New Radar Technology MHz Band

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Ground Based Meteorological Radars Presented By: David Franc NOAAs National Weather Service September 2005.
Advertisements

Aviation Use of Radar WP8B/8D Radar Seminar September 2005.
Frequency sharing in Radiolocation bands
Long RAnge Navigation version C
Radar Principles & Systems
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
Interference Effects and Interference- Limit Criteria for Radar Receivers IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Conference Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 26 July 2010.
Technical Challenges to Spectrum Sharing Between Radars and Non-Radar (Communication) Systems 7th Annual ISART Boulder, Colorado 1 March 2005 Frank Sanders.
Third Edition By : Merrill I. Skolnik
1 Transmission Fundamentals Chapter 2 (Stallings Book)
Introduction to Radar Shaohua Li Graduate Student Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Enabling higher resolution services for the EESS by extended allocations in the 9.6GHz frequency range Presentation to New Zealand National Mtg Wellington,
23057page 1 Physics of SAR Summer page 2 Synthetic-Aperture Radar SAR Radar - Transmits its own illumination a "Microwave flashlight" RAdio.
Topic 4 Radar Fundamentals Enabling Objectives 4.1 DISCUSS the classifications of radars and specific radar systems employed by military and civilian users.
Radar Principles and Systems Part I
Radar Principles and Systems Part II. Learning Objectives Comprehend the factors that effect radar performance Comprehend frequency modulated CW as a.
SeaSonde Overview.
How can we get a vertical profile of the atmosphere?
Development of Active Phased Array Weather Radar
Radar: Acronym for Radio Detection and Ranging
AERIALS AND RADIO FREQUENCY PROPAGATION By Farhan Saeed.
Communication and Ground Station 12 October 2008.
RADAR SPECTRUM ENGINEERING CRITERIA (RSEC) A Comprehensive Review
Radar Principles & Systems
Use of FOS to Improve Airborne Radar Target Detection of other Aircraft Example PDS Presentation for EEE 455 / 457 Preliminary Design Specification Presentation.
Spaceborne Weather Radar
Radar Principles and Systems Part I
Radar 101 Rick Reaser May 19, 2010.
Tutorial I: Radar Introduction and basic concepts
Marsis Ground Processing Overview and Data Analysis Approach M. Cartacci, A. Cicchetti, R. Noschese, S. Giuppi Madrid
1 Business Telecommunications Data and Computer Communications Chapter 3 Data Transmission.
Remote Sensing Microwave Remote Sensing. 1. Passive Microwave Sensors ► Microwave emission is related to temperature and emissivity ► Microwave radiometers.
WMO/ITU Seminar Use of Radio Spectrum for Meteorology Earth Exploration-Satellite Service (EESS)- Active Spaceborne Remote Sensing and Operations Bryan.
Dr A VENGADARAJAN, Sc ‘F’, LRDE
Device Noise Two figures of merit for noisy devices
10. Satellite Communication & Radar Sensors
Radar Project Pulse Compression Radar
Certified Wireless Network Administrator (CWNA) PW0-105 Chapter 2 Radio Frequency Fundamentals.
Airborne RLAN and Weather Radar Interference Studies at C Band Paul Joe 1, Frank Whetten 2, John Scott 1 and Dennis Whetten 2 1 Environment Canada 2 The.
1 Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for Spaceborne/Airborne Forward-Looking Bistatic SAR Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation.
RAdio Detection And Ranging. Was originally for military use 1.Sent out electromagnetic radiation (Active) 2.Bounced off an object and returned to a listening.
ECEN5633 Radar Theory Lecture #19 24 March 2015 Dr. George Scheets n Read 13.3, 9; 9.1 n Problems Web 4, 5, &
EumetCal Examples.
Third Edition By : Merrill I. Skolnik
1 U.S. STUDY RADAR EMISSION MASKS A Review of the Radar Spectrum Engineering Criteria (RSEC) ROBERT L. HINKLE United States Department of Commerce National.
Part 3  Transmission Media & EM Propagations.  Provides the connection between the transmitter and receiver. 1.Pair of wires – carry electric signal.
Microwave Devices.
1 A conical scan type spaceborne precipitation radar K. Okamoto 1),S. Shige 2), T. Manabe 3) 1: Tottori University of Environmental Studies, 2: Kyoto University.
BENT 4343 RADIO NAVIGATION SYSTEM Dr. Ho Yih Hwa Room: A3/37 Tel:
A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster, Arne Theil.
RADAR system References: Intoduction to Radar Systems Merill I. Skolnik, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2001 Radar systems principles, Harold R. Raemer, CRC.
EEE381B Pulsed radar A pulsed radar is characterized by a high power transmitter that generates an endless sequence of pulses. The rate at which the pulses.
Radar Seminar On Submitted To: Submitted By:
Seminar on Radar Technology. Contents  Introduction  History  Basic Principle  Locating Target  Distance Determination  Direction Determination.
Continuous Wave Radar / Doppler Objectives Distinguish between Pulsed radar and CW radar. Explain what is required for CW radar to “see” a contact. Explain.
presented by: Reham Mahmoud AbD El-fattah ali
Radar System Components and System Design
United College Of Engineering And Research,
Visit for more Learning Resources
3-coordinate Coastal Radar with Multi-beam Active Phased Array
A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster,
SNS College of technology (Autonomous) Coimbatore
An-Najah National University
RADIATION SOURCES: OUTPUT POWER vs. FREQUENCY
Eliminating range ambiguity
Subject Name: Microwave and Radar Subject Code: 10EC54
Advanced Radar Systems
Loran c R.Ezhilarasan( ) R.Dinesh( )
Chap II. Radar Hardware (PART 1)
Phased Array Radars Naval Weapons Systems.
Presentation transcript:

