Screening, Signaling and Voluntary Disclosure. Screening and Signaling Definitions: Screening- An attempt by an uninformed party to sort individuals according.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Signalling Often a player wants to convey his private information to other players. It might be information about his own payoffs (My costs are low,
Advertisements

Information Economics Consider the following variants on the game of poker: The Certainty Game – 5 cards dealt face up so that all players can see them.
Asymmetric Information
“A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So is a lot.”
Hal Varian Intermediate Microeconomics Chapter Thirty-Six
Inferring a worker’s productivity In theory, a firm should hire a worker only if the value of his marginal product exceeds the pay he receives. (Marginal.
Michael R. Baye, Managerial Economics and Business Strategy, 3e. ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999 Managerial Economics & Business Strategy Chapter.
Chapter 14 Markets with Asymmetric Information. Chapter 17Slide 2 Topics to be Discussed Quality Uncertainty and the Market for Lemons Market Signaling.
Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 16 The Problem of Adverse Selection COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation.
Chapter 6:The Economics of Information and Choice Under Uncertainty
Choice Under Uncertainty
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 20/1 Chapter 20 Asymmetric Information and Market Behaviour.
Chapter 10 Asymmetric Information and Agency 1.Overview of Information issue 2.Asymmetric Information 3.Application of the Lemons Principle 4.Consumer.
Chapter 6 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Slide 1  2002 South-Western Publishing An assumption of pure competition was complete knowledge of all market information. But knowledge can be unevenly.
Game Theory “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So is a lot” - Albert Einstein Mike Shor Lecture 10.
Adverse Selection Asymmetric information is feature of many markets
The Economics of Information. Risk a situation in which there is a probability that an event will occur. People tend to prefer greater certainty and less.
Interactions of Tax and Nontax Costs n Uncertainty u Symmetric uncertainty u Strategic uncertainty (information asymmetry) F Hidden action (moral hazard)
L25 Asymmetric Information. Structure of the course 1) Consumers choice 2) Equilibrium, Producers (Pareto efficiency) 3) Market Failures - fixed cost:
Asymmetric Information ECON 370: Microeconomic Theory Summer 2004 – Rice University Stanley Gilbert.
Sample Questions Exam 4 Chapters 16, 17, 9, & 7. Price Discrimination Price discrimination Charging different prices to different customers for the same.
18 Private Information Information  One common assumption in economic analysis: perfect information …  … buyer and seller have the same information.
Voluntary Disclosure, Inference and the Strategic Behavior of Colleges Michael Conlin Michigan State University Stacy Dickert-Conlin Michigan State University.
Earnings and Discrimination Chapter 19 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Requests for permission to make copies of any part of the.
Lectures Section Seven: Market Failure Introduction to Microeconomics (L11100)
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy
1 Price Discrimination (when there is no strategic interaction)
Screening and Signaling Edition 7: Chapter 12, pages Edition 6: Chapter 12, pages
Industrial Economics Fall INFORMATION Basic economic theories: Full (perfect) information In reality, information is limited. Consumers do not know.
Who Decides Wage Rates?. WHO DECIDES WAGE RATES? 0 OBJECTIVES 0 Students will be able to: 0 Explain how sellers of labor and buyers of labor interact.
Economics of Information Economics 230 J.F. O’Connor.
Economics of Information Asymmetric Information: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard Chapter 17.
Chapter 37 Asymmetric Information. Information in Competitive Markets In purely competitive markets all agents are fully informed about traded commodities.
Asymmetric Information
Turn In: Career Packet!! Due at the beginning of class!!
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 7-1 Defining Competitiveness Chapter 7.
Asymmetric Information
Harcourt, Inc. items and derived items copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION 1. Definition of asymmetric information 2. Sources of.
1 Private Information. 2 Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard.
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 37 Asymmetric Information.
Asymmetric Information
2012 Edition Based primarily on data from the academic year and fall 2011.
Voluntary Disclosure and the Strategic Behavior of Colleges Michael Conlin Michigan State University Stacy Dickert-Conlin Michigan State University Gabrielle.
Microeconomics 2 John Hey. Asymmetric Information The seller of the good knows more about its quality than the buyer.. Perhaps the market does not exist.
Contracting The incentives of the employer (principal) and employee (agent) are different. A contract is designed to implement an outcome both parties.
Voluntary Disclosure Not Covered in Textbook. You’re on a job interview and the interviewer knows what the distribution of GPAs are for MBA students at.
Chapter ElevenCopyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 1 Chapter 11 Game Theory and Asymmetric Information.
The Economics of Information and Choice Under Uncertainty.
Information. Information Problems Adverse Selection: The Market for Lemons Two types of cars: ½ are good cars ($100) and ½ are lemons ($50). Sellers know.
Asymmetric Information. 2 (c) , I.P.L. Png & D.E. Lehman Outline  imperfect information  adverse selection  appraisal  screening  signaling.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 7-1 Defining Competitiveness Chapter 7.
Econ 2610: Principles of Microeconomics Yogesh Uppal
Prices and Decision Making. Life is full of signals that help us make decisions. Price-the monetary value of a product as established by supply and demand-is.
Signaling Game Problems. Signaling game. Two players– a sender and receiver. Sender knows his type. Receiver does not. It is not necessarily in the sender’s.
1 Private Information. 2 Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard.
Chapter Thirty-Six Asymmetric Information. Information in Competitive Markets u In purely competitive markets all agents are fully informed about traded.
Inference: Bayesian, Cursed, …
Advanced Topics (Private Information)
Auctions and Competitive Bidding
Asymmetric Information
Asymmetric Information
The Economics of Information and Choice Under Uncertainty
Asymmetric Information
Asymmetric Information
Lecture 8 Asymmetric Information: Adverse Selection
Adverse selection Abhinash adhikari Astha gyawali Bijay chalise
Frontiers of Microeconomics
Asymmetric Information
Presentation transcript:

Screening, Signaling and Voluntary Disclosure

Screening and Signaling Definitions: Screening- An attempt by an uninformed party to sort individuals according to their characteristics. Signaling- An attempt by an informed party to send an observable indicator of his or her hidden characteristics to an uniformed party.

