The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A120018. However, these contents do not necessarily.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
A Guide to Implementation
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Collaborative Data Teams
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Monica Ballay Data Triangulation: Measuring Implementation of SPDG Focus Areas.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Measuring Implementation: School-Wide Instructional Staff Perspective Amy Gaumer Erickson, Ph.D. University of Kansas Evaluator: Kansas & Missouri SPDGs.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person, regardless of audience, of the following resources found on.
Carol M. Trivette, Ph.D. Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute Asheville and Morganton, North Carolina Presentation prepared for Helping Extend Learning and.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Goal Attainment Scales as a way to Measure Progress Amy Gaumer Erickson & Monica Ballay December 3, 2012.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Tier 1 Instructional Delivery and Treatment Fidelity Networking Meeting February, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
The Missouri—Show Me Outcomes Story. Missouri Integrated Model (2007 SPDG)
Essentials Understanding connections between foundations and all practice topics (impact for supporting academic and social behavioral progress) Foundations:
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Page 1: Five Ws and One H of Credentialing Column 1 School Year Cohort 1 Year 1 (Pilot Year) Column 2 School Year Cohort 1 Year 2 Cohort.
Louisiana State Personnel Development Grant Personnel Development Grant to improve outcomes for SWD Awarded to the LDOE in 2016.
Assessing High Quality Professional Development BY: MONICA BALLAY |
Professional Development: Evaluation Strategies to Maximize Impact
SSIP Implementation: Alignment & Evaluation Across the State System
Improving Coaching through Participant & Observation Feedback
Family-Guided Routines-Based Intervention Introduction Module
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Multiple background possibilities
Presentation transcript:

The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the US Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Professional Development to Practice Embedding Feedback Data into Your Professional Development SPDG National Meeting, March 2013 Ronda Jenson (UMKC,SPDG Implementation Consultant) Pattie Noonan & Amy Gaumer Erickson (KU, Evaluators) Pam Williams & Ginger Henry (Missouri Dept of Elementary Secondary Education)

Professional Development to Practice Mini-Presentation Overview  Current Reality—  Missouri Statewide System of Support  Collaborative Work  Moving Forward—  Conceptualizing High Quality Professional Development (HQPD)  Early implementation stages: Plans, tools, & steps taken

Professional Development to Practice 2 Learner Objectives  To describe one approach to conceptualizing HQPD  To describe one approach to implementing HQPD at the early implementation stages

Professional Development to Practice Current Reality  Statewide System of Support  9 Regional Professional Development Centers  Collaborative Work  248 of buildings in 105 of districts  Foci Effective Instructional Practices Collaborative Teams Data-based Decision-making Common Formative Assessments CONTEXT

Professional Development to Practice Collaborative Work: How it will be done Effective Teaching and Learning Practices Common Formative AssessmentsData-Based Decision -making Collaborative Data Teams help each other learn to select and use effective teaching and learning practices which are intentionally used to improve student outcomes Collaborative Data Teams use common formative assessments to monitor the value of the teaching and learning strategies and of student acquisition of knowledge and skills Collaborative data teams collectively analyze data to determine who needs more help and what practices are most likely to work for re-teaching. Re-testing validates their decisions.

Professional Development to Practice Collaborative Work Process

Professional Development to Practice By the numbers… Total Districts = 105 (20%) of Missouri Districts Total Buildings248 High School9 Middle School26 Elementary213 Total Teachers8993 General7517 Spec. Ed.1297 Ancillary179 Total Enrollment109900SWD15077 As of February 28, 2013

Professional Development to Practice Moving Forward with HQPD High Quality Professional Development (HQPD) yields a direct impact on teacher practice for improved student outcomes.

Professional Development to Practice What does HQPD look like?  Has defined learner objectives  Aligns with school goals, state and district standards and assessment, and other professional learning activities including formative teacher evaluation.  Builds shared vocabulary and common goals required to sustain instructional improvements through rigorous feedback.  Focuses on core content and modeling teaching strategies of the content  Has structure with well thought out delivery  Makes efficient use of time MO Synthesis

Professional Development to Practice What does HQPD look like?  Has a purposeful design to be ongoing and to include guided practice and learning in the teaching environment  Utilizes adult learning principles  Systematically and continually evaluated for impact on increased knowledge and skills  Includes opportunities to practice and/or rehearse new skills  Includes opportunities for teachers to share and reflect on learning  Embedded and continuous feedback in the form of technical assistance and resources for ongoing improvement  Includes coaching to improve fidelity of implementation MO Synthesis

Professional Development to Practice How will we know if HQPD is occurring?  Pre and post event assessment of knowledge  Formative and summative assessment of participant knowledge and skills  Adherence to standards of high quality professional development (fidelity)  Fidelity of learned teaching practice  Measurable impact on student learning MO Synthesis

Professional Development to Practice PD2Practice: Revitalizing the System  Adult learning principles  Fidelity of training delivered  Matching the need with a balance of training, coaching, & technical assistance  Assessment of adult learning

Professional Development to Practice PD2Practice: Learning Packages Selected high effect size instructional practices* Spaced vs massed instruction Reciprocal teaching Student self-report grades Feedback Foundations Focus AreasEffective Instructional Practices Collaborative Data Team Data- based Decision- making Common Formative Assessment Internal Coaching Alignment Support *Hattie (2009)

Professional Development to Practice HQPD Tools & Support  HQPD structure for learning packages  Online collaborative workspace  Observation Checklist for HQPD training  Pre/Post assessment guidance  Coaching at multiple levels  Regional Implementation Coaches  Building-level internal coaching

Professional Development to Practice HQPD Structure 1.Preparation 2.Opening & introductions 3.Why the topic is important 4.Overview of the topic 5.Unpacking the topic 6.Topic in practice 7.Topic in action 8.Assessment & reflection 9.Closing & follow-up

Professional Development to Practice Online Collaborative Workspace  18 groups  255 participants

Professional Development to Practice Observation Checklist for HQPD Training 21 Item Checklist  Preparation  Introduction  Demonstration  Engagement  Evaluation  Mastery

Professional Development to Practice Pre/Post Test Guidance Checklist

Professional Development to Practice MO SPDG Implementation Coaches 9 Regional Implementations Coaches work closely with Regional Professional Centers to… “support both intervention and implementation fidelity. Implementation fidelity refers to the degree to which high quality professional development is delivered as intended and has the effect of promoting adoption and usage of evidence-based instructional practices. Intervention fidelity refers to the degree to which educators apply the evidence- based instructional practices to their teaching as intended.”

Professional Development to Practice Building-level Internal Coaching  Are building-level educators who demonstrate fluency in the instructional practice necessary for modeling and describing the practice in daily teaching.  Possess critical skills for effective instructive interactions with colleagues  Are fluent in using implementation measures to monitor progress toward fluency

Professional Development to Practice Lessons Learned Thus Far…  Teams are critical/ Leadership is even more critical  HQPD mindset does not equal HQPD practice  Measuring fidelity and assessment of learning can be uncomfortable, but yet so highly valuable  Typical methods of formative assessment during PD often misses the mark