The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme Use of Inpatient Survey Results Results of an online survey of acute hospital trust.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HELP US TO PREVENT INFECTIONS SPREADING cleanyourhands campaign 2008/09.
Advertisements

Progress Files and reflection… …for postgraduate research students…
Quality Accounts: Stakeholder Engagement. Introduction.
Experiences of online feedback in acute and community services Jayne Kruszewski Customer Relations Manager Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust.
Patient Public Involvement (PPI) Policy What is PPI? PPI means putting patients and public at the centre of all that we do. It encourages the active participation.
Developing our next strategic plan Manager’s pack TEAM MEETING DISCUSSIONS.
Appendix 1 Francis report into care at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust – briefing and discussion March 2013.
You’re Welcome: raising the profile of young people and adolescent medicine Anna Gregorowski – Consultant Nurse Nigel Mills – Clinical Nurse Specialist.
Why are we here? We have in place various ways in which patients can engage, to either use services, or influence the way in which those services are provided.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
New Good Governance Handbook and QI/Clinical Audit Guide for Provider Boards Kate Godfrey, Director of Operations for Quality Improvement and Development,
RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION OF STAFF
The National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit Key findings of the Third Annual Report Slides produced by the MBR Project Team. © The National.
Results Conclusions Good compliance with writing TTOs however there is room for improvement with adherence to filling in certain information parameters.
Contractor Engagement Survey 1 Response Rate 20%.
Version 1 | Internal Use Only© Ipsos MORI 1 Version 1| Internal Use Only Sheffield CCG CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
IBD PATIENT PANELS WORK PLANING Work Planning is a cycle of: -review – reflection – planning – action – reflection - review – A systematic way of focussing.
Local Surveys Tools 29th October 2009 The Acute Survey Co-ordination Centre: Jason Boyd.
Making patients’ views count Frequent Feedback Service Regula Dent Marketing Manager Picker Institute 21 April 2009.
Northern Lincolnshire Healthy Lives Healthy Futures Programme Consultation Feedback and Review NEL Partnership Board November 2014.
Making the most of your survey results Caroline Powell.
Overview of the hospital’s computer systems
Crofton & Sharlston Medical Practice Questionnaire Results 2013/14 Presentation of 2013/14 Patient Questionnaire Results Patient Participation Group Wednesday.
How well do we communicate? Internal communications review February 2013.
How to sustain Quality Improvement activities over time
Review of the Clinical Librarian Service Jane Surtees Clinical Librarian Royal Derby Hospital Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation.
Summary of Key Results from the 2013/2014 Survey of Visa Applicants Who Used a Licensed Adviser Survey undertaken by: Premium Research Report prepared:
Maria Jessing, Clinical Improvement Manager SESLHD Trish Wills, Southern Sector Manger Clinical Practice Improvement Unit Sandra Grove A/Clinical Quality.
Slide 1 of 19 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 1: Attendance, retention,
Sue Roberts Chair, Year of Care Partnerships
Monash University Library Quality Cycle EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY and LEADING THE WAY Monash University’s strategic framework and overall directions MONASH.
National Framework for Induction & Introduction to Histopathology (England/Wales) Strand A: An audit of the induction period, ST1 trainees' perspective.
The Cedars Surgery PPG/GP Practice Survey Results 15 th March 2013 Prepared for The Cedars Surgery by the Participation & Insight Team, KMCS. Confidential:
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
Welcome to SURF 09 Involving Patients and the Public in HCAI Research.
Commissioner Feedback for SLAM CQC Inspection in September 2015 Engagement with Member Practices 1.
Reporting Guidelines (FP5) Karen Fabbri Scientific Officer Natural & Technological Hazards DG Research European Commission Brussels
1 WERT: WP 5 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010 Aim To pilot and evaluate the content and context of the course material with target groups To help women.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
Programme for Health Service Improvement Clinical Services Planning Group Moving forward CARDIFF AND VALE NHS TRUST YMDDIRIEDOLAETH GIG CAERDYDD A’R FRO.
S3 Business Management Unit 1.3.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
National Audit of Dementia – care in general hospitals National Audit of Dementia Royal College of Psychiatrists Centre for Quality Improvement 4 th Floor.
School of SOCIAL AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE University of BRISTOL Shall we meet for coffee? Experiments in ways of bridging the researcher commissioner gap:
Dissemination of Good Practice ReadIT an e-learning project to raise literacy standards throughout the school.
LINks (Local Involvement Networks). Outline Help and Care LINks and Host LINks and OSCs Establishing the LINk The LINk in action.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
DEVELOPING PARENT INVOLVEMENT POLICIES Title I No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Section 1118.
QILT May Webinar1. Just before we get started… Who are we? How questions will be handled Resources available after the webinar QILT May Webinar 2.
Powered by Stakeholder Engagement Feedback Pam Kaur, Group Finance Manager University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust.
Northern Lincolnshire Healthy Lives Healthy Futures Programme Programme Update for North East Lincolnshire Partnership Board 12 September 2013.
2013/14.  The Joint Project Board has published the arrangements for the joint teaching of the PCMD cohort of students.  This aims to safeguard the.
Council of Governors Meeting December 2013 Beverley Geary Director of Nursing.
 Friends and Family Test (FFT) -single question ‘would you recommend…’  The Adult National Inpatient Survey (AIPS) - AIPS uses validated questions based.
Speech, Language and Communication Therapy Action Plan: Improving Services for Children and Young People (2011/ /13) Mary Emerson AHP Consultant.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
Overall NSW Health 2011 YourSay Survey Results YourSay - NSW Health Workplace Survey Results Presentation NSW Health Overall Presented by: Robyn Burley.
Welcome to the third edition of the Cheshire and Merseyside Healthy Providers Network Newsletter. The network has been in place since summer of The.
THREE VILLAGES MEDICAL PRACTICE PATIENT SURVEY 2013 Review of Results Discussion Action Plan for October 2013.
Patient and Public Involvement Practice Development Day Thursday 17 October 2013.
Findings – January  Respondents  Access to the practice  Repeat prescription service  Test results  Practice staff  Overall satisfaction 
Welcome to the First Cheshire and Merseyside Healthy Providers Network Newsletter. The network has been in place since summer of The purpose of the.
Tracheostomy Audit Clinical Audit DepartmentNovember 2011 Head and Neck Airways Team.
Response to an Emergency Training for 211 Staff in Ontario Updated September
Alan Bigham Programme Manager (Volunteering) Scottish Health Council Feedback on the needs analysis survey.
<Name of your University> PDMA Student Chapter Annual Report
NHS Adult Inpatient Survey 2018
Patient and Staff Experience Thematic Reviews
Presentation transcript:

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme Use of Inpatient Survey Results Results of an online survey of acute hospital trust survey leads for 2005 inpatient survey

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Background Objectives – –To establish how trusts currently use the survey results – –To identify ways in which we might be able to help them: to use the results more effectively and to disseminate them more widely Methodology – –The survey was conducted online – –All 2005 survey leads (n.169) were ed in early November 2006 to invite them to take part (with follow up mailing to replacement contacts, where notified) – –Two targeted reminders were sent to non-responders at weekly intervals to encourage participation (with a final, third, reminder included in a routine e- bulletin from the Acute Co-ordination Centre)

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Response Rates – –76 trust survey leads completed the questionnaire, giving a “raw” response rate of 45% – –After adjustment for known “undelivered” s (i.e. “bounce-backs” due to invalid e- mail addresses/rejection by SPAM filters) response rate was 47% – –Response rate amongst “in-house” trusts was marginally higher than for those using a contractor, hence all quantitative results have been adjusted at the analysis stage to give appropriate weight to the views of each group – –The job functions of those responding, and giving a job title, were: PALS/PPI 40% clinical governance managers 22% senior managers, including clinical directors 16% audit and information staff 11% others 11%. – –A chart showing dates of returned questionnaires is appended (Appendix 1)

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Key findings: Current use/dissemination of results All survey outputs are widely used. However, the initial results (from a contractor or in-house team) are used the most. This is probably because they are: – –available earlier – –easier to analyse/manipulate Most trusts (82%) do additional analysis of the data – particularly looking at trends and comparing across sites/specialties or with other trusts – – nine out of 10 also use, and value, the open-ended patient comments Benchmark reports are generally found more useful than the national tables – mainly because the latter are felt to be difficult to find and manipulate All results are widely disseminated throughout the trust, with presentations made to a number of groups and findings also shared through intranet, newsletters and various other fora

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Key findings: Help in analysing/using the data Trusts would particularly welcome : Case studies (how others have used the data) And [statistical?] help in: – –comparing with other trusts – –understanding trends – –understanding the weighting used (e.g. in benchmark reports/national tables)

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Key findings: Help in publicising/disseminating the data The most popular suggestions were: Generic fact-sheets for patients and staff explaining the purpose/use of patient surveys Templates for fact-sheets and presentations for trusts to slot in their own results It was also felt by some (around 4 in 10) that the presentation of the results on the Healthcare Commission website could be improved, e.g.: – –More historical comparisons – –More explanation of results – –Better use of graphics – –In general, make the results easier to find

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Survey Outputs Used (%) Which, if any, or the survey outputs listed below does your trust use? Which one of these outputs do you use the most?

