Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake Executive Council November 29, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

Presentation to State Water Resources Control Board November 14, 2012 By Dave Modisette Executive Director California Municipal Utilities Association.
NPDES Phase II in Wake County: Forging A Collaborative Approach to Stormwater Management APWA Conference September 19, 2005.
What is Microgrid Institute? Microgrid Institute is a collaborative organization that focuses on key factors affecting microgrids and distributed energy.
The Effect of the Changing Dynamics of the Conowingo Dam on the Chesapeake Bay Mukhtar Ibrahim and Karl Berger, COG staff Water Resources Technical Committee.
Ted Craddock, DWR 2014 NWHA Conference Oroville Facilities FERC Project No
Conowingo Dam and Lower Susquehanna River Sediment Mt. Airy Water and Sewer Board December 12, 2013 Bruce Michael Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
Conowingo Hydroelectric Power Station and Muddy Run Pump Storage Facility Welcomes the Citizens Advisory Committee.
Environmental Benchmarks Briefing Nancy Gassman Environmental Protection And Growth Management Department Coordinating Council of Broward, Quality of Life.
Resource and Energy.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from Wind Energy : Location, Location, Location? Duncan Callaway SNRE & Department of Mechanical Engineering
Decommissioning and Site Restoration of Non-Federal Hydroelectric Projects John A. Schnagl Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (202)
Hydroelectric Power
The Potential for Increased Cooperation on Offshore Wind among the Northeast States Warren Leon, Executive Director.
Joint OSPE – PEO Chapter Energy Policy Presentation Prepared by OSPE’s Energy Task Force 1.
Challenges and opportunities for dam removal projects in Texas Lessons that can be learned from other states Ryan McGillicuddy – Texas Parks and Wildlife.
Why Wind?.
Electric Generation Reliability Remarks Before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission 2011 Summer Reliability Assessment Meeting June.
NRCS Watershed Rehabilitation
The Policy Voice for Energy Storage Bulk Energy Storage for the Nation’s Electricity Grid Jason Makansi, Executive Director President, Pearl Street Inc.
Lower Susquehanna River Dam Sediment and Solutions Conowingo Relicensing; LSRWA; MD County Resistance; Solutions; CAC Involvement Thursday November 29.
Warm-up What is the difference between a renewable and a non renewable resources? What is an example of a nonrenewable resource? What is an example.
Warren Lasher Director, System Planning October 4, 2014 Our Energy Future.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
Susquehanna River Hydroelectric Projects 1 Shawn A. Seaman September 27, 2010 Image or Graphic.
Blackstone Hydropower Status Report 3 rd Annual River Users Conference Blackstone Valley Tourism Council Tricia Jedele, Conservation Law Foundation Bruce.
State of Oregon New Hydroelectric Projects Mary Grainey October 2008 Oregon Water Resources Department.
Eagle Crest Energy Company February Page 2 New Hydro: Making it Happen Background on the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Need for Eagle.
Buckhorn Mountain EIS Project August Buckhorn Mountain Exploration Project Echo Bay Exploration is seeking federal and state authorization for.
Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Citizens Advisory Committee November 29, 2012 Anna Compton USACE 1.
Update on Current EGNRET Projects APEC EGNRET 23 Meeting Christchurch, New Zealand ~ November 10-12, 2004 Jean Ku National Renewable Energy Lab, USA Cary.
FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues.
Development of Micro-Hydro Projects Stacey Simms Associate Director, Programs CREA Energy Innovations Summit.
Alternative Energy on the Outer Continental Shelf Robert P. LaBelle Deputy Associate Director Offshore Energy and Minerals Management Minerals Management.
FOR SIXTY YEARS WE HAVE BEEN TAKING THE POWER FROM WATER AND HANDING IT OVER TO NATIONS LINKING THE DOTS Bucharest, February 20, 2014.
Community Choice Energy as a Community Development Strategy for Oakland March 30, 2010.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 8, 2010.
Hydroelectric Energy Alisha Kumar Harry Dakesian.
Hydrological Energy By:Saeed Merghani and Dalal Dumaidi.
CWAG ENERGY CONFERENCE BIG SKY, MT Collaborative Efforts to Find Solutions: A Case Study – The Mountain States Transmission Intertie (MSTI) Presented by.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Technical Meeting May 16, 2007, 1-4 pm Red Lion Redding, CA.
Baird Claytor Hydroelectric Project Sedimentation Study.
THE LONG-TERM ENERGY SUPPLY AND DEMAND OUTLOOK IN TAIWAN ENERGY COMMISSION MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AUGUST 2001 MOEA -15-
1.What is the standard relicensing process in the U.S. and what is the ALP (Alternative Licensing Process) ? 2.How did we convince FERC to agree to an.
I RRIGATION P ARKS H YDROELECTRIC E LECTRIC D RAINAGE.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
Overview of Alabama Power’s Tallapoosa River Operations Martin Dam Relicensing Informational Meeting April 1, 2008 Andy Sheppard, P.E. Project Mgr. - Hydro.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Shasta County Board of Supervisors March 4, 2008.
Hydroelectric Energy Madison, Meghan, Emmet.
El Gallo Hydroelectricity Project PDD Analysis
Hydroelectric Energy Brooke Edwards, Steve Reinauer, Heather Shutt, Daniel Weigner, & Kathleen Widmer.
Southern California Edison The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station April 14, 2011.
The Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan Evaluation Update, 2007 The Lake Okeechobee Protection Plan Evaluation Update February 8, 2007.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Craig Williams Market Interface Manager August 21, 2014 ISAS, Portland, OR.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved. 1.
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
Hydroelectric Energy Just go with the flow By: Morgan Stockman.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Group Members Tevin Walker Deidre Brown. Objectives Define the term HYDROELECTIC ENERGY To identify the use/importance of this energy source To explain.
Strategies for Colorado River Water Management Jaci Gould Deputy Regional Director Lower Colorado Region.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
WATER & POWER 4th INDIA WATER WEEK- 2016
Hydroelectric Energy Alexis Abdullah, Brionna Francis and Yasmine Soumahoroyah APE.S.
Opportunities in the Changing Energy System
Hydro Electric Energy By: Leo & Clint .
Lake Elsinore Hydro Project
Presentation transcript:

Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake Executive Council November 29, 2012

Conowingo Hydroelectric Facility In 2011, Conowingo produced over 2.5 million MWhs of clean electricity Conowingo generation displaces generation from fossil fuel sources such as coal and natural gas which results in less emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants Conowingo generates during peak electric demand which helps keep electricity prices lower for the region The Conowingo and Muddy Run facilities are estimated to lower retail electricity prices by 1.8% to 3.4% in Pennsylvania and Maryland The Projects provide additional important contributions to the electricity grid by supplying essential services for the proper functioning of a regional electricity grid. These services include Black-start capability and Spinning Reserves U.S. Department of Energy recently noted the great benefits of the use of hydroelectric power: “Modernizing and optimizing our nation’s hydropower dams is one of the best opportunities to sustainably increase our supply of clean energy. Hydropower’s ability to quickly ramp up power output makes it a natural fit with wind, solar and other renewable energy sources that supply variable power” (Beaudry-Losique, Director, EIA Wind & Water Program, 2010) MW hydroelectric, 11 units Located in Darlington, Maryland on Susquehanna River Constructed in 1928 Last licensed August 1980 Projects provides approx. $78.5 million in property and income taxes annually

Muddy Run Pump Storage In 2011, Muddy Run generated over 1.2 million MWhs of electricity Muddy Run has the ability to store water in the upper reservoir during evening periods when electric demand is low and generate when electricity is needed during peak periods Pump storage generation displaces higher cost generation from fossil fuel sources (coal and natural gas) which results in less emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants The output of Muddy Run is particularly critical for meeting the electricity needs of the region on hot summer afternoons when electricity demand and the marginal costs of electricity generation are the highest The Conowingo and Muddy Run facilities are estimated to lower retail electricity prices by 1.8% to 3.4% in Pennsylvania and Maryland Muddy Run provides stability to the PJM electric grid by having the ability to bring generation on quickly to handle system disturbances and maintain stable prices Muddy Run also provides additional important contributions to the electricity grid by supplying Black-start capability, Voltage Control, Regulation and Spinning Reserves MW of pump storage, 8 units Located in Drumore, Pennsylvania on Susquehanna River Constructed in 1972 Last licensed issued September 1964 Projects provides approx. $78.5 million in property and income taxes annually

