GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg 4.-5.7. 2005 CTM - IFS interfaces GEMS- GRG Review of meeting in January and more recent thoughts Johannes Flemming.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assimilation of radar data - research plan
Advertisements

R. L. Buckley and C. H. Hunter Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Recent Improvements to an Advanced Atmospheric Transport.
GEMS Global Reactive Gases Guy P. Brasseur Martin Schultz Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Hamburg, Germany.
Coupling TM5 to IFS within the GEMS-framework Frans Alkemade Henk Eskes (credits to Arjo Segers, Bram Bregman, Maarten Krol) GEMS Kick-off Meeting, Hamburg,
Regional Air Quality « Regional » : Europe and zoom over some countries. gaz phase (link with GRG) and aerosol (link with.
1 The GEMS production systems and retrospective reanalysis Adrian Simmons.
Martin G. Schultz, MPI Meteorology, Hamburg GEMS proposal preparation meeting, Reading, Dec 2003 GEMS RG Global reactive gases monitoring and forecast.
GEMS Global Production System and
Using PALM to integrate variational data assimilation algorithms with OPA ECMWF, 29 june 2005, Reading. Nicolas Daget CERFACS, Toulouse.
QUANTIFY Activity 3:Large chemistry modeling Status report, month 30 (Athens, 21 september) 3.1 Model evaluation and current impact Evaluation of.
WRF Modeling System V2.0 Overview
Assimilation Algorithms: Tangent Linear and Adjoint models Yannick Trémolet ECMWF Data Assimilation Training Course March 2006.
Status and performance of HIRLAM 4D-Var Nils Gustafsson.
Polly Smith, Alison Fowler, Amos Lawless School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Reading Exploring coupled data assimilation using.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
ERA-Interim and ASR Data Management at NCAR
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for large scale air quality monitoring and forecasting over Europe
ECMWF CO 2 Data Assimilation at ECMWF Richard Engelen European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reading, United Kingdom Many thanks to Phil Watts,
Data assimilation of trace gases in a regional chemical transport model: the impact on model forecasts E. Emili 1, O. Pannekoucke 1,2, E. Jaumouillé 2,
INERIS ongoing works for CITIZEN (2009) 1 Bessagnet, B ; 1 Meleux, F. ; 1,2 Péré, J.-C. ; 1 Colette,A; 1,3 Siour,G, 4 Menut,L; 1 Rouïl, L. 1) INERIS, France.
SECOND GEOS-CHEM USERS’ MEETING April 4-6, 2005 Thanks to NASA/ACMAP and HUCE for providing travel support! Meeting objectives: To share model experiences.
Urban Air Pollution, Tropospheric Chemistry, and Climate Change: An Integrated Modeling Study Chien Wang MIT.
Introduction. A major focus of SCOUT-O3 is the tropics and a key issue here is testing how well existing global 3D models perform in this region. This.
1 NGGPS Dynamic Core Requirements Workshop NCEP Future Global Model Requirements and Discussion Mark Iredell, Global Modeling and EMC August 4, 2014.
Exploring strategies for coupled 4D-Var data assimilation using an idealised atmosphere-ocean model Polly Smith, Alison Fowler & Amos Lawless School of.
Henry Fuelberg Nick Heath Sean Freeman FSU WRF-Chem During SEAC 4 RS.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
1 1 Model studies of some atmospheric aerosols and comparisons with measurements K. G e o r g i e v I P P – B A S, S o f i a, B u l g a r i a.
1 CCOS Seasonal Modeling: The Computing Environment S.Tonse, N.J.Brown & R. Harley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University Of California at Berkeley.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
Coupled Model Data Assimilation: Building an idealised coupled system Polly Smith, Amos Lawless, Alison Fowler* School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences,
Ocean Data Variational Assimilation with OPA: Ongoing developments with OPAVAR and implementation plan for NEMOVAR Sophie RICCI, Anthony Weaver, Nicolas.
GEOS-Chem Chemical Transport Model: Current Status and Future Plans Daniel J. Jacob, GEOS-Chem Model Scientist Harvard University.
Analysis of TraceP Observations Using a 4D-Var Technique
Intermediate model for the annual and global evolution of species
Assimilating chemical compound with a regional chemical model Chu-Chun Chang 1, Shu-Chih Yang 1, Mao-Chang Liang 2, ShuWei Hsu 1, Yu-Heng Tseng 3 and Ji-Sung.
Soil moisture generation at ECMWF Gisela Seuffert and Pedro Viterbo European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts ELDAS Interim Data Co-ordination.
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
HIRLAM 3/4D-Var developments Nils Gustafsson, SMHI.
Gloream workshop, Paris 2006 Setting of an experimental forecast system for air quality at ECMWF in the framework of the GEMS project : implementation.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
MAP MODELING EFFORTS MAP: Building Integrated Earth System Analysis (Modeling): IESA CTM work funded by MAP will be seen as part of the overall Earth System.
Overview of the tracer code in RegCM Tracers Aerosols ( droplets, smoke particles, dust, pollens, flying cats …) Gazeous phase, chemical species Evolution.
The status and development of the ECMWF forecast model M. Hortal, M. Miller, C. Temperton, A. Untch, N. Wedi ECMWF.
EWGLAM Oct Some recent developments in the ECMWF model Mariano Hortal ECMWF Thanks to: A. Beljars (physics), E. Holm (humidity analysis)
DATA ASSIMILATION M. Derkova, M. Bellus, M. Nestiak.
A modelling study on trends and variability of the tropospheric chemical composition over the last 40 years S.Rast(1), M.G.Schultz(2) (1) Max Planck Institute.
10-11 October 2006HYMN kick-off TM3/4/5 Modeling at KNMI HYMN Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the.
G-IDAS Richard Engelen.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Status of MOZART-2 Larry W. Horowitz GFDL/NOAA MOZART Workshop November 29, 2001.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Slide 1 NEMOVAR-LEFE Workshop 22/ Slide 1 Current status of NEMOVAR Kristian Mogensen.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Simulations of MAP IOPs with Lokal Modell: impact of nudging on forecast precipitation Francesco Boccanera, Andrea Montani ARPA – Servizio Idro-Meteorologico.
Incrementing moisture fields with satellite observations
March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison and S. Walters Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
March 9, 2004CCSM AMWG Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison S. Walters and the WACCM group Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation with a Variational Approach (“4-D Var”) David Baker CGD/TSS with Scott Doney, Dave Schimel, Britt Stephens, and Roger Dargaville.
C-IFS: How are developments integrated
The TM5 atmospheric chemistry module in EC-Earth Twan van Noije
Status of the COSMO-Software and Documentation
CMAQ Programs and Options
Application Of KF-Convection Scheme In 3-D Chemical Transport Model
Atmospheric modelling of the Laki eruption
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Chemistry Café and the Model Independent Chemistry Module (MICM)
How will the earth’s temperature change?
Shiliang Wu1 Loretta J. Mickley1, Daniel J
Presentation transcript:

