M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)1 M. Apollonio – University of Oxford sizes for PID & shields.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.
1 Acceptance & Scraping Chris Rogers Analysis PC
PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
Emittance definition and MICE staging U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 1 Apr Topics: a) Figure of merit for MICE b) Performance of MICE stages.
FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MUON IONIZATION COOLING Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 28 July 2004.
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
M.apollonioMICE Analysis meeting 23/1/20071 M. Apollonio – University of Oxford Radius of diffuser and sizes for PID.
1 PID, emittance and cooling measurement Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis phone conference.
Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.
MICE analysis meeting - (4/5/2006) 1 some reflections on scraping, PID sizes and Transmittance M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
OPTICS UPDATE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 3 August 2004.
1 Downstream scraping and detector sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting CERN.
18 June 2004AFC meeting1 MICE  functions and so on Work in progress…. Observation by Ulisse Bravar at CERN meeting that beam not matched in baseline (Proposal.
TJR 10/30/031 MICE Beam rates Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 10/30/03.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
Downstream transversal sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE detector meeting.
PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
11-FEB-2004 TJR1 MICE Beamline TOF Analysis Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Techology February 11, 2004.
MICE analysis meeting - (21/09/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
124/3/2010CM26 - Riverside1 m. apollonio ( ,P) matrix.
1 Statistics Toy Monte Carlo David Forrest University of Glasgow.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
MICE analysis meeting - (26/3/2006) 1 Update on MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Diffuser in G4MICE Victoria Blackmore 09/03/10 Analysis Meeting 1/8.
1 OPTICS OF STAGE III Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 6 October 2004.
1 Losses in the Cooling Channel Malcolm Ellis PID Meeting 1 st March 2005.
M.apollonioAM STEPIII – sizes and positioning m.apollonio, Oxford.
MICE CM - Fermilab, Chicago - (11/06/2006) 1 A (short) history of MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Simulated real beam into simulated MICE1 Mark Rayner CM26.
Beamline-to-MICE Matching Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 August 2004 MICE performance with ideal Gaussian beam JUNE04 beam from ISIS beamline (Kevin.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
1. Optical matching in MICE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 June 2004 Constraints Software MICE proposal mismatch MICE Note 49 (September 2004, Bob.
30 June 2004MICE VC1 MICE  functions Since last VC report: –New Mike Green configurations for decreased spacing between focus and matching coils of 400mm,
M.apollonioImperial College - London1 M. Apollonio University of Oxford the MICE diffuser: issues and operation MICE beamline review Nov. 16 th 2007 Imperial.
1 Progress report on Calorimeter design comparison simulations MICE detector phone conference Rikard Sandström.
1 PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
M.apollonioam M. Apollonio University of Oxford update on STEP III.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
04/01/2006MICE Analysis Meeting1 MICE phase III M. Apollonio, J. Cobb (Univ. of Oxford)
Chris Rogers, Analysis Parallel, MICE CM17 Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
1 Tracker Window & Diffuser Radius vs Scraping Aperture Chris Rogers Analysis PC 6th April 06.
M.apollonio/j.cobbMICE UK meeting- RAL - (9/1/2007) 1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Diffuser Studies Chris Rogers, IC/RAL MICE VC 09 March 2005.
Analysis of MICE Chris Rogers 1 Imperial College/RAL Thursday 28 October, With thanks to John Cobb.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
(+) session, PAC09 Vancouver – TH6PFP056 Introduction The Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment (MICE, fig. 1c) at RAL[1]
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
MICE PID size &scraping MICE CM16, RAL, Oct V. Palladino, Univ & INFN Napoli for R. Sandrstrom and others contributing to this effort Yagmur, Holger,
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
11 Nov 2008PC Analysis PC Schedule 2008 Tuesdays fortnightly 9 September  23 September  2 October  CM22  11 November  25 November 9 December.
Marco apollonio/J.CobbMICE coll. meeting 16- RAL - (10/10/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of.
1M. Ellis - NFMCC - 31st January 2007 MICE Analysis.
PID PC 7th Sept MICE MAGNETIC FIELDS & SHIELDS J. H. Cobb & H. Witte Oxford University Magnet fields for MICE (VI) calculated including magnetic.
M.apollonioMICE UK- RAL- 2/5/20071 MICE beam diffuser M. Apollonio,P. Lau, W. Lau, J. Tacon, S. Yang – Univ. Oxford.
M.apollonioCM18, RAL, 14/6/20071 MICE beam diffuser M. Apollonio, J. Cobb, P. Lau, W. Lau, J. Tacon, H. Witte, S. Yang - Univ. Oxford circa 87 BC.
1 PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
18 th March 2008Measuring momentum using the TOFsSlide 1 Measuring momentum using TOF0 and TOF1 Progress report Mark Rayner (Oxford/RAL) Analysis Meeting,
1June 2 nd 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 m. apollonio Beamline+( ,P) matrix.
CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.
1June 1 st 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 Beamline Optics m. apollonio.
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November The TOF detectors: Beyond particle identification Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
Marco apollonioAnalysis Meeting (9/12/2006)1 transmission vs amplitude with a finite size diffuser M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
C. Rogers, ASTeC Intense Beams Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
C. Rogers, ASTeC Intense Beams Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Effect of Reduced Focus Coil Current on Step IV and Step VI
How to turn on MICE Step IV
The Detector System of the MICE Experiment
Presentation transcript:

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)1 M. Apollonio – University of Oxford sizes for PID & shields

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)2  Consider different optics for MICE  Consider the maximum radius a particle can reach in the tracker (TK) = 15 cm the absorber (ABS) = 15 cm the RF windows (RF) = 21.3 cm It can be shown that  ~  Propagate the radius throughout MICE according to  These curves represent the ENVELOPE of the beam which just touches the TK, the ABS, the RF and the diffuser == muons with a given amplitude == MIN size of diffuser MIN radii in the downstream region

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)3 CAVEAT: Z_diff= m (corrected w.r.t. the original presentation given at a previous an.meeting)

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)4 current diffuser position ideal minimum R D RD-TRK= 15.1 cm RD-ABS= 13.5 cm RD-RF= 11.9 cm

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)5 Wang Z-downstream: shield-in shield-out SW TOF KL

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)6 current diffuser position  inside TKs  inside ABS  inside RF ideal minumum R D Every  in the TKs will traverse both ABS and RF R D must be as large as possible 10 cm is definitely too small !!! RD-TRK= 15.2 cm RD-ABS= 13.8 cm RD-RF= 11.9 cm

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)7 Wang (with energy loss) R grows linearly far from the solenoid (beta ~ z 2 )

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)8 Wang RD-TRK= 15.1 cm RD-ABS= 14.8 cm RD-RF= 13.0 cm

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)9 Wang

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)10 NF RD-TRK= 15.2 cm RD-ABS= 13.5 cm RD-RF= 10.5 cm

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)11 NF

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)12 SFOFO RD-TRK= 15.3 cm RD-ABS= 22.1 cm RD-RF= 10.8 cm

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)13 SFOFO

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)14 SFOFO RD-TRK= 14.6 RD-ABS= 30.9 RD-RF= 11.5

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)15 SFOFO-140-7

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)16 Summary of min R – DIFFUSER (cm)

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007) Definition of MIN Radius for PIDs and SHIELD holes !!! NOT IN SCALE (but figures should be correct) TOF KL SW 750 solenoid end plate  max radius 650

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)18 According to the defs given in previous slides these are the min radii (a) for the shield (to let every  pass) and (b) for the PIDs (to accept every  ) Within tolerances 1000x1000 mm 2 600x x700 mm 2 Slightly out ? tolerances Is it a problem? iron shield

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)19 Wang Z-downstream: shield-in shield-out SW TOF KL like having a 20 cm shorter SW calorimeter But only for the outer muons