Licensing Process The relicensing team is pursuing relicensing of the Conowingo and Muddy Run using FERC’s integrated licensing process (ILP) The ILP is a 7 to 9 year process that requires Exelon to consult with regulatory agencies in advance of filing its license application with FERC The ILP contains mandated time limits in which both FERC and Exelon are required to act 3 Expected License Issuance and Implementation Planning File License Application 2006 Initial Information Package, Execution of Baseline Studies, Stakeholder Meetings Informal Study Scoping Execution of Informal Studies, Develop Pre- Application Document Formal Study Scoping, File Pre Application Document and Notice of Intent to File Application with FERC Execution of Formal Studies Settlement Negotiations Begin

Studies Associated with Licensing Process 4 The type of studies conducted as well as the design of each study were developed in consultation with stakeholders. The ILP processes for the two Projects including 47 studies have cost approximately $22 million dollars. The studies were conducted from 2010 through A variety of aspects were covered by the studies and include areas such as fish and aquatic species communities, fish passage evaluations, instream flow habitat assessments, water quality assessments, sediment introduction and transport as well as recreational and shoreline management assessments. The results of the studies were included with the Final License Application (FLA) and filed accordingly with the FERC.

License Application 5 The licensing process and the development of the Final License Application (FLA) for Conowingo is a cooperative and collaborative process involving multiple parties including federal and state agencies as well as local government and various Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). The FLA for Conowingo was filed in August 2012 and addressed stakeholder comments received on the draft license application which was filed in April The FLA includes Exelon’s proposal for operations and management of facilities in the future license. Exelon has proposed environmental measures as part of the FLA that include: –Plans for managing land with rare, threatened and endangered species habitats –Continuation of the operations and preventive maintenance program for the East Fish Lift (EFL) –Best management practices (BMPs) for controlling sediment introduction from Project lands along with conducting a bathymetry study of Conowingo Pond every 5 years to monitor sediment transport and depositional patterns and a sediment management plan to identify benchmarks and thresholds for action to address sediment issues that may affect Project operations. Recreation and shoreline management plans were also part of the FLA. Exelon plans to invest approximately $7 million in recreational improvements.

Issue: Sediment Transport Sediment within the Susquehanna River Basin that affects the Chesapeake Bay is a watershed issue that requires the participation of all parties. To this end, Exelon has been involved with the Sediment Task Force since its original inception in the late 1990’s and continues to support the effort by participating in the Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment (LSRWA). In conjunction with the LSRWA, Exelon provides in-kind services that have included 2011 bathymetry data for use in modeling and calibration associated with the projects of the LSRWA along with regular participation in meetings associated with the process. Sediment originates from upland and riverine erosion throughout the 27,500 sq mile watershed that covers parts of the three state area Maryland, Pennsylvania and New York To quote a recent Fact Sheet from the Chesapeake Bay Foundation “…The dam, historically, has been the Bay’s best BMP, removing much of what normally would have flowed downstream, particularly phosphorus and sediment.” The amount of sediment deposited as estimated by the 2008 USGS Bathymetry report is an average of 2,000,000 tons annually. This equates to a 100 ton railcar loaded every 26 minutes 365 days per year just to maintain the same level of sediment. 6

Wrap Up 7 Exelon and licensing stakeholders have begun the negotiating phase of the relicensing process. We anticipate that the cooperative and collaborative nature of the previous licensing steps will continue throughout the negotiating stage. Exelon will continue to provide information to facilitate open discussions during the negotiating sessions of licensing. In parallel, Exelon will also continue its involvement with the Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment. Exelon is grateful for the opportunity to participate in today’s panel discussion and appreciates the opportunity to discuss the relicensing process.