Mapping populations Controlled crosses between two parents –two alleles/locus, gene frequencies = 0.5 –gametic phase disequilibrium is due to linkage,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning breeding programs for impact
Advertisements

Why do non-Mendelian patterns occur? (When to decide whether it is “Mendelian” or “non- Mendelian”)
Qualitative and Quantitative traits
Linkage genes and genetic recombination
Concepts and Connections
Patterns of Inheritance: Mendelian Genetics Chapter 11 Biology 1010.
Lecture 3: Jan. 25 Transmission genetics: independent assortment Human pedigrees.
Dr. Madhumita Bhattacharjee Assiatant Professor Botany Deptt. P.G.G.C.G. -11,Chandigarh.
6- GENE LINKAGE AND GENETIC MAPPING Compiled by Siti Sarah Jumali Level 3 Room 14 Ext 2123.
Linkage Analysis: An Introduction Pak Sham Twin Workshop 2001.
LINKAGE ANALYSIS.
Chapter 2: Hardy-Weinberg Gene frequency Genotype frequency Gene counting method Square root method Hardy-Weinberg low Sex-linked inheritance Linkage and.
Joint Linkage and Linkage Disequilibrium Mapping
Genetics I. Introduction A. History 1. C. Darwin & A. Wallace  blending 2. G. Mendel & F. Unger  mixing 3. W. Sutton  Chromosomal theory of Inheritance.
QTL Mapping R. M. Sundaram.
Chi Square Analyses: Comparing Frequency Distributions.
Quantitative Genetics Theoretical justification Estimation of heritability –Family studies –Response to selection –Inbred strain comparisons Quantitative.
31 January, 2 February, 2005 Chapter 6 Genetic Recombination in Eukaryotes Linkage and genetic diversity.
Linkage Disequilibrium Granovsky Ilana and Berliner Yaniv Computational Genetics
Genetic Recombination in Eukaryotes
Observing Patterns in Inherited Traits
11.4 Hardy-Wineberg Equilibrium. Equation - used to predict genotype frequencies in a population Predicted genotype frequencies are compared with Actual.
Chi-Squared Test.
Lecture 5: Segregation Analysis I Date: 9/10/02  Counting number of genotypes, mating types  Segregation analysis: dominant, codominant, estimating segregation.
Methods of Genome Mapping linkage maps, physical maps, QTL analysis The focus of the course should be on analytical (bioinformatic) tools for genome mapping,
DATA ANALYSIS Module Code: CA660 Lecture Block 4.
HARDY-WEINBERG EQUILIBRIUM
Genetic Mapping Oregon Wolfe Barley Map (Szucs et al., The Plant Genome 2, )
Chi-Square as a Statistical Test Chi-square test: an inferential statistics technique designed to test for significant relationships between two variables.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Genetics: From Genotype to Phenotype.
Lecture 19: Association Studies II Date: 10/29/02  Finish case-control  TDT  Relative Risk.
 Linked Genes Learning Objective DOT Point: predict the difference in inheritance patterns if two genes are linked Sunday, June 05,
Experimental Design and Data Structure Supplement to Lecture 8 Fall
Quantitative Genetics. Continuous phenotypic variation within populations- not discrete characters Phenotypic variation due to both genetic and environmental.
Quantitative Genetics
Lecture 13: Linkage Analysis VI Date: 10/08/02  Complex models  Pedigrees  Elston-Stewart Algorithm  Lander-Green Algorithm.
Tutorial #10 by Ma’ayan Fishelson. Classical Method of Linkage Analysis The classical method was parametric linkage analysis  the Lod-score method. This.
1 B-b B-B B-b b-b Lecture 2 - Segregation Analysis 1/15/04 Biomath 207B / Biostat 237 / HG 207B.
Lecture 3: Statistics Review I Date: 9/3/02  Distributions  Likelihood  Hypothesis tests.
Who was Mendel? Mendel – first to gather evidence of patterns by which parents transmit genes to offspring.
Lecture 22: Quantitative Traits II
Chapter 7 Outline 7.1 Linked Genes Do Not Assort Independently, Linked Genes Segregate Together, and Crossing Over Produces Recombination between.
Chapter 22 - Quantitative genetics: Traits with a continuous distribution of phenotypes are called continuous traits (e.g., height, weight, growth rate,
Applied Epidemiologic Analysis - P8400 Fall 2002 Lab 3 Type I, II Error, Sample Size, and Power Henian Chen, M.D., Ph.D.
1 Genetic Mapping Establishing relative positions of genes along chromosomes using recombination frequencies Enables location of important disease genes.
Types of genome maps Physical – based on bp Genetic/ linkage – based on recombination from Thomas Hunt Morgan's 1916 ''A Critique of the Theory of Evolution'',
Did Mendel fake is data? Do a quick internet search and can you find opinions that support or reject this point of view. Does it matter? Should it matter?
I. Allelic, Genic, and Environmental Interactions
The Chi Square Test A statistical method used to determine goodness of fit Chi-square requires no assumptions about the shape of the population distribution.
MULTIPLE GENES AND QUANTITATIVE TRAITS
Genetic Linkage.
OUTLINE 15 E. Violation of independent assortment
Gene Mapping in Eukaryotes
Recombination (Crossing Over)
Genetics I. Introduction A. History
And Yet more Inheritance
MULTIPLE GENES AND QUANTITATIVE TRAITS
Linkage, Recombination, and Eukaryotic Gene Mapping
Linkage, Recombination, and Eukaryotic Gene Mapping
Chi-Square Analysis.
Concept 14.2: The laws of probability govern Mendelian inheritance
Genetic Mapping Linked Genes.
Lecture 9: QTL Mapping II: Outbred Populations
Linkage Analysis Problems
LECTURE 5: LINKAGE.
Chapter 12 Mendel’s Genetics
10.2 Inheritance Skills: Calculation of the predicted genotypic and phenotypic ratio of offspring of dihybrid crosses involving unlinked autosomal genes.
OUTLINE 15 E. Violation of independent assortment
Presentation transcript:

Mapping populations Controlled crosses between two parents –two alleles/locus, gene frequencies = 0.5 –gametic phase disequilibrium is due to linkage, not other causes Examples –Backcross (BC 1 or BC 2 ) –F 2 or F 2:3 –Recombinant inbred lines (RIL) –Doubled haploid (DH)

Recombinant Inbred Lines (RILs)

GenerationAAAaaa F10100%0 F225%50%25% F337.5%25%37.5% F443.75%12.5%43.75% F %6.25%46.875% F %3.125% % F1049.9%0.2%49.9% A (1/2) a (1/2) A (1/2) AA (1/4) Aa (1/4) a (1/2) aA (1/4) Aa (1/4) ♀ ♂

expected frequency r = 0r = Recombinant Inbred Lines (RILs)

R R R R RILs

Doubled Haploids

expected frequency r = 0r = Doubled Haploids (DHs)

DOUBLED HAPLOIDS RR R R RR R R R R

F2 Population

Expected Genotypic Frequencies for F 2 Progeny when r = 0 or r = 0.5 Between Two Loci in Coupling (AB/ab) Configuration GenotypeExpected Frequency r = 0r = 0.5 AB/ABp 1 = 0.25(1 - r) 2 1/4 = 0.251/16 = AB/aBp 2 = 0.50r(1 - r) 0.02/16 = AB/Abp 3 = 0.50r(1 - r) 0.02/16 = AB/abp 4 = 0.50(1 - r) 2 1/2 = 0.52/16 = Ab/aBp 5 = 0.50r /16 = Ab/Abp 6 = 0.25r /16 = Ab/abp 7 = 0.50r(1 - r) 0.02/16 = aB/aBp 8 = 0.25r /16 = aB/abp 9 = 0.50r(1 - r) 0.02/16 = ab/abp 10 = 0.25(1 - r) 2 1/4 = 0.251/16 =

Expected and Observed Genotypic Frequencies Coupling (AB/ab) and Repulsion (Ab/aB) F 2 Progeny GenotypeObserved Frequency CouplingRepulsion AB/ABp1p1 p 1 = 0.25(1 - r) 2 p 1 = 0.25r 2 AB/aBp2p2 p 2 = 0.50r(1 - r) AB/Abp3p3 p 3 = 0.50r(1 - r) AB/abp4p4 p 4 = 0.50(1 - r) 2 p 4 = 0.50r 2 Ab/aBp5p5 p 5 = 0.50r 2 p 5 = 0.50(1 – r) 2 Ab/Abp6p6 p 6 = 0.25r 2 p 6 = 0.25(1 – r) 2 Ab/abp7p7 p 7 = 0.50r(1 - r) aB/aBp8p8 p 8 = 0.25r 2 p 8 = 0.25(1 – r) 2 aB/abp9p9 p 9 = 0.50r(1 - r) ab/abp 10 p 10 = 0.25(1 - r) 2 p 10 = 0.25r 2 Co-dominant Fully classified double hets. Locus A = A and a Locus B = B and b r = recombination frequency between locus A and B

Expected and Observed Genotypic Frequencies Coupling (AB/ab) F 2 Progeny GenotypeObserved Frequency Coupling AB/ABq1q1 q 1 = 0.25(1 - r) 2 AB/aBq2q2 q 2 = 0.50r(1 - r) AB/Abq3q3 q 3 = 0.50r(1 - r) AB/ab + Ab/aBq4q4 q 4 = p 4 + p 5 = 0.50[(1 - r) 2 +r 2 ] Ab/Abq5q5 q 5 = 0.25r 2 Ab/abq6q6 q 6 = 0.50r(1 - r) aB/aBq7q7 q 7 = 0.25r 2 aB/abq8q8 q 8 = 0.50r(1 - r) ab/abq9q9 q 9 = 0.25(1 - r) 2 Co-dominant Unclassified double heterozygotes Locus A = A and a Locus B = B and b r = recombination frequency between locus A and B

