TRB: Waste Management and Resource Efficiency Workshop July 2011 Tom Roick, Senior Policy Analyst Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Oregon DEQ’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Environmental Protection CLEAN FILL POLICY
Advertisements

Introduction to Concurrency Management. What is Concurrency? Chapter , F.S. requires Comprehensive Plans to adopt a concurrency management system,
Certification of Compliance By Evita Lagard
Role of Activity & Use Limitations in Clean Energy Development at Disposal Sites Elizabeth Callahan Acting Division Director, Policy and Program Planning,
Chapter F.A.C. Updates F. Thomas Lubozynski, P.E. Waste Program Administrator.
The Proposed Part 115 Rules and Waste Utilization East and West Michigan Chapters of the Air and Waste Management Association & The Environmental Law Section.
The Pre-eminent Supplier– Our People MAKE IT HAPPEN PAPA 54th Annual Paving Conference Hershey, PA January, 30th 2014 RAS Best Practices.
Basic Economic Development Course in Pennsylvania Environmental and Commercial Real Estate Legal Issues Surrounding Economic Development Act 2 Issues Scott.
Remediation Programs Update MSECA Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2012.
S-1925 Subsection t Stakeholder Meeting November 9, :30-2:30pm NJDEP Public Hearing Room 1 st Floor, 401 East State Street Trenton, NJ.
Waste Ban Compliance Training Program Administrative Compliance Requirements April and May 2006 Administrative Compliance Requirements April and May 2006.
Building for theBy Recycling Industrial Materials Industrial Materials Recycling Kimberly Cochran, PhD US EPA Office of Solid Waste AGC Building Division.
PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION: Old Fall River Road Landfill Dartmouth, MA Massachusetts Unlined Landfill Closure Policy March 28, 2013 Mark Dakers, Acting.
1 Year in Review: Clean Air Act Presented by: Tom Wood Stoel Rives LLP October 8, 2010 Things Are Getting Really Complicated.
Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) Demonstration Project Guidance Stakeholder Workshop Waste Compliance and Mitigation Program Monthly Public Meeting August.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act
Wenxin Zhang Department of Civic Design University of Liverpool
REVISED WASTE CLASSIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR SOUTH AFRICA National Waste Classification and Management Regulations & Standards Stakeholder Workshop.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Tier 1 Module 7 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Establishing a TRP.
Department of Public Works Non-Exclusive Solid Waste Collection Franchise System – Review September 29, 2014.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines January 19, 2010 Daniel Hall, Solid Waste Section Chief.
OAS Meeting August 2012 Jennifer Opila (CO) and David Allard (PA)
Environmental Quality Restricted Account (EQRA) Background Bill Sinclair Acting Executive Director Utah Department of Environmental Quality May 28, 2009.
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
Italy: the new legislation on the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting 5-7th June 2006, Athens,
Post-Consumer Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles in Asphalt Pavement JAMES M. ROSS Project Manager FRED SMITH COMPANY.
October Mary Louise Hendrickson Solid Waste Section – Technical Lead
Draft Policy for Assessing & Managing Contaminants in soil: a progress report WMINZ Conference, 15 October 2009 James Court and Howard Ellis Ministry for.
Advisory Committee Kickoff Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California July 29, 2003 CAL/EPA.
Chapter 46 Environmental Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines June 17, 2009 Mark Dakers, Environmental Analyst Massachusetts.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
1 Draft Final Safe Fill Regulations. 2 W hat’s new in Safe Fill Definition? Definition is short as a result of: – Due diligence procedures moved to existing.
South Australia’s Environment Protection Authority Articulating aesthetics Monday 24 August 2015 Andrew Pruszinski.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
Eco·Systems, Inc.. Beneficial Reuse of Industrial Byproducts Definition- turning an industrial byproduct into a valuable commodity Examples – Coal Combustion.
Discussion And Request For Direction Relative To Strategic Directive 8.3 Regulation Reviews For Alternative Daily Cover And Food/Green Waste Composting.
Ed Mussler, P.E., Permitting Branch Supervisor Solid Waste Section Division of Waste Management NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources Presentation.
Presentation to Association Municipalities of Ontario Implementation of Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices Ministry of the.
Status Report On Staff Review Of Board Regulations For Alternative Daily Cover, Food And Green Waste Composting, Farm And Ranch Composting, Compostable.
EPA P-1 Corrective Action Streamlined Consent Orders Bob Greaves Region 3 Deb Goldblum Region 3 Tom Krueger Region 5.
Preliminary Analysis of an Evolving Issue Inert Disposal Sites and Permits Background  Definitions  Non-Traditional Facilities  LA Sites  New Information.
1 Draft Final Safe Fill Regulations Major Changes/Revisions Presented to the CSSAB November 8, 2002.
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Pete Doorn Special Remediation Branch Superfund Section Division of Waste Management
Division of Water Quality Coal Ash Storage, Use, & Disposal: Update Ted L. Bush, Chief Aquifer Protection Section Division of Water Quality “To protect.
Post-Consumer Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles in Asphalt Pavement February 2012 James M. Ross Asphalt Quality Control Manager Greenville Paving & Contracting,
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 210, Subchapter E Presented by Kara Denney September 23, 2015.
Oil & Gas Waste Stream Management and Permitting Options
Lecture (11): Waste Recycling
The New Construction and Demolition Debris Waste Ban Amendments
Upland Landfill Waste Discharge Application 7295 Gold River Highway
Introduction to the Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule
Fall Low Level Waste Forum Meeting
Tire Accountability Program
Solid Waste Handling Standards
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
What to Do With Contaminated Fill
Ohio EPA Beneficial Use Program
Overview on the Regulations and Technical Requirements for E-Waste Management in Rwanda. RURA.
2019 Environmental Trade Fair & Conference Monica Vallin-Baez
Presentation transcript:

TRB: Waste Management and Resource Efficiency Workshop July 2011 Tom Roick, Senior Policy Analyst Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Oregon DEQ’s Rules for the Beneficial Use of Solid Waste

Topics What is the beneficial use of solid waste? Parts of the new rules Where the rules don’t apply e.g., “clean fill” ?

Topics cont. Examples of how this will work Where to get more information

Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) (12) Beneficial use of solid waste means… ….the productive use of solid waste in a manner that will not create an adverse impact to public health, safety, welfare, or the environment. Solid Waste Productive use Will not create an adverse impact

Beneficial use examples Spent foundry sand from the steel industry used as a substitute for virgin sand in making concrete Dredged sediments used for fill material on upland construction projects Asphalt roofing shingles used as a binder in asphalt mixtures Asphalt pavement or grindings used as aggregate in new pavement or as compacted fill within a road prism

Rules adopted May 2010 What the rules cover: 1.Define beneficial use of solid waste (OAR ) 2.Scope and applicability of the rules (OAR ) 3.Identify “standing” beneficial use determinations (OAR ) 4.Identify performance criteria for evaluating case- specific applications (OAR )

What the rules cover cont. 5.Create three tiers for evaluation depending upon the potential environmental impact or amount of information needed (OAR ) 6.Establish fees (OAR (2)(f)

What is not covered by the beneficial use rules Materials addressed under existing rules such as: Source separated recyclables under the Opportunity to Recycle law Feedstocks for composting Permitted activities (e.g., landfill daily cover) Hazardous Waste “Clean fill” OAR

“Clean fill” means… …material consisting of soil, rock, concrete, brick building block, tile or asphalt paving, which do not contain contaminants which could adversely impact the waters of the State or public health. DEQ is developing risk-based screening criteria for determining acceptable contaminant levels. “Clean fill” is a solid waste, but clean fill disposal sites are exempt from solid waste permitting and if so, a beneficial use determination would not be necessary. OAR

Beneficial use - solid waste definitions “Beneficial use” “Beneficial use determination” (BUD) “Acceptable risk level” “Sensitive environments”

OAR (3) Scope of beneficial use rules A solid waste managed according to a beneficial use determination is not regulated as solid waste. Note - if you are applying the beneficial use rules it’s important to understand that the material is still solid waste, but when a BUD is granted, DEQ agrees to not regulate the material as solid waste as long as the BUD conditions are met.