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)20 conclusions the maximum radii for particles traversing MICE are propagated (from the max R in 3 different places) through the apparatus (TKs, ABS, RF) Considering several optics: min Radius (at fixed position z=-6010 mm) for the diffuser is defined: in order to have particles in the TKs it turns out Rd should be as large as possible (compatible with mechanical contraints) In any case R D =10 cm seems to be small ! min radii for downstream shield holes are computed upon the requirement of accepting every  from trackers min radii for PIDs are computed upon the requirement of having the maximal acceptance within the detector: this condition can be probably relaxed Real B field in the “shield area” should take into account real map. This is just an approximation whose purpose is giving some initial figures

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)21 radial size for the diffuser M. Apollonio – University of Oxford

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)22 Z=-6010 mm for the upstream face of the diffuser. This is a figure established long time ago (CR, CM14 Osaka )  I focussed on the radial size of it propagate muons back from centre tracker to the diffuser record x,y position and check whether they fall within the diffuser generate beams upstream with proper ALPHA/BETA and go through the diffuser compute emittances  check bias due to r_cut would like to convince you that R=10 cm is a bit tight and propose some solution

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)23 ICOOL sim, Pz=200 MeV/c diffuser Z= m

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)24 r=10 cm r=15 cm

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)25  n (mm rad) R 0 (0.1%) (cm) R 0 (0.5%) (cm) R 0 (1%) (cm) Beam fraction within radius R0

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)26 try to see it another way … generate (gaussian) beams BEFORE DIFFuser: 1- thickness of 7 mm inflation: 2.7  6.5 mm rad (BETA=76 cm / ALPHA=.20 ) 2- thickness of 12.7 mm inflation: 2.7  10 mm rad (BETA=127cm / ALPHA=.37 ) 3- thickness of 8 mm inflation: 1.9  10 mm rad (BETA=189 cm / ALPHA=1.14 ) 4- thickness of 14.2 mm inflation: 3.4  10 mm rad (BETA=128 / ALPHA=.4) calculate emi before/after diffuser for several radii (compare with a large radius case) Pz=209 MeV/c +/- 10% Pz=148 MeV/c +/- 10% Pz=267 MeV/c +/- 10%

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)27 ICOOL sim diffuser Z=-6.010

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)28 A tentative scheme for the diffuser trying to exploit all the radial space (15 cm) within the tin can envelope being compatible with mechanical contraints

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)29 7mm 15.5cm Emi inflation in single layer lead diffuser: 2.8  6.1 mm rad 7mm emi(after diff)=6 mm rad Muons selected on the overall channel ideal disc

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)30 7mm 5cm 15.5cm Emi inflation in a staggered lead diffuser: 2.8  6.1 mm rad 7mm realistic diffuser fixed annulus movable disc + support

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)31 7mm 5cm 15.5cm Emi inflation with a single layer of lead (small radius): 2.8  5.3 mm rad 7mm

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007) mm 8 mm 7 to 14.2 mm Proposal to accommodate many configurations 6, 10 mm Pz=200 MeV/c 10 mm Pz=140 MeV/c 10 mm Pz=240 MeV/c …just a sketch (see Stephanie/Wing drawings) 24 to 27 cm 30 cm trackerdiffuser envelope Supports (outer can/disc support): Al Pb diffuser disc and outer annulus

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)33

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)34 emi(R)/emi(R=30 cm) R_diffEmittance bias as a function of R_diff (partial inflation) Pz=209 MeV/c, emi=10mm rad, B=4 T Pz=148 MeV/c, emi=10mm rad, B=2.9 T Pz=267 MeV/c, emi=10mm rad, B=4 T single disc staggered discs

m.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)35 SUMMARY a diffuser with R=10 cm is too small. We should try to use all the space available the choice of R_diff can be inspired by the emi_bias plot, in which case you can choose between 12 and 13.5 cm the “staggered” solution provide uniform inflation (till R~15 cm) and is equivalent to the ideal full disc case. Important for high emittances and low momenta