New Radar Technology 8 500-10 500 MHz Band Presented by Mr. Frank Sanders National Telecommunications & Information Administration Mr. Thomas Fagan Raytheon

Technical Characteristics 8 500-10 500 MHz radars exist on land-based, transportable, shipboard, and airborne platforms. Radiodetermination functions include airborne, space & surface search, ground-mapping, terrain-following, navigation (both aeronautical and maritime), and target-identification. Major differences among radar designs include: transmitter output devices, transmit duty cycles, emission bandwidths, presence and types of intra-pulse modulation, frequency-agile capabilities of some, transmitter peak and average powers, and types of transmitter RF power devices. These characteristics, individually and in combination, all have major bearing on the compatibility of the radars with other radio systems in their environment.

More Technical Characteristics Many radiolocation radars in this band are primarily used for detection of airborne objects. The purpose is to measure target altitude as well as range and bearing. Some of the airborne targets are small and at long ranges as great as 555 km (300 nautical miles). These radiolocation radars must have high sensitivity and must provide a high degree of suppression to all forms of clutter return, including that from sea, land, and precipitation. In some cases, the radar emissions in this band are required to trigger radar beacons. The major radiolocation radars operating in this band are primarily used for detection of airborne objects. They are required to measure target altitude as well as range and bearing. Some of the airborne targets are small and some are at ranges as great as 555 km (300 nautical miles), so these radiolocation radars must have great sensitivity and must provide a high degree of suppression to all forms of clutter return, including that from sea, land, and precipitation. In some cases, the radar emissions in this band are required to trigger radar beacons.

