Oral Native Language Assessment in Native American Tribes CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

Subchapter M-Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act Program Part 273-Education Contracts under Johnson-OMalley Act.
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Education Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Request: Summary of Key Provisions.
Bureau of Indian Education
Jefferson Township Public Schools Spring 2009 Testing Analysis Presented to: Jefferson Township Board of Education Presented by: Mary K. Thornton, Ph.D.
Northwest Collaboration Against Sexual Assault in Tribal Communities A collaborative project of the Oregon Sexual Assault Task Force and the Northwest.
1 The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Financial Impact on Manchester Public Schools Fiscal Year
BIE Flexibility Request Summary of Key Provisions Bureau of Indian Education U.S. Department of the Interior.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
American Indian Studies & Wisconsin Act 31. What is Wisconsin Act 31? The biennial budget bill addressed several educational needs and included.
Getting CONNECT-ED in Montgomery Township Presentation of Learning Amy Wish Kari McGann JoAnn Zisa June 30, 2011.
English Language Arts Ewing Township Public Schools July 2010.
1994 and 1862 Land Grant Institutions Working Together to Address IPM Issues on Tribal Lands Virgil Dupuis, George Godfrey, John Phillips and Susan Ratcliffe.
BIE Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress
Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
Alaska School Leaders Institute Moving Toward Implementation of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards.
Group Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of consistent.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Bureau of Indian Education Updates Tribal Interior Budget Council Meeting August 5, 2015 – Albuquerque, NM Presented by Dr. Monty Roessel, Director.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
 K-12 Principal Internship and Competency Summary Aaron Freed K-12 Principal Licensure Candidate Bethel University.
FNSSP Presentation Sioux Lookout February 3, 2010.
ACCESS for ELLs® Interpreting the Results Developed by the WIDA Consortium.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
How To Have An Effective Indian Parent Committee For Your School District.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Including Quality Assurance Within The Theory of Action Presented to: CCSSO 2012 National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012.
June 081 Competent Learner Model Overview. June 082 Today you will learn… What is the CLM What is the goal of the CLM What are the foundations of the.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Chicago Public Schools Science Perspective DR. JOHN F. LOEHR, ACTING SCIENCE DIRECTOR CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS OFFICE OF TEACHING & LEARNING - SCIENCE A.
June 081 Competent Learner Model Overview. June 082 Today you will learn… What is the CLM What is the goal of the CLM What are the foundations of the.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Mississippi e-Learning for Educators: Reaching Teachers Across the State.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting Bardmoor Elementary.
Scaling Integration: A Vision for Collaboration across the SLV BOCES Curtis Garcia.
LANSING, MI APRIL 11, 2011 Title IIA(3) Technical Assistance #2.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Using Adequate Resources to Double Student Performance Sarah Archibald Allan Odden CPRE Invitational Conference February 21, 2007.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
Professional Learning Informational Update.
State Advisory Council Community Support Grant Summary Presentation for Policy Committee Meeting December 3, 2012.
Utah American Indian Housing Council Market Analysis Project.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Barnes Elementary School Literacy Improvement Plan by Christa Dern & Jocelyn Kluth.
Building an Interim Assessment System: A Workbook for School Districts CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, MI June 22, 2010.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Ronald J. Tomalis, Secretary of EducationCarolyn.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Transition to the Common Core LVUSD. The Challenge The Common Core curriculum itself will not look radically different from the lessons teachers.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March (Excerpted version.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Bureau of Indian Education Tribal Interior Budget Council
A Tribal Language Program
English Language Arts Update
Indistar Summit, Biloxi Mississippi February 29, 2012
Study Questions To what extent do English language learners have opportunity to learn the subject content specified in state academic standards and.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Recruitment & Retention Committee Update Job & Task Analysis Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Oral Native Language Assessment in Native American Tribes CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012

Organizations Involved Bureau of Indian Education – The Bureau of Indian Education serves over 42,000 First American students, in Bureau-funded elementary and secondary schools located in 23 states across America. There are 184 BIE schools, 125 of which are tribally operated under BIE contracts or grants service Measured Progress – Measured Progress served as the primary point of contact for the BIE and for Tribes, provided overall management of the program and budget, and delivered professional development workshops Second Language Testing, Inc. – SLTI collaborated as sub-contractor, provided expertise on the development of oral language test design and item development, delivered professional development workshops Native American Tribes – Eight Tribes actively participated in this project, and an additional eight Tribes participated in professional development workshops.