OAR Standing Beneficial Use Determinations Criteria for, and tabulated list of, rule-authorized standing beneficial use determinations, such as: MaterialBeneficial Use Conditions on Use (a)Asphalt pavementAs asphalt and Asphalt grindings or asphalt grindings aggregate in new must be compacted from road projectsasphalt pavement when used within or as fill within road prisms road prisms

OAR (5) 12 Standing BUDs a)Asphalt pavement or grindings b)Asphalt shingle waste c)Dredged sediment d)Dredged sediment e)Foundry sand f)Foundry sand g)Soil from cleanup sites h)Soil from petroleum cleanup sites i)Steel slag j)Street sweeping fines k)Street sweeping sand from winter applications l)Wood-derived bottom ash from boilers

Standing BUDs How this will work e.g., Asphalt paving or grindings used for new asphalt or as fill within road prisms: Generator may apply an identified Standing Beneficial Use Determination No additional DEQ review or approval, no fees Generator/applicant must maintain records If requested by DEQ, generator/applicant must provide information to confirm that their beneficial use complies with the rules

OAR Case-specific beneficial use performance criteria Criteria for DEQ approval of BUDs: (1)Must Characterize the waste - Sufficiently to demonstrate compliance with the rules (2)The use is productive – An identified or reasonably likely use for the material; The use is a valuable part of a manufacturing process or substitute for a raw material, not disposal; The use is within applicable engineering or commercial standards.

OAR Case-specific beneficial use performance criteria cont. (3)The use will not create an adverse impact to public health, safety, welfare, or the environment – Not a hazardous waste; Stored and managed as a solid waste before use; Hazardous substances in the material do not exceed: (i) concentrations in a comparable raw material or product, (ii) natural background concentrations, or (iii) acceptable risk levels; No increase in hazardous substances to sensitive environments; No objectionable odors, dust, fire, etc.

OAR Case-specific DEQ review of beneficial use applications Tier One…use of a material that does not contain hazardous substances significantly exceeding the concentration in a comparable raw material or commercial product and will be used in a manufactured product Tier Two…use of a material that contains hazardous substances significantly exceeding the concentration in a comparable raw material or commercial product, or involves application on the land Tier Three…use of a material that requires research, such as a literature review or risk assessment, or for a demonstration project to demonstrate compliance with this rule

Case-Specific BUD applications How this will work Example: a company wishes to sell wood boiler ash as a construction fill material or roadbase Generator/applicant applies to DEQ for a Beneficial Use Determination and pays a fee DEQ reviews: –Has the applicant adequately characterized the waste and evaluated the potential risks and exposure routes? –Does DEQ agree with the requested tier review? –Is the proposed use productive? –Does the proposed use meet hazardous substance criteria? –What type of public input may be needed to inform the public of the requested use?

Case-Specific BUD applications How this will work cont. DEQ identifies specific conditions under which the proposed use will meet environmental and human health criteria DEQ will undertake a public comment process, if needed and may adjust the BUD based on public comment DEQ issues the BUD The applicant must meet specific conditions of the BUD including proper management of the waste until it is beneficially used, and keep records and report as required, etc.

OAR (2) Fees (A) The review of an annual or other report required under a beneficial use determination: $250; (B) A Tier One beneficial use determination: $1,000; (C) A Tier Two beneficial use determination: $2,000; (D) A Tier Three beneficial use determination: $5,000; (E) Annual extension to a demonstration project authorization: $1,000.

Take home message - some guidelines When do I need a BUD? If it is Solid Waste (e.g., asphalt grindings) That will be used productively Material has been subject to DEQ oversight because there are environmental concerns with reuse (e.g., street sweepings) When a Solid Waste Letter Authorization for disposal is not appropriate Not addressed in other Solid Waste rules (e.g., not concrete that is “clean fill”) Look for a Standing BUD first

DEQ’s beneficial use web site icialuse.htm The rules Sign up on list serve to receive notices Fact sheets, application forms Guidance Beneficial Use Determinations

DEQ Solid Waste staff Questions? Eastern Region, Bruce Lumper, x240 Western Region, Bob Barrows, Northwest Region, Audrey O’Brien, Tom Roick, Land Quality Division,