The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Strategic Interventions for English Learners Long Beach Unified School District Chris Dominguez, Deputy Superintendent Pamela Seki, Director, Program Assistance.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
A NEW MODEL OF TIERED INTERVENTION REQUIRED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT AS OF JULY 1, PRESENTED BY JESS GRAYUM Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… A process for achieving higher levels of academic and behavioral success for all students through: High.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention This ppt is an adaptation of a specific PISD Training on RTI, The Educational Testing and.
Maintaining & Sustaining Fidelity of Implementation in Your RtI System Maintaining & Sustaining Fidelity of Implementation in Your RtI System The Wisconsin.
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Getting Started with RTI School-wide Assessment Tool for an RTI Model.
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
As Services and Not a Place Quality IEPs + Tiered Interventions and Supports.
Progress Monitoring and Action Planning Using the Team Implementation Checklist The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Clarifying Retreat.
How It’s Being Done in Burlington Public Schools! Susan Astone Ellen Johnson John Lyons Deborah Dressler Dr. Eric Conti Superintendent of Burlington Public.
TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal(s) Objectives & Actions.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The RTI² framework allows for an integrated, seamless problem-solving model that addresses individual student need.  This.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
1 CSIP: Clarifying Retreat June TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal Staff Development Objectives.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
Dig Deeper About this Key Feature. School-wide Process for Responding to Student Needs CULTURAL COMPETENCE COLLABORATION Multiple times throughout each.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
D62 Response to Intervention
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
ILP Intervention Plans Tutorial. Intervention Plans in the ILP The Intervention Plan module was added to the ILP in May 2009 to meet requirements of SB.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
2015 WI PBIS Conference A5. Benchmark of Quality – Implementation Plan Dave Kunelius - WI RtI Center Regional Coordinator-PBIS.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
What does an effective secondary school look like and sound like?
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
District Response to Instruction and Intervention Reflection and Planning.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
DPI Javits Grant: Expanding Excellence Initiative State Leadership Cadre March 2016.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Creating and Sustaining Selected and Intensive Levels of Support
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Presentation transcript:

The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation and for the continued support of this federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material. Select Interventions and Additional Challenges About this Key Feature

School-wide Process for Responding to Student Needs CULTURAL COMPETENCE COLLABORATION Multiple times throughout each school year… Screen students and organize data Review data and set goals Dig Deeper Match Supports to Needs Monitor Progress and Adjust Accordingly WHILE DEMONSTRATING ACCOMPLISH THROUGH Outcomes Screening measures Progress monitoring measures Decision rules and protocols Interventions and Additional Challenges Before collecting data, first establish… Then, at the start of each school year... Plan Logistics At least annually… Evaluate and Refine the Process

Our vision: All Wisconsin students will learn and be successful in life.. Our mission: To build the capacity of Wisconsin schools to develop and sustain a culturally responsive multi-level system of support to ensure the success for all students.. Wisconsin RtI Center

The Select Interventions and Additional Challenges module shows how schools with a coordinated continuum of supports can proactively leverage their strengths, strategies, and resources for the benefit of students. Included in this module is a guided process for developing a continuum of supports while considering state mandates, existing staff and resources, and prioritized student needs.

“ A criterion for schools that have made great strides in achievement and equity is immediate and decisive intervention…Successful schools do not give a second thought to providing preventative assistance for students in need.” -Doug Reeves, 2006

Begin with a strong, high quality foundational level. With each level of support, increase intensity.

A strong core is necessary, but not sufficient

Multi-Level System of Support

From Fragmented Services…

Universal Level SWD Advanced Learners Title l ELL Fragmented Services Can Lead to: gaps, pockets of isolated practices, inefficiencies in supports, untapped strengths and resources Amount of Resources Needed to Support Students Intensity of Need

Bridging the Gap General + Intensive Resources General Resources Intensity of Need Amount of Resources Needed to Support Students General + Supplemental Resources ……to a Coordinated System of Support

Collaborative Teams: Developing a Coordinated Continuum of Supports In addition to Instead of In addition to Instead of What will be needed to support student needs along this continuum?