Scope of Work Timeline: September, March, 2012 Provide technical assistance to Tribes wishing to waive part or all of the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) definition found within the Accountability Workbook of the state in which the school is located, per provisions written into NCLB. Specifically, our task was to provide technical assistance to Tribes in the development of oral native language assessments as an alternative definition of AYP.

Refinement of Scope A task list was developed to specify the types of activities that MP/SLTI could undertake within the scope of the contract. The tasks were divided into three categories: Technical Assistance: Evaluation of Program, Alignment/Bias Review of Standards, Development of Formative/Summative Assessments, Scale Development & Scoring, Psychometric analysis Professional Development: Assessment 101, Training Test Administrators and Raters, Best Practices for Instruction and Assessment Dissemination of Information: Provide Research on the Assessment of Indigenous Languages Around the World, Research and Arrange for Tribal Members to Attend Relevant Conferences, Meetings and Presentations.

Working with Tribes We began work by holding committee meetings with the Navajo, OSEC, and Miccosukee Tribes to learn about each of their language revitalization and assessment programs, to share information about our contract with the BIE, and to discuss ways in which we could provide assistance to them At project start, focus was primarily on addressing the needs of these three groups To expand the project, the BIE offered our services to all interested Tribes and Tribal schools, leading to the inclusion of the Choctaw, Cherokee, Laguna Pueblo, Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe, and Yakima Tribes.

All Participating Tribes Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwe Laguna Pueblo Tribe Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin Mescalero Apache Tribe Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians Navajo Nation Northern Arapaho Tribe Oceti Sakowin Education Consortium (OSEC) Member Schools Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa/Meskwaki Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Wahelut School Yakima Indian Nation

Process Visit Tribe: Meet assessment program administrators, policy makers, committee members, teachers, and other stakeholders. Perform Needs Assessment: Discuss status of Tribe’s native language program, review standards, curriculum, and supporting materials, conduct classroom observations. Execute Activities: Identify goals of language program, schedule tasks and resources to support tribe. Conduct ongoing meetings to discuss work being performed. Disseminate relevant program information and deliverables.

WORK PERFORMED NavajoOSECMiccosukeeChoctawCherokeeOjibweYakama Laguna Pueblo Assessment 101 Workshops: Test Dev & Design, Standards, Alignment/DOK, Student Data Management, Administration, Psychometrics, Reporting XXX Professional Development: BIE Language Institute, Lesson Planning, Communication-Based Instruction, Immersion Instruction, Rubric Creation, Classroom Mgmt/Best Practices, Oral Language Assmt Models, Project-Based Learning XXXXXXXX Curriculum/Standards/Item Development Workshops XXXXX Standards Alignment Workshops XXX Test Administration Workshops X Benchmarking/Scoring Training Workshops X Develop Tests/Materials: Items, Graphics, Sample Assessment Tasks, Oral Language Dialogues, Trad. Storytelling Media XXXXXX Literature Review: Assessment of Indigenous Languages, Int’l XXXXXXXX

Next Steps BIE: – Delivered Alternative AYP/Common Core Workshops at Summer Institute in Denver, CO, June 2012 Navajo: – The DODE is interested in discussing assessment development for Oral Native Language program. OSEC: – Possible Psychometric activities related to Oral Native Language Assessment for OSEC member schools for 6111 Alternative AYP grant offered by BIE. Choctaw: – Will assist Tribe with completing the alignment of Choctaw Language Learning Standards for pre K through 3 rd grade and provide additional training opportunities for teachers. Miccosukee – Currently developing content for an Oral Native Language Assessment.

Locations of Tribes

Phil Robakiewicz, PhD Measured Progress Director, Client Services John Farias Measured Progress Program Manager Leslie Harper Niigaane School Director, Niigaane Ojibwemowin Immersion Charles Stansfield, PhD Second Language Testing, Inc. President Maureen Lesky, PhD Bureau of Indian Education Education Research Analyst