Examples of Screening 1. Screening to enable price discrimination (coupons, rebates, outlet malls,…) 2. Screening to sort different types of workers. 3. Choice of deductibles associated with different types of insurance. 4. Obtaining a physical to obtain a favorable life insurance policy.

Examples of Signaling 1. Obtaining an advanced degree such as an MBA or PhD. 2. Seller offering a warranty. 3. Labor contract negotiations/ Negotiating a compensation package.

Example 1: Signaling with a Warranty Suppose there are sellers of lemons and sellers of peaches and buyers cannot tell a lemon from a peach (like the adverse selection example we did). Suppose a seller can obtain a price of $2,000 if he has a lemon and the buyer knows it’s a lemon and a price of $3,000 if he has a peach and the buyer knows it’s a peach. Finally, assume all sellers can credibly offer a warranty.

Example 1: Signaling with a Warranty Let the probability of a lemon breaking down be.70 and the probability of a peach breaking down be.10. Suppose the warranty states that if the car breaks down, the seller will pay the buyer $1,500 to repair the car.

Example 1: Signaling with a Warranty Will the seller with a lemon offer the warranty? Marginal Benefit (MB) from offering the warranty is $1,000. Marginal Cost (MC) from offering the warranty is.7*1500=$1,050. Will the seller with a peach offer the warranty? Marginal Benefit (MB) from offering the warranty is $1,000. Marginal Cost (MC) from offering the warranty is.1*1500=$150. MB MC for seller with peach. Therefore, seller with peach can credibly signal to buyer that the car is a peach by offering the above warranty.

Example 2: Signaling in National Football League Contract Negotiations Representative Contract YearSigning Bonus Base Salary Reporting Bonus 1991$250,000$150, $170, $190,000$20,000 Guaranteed Non-Guaranteed

Signaling in NFL Negotiations Review of Economic and Statistics (2003) Michael Conlin and Patrick Emerson

Proportion that “Make Team” and Mean Number of Starts

Voluntary Disclosure Not Covered in Textbook

You’re on a job interview and the interviewer knows what the distribution of GPAs are for MBA students at MSU: Percent GPA Expected/Average grade for everyone:.2*2.5+.3*3.0+.3*3.5+.2*4.0 = 3.25 Geoff Humphrys at the Lear Center advises anyone who has a 3.5 GPA or higher to volunteer their GPA. Is this a stable outcome?

What does the potential employer believe about the people who stay quiet? They know their GPA is below a 3.5, but how far below? Guess the average grade of everyone who didn’t get at least a 3.5. What is that? Percent GPA /.5 =.4 Original share Students remaining.3/.5 =.6.4* *3.0 = 2.8 People with 3.0s will reveal themselves because they don’t want employer to assume they have a 2.8 Percent GPA

Voluntary disclosure Full disclosure principle - if some individuals stand to benefits by revealing a favorable trait, others will be forced to disclose their less favorable values. If disclosure is costless, only the lowest types will not reveal their quality

Voluntary Disclosure and Signaling Voluntary Disclosure differs from Signaling because we are assuming that the cost of lying (i.e., saying you have a GPA of 4.0 when you have a GPA of 3.5) is so large than no one does it. Therefore, the decision is to either reveal your private information truthfully or don’t reveal.

Voluntary Disclosure If it is true that only the lowest types don’t reveal and that consumers/employers (the uninformed party) can infer they are the lowest type, then government should not have to intervene in the market – for example, they should not require firms producing salad dressings to report the fat content and they should not require restaurants to report their hygiene score.

Fat content in Salad Dressing The Impact of Mandatory Disclosure Laws On Product Choice Alan Mathios

Hygiene Scores for LA Restaurants The Effect of Information on Product Quality By Phil Leslie and Ginger Jin

Shipping Charges in Online Auction Platforms Shrouded Attributes and Information Suppression: Evidence from the Field (e-Bay and on-line auction platforms in Taiwan and Ireland) By Jennifer Brown, Tanjim Hossain and John Morgan (QJE 2010)

Film Studios Withholding Movies from Critics To Review or Not to Review? Limited Strategic Thinking at the Movie Box Office By Alexander Brown, Colin Camerer and Dan Lovallo (AEJ: Micro 2012)

Inference of SAT score in College Admissions By Michael Conlin and Stacy Dickert-Conlin

Why would Colleges go to Optional SAT Policy? Attract a different type of student (those that don’t test well but do well in college) Maybe more diverse? Improve ratings Average SAT score included in U.S. News and World Report If don’t have SAT scores for lowest score students, reported average increases.

U.S. News and World Report CriteriaWeightSubcriteriaWeight Student Selectivity15%SAT/Act scores Acceptance Rate Yield High school class standing top 10% 40 % 15% 10% 35% Academic reputation (survey of other colleges) 25% Faculty resources20% Graduation and retention rate20% Financial resources (expenditure per student) 10% Alumni giving (rate)5% Graduation rate performance5%

Strategic Behavior of Colleges By Michael Conlin, Stacy Dickert-Conlin and Gabrielle Chapman Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations (2013)