Gretchen Rossman Ola M Khalili Ramallah-Palestine August-1-2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEASURES OF SUCCESS: An Evaluators Perspective Carol L. Colbeck Director & Associate Professor Center for the Study of Higher Education The Pennsylvania.
Advertisements

Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
Provisions for Training and Professional Development 1 Florida Digital Instructional Materials Work Group November 13, 2012.
Teacher Preparation and Education Reform: A Behavioral Systems Perspective Çhair: Ronnie Detrich, Wing Institute Discussant: Chuck Salzberg, Utah State.
Providing On-going Support for STEM Teachers Joan D. Pasley Horizon Research, Inc.
Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.
Professional Development and Research at UNM CEMELA Retreat May 24, 2005.
UTILIZING FORMATIVE EVALUATION IN A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Tiah Alphonso Louisiana State University Department of Educational Theory, Policy,
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Method Issues Marian Ford Erin Gonzales November 2, 2010.
1. Principles Learning Assessment Technology 3 Teaching Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality.
Supporting Teachers to make Overall Teacher Judgments The Consortium for Professional Learning.
Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
1 The Differential Effects of Two Versions of Professional Development on Teachers’ Self-Efficacy to Implement Inquiry-Based Science Brian Lawton University.
E-portfolio in TaskStream (DRF) Signature Assignments Signature Assignments Classroom Community (1 st & 2 nd semesters) Classroom Community (1 st & 2 nd.
Studying One’s Own Practice through Action Research
CONSTRUCTIVISM.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Paper Title: “The influence of gender in the relation between Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation, and Citizen Empowerment” Conference Paper by: Kennedy.
CYCO Professional Development Packages (PDPs) Teacher Responsiveness to Student Scientific Inquiry 1.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
Does Theory Improve Practice? Can Participation in Research Based Workshops Improve Teachers’ Practice? Ronith Klein Kibbutzim College of Education, Tel.
Instructional System Design
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
UNIVIRTUAL FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Versione 00 del 29/07/2009.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
 Sytemic Issues ◦ University entrance exams, National curriculum and education reforms, Extension of compulsory education, Poor budget, poor facilities,
LEARNING DIFFERENCES - AGENCY SELF-ASSESSMENT GUIDE Program Year A tool for identifying program improvement and professional development needs.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Collaboration between mathematicians and mathematic education researcher María Leonor Varas UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE BIRS, January 2014.
1 National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Illustrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice: Getting Started with the Practices Investigations.
1 From Theory to Practice: Teaching mathematics through problem solving Misfer Saud AlSalouli AlHasa Teachers’ College King Abdulaziz City for Science.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Matthew C. Robinson, Summer B 2006
Deconstructing Standard 2c Dr. Mike Mahan Gordon College 1.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Making Connections. Overview A framework Previous work Current work.
Philosophy of Education Competency 4.7. Developmental Goal Your own philosophy of education is very important because it provides focus and emphasis for.
RESEARCH IN MATHEMATİCS EDUCATION Karadeniz Technical University Fatih Faculty of Education Prof.Dr. Adnan Baki.
Table of Contents Professional Development School Pilot Study.
CT 854: Assessment and Evaluation in Science & Mathematics
AERA Annual Meeting 2004, San Diego April, Optimizing Evaluation Quality & Cost Effectiveness Evaluating the University of Texas Master Teacher.
Dr. Othman Ali Alghtani Tabuk University, K.S.A.
IMPACT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN EFFECTIVENESS OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION IN ALBANIA IMPACT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN EFFECTIVENESS OF VOCATIONAL.
Presented by: Shawna Howard Research Professor: Andres Garcia, Ed.D
School of Education, CASEwise: A Case-based Online Learning Environment for Teacher Professional Development Chrystalla.
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
FASA Middle School Principal ’ s Leadership Academy Don Griesheimer Laura Hassler Lang July 22, 2007.
Part of intro to OAME LEADERSHIP Fall 2011 (draft of ideas) Chris Suurtamm & Connie Quadrini.
Developing Leaders in Effective Teaching Diane J. Briars President National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2015 NCTM Minneapolis Regional.
Supervisor Training PEER Centers April/May
I, robot Freewill and the role of the maths teacher ALM 2009 Rachel Stone
Pre-Session Checklist MUTE mic TEST Bridgit PRINT Handouts Sign-in sheet Alberta Assessment Consortium Winter Seminar 2010 Student Engagement.
5.0 Teaching Academy Liberty High.   Your own philosophy of education is very important because it provides focus and emphasis for your teaching. 
Deconstructing Standard 2c Laura Frizzell Coastal Plains RESA 1.
PARCC Model Content Frameworks A Review. 2 Structure of the Frameworks Examples of key advances from the previous grade; Fluency expectations or examples.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
EVALUATING A MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH M.ED. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Knowledge, Pedagogy, Practice or Student Achievement:
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Integrating Curriculum Through Project and Play
Session 4 Objectives Participants will:
NJCU College of Education
Logo slide English/Arabic
REPORTING.
EDD/581 Week 1.
The Influence of Teachers’ Technology Use on Instructional Practices
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Research-based Active-Learning Instruction in Physics
Presentation transcript:

Gretchen Rossman Ola M Khalili Ramallah-Palestine August

 The problem  Purpose of the study  Research questions  Theoretical framework  Research methodology  Research context  Findings  Limitations  Recommendations

 The characteristics of current teachers.  The objectives of current TPDPs.

 Describe and analyze the process of TPDPs.  Explore the beliefs that different groups of stakeholders hold about mathematics and mathematics teaching and learning  Describe the interaction between the previous two objectives.

1. What do TPDPs for mathematics teachers look like in Palestine? 2. What do Palestinian teachers, teacher trainers, and policy makers believe about mathematics and mathematics teaching? 3. What is the correspondence or gap between:  Teachers’ and trainers’ beliefs?  Teachers’ and policy makers’ beliefs?  The participants’ beliefs and principles of effective mathematics teaching

Beliefs Math and math teaching Self-efficacy Beliefs and practices TPDPs Characteristics of effective TPDPs Beliefs and TPDPs Changing beliefs and practices through TPDPs

Beliefs Math and math teaching Self-efficacy Beliefs and practices TPDPs Characteristics of effective TPDPs Beliefs and TPDPs Changing beliefs and practices through TPDPs Theoretical Framework

Skemp (1978)Lerman (1983)Kuhs and Ball (1986)Ernest (1989), (1994) InstrumentalAbsolutistContent focused with emphasis on performance Instrumental Content focused with emphasis on conceptual understanding Platonic Classroom focused Relational FallibilistLearner focusedProblem solving

Evidences from research correlate between teachers’ sense of self-efficacy and their:  willingness to apply non-traditional teaching methods.  beliefs about teaching.

 Teachers’ practices reflect their beliefs.  Teachers’ practices are influenced by other factors besides their beliefs.

Beliefs Math and math teaching Self-efficacy Beliefs and practices TPDPs Characteristics of effective TPDPs Beliefs and TPDPs Changing beliefs and practices through TPDPs Theoretical Framework

TPDPs Traditional Developing stage Implementing stage Job- embedded After implementing

Beliefs Math and math teaching Self-efficacy Beliefs and practices TPDPs Characteristics of effective TPDPs Beliefs and TPDPs Changing beliefs and practices through TPDPs Theoretical Framework

 Assimilation and accommodation (Paiget, 1952)  Conceptual change process (Kagan, 1992)  Elicitation and construction ( Fenstermacher and Richardson, 1993)  Schema theory (Timperley and Robinson, 2001)

 MOEHE  2-district offices/West Bank

 Qualitative approach ◦ Interviews ◦ Document analysis

Gender Position MaleFemale Policy makers41 Supervisors24 Training developers 11 Principals22 Mathematics teachers 24 Total1112

 Training manuals  Policy documents Standards for teachers Standards for TPDPs

1. The process of developing, implementing, and following-up TPDPs 2. Beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching 3. Policy documents vs. TPDPs and policies

 Reforms and suggested changes in practice should emerge as a result of interaction between different stakeholders.  Up-grade trainers’ qualifications and methods of training.  The necessity of integrating subject-matter knowledge with PCK.

 There is a need for systematic follow-up procedures during and after TPDPs.  Rethink the current approaches in TPDPs.

 Emphasize one domain of the mathematical knowledge (training documents)  Instrumental view of mathematics Teacher role: instructor Student role: respond to teachers’ instruction Curriculum: determine what should be taught and how

3. Policy documents vs. TPDPs and policies  Assessment practices  Reflective practice  The curriculum  Teachers’ qualification Policy documents TPDPsPolicies

 The study did not collect data about the actual implementation of TPDPs.  The study did not measure the actual impact of TPDPs.  No generalization can be made of the collected data

 Alternative approaches in TPDPs  Supportive policies that encourage and sustain the process of teacher change  More studies to investigate teachers’ and supervisors’ beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching

THANK YOU شكرا