More Seats for Students History of Tuckahoe Capacity and APS Actions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ridgefield School District Capital Facilities Plan March 9, 2010.
Advertisements

February 16, Tonight’s Agenda  Review Assets and Challenges From Last Meeting  Review Necessary Assumptions  Look at Possible Considerations.
City Council Presentation July 1, 2014 Parks & Recreation Master Plan.
2012 Town Hall Meeting. Parish History Master Plan Phase 1 Costs Next Steps Parish Survey 2012 Town Hall Meeting Questions + Answers Agenda.
Washtenaw County Strategic Space Plan Recommendations November 1, 2006.
Enrollment Data Analysis and Plans to Address Overcrowding Update to School Board February 17, 2015.
Board Update November 21, What is Tower Pinkster's Charge? 1.To assess the existing conditions of the Portage Public School Buildings and Sites.
January – May 2013 Existing Curriculum and Space Needs Summary Facilities staff meets individually with all school principals, as well as Academics and.
Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #5 October 22, 2007.
Superintendent’s Recommendations for District Improvement Related to Facility Needs VICTORIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
The Catholic Community of St. Thomas More New Building Committee.
Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #8 November 19, 2007.
A Long Term Solution Oak Ridge Addition. NPD117’ s Core Values Visionary Leadership Learning-Center Education Organizational and Personal Learning Managing.
WCA Facilities Planning February WCA Request 2 Educational Program: The Charter School’s educational program has unique facilities needs. Key.
BVUSD Facility Workshop September 17, Board Policy-BP 7110 The Board of Trustees recognizes the importance of long-range planning for school facilities.
UMass Boston Space Planning Presentation to Faculty Council April 7,
MSAD # PROPOSED BUDGET. MSAD #11 District Goals The budget was developed to ensure implementation of the district goals and to prepare students.
SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS Capacity Utilization Arlington Public Schools December 3, 2009.
C APITAL I MPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2015/16 – FY 2020/21 August 14, 2014.
Long Range Facility Planning assisted by Silver Falls School District.
Arlington Public Schools Whom are we serving? Who is providing the services? What is changing? How are the services provided? October 2006.
Space Utilization Project Chandler Unified School District 2010.
TOWN OF WALPOLE FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE SPRING ANNUAL TOWN MEETING MAY 7, 2014.
The 20/20 Vision Report to the Board of Education January 2009.
PISD High Schools: A Vision and Plan for the Future March 22, 2012 Board Presentation.
RFP# 99FY12 Ashlawn ES/Williamsburg ES June 8, 2012.
Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #3 October 9, 2007.
Presentation to the School Board Facilities and Operations April 30, 2009 Arlington Public Schools Arlington Facilities and Student Accommodation Plan.
Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #4 October 16, 2007.
Kingsclear Consolidated School Parent / Community Meeting November 29, 2010.
Update on Capacity Utilization Process Arlington Public Schools September 24, 2009.
Recommendations to Address Kindergarten Over Enrollment at Impacted Schools Alameda Unified School District Board of Education March 10, 2009.
1 FY County Manager’s Recommended Capital Budget July 18, 2006.
Lincoln Consolidated Schools Citizens Steering Committee Bond Issue Final Recommendation Board of Education Meeting October 18, :00 p.m.
ACPS & City of Alexandria 1.  Long Range Educational Facilities Plan to improve facilities planning, accommodate the growing student population, and.
11 School Board Monitoring Report: Capacity Update Arlington Public Schools April 29, 2010.
1 Building Use Study Plattsburgh City School District Advisory Committee Meeting November 20, 2013 Castallo and Silky- Education Consultants Bill Silky.
West Sylvan Enrollment and Capacity
SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS Capacity Utilization Arlington Public Schools December 17, 2009.
Ridgefield School District Capital Facilities Plan March 9, 2010.
DRAFT Inman Middle School Community Conversation February 19, 2015.
Advocacy: Influencing Facility Development in Public Parks and Recreation Departments Tennis advocacy should occur year round through informal communications.
Report to the Board of Trustees Presented by: Ashton Cumberbatch, Bobby Jenkins, and Eliza May November 23, Community Bond Oversight Committee.
What is the long term vision of how APS should match enrollment and capacity? Boundary changes versus expanded choices John McClelland, Ashlawn.
DRAFT Grady Cluster Capacity Community Conversation September 24, 2015.
November 9, 2015 JACKSONVILLE School District 117.
2016 BOND REFERENDUM Parent Advisory Council 11/17/15.
Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) September 10, 2007.
Elementary and Middle School Options to Reduce Crowding November 2008.
Additional Approaches to Overcrowding Presented by: Arlington Traditional School.
Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Drew Meeting October 30, 2007.
Facilities Study Committee September 20, Meeting 1 Agenda Introductions Committee Makeup Parents Staff Community Members Goal Process Middle School.
TECHNOLOGY MASTER PLAN Our Children, Our Schools, Our Future Technology Master Plan.
Facility Master Plan Board of Education Update April 26, 2016.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.
South Arlington Working Group Update Patrick Henry Elementary School PTA Meeting Tuesday, October 6 th, 2015.
District Local Planning Committee Orientation Part 2 Trimble County Schools Kentucky Department of Education Division of District Support - District Facilities.
Lincoln Public Schools Lincoln, Nebraska Lincoln Public Schools Work Session 10-Year Facility and Infrastructure Plan Update October 22, 2013.
Student Reassignment Analysis for the Lexington Public Schools Project Introduction & Update for the LPS School Committee February 2, 2016.
SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS – Community Forum Capacity Utilization Arlington Public Schools December 9, 2009.
Wahoo Public School District Facility Planning Update April 18, 2016.
ASHLAND TOWN HALL May 10, Ashland Town Hall  Dedicated April 12, 1955  Plan for the next 50+ years  Strategic Plan:  Initiative – Develop.
UPDATE: 8/8/2011 Batavia City School District
1300+ High School Seats School Board Work Session May 15, 2017
Short- and Long-Term Capacity Needs
March 19, 2018 CCPTA.
Fall 2018 Elementary School Boundary Process: Superintendent’s Recommendation (To take effect September 2019) November 8, 2018.
School Board Action Item on Elementary School Boundaries
Long Range Planning Advisory Committee
Chimacum District Facility & Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

