher must be informed that the school is restructuring and must be given the opportunity to provide input  The restructuring plan must be implemented no later than the beginning of the following school year and must include either o Replacing school staff, possibly school principal, if staff is relevant to school’s failure to meet AYP o Enter into a contract with and outside entity to operate the school o Implement other restructuring activities that are consistent with the principles of restructuring  District must provide technical assistance that emphasize: o The importance of improving instruction through scientifically-based strategies o The importance of analyzing and applying data in decision-making  District must continue to offer public school choice and SES  School must set aside 10% of building allocation for professional development.

 District must ensure that the school has implemented the school’s restructuring plan  District must continue to offer public school choice and SES  School must set aside 10% of building allocation for professional development.

 295 school districts exist in Washington state  104 school districts are currently in step 1 or higher of the AYP/School Improvement process.  With this year’s increase of the Uniform Bar most school districts in Washington state will not make AYP.

 2124 public schools exist in Washington state  1121 public schools are currently in step 1 or higher of the AYP/School Improvement process.  With this year’s increase of the Uniform Bar most schools in Washington state will not make AYP.

 Of the 2124 public schools in Washington state 1197 are Title 1 schools.  Of the 1197 Title 1 schools in Washington 516 are currently in step 1 or higher of the AYP/School Improvement process.  With this year’s increase of the Uniform Bar most Title 1 schools in Washington state will not make AYP.

 Title 1 is Federal funding  LAP is state funding  The amount of financial support provided through Title 1 is significantly greater than that provided through LAP  Title 1 funding in the WSD is allocated to WPS, WIS and Yale to support early interventions.  LAP funding in the WSD is allocated to WMS and WHS.

 No Child Left Behind only applies to Title 1 schools.  No Child Left Behind does not apply to LAP schools, such as WMS and WHS.  This being said, if a school does not receive Title 1 allocations (WMS and WHS) it is exempt from the step process/school improvement and sanctions that accompany not making AYP.

 We must continue improvement planning  District must continue to offer public school choice  District must provide supplemental educational services (SES) to low-achieving, low-income students  Districts must use the equivalent of 20% of its Title I funds to finance public school choice and SES  School must set aside 10% of building allocation for professional development

 Supplemental Educational Services (SES) are additional academic instruction designed to increase the academic achievement of students in schools in the second year of improvement, corrective action, or restructuring.  SES is available to students who: (1) attend a Title 1 school not meeting AYP standards in reading and/or math (2) are in step 2 or beyond and (3) are classified as low-income families (free and reduced).  Each student who qualifies for SES is allocated a specific dollar amount for services. This comes from the 20% of Title 1 allotment that schools in step 2 must set aside.

 These services, which are in addition to instruction provided during the school day, may include academic assistance such as tutoring, remediation and other supplemental academic enrichment services that are consistent with the content and instruction used by Woodland Intermediate and are aligned with the state’s academic content and achievement standards.  SES must be high quality, research-based, and specifically designed to increase student academic achievement.

 Parents may select any provider from the state approved list, as long as that provider is able to provide services in or near the area served by the public school, which may include approved providers that use e-learning, online, or distance learning technology to provide supplemental educational services.

 All providers must be approved by OSPI.  OSPI provides a list of approved providers.  Examples include:  Sylvan Learning Center  ESD 112  Better Grades In Home Tutoring  Academic Link Outreach  Able Academics  ACE Tutoring Services, Inc.  Brilliance Academy  ETC.

 ESD 112 is currently seeking teachers and para- educators to tutor students from our school if we end up in step two of AYP next year.  If this is something that interests you send Chris and ASAP.