Mission Requirements Dictate General Design Characteristics Basic radar design parameters are as follows: Minimum target size (cross section) and maximum range requirements Maximum available space for antenna (constrained, for ex., by platform size) Spectrum band (driven by propagation needs & maximum possible antenna size) Required (minimum acceptable) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for target echoes Minimum number of pulses (N), echoed from each target to achieve minimum SNR Antenna scan rate and beam scanning pattern, determined by the values of N and PRI Pulse repetition interval (PRI), determined by maximum radar range Pulse width and shape, determined by need for best possible location resolution Largely because of these mission requirements, the radars using this band tend to possess the following general characteristics: – they tend to have high transmitter peak and average power, with notable exceptions; – they typically use master-oscillator-power-amplifier transmitters rather than power oscillators. They are usually tunable, and some of them are frequency-agile. Some of them use linear – or non-linear – FM (chirp) or phase-coded modulation; – some of them have antenna mainbeams that are steerable in one or both angular dimensions using electronic beam steering; – they typically employ versatile receiving and processing capabilities, such as auxiliary sidelobe‑blanking receive antennas, processing of coherent-carrier pulse trains to suppress clutter return by means of moving-target-indication (MTI), constant-false-alarm-rate (CFAR) techniques, and, in some cases, adaptive selection of operating frequencies based on sensing of interference on various frequencies. – individual radars often have numerous different pulse widths and pulse repetition frequencies; some chirp radars have a choice of chirp bandwidths; and some frequency-agile radars have a variety of agile‑ or fixed-frequency modes. This flexibility can provide useful tools for maintaining compatibility with other radars in the environment. There is a wide variety of radar missions, platforms, waveforms, bandwidths, duty cycles, power levels, transmitter devices, etc. found in radars using this band.

Mission Requirements Dictate General Design Characteristics (cont.) Basic radar design parameters continued: Pulse peak power, determined by target size (cross section) and maximum range Pulse modulation (coding), which can allow pulses to be transmitted at lower peak power, but with proportionately longer length. (i.e., average power tends to stay constant). Selection of radar transmitter output device is determined by needs for peak power, pulse modulation (if any), size, weight, cost, reliability, and spectrum characteristics. 8 500-10 500 MHz radars often have small platform-size (and thus small antenna) constraints. 8 500-10 500 MHz radars often need to observe small targets at relatively long ranges using designs that have reasonable cost, reliability, and maintainability. These constraints feed back into all of the design parameters listed on the previous slide. Largely because of these mission requirements, the radars using this band tend to possess the following general characteristics: – they tend to have high transmitter peak and average power, with notable exceptions; – they typically use master-oscillator-power-amplifier transmitters rather than power oscillators. They are usually tunable, and some of them are frequency-agile. Some of them use linear – or non-linear – FM (chirp) or phase-coded modulation; – some of them have antenna mainbeams that are steerable in one or both angular dimensions using electronic beam steering; – they typically employ versatile receiving and processing capabilities, such as auxiliary sidelobe‑blanking receive antennas, processing of coherent-carrier pulse trains to suppress clutter return by means of moving-target-indication (MTI), constant-false-alarm-rate (CFAR) techniques, and, in some cases, adaptive selection of operating frequencies based on sensing of interference on various frequencies. – individual radars often have numerous different pulse widths and pulse repetition frequencies; some chirp radars have a choice of chirp bandwidths; and some frequency-agile radars have a variety of agile‑ or fixed-frequency modes. This flexibility can provide useful tools for maintaining compatibility with other radars in the environment. There is a wide variety of radar missions, platforms, waveforms, bandwidths, duty cycles, power levels, transmitter devices, etc. found in radars using this band.

