Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data dissemination and further analysis workshop Maternal and Reproductive Health MICS4 Data Dissemination and Further.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Skilled Attendant at Delivery MICS3 Data Analysis and Report Writing.
Advertisements

Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys MICS3 Regional Training Workshop Maternal Mortality.
Contraceptive Prevalence MICS3 Data Analysis and Report Writing.
Unmet Need MICS3 Data Analysis and Report Writing Workshop.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Questionnaire for Individual Women: HIV/AIDS.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Questionnaire for Individual Women: Post-natal health check module.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Questionnaire for Individual Women: Maternal and Newborn Health.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Questionnaire for Individual Women: Child Mortality.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Questionnaire for Individual Women: Maternal mortality.
Antenatal Care MICS3 Data Analysis and Report Writing.
Maternal Mortality MICS3 Data Analysis and Report Writing.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Questionnaire for Individual Women : Womans Information Panel and.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Questionnaire for Individual Women: Unmet Need and Desire for Last.
Health statistics in MICS and DHS – a gendered perspective Holly Newby Statistics & Monitoring Section UNICEF ESA/STAT/AC.219/12.
THE STATE OF THE WORLD’S CHILDREN 2009
TRCHS 1999 Tanzania Reproductive and Child Health Survey (TRCHS) 1999 Preliminary findings presented by The RCHS Unit, MOH.
National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda
Goal 5: Improve maternal health Target 5b: Achieve, by 2015, universal access to reproductive health 5.3 Contraceptive prevalence rate 5.4 Adolescent birth.
By Statistics Indonesia and Ministry of Health Indonesia Workshop on MDGs Monitoring 2015 and Beyond UN-ESCAP, Bangkok, 9-13 July 2012 Workshop on MDGs.
GOAL 5; IMPROVE MATERNAL HEALTH. TARGET 2: Achieve, by 2015, universal access to reproductive health. TARGET 1: Reduce by three quarters, between 1990.
Unmet need for family planning
MICS Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Questionnaires for Individual Women and Men.
Fertility, Proximate Determinants and Fertility Preferences
Maternal Health National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3)
1 |1 | Making Pregnancy Safer UN Human Rights Council Session 14 4 th June 2010 Department of Making Pregnancy Safer Dr. Maurice Bucagu Sachiyo Yoshida.
National Conference on MDG 5 – Improving Maternal Health in Pakistan November, 2013 Islamabad, Pakistan.
Country Data workshop: Building better dissemination systems for national development indicator Discrepancy analysis Lao PDR Presented by Vilaysook Sisoulath.
New targets and indicators: an overview of metadata and data preparation for the global monitoring Workshop on MDG Monitoring United Nations Statistics.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data dissemination and further analysis workshop Literacy Education MICS4 Data Dissemination and Further Analysis Workshop.
Healthy Timing and Spacing of Pregnancies in Asia, and Haiti Leanne Dougherty, MPH Knowledge Management Services Project January 11,
IRAQ Multiple Indicator Cluster survey MICS4 Launch of the Final Report Baghdad, 12 December 2012.
Programme session 7 Presentation by Kaobari Matikarai, SPC Statistics for Development Division INDICATORS SOURCED FROM DEMOGRAPHIC HEALTH SURVEY (DHS)
Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey – Key Indicators Results.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Interpretation, Further Analysis and Dissemination Workshop Maternal and Reproductive Health.
Antenatal Care Coverage: Comparison between National and International Data and Metadata Cambodia Experience Workshop on MDG Monitoring to 2015 and beyond.
Skilled attendant at birth mDG 5, target 5A, Indicator 5.2
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data dissemination and further analysis workshop Maternal and Reproductive Health MICS4 Data Dissemination and Further.
Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey Key Indicators Report.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data dissemination and further analysis workshop HIV/AIDS, SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, and ORPHANS MICS4 Data dissemination and.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Interpretation, Further Analysis and Dissemination Workshop HIV/AIDS and sexual behaviour.
CountryData workshop: Building Better Dissemination Systems for National Development Indicators Differences between national and international reported.
Afghanistan Mortality Survey 2010 Key Findings. What is the AMS? The AMS 2010 is the first comprehensive mortality survey in Afghanistan. It is a nationally.
Antenatal care MDG 5, Target 5b, Indicator 5.5
Improving Maternal Health in Afghanistan Suraya Dalil, MD, MPH Minister of Public Health Washington, DC April 23, 2012.
National Institute of Population Studies Islamabad.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE 2002 CPS FIELD WORKERS INTERVIEWED 2,698 MAURITIAN RESPONDENTS 500 RODRIGUAN RESPONDENTS IMPORTANT EVALUATION TOOL FOR IDENTIFYING.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data dissemination and further analysis workshop Further Analysis: Youth and Adolescents MICS4 Data dissemination and.
Child bearing and sexual and reproductive health and rights in Dhaka slums SAFE baseline survey findings Sajeda Amin, Laila Rahman and Md. Irfan Hossain.
Extracted from Papers of the Universal Health Care Study Group.
MEASURE DHS Questionnaire issues July 10, 2007 By: Martin Vaessen.
Preparing for Data Analysis and Interpreting Data CEI Implementing the Reproductive Health Assessment Toolkit for Conflict-Affected Women November.
Division of Reproductive Health Maternal and Newborn Health in Kenya DR SHIPHRAH KURIA DEPUTY-HEAD DRH.
Data Sources, Assessment and Adjustments for MDG Indicators 5.3, 5.4 and 5.6 United Nations Population Division/DESA 8-12 November, 2010 UNSD/ECE Workshop.
MDG 4 Target: Reduce by two- thirds, between 1990 & 2015, the mortality rate of children under five years.
Family Planning In Jordan
TUVALU DEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTH SURVEY OUTLINE  Background  Questionnaire  Sensitive questions  Training  Indicators.
Impact of Interpersonal Communication on uptake of Birth Spacing in Somaliland November 25 th, 2014.
Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2011 Maternal Health.
2015 Afghanistan Demographic and Health Survey (AfDHS) Key Indicators Report.
Adults living with HIV (15+) (thousands) [5] Children living with HIV (0-14) (thousands) [5] Pregnant.
2014 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) Key Indicators.
Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2011 Family Planning and Fertility Preferences.
Dr. Farhat R Malik Assistant Professor Community Health Sciences.
Follow along on Twitter!
Workshop on MDG Monitoring United Nations Statistics Division
MILLENIUMS DEVELOPMENT GOALS
Healthy Timing and Spacing of Pregnancies
Workshop on MDG Monitoring United Nations Statistics Division
Workshop on MDG Monitoring United Nations Statistics Division
Country year(s) Maternal & Newborn Health
Presentation transcript:

Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data dissemination and further analysis workshop Maternal and Reproductive Health MICS4 Data Dissemination and Further Analysis Workshop

Overview of MICS4 contents Core modules –Childbearing among adolescents (3 tables) –Contraception (2 tables) –Antenatal care (3 tables) –Delivery care (2 tables) Other modules –Post-natal health care (6 tables) –Maternal mortality (1 table)

Childbearing among adolescents Calculations based data from the child mortality module (Brass questions) or birth history Pay attention to sample sizes, especially for breakdowns by background variables NEW! Table RH.1: Adolescent birth rate and total fertility rate Adolescent birth rates and total fertility rates, Country, Year Adolescent birth rate 1 (Age-specific fertility rate for women age 15-19) Total fertility rate Region Urban-rural residence Women’s education Wealth index quintile Religion/Language/Ethnicity of household head Total 1 MICS indicator 5.1; MDG indicator 5.4

Childbearing among adolescents Table RH.1: Adolescent birth rate and total fertility rate Adolescent birth rates and total fertility rates, Country, Year Adolescent birth rate 1 (Age-specific fertility rate for women age 15-19) Total fertility rate Region Urban-rural residence Women’s education Wealth index quintile Religion/Language/Ethnicity of household head Total 1 MICS indicator 5.1; MDG indicator 5.4 Calculations based data from the child mortality module (Brass questions) or birth history Pay attention to sample sizes, especially for breakdowns by background variables Number of births to women age years, divided by the average number of women age (during the one year period preceding the survey) Average number of children to which a woman will have given birth by the end of her reproductive years if current fertility rates prevailed. The total fertility rate (TFR) is calculated by summing the age-specific fertility rates calculated for each of the 5-year age groups of women, from age 15 through to age 49. NEW!

