Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 SLC-Off Gap Filled Product Generation Richard Irish SSAI, NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Agency Report, WGISS #22 September 15, 2006 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological Survey Center for Earth.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Agency Report, WGISS #24 October 19, 2007 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological Survey Center for Earth.
Change Detection. Digital Change Detection Biophysical materials and human-made features are dynamic, changing rapidly. It is believed that land-use/land-cover.
Major Operations of Digital Image Processing (DIP) Image Quality Assessment Radiometric Correction Geometric Correction Image Classification Introduction.
Resolution Resolving power Measuring of the ability of a sensor to distinguish between signals that are spatially near or spectrally similar.
Radiometric and Geometric Errors
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Correction of Geometric Distortions in Line Scanner Imagery Peter Kopacz Dr. John Schott Bryce Nordgren Scott.
History and Features of Landsat 7 By: Andy Vogelsberg Photo of Landsat 7 taken from tures/litho/landsat/land.jpg.
Graphics Output Primitives Pixel Addressing and Fill Area Dr. M. Al-Mulhem Feb. 1, 2008.
Previously Two view geometry: epipolar geometry Stereo vision: 3D reconstruction epipolar lines Baseline O O’ epipolar plane.
Satellite Thermal Remote Sensing of Boiling Springs Lake Jeff Pedelty NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Goddard Center for Astrobiology.
CSE 219 COMPUTER SCIENCE III PROPERTIES OF HIGH QUALITY SOFTWARE.
A Pattern Matching Method for Finding Noun and Proper Noun Translations from Noisy Parallel Corpora Benjamin Arai Computer Science and Engineering Department.
Spectral contrast enhancement
Geography 121 Lab #4 Finding Landsat Data November 8, 2006 Dave Alleman Pat Clancy Sarah Gustafson.
Lesson №2. is the unique activity that has a beginning and an end time, aimed at achieving a predetermined result/goal, the creation of a specific, unique.
SSFS Test Plan/Report Overview of the test cases What “success” means for a data format type test How the tests were conducted Key results and conclusions.
Testing. Definition From the dictionary- the means by which the presence, quality, or genuineness of anything is determined; a means of trial. For software.
Implementation Yaodong Bi. Introduction to Implementation Purposes of Implementation – Plan the system integrations required in each iteration – Distribute.
1ESDIS HDF-EOS Workshop IV Landover, Maryland, September 20, 2000 The Landsat 7 Processing System ( LPS ) Level Zero-R Science Products Michael R. Reid.
Introduction to Remote Sensing. Outline What is remote sensing? The electromagnetic spectrum (EMS) The four resolutions Image Classification Incorporation.
WRF Domain Wizard A tool for the WRF Preprocessing System Jeff Smith Paula McCaslin July 17, 2008.
USGS Report U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Kristi Kline USGS EROS Center.
A METHODOLOGY TO SELECT PHENOLOGICALLY SUITABLE LANDSAT SCENES FOR FOREST CHANGE DETECTION IGARSS 2011, Jul, 27, 2011 Do-Hyung Kim, Raghuram Narashiman,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geometric Assessment of Remote Sensed Data Oct Presented By: Michael Choate, SAIC U.S.
Filling in the gaps in Landsat 7 data Northwest GIS Users Group Conference Boise, Idaho, October 19 – 21, 2011 William J. Kramber Idaho Department of Water.
