Quality Assurance Program - The Law - 33 USC § 892b. Quality assurance program (a) Definition. For purposes of this section, the term "hydrographic product"

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Making Contract Opportunities and Awards More Transparent Ahmet Arif Sezgin Public Procurement Authority of Turkey Rabat 03 April 2008.
Advertisements

OECD International Futures Programme 1 OECD Futures Project The Commercialisation of Space and the Development of Space Infrastructure: The Role of Public.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
HIPAA Security Presentation to The American Hospital Association Dianne Faup Office of HIPAA Standards November 5, 2003.
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
ICAO Part 139 Review Aerodrome Certification Rule Design Proposal
Effective Contract Management Planning
Agenda Introduction Advisory Circular Changes Consultant Selection Procedures Contract Format and Provisions Methods of Contracting and Allowable Costs.
J Garza Consulting and Associates 1 Pilot Car Escort Certification Model For State Implementation.
Conflict of Interest, Conflict of Commitment, and Outside Activities UTSA HOP 1.33 Non-covered UTSA staff 1.
Introduction to Records Management Policy
1 CDBG Citizen Participation For Grant Administrators.
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the PCT Audit Procedure Background: The Act was passed in November The Act will be fully in force by January.
Chapter 14 Fraud Risk Assessment.
Negotiated Rulemaking – What You Need to Know and How You Can Participate David Bergeron U.S. Department of Education 1.
“Scientifically Based Evaluation Methods” Presented by Paula J. Martin COE Conference, September 13, 2004.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
Overview of New Rules Keith Waye Government Contracting Small Business Administration.
CENTRAL CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION (CAGE CODES) DFARS Case 2003-D040 DFARS Parts 204, 212, 213 and 252 are amended to remove policy on Central Contractor.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
Legislative Rule-Making Process. Three Different Processes Higher Education 29A-3A-1 et seq State Board of Education 29A-3B-1 et seq All other state agencies.
Property and Equipment Disposition Larry Jenkins, BTOP Grants Officer Marianne Eggers, NOAA Grants Management Specialist.
Georgia Airports Association Spring Workshop February 25, 2015 Georgia Department of Transportation FAA Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport.
1 FAA Reform: Congressional Staff Briefing January 24, 1996.
1 Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board. The Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015(MFA) Grants state and local jurisdictions the right to require the collection.
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association December 9, 2005 (revised January 4, 2006)
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
Quality Assurance Program - The Law - 33 USC § 892b. Quality assurance program (a) Definition. For purposes of this section, the term "hydrographic product"
Federal Advisory Committee Act P.L , Oct 6, 1972 FACA Briefing for HSRP Members February 25, 2014 Rear Admiral Gerd F. Glang HSRP, Designated Federal.
The Brooks A&E Act National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration Acquisition & Grants Office January 24, 2006.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
A Review of Board of Health Liability James A. LeNoury LeNoury Law Counsel to alPHa February 5th, 2015.
Adapted from a presentation by Mark Lieu Academic Senate for California Community Colleges - Leadership Institute 2006 Academic Senate for California Community.
FAR Part 2 Definitions of Words and Terms. FAR Scope of part (a)This part – (1) Defines words and terms that are frequently used in the FAR; (2)
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,
1 ENC Encryption/ISO Julia Powell Office of Coast Survey Marine Chart Division.
Regulatory Primer 101 Patrick Kennelly, Chief Food Safety Section California Department of Public Health March 11, 2014.
Jobs Act March 2011  Jobs Bill Updates  Parity  Comp Demo  MAS Set-asides  Misrepresentations  Subcontracting Payments & Plans.
Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act 2002 (PPEA) Joe Damico.
Restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast David Peterson – La. AG’s Office – Asst. Attorney General - AG Designee to CPRA Ken Ortego – Vilar and Elliott.
FAR Part 10 Market Research. FAR Part 10 - Prescribes policies and procedures for conducting Market Research.
Implementing the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 2 Background The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612) requires Federal agencies to— –Consider the.
2.2 Acquisition Methodology. “Acquisition methodology” – the processes employed and the means used to solicit, request, or invite offers that will normally.
Policies and procedures for developing acquisition plans; determining whether to use commercial or Government resources; whether it is more economical.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND REGULATORY AGENCIES © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as.
Office of Governmentwide Policy U.S. General Services Administration Henry Maury – Program Director Travel and Transportation Management Policy (MTT) Office.
The Integrated Coastal and Oceans Observation System Act of 2009: Implementation 2009 IOOS Regional Coordination Workshop Thursday, August 27.
HSRP Review of NOAA’s Mapping and Charting Contracting Strategy Brian Greenawalt, Office of Coast Survey.
Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 1998 with Amendments from 2002 OVERVIEW.
CEQA and the Delta Plan Presentation to Delta Stewardship Council February 24, 2011.
MSRA Implementation Status Update. 2 Implementation Strategy Divide tasks Priority 1 – Due date specified in the Act Priority 2 – Required, but no due.
Kenneth Dodds Director, Office of Policy, Planning & Liaison Small Business Administration April, 2016.
2009 IOOS Regional Coordination Workshop Thursday, August 27
Case C-174/14 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 29 October 2015
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
FAR Part 2 - Definitions of Words and Terms
An Overview of the Small Business Advocacy Review Panel Process
CHAPTER ONE OBJECTIVE AND GOAL
U.S. Coast Guard Regulatory Development
The Rulemaking Process
Demystifying Article 15A – MWBE Requirements
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN LANGUAGE PRACTITIONERS COUNCIL ACT, 2014 (Act No. 8 of 2014) PRESENTED TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION & RECREATION.
Meeting international obligations
Quality Assurance Program - The Law -
What is OAL? The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) ensures that agency regulations are clear, necessary, legally valid, and available to the public. OAL.
A Review of Board of Health Liability
Eligible Agency Administration and Accountability Branch
Presentation transcript:

Quality Assurance Program - The Law - 33 USC § 892b. Quality assurance program (a) Definition. For purposes of this section, the term "hydrographic product" means any publicly or commercially available product produced by a non-Federal entity that includes or displays hydrographic data. (b) Program. (1) In general. The Administrator-- (A) by not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act Amendments of 2002 shall, subject to the availability of appropriations, develop and implement a quality assurance program that is equally available to all applicants, under which the Administrator may certify hydrographic products that satisfy the standards promulgated by the Administrator under section 303(a)(3) of this Act; (B) may authorize the use of the emblem or any trademark of the Administration on a hydrographic product certified under subparagraph (A); and (C) may charge a fee for such certification and use. (2) Limitation on fee amount. Any fee under paragraph (1)(C) shall not exceed the costs of conducting the quality assurance testing, evaluation, or studies necessary to determine whether the hydrographic product satisfies the standards adopted under section 303(a)(3), including the cost of administering such a program. (c) Limitation on liability. The Government of the United States shall not be liable for any negligence by a person that produces hydrographic products certified under this section.

Quality Assurance Program - The Definitions - Hydrographic products – Any publicly or commercially available product produced by a non-Federal entity that includes or displays hydrographic data. Hydrographic data – Information acquired through hydrographic or bathymetric surveying, photogrammetry, geodetic, geospatial, or geomagnetic measurements, tide and current observations, or other methods, that is used in providing hydrographic services. Hydrographic services – Hydrographic services means - the management, maintenance, interpretation, certification, and dissemination of bathymetric, hydrographic, geodetic, geospatial, geomagnetic, and tide and current information, including the production of nautical charts, nautical information databases, and other products derived from hydrographic data; - the development of nautical information systems; and - related activities. Quality Assurance Program – A set of procedures by which hydrographic products are proposed for certification; by which standards and compliance tests are developed, adopted, and applied for those products; and by which certification may awarded or denied. Quality Assurance Program Implementation – The execution of the Quality Assurance Program procedures for specific hydrographic products.

Quality Assurance Program - The Plan - NOAA proposes to fulfill this mandate by establishing procedures under which hydrographic products are: - proposed for certification; - standards are developed and adopted; - compliance tests are developed and adopted; - tested for compliance with the standards; and - certification may awarded or denied. These procedures would be the mandated Quality Assurance Program. The execution of those procedures for specific hydrographic products would be the implementation of the program.

NOAA Quality Assurance and Certification Program Standards Preparation: Via standards body, or NOAA-convened, or NOAA writes. Compliance Test Preparation: Via testing body, or NOAA-convened, or NOAA writes. Filter Testing and Certification Determination Adopt Class Definition Non-federal hydrographic product NOAA proposed hydrographic product Non-federal hydrographic product NOAA proposed hydrographic product (§996.10)(§996.10f)(§996.10d)(§996.11)(§996.11g) (§996.12)(§996.12g)(§996.13) (§996.20) (§ and §996.22) (with regulatory references)

Quality Assurance Program - The Policy - Intention is to stimulate the development of private sector hydrographic products. Open process (anyone can apply, participate in standards and test development, object). Not all proposed products will be accepted into the program. Standards and tests preferably written with standards bodies. Will not certify products for purposes of regulatory carriage requirements. Certification means standards compliance, not fitness for a purpose. In all matters NOAA will act in a manner that maximizes safety.

Quality Assurance Program - Status - - Final rule published January 5, Effective date of program is February 5, Internal meeting held at Coast Survey to examine how to proceed, e.g. - sit quietly and see if anyone applies, or - use for own purposes (legitimatize present actions with Tide Tables), or - aggressively solicit submission of hydrographic products by private sector.

Quality Assurance Program - Potential Issues - - The law is unmanageably broad. It might include: - text messaging delivery of real-time tides. - a database, e.g. Oracle for geodetic data storage. - Captain Jacks hot fishing spots. - an algorithm to manipulate geospatial data, e.g. smoothing. - Request for standards where NOAA has no expertise. - Certification of fitness for a purpose vs. standards-compliance. - Part of a product might be appropriate for a standard while the whole might not be. - A surge of applications at program startup may inundate NOAA. - Residual liability. - There was no appropriation for this purpose.

Quality Assurance Program - Potential Issues - - Unrealistic expectations by private companies, e.g. - what NOAA is willing to certify; - slowness of the process; - no private standards. - Industry may view this as a marketing opportunity rather than an invention stimulator. - Alternatively, industry may view this as government interference in the marketplace. - The market is already saturated with hydrographic products. - Exclusion of regulated carriage-compliance has been an issue. - Lack of manpower to optimally operate the program.

Quality Assurance Program - Conclusion - NOAA will make a good faith effort: - to fulfill the intention of the law, - via an open program, - within its existing constraints, and - with public safety as the foremost concern.