An outline to help schools/districts begin this process….. Identify areas of need Identify existing supports Align supports and needs Analyze your continuum of supports Identify personnel and procedures for accessing, delivering, and monitoring support “Finalize” your prioritized and organized continuum of supports

Step 1: Identify areas of need First, specify areas of support mandated by the state Areas of Learning Disabilities 1. Oral Expression 2. Listening Comprehension 3. Written Expression 4. Reading Fluency 5. Basic Reading Skills 6. Reading Comprehension 7. Mathematics Calculation 8. Mathematics Problem Solving Remedial Reading Wisconsin State Statute (Standard C) Wis. Stats., Ch Wis. Stats., Ch Each school board shall: (c) Provide remedial reading services for a pupil in grades kindergarten to 4 if any of the following occurs. Section (1)(c) 1 and 2 of the statutes are created to read: (1)(c) 1. The pupil fails to meet the reading objectives specified in the reading curriculum plan developed by the school board under par. (k). 2. The pupil fails to score above the state minimum performance standard on the reading test under par. (r) and: a. A teacher in the school district and the pupil's parent or guardian agree that the pupil's test performance accurately reflects the pupil's reading ability; or b. A teacher in the school district determines, based on other objective evidence of the pupil's reading comprehension, that the pupil's test performance accurately reflects the pupil's reading ability. c. Section 3. Effective date. This act took effect on July 1, 1991.

Then, identify other common prevalent student needs beyond the reach of the universal level of support Step 1: Identify areas of need Students Below the Benchmark~ Prioritized Student Needs Based on Data Students Exceeding the Benchmark~ Prioritized Student Needs Based on Data Students Needing Behavioral Supports~ Prioritized Student Needs Based on Data

Step 2: Identify existing supports School Menu of Supports Matched to Areas of Instructional Need Reading Interventions Reading Additional Challenges Math Intervention Math Additional Challenges Behavioral Interventions Community Supports Phonological Awareness Phonics Fluency Vocabulary Reading Comprehension Example

Step 3: Align supports and needs State/ Local Mandates Chart Student Area of Needs Chart Step 1 Step 2 Match Mandates and Needs to Available Supports School Menu of Supports

Step 4: Analyze your continuum of supports Analyze for adherence to mandates Intensive Interventions Meeting “Gold Standard Criteria”

Step 4: Analyze your continuum of supports Analyze your continuum of supports for gaps, redundancies, and misalignments 1 Fill gaps 2 Eliminate redundancies 3 Weed out misaligned supports

Step 4: Analyze your continuum of supports Analyze your continuum of supports for effectiveness, feasibility, and support 1 Review the effectiveness of the supports 2 Consider the feasibility of sustaining supports that address the same underlying need 3 Consider the degree of staff backing of supports

Step 5: Identify personnel and procedures for accessing, delivering, and monitoring support See the PLANNING LOGISTICS module for guidance with this step.

Step 6: “Finalize” your prioritized and organized continuum of supports *Graphic adapted from Phil Daro, Tools for Principals & Administrators: Intervention Worksheet, Inside Mathematics More than a year behind, gaps and misconceptions from many years Gaps and misconceptions disrupt participation Struggles with some assignments Keeps upThrivesExcels Years ahead Prioritized and organized continuum of supports Intensive Interventions Selected Interventions Tier 2 Behavioral Interventions Community Supports Tier 3 Behavioral Intervention Selected Additional Challenges Intensive Additional Challenges In addition toInstead of

The Benefits of an Articulated, Shared Continuum of Supports Collaborative teams are able to match students to supports sooner Schools are better positioned to provide targeted professional development to support staff delivering interventions and additional challenges Schools can more readily and efficiently create student and staff schedules

Creating the Infrastructure for Supports For guidance in this area, see the ESTABLISH COLLABORATIVE STRUCTURES module