More Seats for Students History of Tuckahoe Capacity and APS Actions

Tuckahoe’s Physical Structure Constructed in 1953: 16 classrooms, library, multipurpose room, several smaller admin rooms. 1971: Addition of 9 classrooms, a music room, an open media center, and a gym. 1983: Reed Elementary School was closed due to declining enrollment, students reassigned to Tuckahoe : School Renovation to Upgrade the Physical Plant, resulting in a School Supporting 499 Students (Now School Defined Capacity At 521 Students)

Tuckahoe Enrollment Growth

APS Elementary Enrollment

Changes to Tuckahoe Campus 6 Relocatables located behind the school with the Potential for Additional Relocatables to Accommodate Projected Enrollment Increases Additional Classroom Space Created from Rooms Formerly Dedicated to Programs (i.e., Special Education pull-out, Computer labs)

Challenges Resulting from Current Capacity Building and Maintaining Strong and Personal Connections Among Students, Parents and Staff Foregoing FLES Program Diminishing Computer Lab Space Sharing Space for Integral Programs (Music, Arts, Special Education Pull-Out) Custodial Issues Diminishing Play Space

Tuckahoe Projected Enrollment

APS Projected Elementary Enrollment

APS Efforts to Address Projected Student Enrollment Increases 2004 Boundary Process – Created Barrett cluster – Revised transfer admissions policy to 95% capacity – Moved some planning units from Taylor and a Montessori class from McKinley – No planning units moved from Tuckahoe – Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) – Moved one Tuckahoe planning unit to Glebe – Moved one Tuckahoe planning unit to Nottingham – Moved McKinley Montessori class to Campbell – Moved Interlude from Nottingham to Oakridge – Moved MIPA from Barrett to Abingdon – Barcroft transfers to Randolph instead of Barrett