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg CTM - IFS interfaces GEMS- GRG Review of meeting in January and more recent thoughts Johannes Flemming

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg Background Assimilating remotely sensed observation about atmospheric composition GEMS production is hosted at ECMWF Integrated Forecast System (IFS) provides background –Transport, emissions, deposition and chemical conversion GRG-specific problem: –Chemical mechanism with > 40 species can hardly be incorporated in IFS

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg GRG - approach Include observable species in IFS (transport and assimilation) O 3, NO 2, SO 2, CO and HCHO can be observed from space (?) Assimilate species in IFS with ECMWF 4D-VAR Simulated source and sinks by coupling Chemical Transport Models (CTM) CTM: MOZART (MPI-H), TM5 (KNMI), Mocage (meteo-france)

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg What do we have to consider? Fields to be exchanged Choice of coupling method Choice of model grid Frequency and timing of exchange in forecast and assimilation runs Common computing environment for IFS and CTMs Harmonised interfaces

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg Coupling method Coupler OASIS4 Is being developed in PRISM (work in progress) Can exchange 3D fields between different grids –Mass conservation atmospheric balances (?) –Support of reduced Gaussian grid (?) –Spectral and grid point presentation Coupling on the level of the MPI processes –CTM should be MPI parallel File output possible Coding interfaces and control by XML scripts GEMS needs will be considered in development

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg CTM & IFS Horizontal resolution –IFS: reduced Gaussian grid, T159 –CTM: Regular or Gaussian grid, T63/ T42 Vertical resolution –IFS: L90 Levels in sigma hybrid coordinate –CTM: L20-30 Levels in sigma hybrid coordinate (same coefficients) Orography & surface pressure –CTMs should use an orography consistent with the spectral truncation of the IFS output Advection scheme, chemical mechanism MPI parallelisation (?)

