Polar Topographic Knowledge Prior to LCROSS Impact David E. Smith 1, Maria T. Zuber 2 1 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter NASA’s Next First Step To The Moon Noah E. Petro NASA Goddard Space Flight Center May 12 th, 2009.
Advertisements

Pre-Launch Testing of NGSLR Ranging to LRO Anthony Mallama Jan McGarry Tom Zagwodzki Jack Cheek Christopher Clarke All at NASA/GSFC.
Line Efficiency     Percentage Month Today’s Date
The ICESat-2 Mission: Laser altimetry of ice, clouds and land elevation T. Markus, T. Neumann NASA Goddard Space Flight Center W. Abdalati Earth Science.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is the first mission in NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, a plan to return to the moon and then to travel to.
LRO/LEND LEND 1 LCROSS Site Selection Workshop October 16 th 2006 Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector Evaluation of Potential LCROSS Impact Sites Igor Mitrofanov.
School of Earth and Space Exploration Existing Lunar Datasets M. S. Robinson School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Lunar and Planetary Science Conference LRO Overview Session March 13, 2008 Multispectral Mapping Surface Operations.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lunar Mapping and Modeling Project Summary and Status Go for Lunar Landing Conference Tempe,
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission Victor Gardner University of Maryland 2007 AIAA Region 1 Mid-Atlantic Student Conference National Institute.
Lunar Lander Phase B1 p. 0 9 th International Planetary Probe Workshop, Toulouse, June 21 th, 2012 Innovative Visual Navigation Solutions for ESA’s Lunar.
Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project LCROSS Site Selection Workshop Oct , 2006 NASA/ARC, Mountain View, California LCROSS Orbital.
LCROSS Our next mission to the surface of the Moon. Developed and managed by NASA Ames Research Center in partnership with Northrop Grumman. Goal: to.
Why look for water? Humans exploring the Moon will need water: –Option 1: Carry it there. –Option 2: Use water that may be there already! Carrying water.
Mark Beckman - Flight DynamicsMB-1 Lunar Flight Dynamics Mark Beckman July 12, 2012.
1 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Overview 4/13/2005 Craig Tooley.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
Chapter 1 Charting the Heavens.
Track 1. Track 2 TRACK LIST 1.An introduction to synthetic aperture radar 2.Mini-RF on LRO 3.The moon as seen by radar 4.The search for ice 5.Conclusions.
NASA/NSTA Web Seminar: Lunar Exploration: Mapping the Moon LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP.
SWOT Near Nadir Ka-band SAR Interferometry: SWOT Airborne Experiment Xiaoqing Wu, JPL, California Institute of Technology, USA Scott Hensley, JPL, California.
Seasonal Climate Cycles Solar Radiation at the Earth’s Surface.
Spaceborne 3D Imaging Lidar John J. Degnan Geoscience Technology Office, Code Code 900 Instrument and Mission Initiative Review March 13, 2002.
USGS DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS AND MOSAICS FOR LMMP M. R. Rosiek, E. M. Lee, E. T. Howington-Kraus, R. L. Fergason, L. A. Weller, D. M. Galuszka, B. L. Redding,
1 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Overview CRaTER PDR 6/27/2005 Craig Tooley.
Key Concepts What features are found on the moon’s surface? What are some characteristics of the moon? How did the moon form?
Current Status of KAGUYA 1 Overview of SELENE(KAGUYA) and HDTV Movie show SELENE Project Team Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS) Japan.
Goldstone Radar Support for LCROSS Evaluation of Impact Sites Martin Slade October 16, 2006 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion.
LRO SRR LRO Mission Overview.
SHOEMAKER CRATER – GOING WHERE WE CAN “SEE” Carlton Allen NASA JSC.
SATELLITE ORBITS The monitoring capabilities of the sensor are, to a large extent, governed by the parameters of the satellite orbit. Different types of.
Satellite Climatology - Orbits Geostationary orbits Sun synchroneous orbits Precessing orbit Discussion.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO SRR LRO Mission Level 1 Requirements.
Ice At the Moon - How the Moon Mineralogy Mapper on Chandrayaan-1 Will Help Noah E. Petro NASA Goddard Space Flight Center March 4 th, 2009.
Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project LCROSS Astronomer Workshop Feb. 29, 2008 NASA/ARC, Mountain View, California Mission Design & Observation.
Mark Beckman NASA/GSFC Code 595 August 16-17, 2005
(2) Norut, Tromsø, Norway Improved measurement of sea surface velocity from synthetic aperture radar Morten Wergeland Hansen.
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
LRO Mission Baseline Ephemeris v10.0
Analyzing patterns in the phenomena
Q1 Jan Feb Mar ENTER TEXT HERE Notes
Maps.
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera
2017 Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
North Carolina Piedmont Region Consortium Timeline
Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE

Calendar Year 2009 Insure Oklahoma Total & Projected Enrollment
MONTH CYCLE BEGINS CYCLE ENDS DUE TO FINANCE JUL /2/2015
Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Moblas 4 Monument Peak, CA LRO and HPWREN Scott Wetzel NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Program Near Earth Networks Programs.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
Electricity Cost and Use – FY 2016 and FY 2017
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Pilot of revised survey
Presentation transcript:

Polar Topographic Knowledge Prior to LCROSS Impact David E. Smith 1, Maria T. Zuber 2 1 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology LCROSS Site Selection Workshop NASA/Ames Research Center October, 2006

Question: What topographic data can LOLA provide before and after the impact of LCROSS? What can LOLA data be used for: –Improved location of planned impact site? –“Imaging” of permanently shadowed impact region to characterize pre-impact regolith, including surface roughness, surface reflectance, slopes, topography, etc –Identification of existing craters?