Childbearing among adolescents Table RH.2: Early childbearing Percentage of women age years who have had a live birth or who are pregnant with the first child and percentage of women age years who have begun childbearing, percentage of women who have had a live birth before age 15, and percentage of women age who have had a live birth before age 18, Country, Year Percentage of women age who: Number of women age Percentage of women age who have had a live birth before age 18 1 Number of women age Have had a live birth Are pregnant with first child Have begun child- bearing Have had a live birth before age 15 Region Urban-rural residence Education Wealth index quintile Religion/Language/Ethnicity of household head Total 1 MICS indicator 5.2 Sum of first two columns NEW!

Childbearing among adolescents Table RH.3: Trends in early childbearing Percentage of women who have had a live birth, by age 15 and 18, by residence and age group,Country,Year UrbanRuralAll Percenta ge of women with a live birth before age 15 Number of women Percenta ge of women with a live birth before age 18 Number of women Percenta ge of women with a live birth before age 15 Number of women Percenta ge of women with a live birth before age 18 Number of women Percenta ge of women with a live birth before age 15 Number of women Percenta ge of women with a live birth before age 18 Number of women Age 15-19na Total Two indicators -- Note that each indicator has a different denominator Figures in the total row are based on women age and for live births before age 15 and age 18, respectively. Data from different cohorts provides trends NEW!

Adolescent childbearing – a comparison of indictors Indicator Valu e Adolescent birth rate22 Unpublished example from a MICS4 survey

Adolescent childbearing – a comparison of indictors Indicator Valu e Adolescent birth rate year old women who have had a live birth 2% Unpublished example from a MICS4 survey

Adolescent childbearing – a comparison of indictors Indicator Valu e Adolescent birth rate year old women who have had a live birth 2% Live birth before age 18 (among year olds) 16% Unpublished example from a MICS4 survey

Contraception Table RH.4: Use of contraception Percentage of women age years currently married or in union who are using (or whose partner is using) a contraceptive method, Country, Year Not using any meth od Percent of women (currently married or in union) who are using: Num ber of wom en curre ntly marri ed or in union Fe- male sterili - zatio n Male sterili - zatio nIUD Inject ables Im- plant sPill Male con- dom Fe- male con- dom Dia- phrag m/ Foa m/Jell yLAM Perio dic absti n- ence With- draw alOther Any mod- ern meth- od Any tradi- tional meth- od Any meth od 1 Any method is an MDG indicator Modern Traditional

How to define unmet need? Women with an unmet need for family planning are women who –are married or in union –are fecund –not using any method of contraception –report not wanting any more children or wanting to delay the birth of their next child for at least two years

We also consider the following to have unmet need: Women* who are pregnant, but whose current pregnancy unwanted or mistimed Postpartum amenorrheic women* (not using contraception) whose last birth was unwanted or mistimed *Married/in union How to define unmet need?

Key indicator elements Marital status Current use of contraception (any method) Fecundity Pregnant or amenorrheic Desire for last birth Desire for future births

Unmet need Table RH.5: Unmet need for contraception Percentage of women age years currently married or in union with an unmet need for family planning and percentage of demand for contraception satisfied, Country, Year Met need for contraception Unmet need for contraception Number of women currently married or in union Percentage of demand for contraception satisfied Number of women currently married or in union with need for contraception For spacing For limitingTotal For spacing For limitingTotal 2 Region Urban-rural Age Education Wealth index quintiles Religion/Language/Ethnicity of household head Total 1 MICS indicator 5.3; MDG indicator MICS indicator 5.4; MDG indicator 5.6 New MICS4 methodology – may make comparisons challenging Note that met need for contraception includes both traditional and modern methods

MICS4 country example of unmet need Met need for contra- ception - For spacing Met need for contra- ception - For limiting Met need for contra- ception - Total Unmet need for contra- ception – For spacing Unmet need for contra- ception – For limiting Unmet need for contra- ception - Total Number of women currently married or in union Percentage of demand for contra- ception satisfied Number of women currently married or in union with need for contra- ception , ,171 Any method 77.2 Any modern method 58.8 Any traditional method 18.5 Periodic abstinence/Rhythm 12.0 Withdrawal 6.2 RH4: Use of contraception Note that met need for contraception includes both traditional and modern methods

Antenatal care Table RH.6: Antenatal care coverage Percent distribution of women age who gave birth in the two years preceding the survey by type of personnel providing antenatal care, Country, Year Person providing antenatal care No antenata l care receivedTotal Any skilled personnel 1 Number of women who gave birth in the preceding two years Medical doctor Nurse/ Midwife Auxiliary midwife Traditiona l birth attendant Communi ty health workerOther Key indicator: At least one ANC visit (MDG) Personnel categories Should have been modified in country MICS4 standard -- Skilled health personnel includes doctors, nurses, midwives, and auxiliary midwives. But double-check and document in final report text