More Seats for Students Highlights from Oct. 5 APS Presentation

Defining the Capacity Shortage 2011 enrollment: 22,245 students – 83 relocatable classrooms (28 added this year) – 50% of our schools now have students in relocatables Projected growth at 4% per year through 2016 Resulting system-wide shortages in capacity 2013: 834 seats 2016: 3,387 seats Cannot resolve crowding within existing facilities

Quantifying the Shortage Elementary School shortages – 2013: 1,084 seats (approx 46 classrooms) – 2016: 1,608 seats (approx 69 classrooms) Middle School shortages – 2016: 921 seats (approx 38 classrooms) High School shortages – 2013: 105 seats (approx 4 classrooms) – 2016: 857 seats (approx 36 classrooms) Total additional classrooms needed in 2016: – 143 classrooms

Progressive Planning Model Stepwise approach to developing capacity – 4 phases (2010 thru 2016 and beyond) Some solutions immediate Other solutions require longer planning horizon

APS strategies for increasing capacity and balancing utilization 1.Move programs from crowded to underutilized schools when possible 2.Increase class size 3.Increase utilization of secondary schedule (6/7 model) 4.Convert computer labs and other internal spaces (10 for 2011) 5.Add relocatables (28 classrooms for 2011) 6.Increase enrollment at countywide schools 7.Construction

Results of APS capacity strategies Since 2005, APS has added 2,531 seats – 929 elementary schools – 684 middle schools – 918 high schools Does not include relocatable seats More seats are needed

Convergence of Two Processes Capital Improvement Process Capacity Planning Capacity Planning process will result in CIP projects and programmatic strategies for addressing capacity concerns

Capacity Planning Process Milestones & Outcomes Criteria Development June –July 2011 – Identify criteria for evaluating capacity planning solutions Develop Solutions Catalog May - Sept 2011 – Collect potential capacity planning options and develop a catalogue of potential solutions Potential solutions include summary of PTA responses, staff options etc. Refine the master list of potential options with FAC/PCS subcommittee, senior staff, evaluation committee (9/15)

Capacity Planning Process (cont’d) Milestones & Outcomes Data Collection and Analysis Fall 2011 – Conduct investigations, analysis and feasibility studies of the prioritized solutions Rank Capacity Planning Solutions Late Fall- Winter 2011 – Leverage a collaborative process to rank solutions for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Plan – Review capacity generation and funding scenarios Superintendent presents CIP to the Board May 2012

APS Site Evaluation Process Capacity Building Solutions: CCPTA Survey of all schools Evaluation Committee, including: – Facilities Advisory Council subcommittee on projections/capacity – 8 community members – APS senior staff representing all departments – CCPTA representation Evaluation Committee determined which APS sites to pursue further as part of CIP development Two critical questions: 1.Is it feasible to build on this site? 2.Which sites are recommended and why?

Evaluation Criteria Open Space Buildability Concerns – Parking – Slope – Environmental issues Cost (based on size of additions)

Evaluation Limitations APS cannot plan/build/fund expansions on 30 sites simultaneously Building above an existing building – Requires that all students be out for construction Building where relocatables are located – Requires that all students be moved prior to start of construction APS does not assume that we can build on or use adjacent County property

Sites Recommended for Further Study Abingdon Arlington Traditional Ashlawn Carlin Springs Drew Glebe Hoffman-Boston Jamestown McKinley Nottingham Oakridge Taylor Jefferson Kenmore Williamsburg Reed

Next Steps November 10 th Town Hall Meeting – Special Guest– Todd McCracken Will Provide Update on APS Planning Process and Answer Questions/Concerns Regarding the Planning Process Tuckahoe Input To Requests from APS Planning Process Advocacy– Staying Informed and be Willing to Voice Tuckahoe Challenges