Expected and Observed Genotypic Frequencies Coupling (AB/ab) and Repulsion (Ab/aB) F 2 Progeny GenotypeObserved Frequency CouplingRepulsion A_B_f1f1 f 1 = 0.25(3 - 2r + r 2 )f 1 = 0.25(2 + r 2 ) A_bbf2f2 f 2 = 0.25(2r – r 2 )f 2 = 0.25(1 – r 2 ) aaB_f3f3 f 3 = 0.25(2r – r 2 )f 3 = 0.25(1 – r 2 ) aabbf4f4 f 4 = 0.25(1 - r) 2 f 4 = 0.25r 2 Dominant Locus A = A and a Locus B = B and b r = recombination frequency between locus A and B

Analysis 1.Single-locus analysis 2.Two-locus analysis 3.Detecting linkage and grouping 4.Ordering loci 5.Multi-point analysis

Mendelian Genetic Analysis Phenotypic and Genotypic Distributions The expected segregation ratio of a gene is a function of the transmission probabilities If a gene produces a discrete phenotypic distribution, then an intrinsic hypothesis can be formulated to test whether the gene produces a phenotypic distribution consistent with a expected segregation ratio of the gene The heritability of a phenotypic trait that produces a Mendelian phenotypic distribution is ~1.0. Such traits are said to be fully penetrant The heritability of a DNA marker is theoretically ~1.0; however, it is affected by genotyping errors

Mendelian Genetic Analysis Hypothesis Tests The expected segregation ratio (null hypothesis) is specified on the basis of the observed phenotypic or genotypic distribution One-way tests are performed to test for normal segregation of individual phenotypic or DNA markers –If the observed segregation ratio does not fit the expected segregation ratio, then the null hypothesis is rejected. The expected segregation ratio is incorrect Selection may have operated on the locus The locus may not be fully penetrant A Type I error has been committed

Mendelian Genetic Analysis Hypothesis Tests Two-way tests are performed to test for independent assortment (null hypothesis - no linkage) between two phenotypic or DNA markers. –If two genes do not sort independently, then the null hypothesis is rejected The two genes are linked (r < 0.50) The expected segregation ratio is incorrect A Type I error has been committed.

Mendelian Genetics Analysis Null Hypothesis AcceptReject True No error 1 -  Type I error  False positive False Type II error  False negative No error 1 - 

One-way or single-locus tests   statistics Log likelihood ratio statistics (G-statistics) i = i th genotype (or allele, or phenotype) Pr[  2 >  2 df ] =  Pr[G >  2 df ] =  Goodness of fit statistics

One-way or single-locus tests GenotypeSample ASample BTotal aa Aa Total Two backcross populations (A and B) genotyped for a co-dominant marker (Brandt and Knapp 1993) Null hypothesis 1:1 ratio of aa to Aa Pr[G A >  2 k-1 ] = Pr[14.8 >  2 1 ] = Pr[G B >  2 k-1 ] = Pr[6.88 >  2 1 ] = Null hypothesis is rejected for both samples Individual G-statistics for samples A and B i = i th genotype k = 2 genotypic classes

One-way or single-locus tests GenotypeSample ASample BTotal aa Aa Total Two backcross populations (A and B) genotyped for a co-dominant marker (Brandt and Knapp 1993) Null hypothesis 1aa to 1Aa ratio for pooled samples Pr[G P >  2 k-1 ] = Pr[20.7 >  2 1 ] = Null hypothesis is rejected Pooled G-statistic across samples i = i th genotype j = j th sample k = genotypic classes p = No. of samples (populations)

One-way or single-locus tests GenotypeSample ASample BTotal aa Aa Total Two backcross populations (A and B) genotyped for a co- dominant marker (Brandt and Knapp 1993) Null hypothesis Samples A and B are homogenous Pr[G H >  2 (k-1)(p-1) ] = Pr[0.94 >  2 1 ] = 0.33 (N.S.) The heterogeneity G-statistic is i = i th genotype j = j th sample (population) k = genotypic classes p = No. of samples (populations) n = Total No. of observations

One-way or single-locus tests Pr[G T >  2 p(k-1) ] = Pr[21.7 >  2 2 ] = SourceGdfPr > G Sample A14.7k-1 = 2-1 = Sample B6.9k-1 = 2-1 = Total21.6p(k-1) = 2(2-1) = Pooled20.7k-1 = 2-1 = Heterogeneity0.9(k-1)(p-1) = (2-1)(2-1) = Total21.6p(k-1) = 2(2-1) = Relationship between G statistics k = genotypic classes p = No. of samples (populations)

One-way or single-locus tests Allelic constitutionGenotypeObservedExpected 120bp /120bpaa bp /124bpAa bp /124bpAA Total94 F 2 progeny of Ae. cylindrica genotyped for the SSR marker barc98. Null hypothesis 1:2:1 ratio of aa:Aa:AA Pr[G >  2 k-1 ] = Pr[1.67 >  2 2 ] = Null hypothesis is not rejected Individual G-statistics for samples A and B i = i th genotype k = 3 genotypic classes

Calculating probability values for Chi-square distributions SAS program data pv; Input x df; datalines; ; data pvalue; set pv; pvalue = 1 – probchi (x, df); output; proc print; run; Output Obs x df pvalue Excel formula =CHIDIST(x, degrees_fredom) =CHIDIST(3.75, 2) Output