1 Pecora 18 Forty Years of Earth Observations… Understanding a Changing World November 16, 2011 (A little dated, but still relevant) Presented By: Eugene.
U.S. Geological Survey EROS Data Center Landsat Program Archive Advisory Committee Meeting October 2004 Attachment D Landsat Status Briefing: ETM+
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Mid Decadal Global Land Survey Project briefing to the ScanEx RDC 3 rd International Conference,
Remote sensing and in situ measurements in the Global Earth Observing System of Systems Curtis Woodcock, Boston University.
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science © Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial use with attribution.
Landsat Studying the Earth from Space Ratko Jagodic University of Illinois at Chicago.
Event Data History David Adams BNL Atlas Software Week December 2001.
Remote Sensing Realities | June 2008 Remote Sensing Realities.
LANDSAT Program Update
Radiometric Correction and Image Enhancement Modifying digital numbers.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS/EROS WCS Experience and Ideas for Landsat Data Access WGISS #27 May, 2009 Toulouse, France.
Lecture 3 The Digital Image – Part I - Single Channel Data 12 September
Remote Sensing Data Acquisition. 1. Major Remote Sensing Systems.
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
NSLRSDA Science Team Samuel N. Goward ACC III 19 April 2006.
14 ARM Science Team Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, March 21-26, 2004 Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada Natural.
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
GEOG 121 Project 4: Finding Landsat Data Presented by: Dan LaSota Greg Stricker Weiqiang Lin.
VIIRS Product Evaluation at the Ocean PEATE Frederick S. Patt Gene C. Feldman IGARSS 2010 July 27, 2010.
August 2003 At A Glance The IRC is a platform independent, extensible, and adaptive framework that provides robust, interactive, and distributed control.
Change Detection Goal: Use remote sensing to detect change on a landscape over time.
1 Test Coverage Coverage can be based on: –source code –object code –model –control flow graph –(extended) finite state machines –data flow graph –requirements.
IGETT Learning Unit Lessons Learned or... OH, NOW I GETT IT! Tora Johnson UMaine at Machias GIS Lab & Service Center.
1 Status Report on GEO Task AR Advocate continuity for moderate-resolution satellite remote sensing, including support for a Landsat follow-on mission.
The Derivation of Snow-Cover "Normals" Over the Canadian Prairies from Passive Microwave Satellite Imagery Joseph M. Piwowar Laura E. Chasmer Waterloo.
OPERATING SYSTEMS (OS) By the end of this lesson you will be able to explain: 1. What an OS is 2. The relationship between the OS & application programs.
IISME Fellowship Lockheed Martin Space Systems Summer 2010 SBIRS Space Based Infrared System GEO-1 satellite All pictures are from google.
Geog 121 Project 4: Finding LandSat Data
Jakobshavn Isbrae Glacial Retreat
Development Environment
Protecting Memory What is there to protect in memory?
LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION WITH THE IMPACT TOOL
Monitoraggio Geodetico e Telerilevamento 3 Remote Sensing Images
Digital Data Format and Storage
Dr Samantha Lavender and Davide Mainas,
Active Data Management in Space 20m DG
USGS Status Frank Kelly, USGS EROS CEOS Plenary 2017 Agenda Item #4.14
Ch > 28.4.
Geography 121 Lab #4 Finding Landsat Data
Introduction to Programming
Introduction to javadoc
Geog 121 Project 4: Finding LandSat Data
Introduction to Programming
Presentation transcript:

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 SLC-Off Gap Filled Product Generation Richard Irish SSAI, NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Pat Scaramuzza SAIC, Center for Earth Observations and Science (EROS)

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 Scan Line Corrector Failure On May 31, 2003, Landsat 7 experienced an anomaly causing the Scan Line Corrector (SLC) to stop functioning normally. The telescope focuses energy onto a pair of motion compensation mirrors (i.e. SLC) where it is redirected to the focal planes and accounts for the compound effect of along-track orbital motion and cross-track scanning which leads to significant overlap and underlap in ground coverage between successive scans. While missing data is lost, it was possible to modify existing algorithms to produce imagery containing roughly 80% of the expected scene. The processed post-anomaly data continues to maintain its expected radiometric and geometric fidelity.

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 Scan Line Corrector

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 SLC-off Archive Potential Landsat 5 has outlived its design life by an astounding 22 years yet its demise will likely precede that of Landsat 7. Over 660,000 SLC-off scenes have been acquired, archived, and are available for free. Many uniquely represent the only recent Landsat observations over foreign soil. The goal of the algorithm presented here is to tap the value represented by the SLC-off archive by filling missing pixels with radiometry that has scientific purpose. With a LDCM (Landsat - 8) scheduled for a late 2012 launch, there maybe no choice.

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 Algorithm Description Step 1 - Scene Reframing (reframe_l1t.pro) Step 2 - Gap Filling (gap_fill.pro) Although, the standard ETM+ L1T product is geo-located and Orthonormalized, scenes for common path/rows are not necessarily aligned. Scene reframing (using the GeoTIFF header) establishes a common frame and achieves registration through translation. Common neighorhood pixels (non-zero) are identified for each primary scene pixel gap and its fill scenes counterparts. Linear least-squares regression analysis, using 144 data points yields the predictive equation used for filling.

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 Adaptive Window Logic Anchor sceneFill scene 1Common pixels = 4 Anchor scene Fill scene 1 Common pixels = 12 = gap= valid data

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 Predicter Relationship Developed

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 Frame_and_fill The primary goal of this endeavor was to create freeware so anyone with a desire could take greater advantage of the ETM+ SLC-off archive. Unfotunately, reframe_l1t.pro and gap_fill.pro require an IDL license to run. Fortunately, ITT provides a Virtual Machine a mechanism for creating standalone applications called runtime distrubutions. The only penalty is an ITT splash screen at program launch. Creating a runtime distribution required learning the IDL GUI language, a treat, and creating a solitary application called frame_and_fill. Currently versions exist for Windows - 32 and Mac PPC. Plans are to make additional versions for Mac Int (32, 64 bit), Windows-64, Linux and Solaris (32 and 64 bit).

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 Frame_and_fill Data Staging Rules The primary scene to be filled is termed the anchor scene. It MUST reside in a folder named anchor for the software to work. The filler scenes reside in separate folders at the same directory level as the anchor folder. They are so named fill_scene_1, fill_scene_2... to reflect their processing priority. These folder naming conventions must be followed for the software to work.

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 Frame_and_fill Opening Window Note: Frame_and_fill will work on all L1T GeoTIFF formatted Products available from EROS (i.e. Landsat 5, L7 SLC-on). Also, if you’ve previously framed your scenes you bypass the re-frame step.

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 Reframe_L1T Parameters

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 Gap Fill Parameters

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 Frame_and_fill expects the EROS file naming conventions for the input L1T scenes and won't work if these are altered. A typical file name for band one will appear as: L _ _B10.TIF. After re-framing the new band one file name will be: L _ _B10_reg.TIF After gap filling the final band one file name will appear as: L _ _B10_reg_filled.TIF Output band files are GeoTIFF formatted. Additionally, processing results text files are produced. File Naming Conventions

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 Path 190, Row 52 acquired on 1/20/08 in Western Nigeria. ETM+ Sub-scene Anchor

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 ETM+ Fill Sub-Scene #1 Path 190, Row 52 acquired on 2/22/08 in Western Nigeria.

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 ETM+ Fill Sub-Scene #2 Path 190, Row 52 acquired on 3/08/08 in Western Nigeria.

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 ETM+ Filled Sub-Scene Path 190, Row 52 acquired on 2/22/08 in Western Nigeria.

Remote Sensing Basics | June 14-20, 2009 SLC-off Scene Selection Criteria If possible, fill scenes should be cloud-free with minimal changes In scene content (e.g. snow). Choose fill scenes that are temporally close to the anchor to minimize changing ground cover. A second choice would be anniversary scenes where scene content is similar. Select fill scenes that are within ± 4 WRS cycles of the anchor. The ETM+ scan cycle changes slowly over time meaning the relative scan gap phase will vary across the scene if the acquisition date interval Is too great. What appears to be a perfect match may not be. One might consider using an SLC-on scene as the final fill component. This will ensure complete gap coverage.