Mission Requirements Dictate General Design Characteristics (cont.) 8 500 10 500 MHz radars often need high transmitter peak and average power Master-oscillator-power-amplifier transmitters may be preferred over power oscillators. Tunability and frequency-agility are sometimes required Some require pulse modulation such as a linear (or non-linear) FM chirp or phase codes. Antenna mainbeams often need to be steerable in one or both angular dimensions, sometimes using electronic beam steering. Largely because of these mission requirements, the radars using this band tend to possess the following general characteristics: – they tend to have high transmitter peak and average power, with notable exceptions; – they typically use master-oscillator-power-amplifier transmitters rather than power oscillators. They are usually tunable, and some of them are frequency-agile. Some of them use linear – or non-linear – FM (chirp) or phase-coded modulation; – some of them have antenna mainbeams that are steerable in one or both angular dimensions using electronic beam steering; – they typically employ versatile receiving and processing capabilities, such as auxiliary sidelobe‑blanking receive antennas, processing of coherent-carrier pulse trains to suppress clutter return by means of moving-target-indication (MTI), constant-false-alarm-rate (CFAR) techniques, and, in some cases, adaptive selection of operating frequencies based on sensing of interference on various frequencies. – individual radars often have numerous different pulse widths and pulse repetition frequencies; some chirp radars have a choice of chirp bandwidths; and some frequency-agile radars have a variety of agile‑ or fixed-frequency modes. This flexibility can provide useful tools for maintaining compatibility with other radars in the environment. There is a wide variety of radar missions, platforms, waveforms, bandwidths, duty cycles, power levels, transmitter devices, etc. found in radars using this band.

Mission Requirements Dictate General Design Characteristics (cont.) Driven by mission requirements, individual 8 500-10 500 MHz radars need a wide variety of pulse widths & pulse repetition frequencies. Chirp radars need a variety of chirp bandwidths. Some frequency-agile radars need a variety of agile-frequency modes. Such design flexibilities can provide useful tools for performing missions while maintaining compatibility with other radars in the environment. Versatile receiving and processing capabilities are also often needed for 8 500-10 500 MHz radars to include: Auxiliary sidelobe‑blanking receive antennas; Processing of coherent-carrier pulse trains to suppress clutter return by means of moving-target-indication (MTI): Constant-false-alarm-rate (CFAR) techniques: Adaptive selection of operating frequencies based on sensing of interference on various frequencies (some cases). Largely because of these mission requirements, the radars using this band tend to possess the following general characteristics: – they tend to have high transmitter peak and average power, with notable exceptions; – they typically use master-oscillator-power-amplifier transmitters rather than power oscillators. They are usually tunable, and some of them are frequency-agile. Some of them use linear – or non-linear – FM (chirp) or phase-coded modulation; – some of them have antenna mainbeams that are steerable in one or both angular dimensions using electronic beam steering; – they typically employ versatile receiving and processing capabilities, such as auxiliary sidelobe‑blanking receive antennas, processing of coherent-carrier pulse trains to suppress clutter return by means of moving-target-indication (MTI), constant-false-alarm-rate (CFAR) techniques, and, in some cases, adaptive selection of operating frequencies based on sensing of interference on various frequencies. – individual radars often have numerous different pulse widths and pulse repetition frequencies; some chirp radars have a choice of chirp bandwidths; and some frequency-agile radars have a variety of agile‑ or fixed-frequency modes. This flexibility can provide useful tools for maintaining compatibility with other radars in the environment. There is a wide variety of radar missions, platforms, waveforms, bandwidths, duty cycles, power levels, transmitter devices, etc. found in radars using this band.

Marine Radar U.S. Department of Commerce Typical X-Band maritime radionavigation radar Magnetron Output Integrated Platform (receiver & transmitter contained in small mast- mounted package) Typically found onboard pleasure craft and commercial ships

8 500-10 500 MHz Marine Radar Mk-2 Pathfinder (marine) Raytheon

Mission Requirements Dictate Frequency Range Atmospheric attenuation and water vapor absorption help determine radar operational frequencies. Weather radars use frequencies where water vapor absorption is high. Radiolocation radars use frequencies where water vapor absorption is low. Only certain frequency bands have low water vapor absorption.

8 500-10 500 MHz Radar Design Tradeoffs Except for some ground-based systems, 8 500-10 500 MHz platform dimensions typically restrict the maximum possible size of transmitter antennae, both for present and future systems. Small antenna sizes tend to force high pulse peak power levels for adequate target detection. Alternatively, if lower peak power levels are used then longer pulse widths are required to expose targets to enough total energy to detect them. But, if longer pulses are used, then additional pulse modulation (coding) is required to achieve adequate range resolution.

