What is the Interstate Compact? The Compact is a uniform law, adopted in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the U.S. Virgin Islands, for the purpose.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements

ARREST.
Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
CHILDREN IN CARE SOUTH KENT. Ashford 1 Child in Care Team Comprises of one Team Manager: Pat Hatcher, 6 Social Workers and 2 Senior Practitioners. 3 Family.
THE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH FOR CENTRAL MICHIGAN CONSUMER GRIEVANCE SYSTEM.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Runaways and the ICJ 2013 Annual Business Meeting.
I C W A R ON J ACKSON – T RIBAL A TTORNEY Y SLETA DEL S UR P UEBLO.
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act The “UCCJEA”
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
Dependency Court – A Team Approach Presen Presented by: Judge Brantley S. Clark and Carol A. Dunaway, M.S. 1.
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
ICWA The Tribe as the “Third Parent”. Why ICWA? Wabanaki people are indigenous to the land that is now the State of Maine. In 15 th century there were.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 3/1/2014]
Overview of ICPC Process What the Guardian ad Litem Needs to Know H. Stephen Pennypacker, Esq. ICPC Compact Administrator September 19, 2008.
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 5/18/2012]
Adoption & Safe Families Act
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
Juvenile Law Update District Court Judges’ Conference June 17, 2004 Janet Mason Institute of Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Overview of ICPC Process: What the Guardian ad Litem Needs to Know H. Stephen Pennypacker, Esq. ICPC Compact Administrator November 18, 2009.
ICAOS Rules Training Presented by: The Only Way to Go… Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision.
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 53: Family Law Chapter 53: Family Law Business Law Legal, E-Commerce,
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
SORT LEGAL UPDATE AND REVIEW
PA201 Unit 2 WHAT IS THE “LAW”?.
205: Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children 1.
Laws for Minors. Contracts – minors may avoid contracts; adults are bound by law to the contracts they enter. Juvenile delinquent- an underage person.
The ICPC Process ICPC: How to Navigate Across State Lines and Indian Country The ICPC Process Karen Dinan Senior Counsel Office of the Assistant Attorney.
Department of Children and Families Autism Services Jan Nisenbaum Deputy Commissioner Clinical and Professional Services.
Interstate Compact for Juveniles Amendment Training for Rules Effective April 1, 2014.
CIVIL STATE MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT FACILITY RESPONSIBILTIES.
Probate Guardianships of the Person Self-Help Overview Course.
What does the Safe Haven Law provide? The law protects a parent who leaves their baby at a “Safe Haven” location. The parent will not face criminal prosecution.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Session III: ICJ Working with ICPC Presenters: Rose Ann Bisch (MN) Carla Fults (AAICPC)
1 ICAOS 2008 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
Washington – Oregon ICPC Border Agreement Training.
1 Child in Need of Protection or Services Proceedings Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl.
PROTECTING CLIENT DATA HIPAA, HITECH AND PIPA PART 1B.
HB 446/SB 142 Standards for Out-of-State Placement of Ohio Children Stakeholder Meeting April 6, 2010.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 FAMILY LAW © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall CHAPTER 53.
Institute for Criminal Justice Studies Texas Family Code.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
ICAMA & ICPC Liz Oppenheim Summit of the States on Interstate Cooperation National Center for Interstate Compacts June 1-2, 2006.
Intersection of Fostering Connections and McKinney-Vento What is the connection? How do we connect? Susie Greenfelder, Education Planner MI Department.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
Permanency.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
FOSTER CARE AND ADOPTION. 1. Foster Care a.Foster parent: a person who cares for a minor at the order of the court b.legal custody still belongs to birth.
Minor Consent & Confidentiality 15 th Annual Health Care Symposium April 1, 2016.
Family law Who can make medical decisions for a minor child?
ICJ Rule Amendment Training Rules effective February 1,
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC)
Family Law Workshop.
Department of Children and Families
Washington – Oregon ICPC Border Agreement Training
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS Adjunct Professor Monica Bogucki, BSW, JD
Washington – Oregon ICPC Border Agreement Training
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
An Overview of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children
Navajo Adult Guardianship Act
Inter District Transfers & Appeals
Extended court jurisdiction
Presentation transcript:

What is the Interstate Compact? The Compact is a uniform law, adopted in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the U.S. Virgin Islands, for the purpose of establishing an orderly process for the interstate placement of children. The Compact is a uniform law, adopted in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the U.S. Virgin Islands, for the purpose of establishing an orderly process for the interstate placement of children. Guide to the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children, American Public Human Services Association, 2000, at 2. See http//icpc.aphsa.org (hereinafter referred to as Guide).

Sources of Law Statute: C.G.S.A § 17a0175 to 17a- 182 Statute: C.G.S.A § 17a0175 to 17a- 182 DCF Policy: Chapter 47 DCF Policy: Chapter 47

Resources for Interstate Compact Issues Guide to the Interstate Compact on Placement of Children, American Public Human Services Association, See http//icpc.aphsa.org/documents/asp Guide to the Interstate Compact on Placement of Children, American Public Human Services Association, See http//icpc.aphsa.org/documents/asp Connecticut Coordinator for ICPC: Sandra Matlack, Deputy Compact Administrator, Connecticut Coordinator for ICPC: Sandra Matlack, Deputy Compact Administrator,

When does the ICPC apply? Any time a state “sends, brings, or causes to be sent or brought into any other party state any child for placement in foster care or as a preliminary to possible adoption.” C.G.S.A §17a-186, Article III(a). Any time a state “sends, brings, or causes to be sent or brought into any other party state any child for placement in foster care or as a preliminary to possible adoption.” C.G.S.A §17a-186, Article III(a).