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg IFS fields to CTM Wind components – mass fluxes Temperature Humidity Clouds Convective mass fluxes Profiles of precipitation Vertical diffusion coefficient IFS concentrations (data assimilation mode) Surface pressure ………?

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg CTM fields to IFS Production P Loss rate L – L C and P C due to chemistry (3D) – P E due to emissions (2D) – L D due to deposition (2D/3D cloud) –Not standard output – L C, P C,L D and P E are not independent –Totals only (?) Concentrations (Initial conditions) (?)

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg Dislocation problem

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg Dislocation problem IFS concentration fields differ from CTM fields because of different transport and data assimilation –CTMs P&L is not consistent with IFS concentration fields –IFS chemical analysis is not chemically consistent with CTM fields (difficult to merge) –Is this an issue ?

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg Forecast mode 2-way coupling requires synchronous run –Exchanged met-data and P&L have to be assumed constant till next coupling –P&L IC required –How to consistently merge IFS chemical analysis in CTM IC 1-way coupling (CTM gets met-data) –would allow lagged coupling (temporal interpolation of met-data)

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg Coupling in Forecast mode

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg ECMWF 4D-VAR Data assimilation T,u,v,q,O 3 O 3 transport + chemistry O 3 advection only O 3 transport + chemistry

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg Coupling in Data assimilation mode Tangent linear and adjoint of coupled system (IFS- OASIS4-CTM) would be needed (not feasible) Problems: –Including P&L chemistry in inner loops (Do we need it? What are the consequences?) –How to consistently transfer assimilated concentration to CTM IC –Impact of analysed met data on CTM (P&L) 1. Option: –No chemistry in 4D-VAR inner loops (as currently for Ozone) 2. Option: –Fixed L and P terms from CTM forecast –no impact on CTM except for met data in out loop Does coupler work in 4DVAR (?)

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg CTM-implementation GEMS partners access to ECMWF HPCF –Member state or special project access Source code management for CTM and Coupler –Perforce projects for CTMS and OASIS (license?) Build and scheduling system for CTMs and Coupler –ECMWF build-system for the CTMs Code sharing CTM and IFS –no restriction to the CTM code (?) CTM parallelisation –The CTMs need to be MPI-parallel for efficient coupling OASIS MPI1 mode only on IBM –Model have to run with communicator provided by coupler –Seems to be no problem

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg Status and (short-term) Plans at ECMWF IFS code –CY29r2 based version with 5 GRG prognostic and Aerosol –Identify best position for OASIS4 interfaces (met and chemistry) –Routine for global budget calculation OASIS4 coupler –Playing with code and toy models (local linux environment) –No support of reduced Gaussian grid –MPI2 mode (spawning) not possible –Graphical Interface ready for editing of XML configuration files –Build CTM toy model and couple it to IFS CTM – Implementation –Meeting on technical issues –TM5 and Mozart run at ECMWF HPCF in special project status –Implement CTMs in GEMS environment as soon as code is available

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg Issues CTM-IFS coupling I Technical implementation of coupler –How long will it take to get OASIS4 running with IFS and CTM –CTM efficiency, MPI communication, Coupler efficiency Data to be exchanged –List complete –Grids support (vertical and horizontally) –Spectral or Grid point –Different resolution and orography –Mass conservative interpolation Coupling frequency –High temporal coupling frequency reduces problems (requires efficient coupler)

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg Issues CTM-IFS coupling II –Constant L&P and met-data assumption –Careful analysis of temporal scales of P and L Coupling in data assimilation mode –chemistry modelling in inner loops –Analysed met-data for CTM –Different resolution and orography Different concentration patterns in CTM and IFS (Dislocation problem) –P&L fields dislocated –Chemically consistent CTM analysis –More chemistry in IFS (?) –Using more balanced tracers (NOx, Ox) in IFS

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg END Thank You!