8 500-10 500 MHz Radar Design Tradeoffs (cont.) The choice of 8 500-10 500 MHz transmitter output device technology is a major design decision. It significantly affects radar performance, cost, and spectrum out-of-band and spurious emission levels. Tradeoffs between all these parameters must be carefully balanced by designers of X-band radars. Some 8 500-10 500 MHz radar designs may be driven primarily by cost and size factors, and may therefore need to use cheaper and lighter tubes, such as magnetrons. Conversely, more advanced transmitter output devices (eg; solid state), may be more costly, heavier, and more complex. But they may offer better-controlled pulse shaping and thus possibly improved spectrum out-of-band and spurious emission characteristics.

8 500-10 500 MHz Airborne Radar Raytheon Typical example of an Airborne Radar where it must fit into the nosecone of an aircraft Note that the antenna is small to fit into the limited amount of space available AN/APG-73 radar Raytheon

8 500-10 500 MHz Airborne Radar AN/APG-70 radar Raytheon

8 500-10 500 MHz Surface Surveillance Radar Used for monitoring ground traffic (airplanes, service vehicles, baggage vehicles, security vehicles) at airports Advanced Surface Movement Radar (ASMR) Raytheon

Future 8 500-10 500 MHz Radar Design Trends (cont.) More flexibility will be needed, including the capacity to operate different modes in different azimuth and elevation sectors. Capability to operate in a wide bandwidth will be needed. Electronically-steerable antennae will become more common. Current technology makes phase steering a practical and attractive alternative to frequency steering. Radars in other bands have employed phase steering in both azimuth and elevation, and can steer any fundamental frequency in the radar’s operating band to any arbitrary azimuth and elevation within its angular coverage area. Phase steering may enhance electromagnetic compatibility in many circumstances. Reduction of unwanted emissions below those of the existing radars that employ magnetrons or crossed-field amplifiers may occur through the use of linear beam and solid-state output devices. In broad outline, radiodetermination radars that might be developed in the future to operate in the 8 500-10 500 MHz band are likely to resemble the existing radars described here. Future radiodetermination radars are likely to have at least as much flexibility as the radars already described, including the capacity to operate differently in different azimuth and elevation sectors. It is reasonable to expect that some future designs may strive for a capability to operate in a wide band extending at least to the band limits used in this consideration. Future radiodetermination radars are likely to have electronically-steerable antennae. Current technology makes phase steering a practical and attractive alternative to frequency steering, and numerous radiodetermination radars developed in recent years for use in other bands have employed phase steering in both azimuth and elevation. Unlike frequency-steered radars (e.g. Systems 15 and 17), new phased-array radars can steer any fundamental frequency in the radar’s operating band to any arbitrary azimuth and elevation within its angular coverage area. Among other advantages, that would facilitate electromagnetic compatibility in many circumstances. Some future radiodetermination radars are expected to have average-power capabilities at least as high as those of the radars described herein. However, it is reasonable to expect that designers of future radars will strive to reduce wideband noise emissions below those of the existing radars that employ magnetrons or crossed-field amplifiers. Such noise reduction is expected to be achieved by the use of solid-state transmitter/antenna systems. In that case, the transmitted pulses would be longer in duration and the transmit duty cycles would be substantially higher than those of current tube-type radar transmitters.

Future 8 500-10 500 MHz Radar Design Trends (cont.) Radar designs will continue to evolve Towards solid-state output devices; Radar bandwidth will increase (instantaneous and operational); Peak power will increase on some radars; Average power will increase on some radars; Pulse Repetition Frequency (PRF) and pulse width will increase; Amount of coding modulation (phase and chirp) will increase due to the trend towards solid-state output devices; Use of this radar frequency band will increase.

Summary Development of radars in this band is an ongoing process that continue to evolve as technology advances. Working Party 8B will continue to follow these technology trends and their consequences and impact on the use of the radio spectrum. Thank You for your attention!