What constitutes foster care? Foster care is “care of a child on a 24-hour basis away from the home of the child’s parent(s).” Guide, at 2. This includes care by: A relative of the child; A relative of the child; A non-related individual; A non-related individual; A group home; A group home; A residential facility; A residential facility; Any other entity; or Any other entity; or Care by a parent if the care is by reason of a court-ordered placement and not by virtue of the parent-child relationship. Care by a parent if the care is by reason of a court-ordered placement and not by virtue of the parent-child relationship. Guide, at 2.

When does the Compact NOT apply? Transfer of custody to non-custodial parent (where Court has no evidence that the parent is unfit, doesn’t seek such evidence, and doesn’t retain jurisdiction). Guide, at 15. Transfer of custody to non-custodial parent (where Court has no evidence that the parent is unfit, doesn’t seek such evidence, and doesn’t retain jurisdiction). Guide, at 15. “placement in any institution caring for the mentally ill, mentally defective or epileptic or any institution primarily educational in character, and any hospital or other medical facility” C.G.S.A. § 17a-175, Article II; or “placement in any institution caring for the mentally ill, mentally defective or epileptic or any institution primarily educational in character, and any hospital or other medical facility” C.G.S.A. § 17a-175, Article II; or

When does the Compact NOT apply? The sending or bring of a child into a receiving state by the child’s parent, stepparent, grandparent, adult brother or sister, adult uncle or aunt, or the child’s guardian and leaving the child with any such relative or non-agency guardian in the receiving state provided that the person who brings, sends, or causes a child to be sent or brought to the receiving state is a person whose full legal right to plan for the child (1) has been established by law at a time prior to initiation of the placement arrangement, and (2) has not been voluntarily terminated, or diminished or severed by the action or order of any court. Guide, at (emphasis added). The sending or bring of a child into a receiving state by the child’s parent, stepparent, grandparent, adult brother or sister, adult uncle or aunt, or the child’s guardian and leaving the child with any such relative or non-agency guardian in the receiving state provided that the person who brings, sends, or causes a child to be sent or brought to the receiving state is a person whose full legal right to plan for the child (1) has been established by law at a time prior to initiation of the placement arrangement, and (2) has not been voluntarily terminated, or diminished or severed by the action or order of any court. Guide, at (emphasis added).

Timeline for Requests The recommended processing time is 6 weeks (30 business days) from the date the receiving state compact office receives the request. Guide, at 5. The recommended processing time is 6 weeks (30 business days) from the date the receiving state compact office receives the request. Guide, at 5. If an expedited placement is needed, priority placement orders may be made, but only under limited circumstances. If an expedited placement is needed, priority placement orders may be made, but only under limited circumstances.

Priority Placement Orders Court must enter express finding that either: the proposed placement recipient is a relative belonging to the class that would otherwise be exempt from ICPC under Article VIII(a) AND the proposed placement recipient is a relative belonging to the class that would otherwise be exempt from ICPC under Article VIII(a) AND the child is under 2 years old; the child is under 2 years old; the child is in an emergency shelter; or the child is in an emergency shelter; or the child has spent a substantial amount of time in the home of the proposed placement recipient; OR the child has spent a substantial amount of time in the home of the proposed placement recipient; OR the receiving state has had a properly completed interstate compact request for more than 30 business days but the sending state has not received a determination from the receiving state. the receiving state has had a properly completed interstate compact request for more than 30 business days but the sending state has not received a determination from the receiving state. Guide, at 20.

Effect of Compliance with the ICPC “Sending agency retains jurisdiction over the child sufficient to determine all matters in relation to the custody, supervision, care, treatment and disposition of the child which it would have had if the child remained in the sending agency’s state... “Sending agency continues to have financial responsibility for the child. “Sending agency retains jurisdiction over the child sufficient to determine all matters in relation to the custody, supervision, care, treatment and disposition of the child which it would have had if the child remained in the sending agency’s state... “Sending agency continues to have financial responsibility for the child. The sending state can enter into an agreement with agencies in the receiving state to provide services to the child. The sending state can enter into an agreement with agencies in the receiving state to provide services to the child. Jurisdiction continues until the child is adopted, reaches majority, or becomes self-supporting or is discharged with the concurrence of the receiving state. Jurisdiction continues until the child is adopted, reaches majority, or becomes self-supporting or is discharged with the concurrence of the receiving state. CGSA § 17a-175, Article V.

What happens if the Compact is violated? Violators are subject to punishment or penalty in either jurisdiction in accordance with state laws; and Violators are subject to punishment or penalty in either jurisdiction in accordance with state laws; and Violation constitutes grounds for suspension or revocation of any license, permit, or other legal authorization held by the sending agency which empowers or allows it to place, or care, for children. Violation constitutes grounds for suspension or revocation of any license, permit, or other legal authorization held by the sending agency which empowers or allows it to place, or care, for children. CGSA § 17a-175, Article IV

What happens if the Compact is violated? In addition, the receiving state may: Return the child to the sending state; Return the child to the sending state; Refuse to proceed with adoption; Refuse to proceed with adoption; Place the child in emergency shelter or foster care in the receiving state; or Place the child in emergency shelter or foster care in the receiving state; or Allow the child to remain in the home until compliance is achieved. Allow the child to remain in the home until compliance is achieved. The Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children: A Manual and Instructional Guide for Juvenile and Family Court Judges, at 89.