The REF assessment framework and guidance on submissions Linda Tiller, HEFCW 16 September 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Research Assessment Exercise Iain Richardson School of Engineering and the Built Environment
Advertisements

Research Excellence Framework Jane Boggan Planning Division Research Staff Forum - January 2010.
Main Panel A: Subpanels and Chairs A1: Clinical Medicine - Christopher Day, Newcastle University A2: Public Health, Health services and Primary Care -
Develop and Validate Minimum Core Criteria and Competencies for AgrAbility Program Staff Bill Field, Ed.D., Professor National AgrAbility Project Director.
Impact workshop Phil Hannaford VP Research and Knowledge Exchange.
REF2014 Pauline Muya Jo Lakey.
Research Excellence Framework and equalities Belfast 29 November 2011 Ellen Pugh Senior Policy Adviser, ECU.
REF2014 HODOMS Birmingham 8 th April Ann Dowling: Chairman of REF Main Panel B John Toland: Chairman of REF Sub-Panel B10: Mathematical Sciences.
Supporting & promoting Equality & Diversity through REF Dianne Berry, Chair REF E&D Advisory Panel Ellen Pugh, Senior Policy Officer ECU.
The Research Excellence Framework Assessment framework, guidance on submissions and panel criteria.
Guidance on submissions Chris Taylor, Deputy REF Manager Graeme Rosenberg, REF Manager.
Impact in REF2014: what have we learned? Steven Hill Head of Research Policy HEPI Conference 31 March
Research Excellence Framework 2014: A briefing for Staff Professor Ros Foskett Deputy Vice Chancellor.
These slides have been produced by the REF team, and were last updated on 3 September 2011 They provide a summary of the assessment framework and guidance.
Communicating the outcomes of the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise A presentation to press officers in universities and colleges. Philip Walker, HEFCE.
The Research Assessment Exercise in the United Kingdom Paul Hubbard International colloquium “Ranking and Research Assessment in Higher Education” 13 December.
Research at York Presentation to Council Alastair Fitter Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Research.
Westminster City Council and Westminster Primary Care Trust Voluntary Sector Funding 2009/10 Voluntary Sector Funding Eligibility, Application Form Funding,
Research Excellence Framework : Equality and Diversity Working Methods and Code of Practice University of Wales, Trinity Saint David Matt Briggs Eleri.
The Research Excellence Framework Panel criteria [Main Panel Chair] Graeme Rosenberg.
Demonstrating research impact in the REF Graeme Rosenberg REF Manager
The Research Excellence Framework. Purpose of REF The REF replaces the RAE as the UK-wide framework for assessing research in all disciplines. Its purpose.
The Research Excellence Framework. Presentation outline The REF assessment framework and guidance on submissions: - Overview - Staff - Outputs - Impact.
Consultation on panel criteria and working methods.
REF Information Session August Research Excellence Framework (REF)
The Research Excellence Framework Data and Audit May 2012.
Foundation Level of the Equality Standard. Overview Background UK Equality Standard Foundation Level Requirements Timeline.
Introduction to the Research Excellence Framework.
The Research Excellence Framework Briefing event for REF institutional contacts Graeme Rosenberg REF Manager.
The Research Excellence Framework Briefing events for HEI contacts 21 May: Glasgow 23 May: Manchester 24 May: London 28 May: Cardiff 31 May: London.
Teaching and Learning Research Programme CREATING KNOWLEDGE TOGETHER IN THE CONTEXT OF RESEARCH ASSESSMENT.
Research Assessment Exercise RAE Dr Gary Beauchamp Director of Research School of Education.
Page 1 RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK : RESEARCH IMPACT ASESSMENT LESSONS FROM THE PILOT EXERCISE Professor John Marshall Director Academic Research Development.
Chair: Professor Dame Ann Dowling Sub-panel Chairs: Panel Advisers: SP07: Professor David Price Dr Karen Ness SP08: Professor Richard Catlow Ms Lesley.
Professor Andrew Wathey Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive Northumbria University.
Main Panel D Criteria and Working Methods Main Panel D covers: Area Studies Modern Languages and Linguistics English Language and Literature History Classics.
The Research Excellence Framework Impact: the need for evidence Professor Caroline Strange 22 June 2011.
THE IMPACT OF RAE ON SERIAL PUBLICATION Professor Judith Elkin UK Serials Group March 2004.
12/9/10 Pilot assessment impact- paperwork Findings of the expert panels- report + appendix Lessons learned- feedback from pilot institutions Examples.
The REF assessment framework (updated 23 May 2011)
Delivering Strength Across the Piece David Sweeney Director, Research, Education and Knowledge Exchange HEPI, Royal Society 31 March 2015.
Research Excellence Framework 2014 and Open Access 23 rd October 2012.
Main Panel A Criteria and Working Methods Cardiff School of Biosciences Ole H Petersen Chair.
What is impact? What is the difference between impact and public engagement? Impact Officers, R&IS.
Research Impact Sarah Hall Research Impact Strategy and Policy Manager.
Research Excellence Framework 2014 Michelle Double Hyacinth Gale Sita Popat Edward Spiers Research and Innovation Support Conference.
The Research Excellence Framework Assessment framework and guidance on submissions Graeme Rosenberg, REF Manager.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Towards REF 2020 What we know and think we know about the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS Anglia.
Impact and the REF Tweet #rfringe17
WP2. Excellent university for the researchers
Consultation on draft panel criteria and working methods
RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK 2021
REF 2021 Briefing 25 January 2018.
REF 2021 What we know and thought we knew, in preparation for the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS.
Law Sub-panel Generic Feedback - Impact
These slides have been produced by the REF team, and were last updated on 30 January 2012 They provide a summary of the assessment framework and guidance.
REF 2021 Briefing Consultation on the draft guidance
These slides have been produced by the REF team, and were last updated on 30 January 2012 They provide a summary of the assessment framework and guidance.
One year on: developments since Duxford 2016
Anglia Ruskin REF Awayday 2017
REF 2021 & ECRs: policy & planning in an uncertain landscape
Research Update GERI May 2010.
Webinar on Staff circumstances in REF 2021 Follow us on Twitter
us: REF 2021 – an update Follow us on us:
Rating in 2002 for funding from 2003
REF and research funding update
UCML, London 18 January 2019 REF 2021 Susan Hodgett (D25)
REF2021: Code of Practice Consultation
Understanding Impact Stephanie Seavers, Impact Manager.
Presentation transcript:

The REF assessment framework and guidance on submissions Linda Tiller, HEFCW 16 September 2011

Assessment Framework and Guidance on Submissions Assessment Framework and Guidance on Submissions (REF ) – published in July 2011 available at

The assessment framework: Overview Overall quality Outputs Maximum of 4 outputs per researcher Impact Template and case studies Environment Template and data 65% 20% 15%

Example of a quality profile

Staff: Eligibility HEIs select which staff to include in submissions: Category A staff: Academic staff with a contract of at least 0.2 FTE, on the payroll of the HEI on 31 Oct 2013, with a primary employment function of either ‘research only’ or ‘teaching and research’ Category C staff: Staff employed by an organisation other than an HEI with a contract or job role including research, and whose research is primarily focused in the submitting unit on 31 Oct 2013 (Category C staff will contribute to the quality profile but not the volume measure for funding purposes)

Research outputs: Eligibility Outputs must be: - a product of research (as defined for the REF) - first brought into the public domain between 1 January 2008 and 31 December Authored/co-authored by the member of staff against whom it is listed (regardless of where they were employed prior to the census date) Outputs may include but are not limited to: printed or electronic publications, materials, devices, images, artefacts, products, buildings, confidential or technical reports, patents, performances, exhibits or events All forms of outputs shall be assessed on a fair and equal basis

Staff: Individual circumstances Clearly defined circumstances Qualifying as an Early Career Researcher (ECR) Part-time working Maternity, paternity or adoption leave (see also ‘complex circumstances’) Secondments or career breaks outside of HE Complex circumstances Disability Ill health or injury Mental health conditions Constraints relating to pregnancy or maternity in addition to maternity leave Childcare or other caring responsibilities Gender reassignment Other circumstances relating to characteristics protected by the Equality Act 2010

Impact: Definition for the REF An effect on, change or benefit to the economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment or quality of life, beyond academia Impact includes an effect, change or benefit to: - The activity, attitude, awareness, behaviour, capacity, opportunity, performance, policy, practice, process or understanding - Of an audience, beneficiary, community, constituency, organisation or individuals - In any geographic location whether locally, regionally, nationally or internationally It excludes impacts on research or the advancement of academic knowledge within HE; and impacts on teaching or other activities within the submitting HEI

Impact: Submissions Impact template (REF3a) Sets out the submitted unit’s general approach to enabling impact from its research One template per submission – with a page limit depending on the number of staff submitted Covers the period 1 Jan 2008 to 31 Jul 2013 Contributes 20% to the impact sub-profile Case studies (REF3b) Specific examples of impacts that were underpinned by the submitted unit’s research The number of case studies required depends on the number of staff submitted Impacts during 1 Jan 2008 to 31 Jul 2013; underpinned by research since 1 Jan 1993 Contributes 80% to the impact sub-profile

Impact: Case studies (REF3b) Each case study is limited to 4 pages and must: - Describe the underpinning research produced by the submitting unit - Reference one or more key outputs and provide evidence of the quality of the research - Explain how the research made a ‘material and distinct’ contribution to the impact (there are many ways in which this may have taken place) - Explain and provide appropriate evidence of the nature and extent of the impact: Who/what was affected? How were they affected? When? - Provide independent sources that could be used to verify claims about the impact (on a sample audit basis)

Environment: Data (REF4) All submissions to include data on: - Research doctoral degrees awarded - Research income - Research income in-kind Definitions are aligned with HESA data. REF Team will provide HESA data to institutions to assist in preparing submissions, and will use it for verification purposes Some sub-panels may request additional data related to the environment, to be included within the environment template Data will be considered alongside the qualitative information provided in the environment temp

Environment: Template (REF5) Each submission to include a completed template (with page limits depending on the number of staff submitted): - Overview - Research strategy - People (including staffing strategy and staff development; and research students) - Income, infrastructure, and facilities - Collaboration and contribution to the discipline Panel criteria indicate the relative importance of each section; and identify appropriate forms of evidence No expectation that the environment relates to a single department or organisational unit

Key changes since the 2008 RAE Inclusion of assessment of impact Fewer UOAs/panels operating more consistently Strengthened equality and diversity measures Revised eligibility criteria for staff Addition of (limited) use of citation data in some UOAs Removal of ‘esteem’ as a distinct element Revised approach to ‘environment’ Increased ‘user’ input on panels; and an integrated role for additional assessors Publication of overall quality profiles in 1% steps

Timetable 2011 Panels appointed (Feb) Guidance on submissions (Jul) Draft panel criteria for consultation (Jul) Close of consultation (5 Oct) 2012 Final panel criteria and methods (Jan) HEIs submit codes of practice (Jul) Survey of submission intentions and requests for multiple submissions (Oct-Dec) 2013 Launch REF submissions system Recruit additional assessors Staff census date (31 Oct) Submissions deadline (29 Nov) 2014 Panels assess submissions Publish outcomes (Dec)