Table RH.7: Number of antenatal care visits Percent distribution of women who had a live birth during the two years preceding the survey by number of antenatal care visits by any provider, Country, Year Percent distribution of women who had: Number of women who had a live birth in the preceding two years No ante- natal care visitsOne visit Two visits Three visits 4 or more visits 1 Total Region Urban-rural Mother's age at birth Education Wealth index quintile Religion/Language/Ethnicity of household head Total MICS indicator 5.5b; MDG indicator 5.5 Antenatal care NEW! MDG indicator; for reporting ensure that 4+ can be derived from table Watch out for… Indicator definition (any provider) “don’t knows”

Table RH.8: Content of antenatal care Percentage of women age years who had their blood pressure measured, urine sample taken, and blood sample taken as part of antenatal care, Country, Year Percentage of pregnant women who had: Number of women who had a live birth in the preceding two years Blood pressure measured Urine sample taken Blood sample taken Blood pressure measured, urine and blood sample taken 1 Region Urban-rural Mother's age at birth Education Wealth index quintile Religion/Language/Ethnicity of household head Total 1 MICS indicator 5.6 Antenatal care

Delivery Care Table RH.9: Assistance during delivery Percent distribution of women age who had a live birth in the two years preceding the survey by person assisting at delivery and percentage of births delivered by C-section, Country, Year Person assisting at delivery No attend- antTotal Delivery assisted by any skilled atten- dant 1 Percent delivered by C-section 2 Number of women who had a live birth in preceding two years Medical doctor Nurse/ Midwife Auxiliary midwife Traditio nal birth attend- ant Com- munity health worker Relative /FriendOther MDG indicator: Skilled attendant at delivery MICS 4 standard -- Skilled health personnel includes doctors, nurses, midwives, and auxiliary midwives. But double-check and document in final report text New indicator! C-section should be within 5%-15% NEW!

Delivery Care Table RH.10: Place of delivery Percent distribution of women age who had a live birth in two years preceding the survey by place of delivery, Country, Year Place of delivery Total Delivered in health facility 1 Number of women who had a live birth in preceding two years Public sector health facility Private sector health facilityHomeOther Region Urban-rural Mother's age at birth Number of antenatal care visits Education Wealth index quintiles Religion/Language/Ethnicity of household head Total MICS indicator 5.8 Place of delivery categories should have been modified in country Possible to present additional categories

Continuum of reproductive and maternal health interventions Pre- preg Pregnancy (Antenatal Care) Delivery Care

Continuum of reproductive and maternal health interventions Pre- preg Pregnancy (Antenatal Care) Delivery Care Gap!

Post-natal Health Checks New MICS4 module 6 tables covering post-natal health checks for both mother and child –Post-partum stay in health facility –Post-natal health checks for newborns –Post-natal care (PNC) visits for newborns –Post-natal health checks for mothers –Post-natal care (PNC) visits for mothers –Post-natal health checks for mothers and newborns NEW!

MICS4 – now recommends direct sisterhood method (survivorship of all siblings) Limitations include: –Reference period usually 7 years or 10 years before the survey –Confidence intervals are very wide –Studies indicate that both male and female mortality underestimated Maternal mortality

Table RH.17: Maternal mortality Direct estimates of maternal mortality for the 0-6 years preceding the survey, Country, Year Maternal deaths Exposure (years) Mortality rates (per 1000) Proportion of maternal deaths to female deaths Age Total General fertility rate Maternal mortality ratio 1 1 MICS indicator 5.13; MDG indicator 5.1 Maternal mortality ratio is calculated as the maternal mortality rate divided by the general fertility rate The maternal mortality rate and general fertility rate are age-adjusted

Trend Estimation from Sibling Histories with 95% Confidence Intervals (Namibia) Estimates are averages over long periods (here 7 or 9 years) and 95% confidence intervals are large Source: Ken Hill – UN maternal mort workshop, Nairobi December 2010

Further use of the data

Tracking Progress on Child and Maternal Nutrition

Brainstorming Focus on adolescents Maternal health… –fertility desires –Empowerment (Attitude towards domestic violence) HIV and maternal care (knowledge, testing during ANC)

Thank you!