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Are any additional analyses carried out?

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Types of additional analysis done (% mentioning each type of analysis) Based on 82% of trusts who do additional analysis

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Use of patient comments Asked of those who analyse/use the open-ended comments 89% of trusts say they use the patient (open-end) comments. The number of trusts mentioning each “theme” is as follows:

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Use of patient comments: some examples “These are the 'diamonds' in the patients survey because they make the statistics real and meaningful…. The comments help stop any tendency to challenge the data on the stats.” “Break down into specialty and then into different themes – food, cleanliness, staff attitude & service provision positive/negative, medication issues, clinical issues, information & communication.” “ We produce posters with comments on for use at action planning workshops.” “We use the comments for a wide range of training opportunities such as Trust induction, Jnr Docs induction, Student Nurse Training etc.” We circulate the comments widely and use examples in poster displays to raise awareness of the survey.”

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Is there a dedicated person within the trust responsible for analysis and reporting of results? “Other(s)” are mainly: PALS/PPI Senior management inc. clinical directors Audit & information staff

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Ease of understanding & usefulness: Benchmark Reports & National Tables Benchmark ReportsNational tables UnderstandingUsefulnessUnderstandingUsefulness

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results How are the Benchmark Reports used? Asked of the 74 trusts saying they found the benchmark reports very or quite useful 97% of trusts say they find the Benchmark Reports very or quite useful. The number of trusts mentioning each “use” is as follows:

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results How could the Benchmark Reports be improved? Asked of the 74 trusts saying they found the benchmark reports very or quite useful The number of trusts suggesting each type of improvement is as follows:

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results How are the National Tables used? Asked of the 51 trusts saying they found the national tables very or quite useful 67% of trusts say they find the National Tables very or quite useful. The number of trusts mentioning each “use” is as follows:

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results How could the National Tables be improved? Criticisms asked of the 15 trusts saying not very useful. Suggestions asked of 66 trusts - 15 saying national tables not very useful + 51 saying they found them very or quite useful The number of trusts making detailed criticisms, or suggesting improvements, is as follows:

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Who sees initial trust results from contractor/in-house team?

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Who sees the benchmark report?

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Who sees the national tables (spreadsheets)?

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Summary of presentations made to different audiences (by contractor and/or in-house team) The following two slides show the break down between presentations made by contractors and those made by in-house teams

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Presentations made by external contractor to different audiences Based on those receiving data/report from external contractor (unweighted base 57 trusts)

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Presentations made by internal staff/ trust survey lead to different audiences

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Other ways of disseminating results to staff

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Ways of sharing results with public/patients

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Other groups that results are shared with

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Other ways in which shared with different groups (number of trusts mentioning each) Based on those saying results disseminated to “other” groups

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Other ways in which trusts share the results “..used for focus group work..” “We have an annual Patient and Public awareness day and the results are always displayed then. There is always someone on hand to discuss any aspects of the survey that people wish to raise.” “ …large workshop events with key stakeholders from PCT, SHA, local patient forums and user groups including patient groups to discuss the results and prioritise areas for action.” “…Patients’ Panel newsletter that is circulated throughout local community groups, wards and departments in the hospital, all local GPs and members on the Panel.” “In-house magazine.” “Monthly communications bulletin to all staff.”

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results In what ways do you use the information?

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Levels of action planning within the trust using the survey results Based on the 99% of trusts who use the results in action planning In most trusts (91%) action plans are followed through with a dedicated person, or persons, leading, monitoring and checking progress.

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Ways in which improvements publicised to patients/the general public Based on the 69% of trusts who publicise improvements identified through the results to patients/the general public

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Do you specifically mention that improvements have been identified through the survey results? Based on the 69% of trusts who publicise improvements identified through the results to patients/the general public

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Preferred options for help in analysing/interpreting/reporting on findings (% mentioning each option)

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Preferred options for help in disseminating results (% mentioning each option)

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Usefulness of the survey section of the Healthcare Commission website

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Do you think the Healthcare Commission’s presentation of survey results on the site could be improved? Based on those aware of this section of the site

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Agreements with suggested improvements to presentation of survey results on Healthcare Commission website Based on the 39% of respondents who felt the Commission’s website could be improved

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Appendices Return of completed questionnaires Who analyses and reports on the results

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Return of completed questionnaires First mailing Replacement contacts First reminder ACC e- bulletin November 2006

The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme: Online survey of use of Inpatient Survey Results Who analyses and reports on the results? *inc. clinical directors