By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Advertisements

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
The Board’s Role in Accreditation Michael F. Middaugh Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness University of Delaware Celine R. Paquette Trustee,
Rejected! Rebounding From and Moving Forward Following a Monitoring Report Requirement.
The Periodic Review Report at the Community College: Opportunities for Collaborative Institutional Renewal Valarie Avalone, Director of Planning Dr. Michael.
Periodic Department Review A System of Affirmation LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
What is Middle States, Anyway? Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated by Joe Marchetti, Gene.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The Middle States Accreditation and Review Process & the ESC Self-Study Center for Distance Learning Craig Lamb – Director of Academic Support Val Chukhlomin.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT MIDDLE STATES AND ASSESSMENT New York State Disability Services Council June 20, 2012 Lake Canandaigua, NY Presented by: Mary.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
University-wide Accreditation Academic Leadership Program February 18, 2010.
MIDDLE STATES COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION: REACCREDITATION D ECENNIAL S ELF -S TUDY P ROCESS A CADEMIC S ENATE S EPTEMBER 17, 2015 Anne Wahl Michael.
What the *!# Is Middle States Looking For? A Review of Standards 7 and 14—Institutional & Student Learning Assessment Presentation to the Association of.
Working Group Training Compiling Evidence for a Successful Chapter LaMont Rouse, Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Preparing and Planning for Self Study Washington & Jefferson College November 2010.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
CCC: Where Teaching and Learning Transform Lives, Putting Together the Self- Study Puzzle Corning Community College August 24, 2012.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation by SACS Commission on Colleges.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
Los Angeles Mission College Institutional Self Study for Reaffirmation of Accreditation
Long-Range Planning Presentation to the Del Mar College Board Committee May 13, 2008.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 1: Institutional Excellence Standards 1 and 6.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Committee on University Effectiveness Working Group on Institutional Assessment April 8, 2011.
Strategic Planning Linked to Long Range Planning Presentation to Faculty and Staff February 13-14, 2008
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
The NJIT Accreditation Process: Launching the Middle States Commission on Higher Education Self Study Presentation to Committee on Academic Affairs September.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
SELF STUDY: COUNTDOWN TO THE TEAM VISIT MSCHE ANNUAL CONFERENCE – 2009 Debra Klinman.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
Accreditation Update Self-Study Progress and Review MPC Flex Days Spring 2015.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
What’s Going on at SCC Presented by: Corinna Evett.
IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Self-Study 2010: Review, Reflect, and Renew. The Accrediting Process  A means of self-regulation  Intended to strengthen and sustain the quality higher.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Donna Kragt: HLC Liaison April 11, 2017
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
UPRM Self-Study for MSCHE
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

by Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012

What is Middle States? The Middle States Commission on Higher Education accredits degree-granting colleges and universities in the Middle States region, which includes Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and several locations internationally. The Commission is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that defines, maintains, and promotes educational excellence across institutions with diverse missions, student populations, and resources. It examines each institution as a whole, rather than specific programs within institutions.

Cedar Crest & Middle States Cedar Crest College has been a continuous member of Middle States since 1944.

Reaccreditation Cycle ■ Major Self-study due every 10 years –CCC’s last decennial report was 2004 ■ Periodic Program Reviews due every 5 years –CCC’s last PRR was accepted November 2009 ■ New self-study process beginning now, re- accreditation expected Spring 2014

Decennial Review 1)Comprehensive Self Study of the entire institution based on the Characteristics of Excellence. 2)The final report will be approximately 100 pages Contains 8 Chapters Make suggestions and recommendation 3)Supporting Materials will be at least 3,000 to 5,000 pages 4)There will be no fewer than 200 separate and unique supporting documents

Decennial Review Purpose 1) Strengthen Cedar Crest through the next decade; 2) Demonstrate Compliance with the 14 Standards; 3) Demonstrate to our Constituents that our institution has value.

Decennial Review Time Line Spring 2012 Working groups are formed; Self-Study Design Document is created MSCHE Liaison visits Cedar Crest Fall 2012 Working Group Training; Working Group meetings; A progress report is written on December 1 st ; Spring 2013 MSCHE selects the team; Working groups submit a draft chapter (March 15 th ); Chapters are edited and synthesized into a document

Decennial Review Time Line Fall 2013 Campus reviews the draft; Evaluation chair reviews the self-study report; The Board reviews the draft; CCC sends a draft copy to the team chair; CCC prepares the final version of the self-study report. Spring 2014 Team Visit; Team Report; Institutional Response. Summer/Fall 2014 Middle States meets and acts on the findings.

Decennial Review/The Visiting Team Middle States will send a visiting team to interview us on our report and our progress. They will judge our effectiveness on… 1)How well are we meeting our mission? 2)How are we responding to past suggestions and recommendations that they’ve made? (Interest in Standards 3 & 7) 3)Based on the Characteristics of Excellence. 4)Based on our ability to document our success, particularly of student learning.

Decennial Review/Post-Visit 1) Make suggestions; 2) Make recommendations; 3) Vote to affirm our accreditation; 4) There may be a follow-up report called a Progress Report or a Monitoring Report

What are they looking for? ■ We are in a new era of accountability ■ Accreditation currently entirely voluntary ■ May be subject of state/federal regulation in the future

The Era of Accountability Do you have plans to sustain the institution? Strategic Plan(s). Financial Forecasts based on real assumptions; Enrollment Management Plan; Facility Master Plan; MSCHE : Who owns each plan? How are they being updated?

The Era of Accountability Are all major programs (academic and non-academic being assessed on a regular basis? What is the process? What are the results? How do you use the results?

The Era of Accountability Data Driven Decision-Making Do you use data to make decisions? Do you use data to improve the institution (close the loop)? How does data link to budgeting?

The Era of Accountability Communications: How do we communicate results? How do we improve transparency? How do we serve our constituents?

The Era of Accountability How do we communicate our results to our constituents? Students Prospective Students Alumnae Federal and State Government Employees (Faculty, Staff and Administration) Greater Lehigh Community

The Language of Middle States Assessment is an ongoing and continuous cycle of self-improvement. Assessment results are measurable. The results are used for action.

The Language of Middle States Close the Loop: Results are used for improvement; results are used to allocate resources. I like to call it meaningful modifications….

The Language of Middle States Institutional Effectiveness: How does the college meet its mission and other plans? How does the college use data to improve its operations? “Deciding where we want to go. Making sure we get there!” Linda Suskie

The Language of Middle States Shared Governance looks at whether there is a process by which constituents participate in the decision-making of the institution. How broad is it? What are the steps?

Characteristics of Excellence

Characteristics of Excellence & Cedar Crest Cedar Crest: Has an active mission; Has a culture of assessment; Has an active strategic plan; Has a body of evidence to document learning at the program level.

Characteristics of Excellence & Cedar Crest Cedar Crest: Has a very positive reputation: U.S. News & World Report (Top Regional Liberal Arts College, Top Women’s College) Forbes Top 10; Multiple Discipline-Related Accreditations

Characteristics of Excellence & Cedar Crest The Future: There is work ahead, but it will be productive. There will be additional work, but it will be valuable. This process is about making Cedar Crest a model of excellence.

The End