Rx Telescope Beam Expander Earth Ranging Port Lunar Ranging Port Laser Radiator Lunar Ranging Port S/C Velocity Pattern Clock Angle = 26° D~ 56 m dsds ~65 m 25 m 5 m Measurement Pattern

Measurement Accuracy/Precision Range to surface:<10 cm, each 5 meter spot Surface Roughness:30 cm, each 5 meter spot Albedo (1064 nm):± 0.02, each 5 meter spot Slopes, 2 directions:± 0.3 o, 25 meter baseline Orbital altitude:< 1 meter Along track position~ 25 meters

10 cm range precision 28 Hz, 532 nm 10 cm range accuracy 28 Hz, 1064 nm LRO Precision Tracking In conjunction with the altimeter and S-band tracking we estimate positional accuracies of 50 m along track and <1 meter radially (CoM) after improvement of the lunar gravity field.

Orbital Variations Altitude Inclination 60 km 40 km Eccentricity Because of the eccentricity of the orbit the nadir panel will be offset from the sub-satellite position by ±0.3 to ±2.5 degrees along track each orbit. (~ 2 km from 50 km)

TLI Impulsive2008 OCT 28 10:23: :23: LOI-1 Finite 2008 NOV 02 09:54: :32: LOI-2 Finite 2008 NOV 03 11:04: :16: LOI-c Finite 2008 NOV 04 06:41: :48: LOI-p Finite 2008 NOV 04 07:34: :37: MOI-1 Impulse2008 DEC 13 16:10: :12: MOI-2 Impulse2008 DEC 13 17:37: :38: MOI-3 Impulse2008 DEC 13 18:36: :37: SK-1 Impulse2009 JAN 09 23:47: :43: SK-2 Impulse2009 FEB 06 07:37: :31: SK-3 Impulse2009 MAR 05 13:34: :30: SK-4 Impulse2009 APR 01 21:21: :17: SK-5 Impulse2009 APR 29 05:09: :04: SK-6 Impulse2009 MAY 26 12:57: :52: SK-7 Impulse2009 JUN 22 18:52: :47: SK-8 Impulse2009 JUL 20 02:39: :34: SK-9 Impulse2009 AUG 16 10:26: :21: SK-10 Impulse2009 SEP 12 18:14: :09: SK-11 Impulse2009 OCT 10 02:01: :55: SK-12 Impulse2009 NOV 06 09:48: :43: SK-13 Impulse2009 DEC 03 17:35: :29: Date Start Stop LRO Maneuvers The LRO orbit is circularized every month to 50 km in order to avoid impacting the surface

South Pole Coverage, 87S->Pole All altitudes at the South Pole each month (35-65 km). Not all months the same.

LOLA COVERAGE

Coverage of Southern Part of Shackleton Crater Nov 2 - Dec 13Nov 2 - Jan 9Nov 2 - Feb 6 The coverage varies significantly from month to month

After 1 year: Approx one 5-meter spot every 10 x 10 meter block Coverage at the End of Mapping of Shackleton Crater Coverage in the polar regions at the end of the LRO mission is not likely to be a problem…

Nov 2 - Dec 13Dec 13 - Jan 9Jan 9 - Feb 6 Monthly Coverage 88S to Pole Including Shackleton and de Gerlache Craters

Open: LOLA SP Crater slide show 1. SP_nadir 2. SP_89p7_nadir 3. SP_89p7_buildup

Close-Up of Region of “Permanent Light” Actual ground tracks of Lunar Prospector near Shackleton and de Gerlache craters. Poorest regional coverage is with a few km around the pole.

Close-Up of Region “Permanent Light” LRO Commissioning Orbit - 6 weeks ~ 1.0 km ~ 1.2 km Typical landing site area ~ 1.2 sq km Coverage: Nov 2 - Dec 13

Close-Up of Region “Permanent Light” LRO Mapping Orbit - 1st Month 4 weeks - Dec 13 - Jan 9 ~ 1.0 km ~ 1.2 km

Close-Up of Region “Permanent Light” LRO Commissioning + 2 Months Mapping Orbit 13 weeks (91d) - Nov 2 - Feb 6 ~ 1.0 km ~ 1.2 km Average of one 5-meter spot every 20 x 20 meter block

Open: LOLA SP Crater slide show 1. Shackleton_nadir_buildup

Regularizing the Coverage of a Landing Site Region A small off-nadir roll of LRO could change location of ground track. A roll of 2 mrad produces a 100 m movement of the ground track from 50 km altitude. Adjustments of less than 100 m unnecessary due to LOLA’s swath width of ~65 m. Accuracy of LOLA unaffected by small of-nadir pointing NOTE: Along track position of LRO will be non-nadir by 1 to 2 km due to eccentricity of the orbit!

Nominal Attitude - Nadir Ground Track Off-Nadir Displacement 100 m from 50 km Effect of Pointing Off-Nadir 2 millrads ~ 1.2 km ~ 1.0 km

Nominal Attitude - Nadir Ground Track Off-Nadir Displacement 200 m from 50 km Effect of Pointing Off-Nadir 4 millrads ~ 1.2 km ~ 1.0 km

Summary & Conclusions Prior to LCROSS impact: Characterize impact site LOLA will provide accurate elevations (~10 cm) with average coverage of 1 observation in a 20 x 20 meter block inside Shackleton. (Slightly better further from the pole). The elevation data will be complemented by roughness estimates, surface slopes and reflectance at 1064 nm. Post LCROSS impact: Characterize the impact site again for evidence of the impact Elevation coverage in Shackleton 3 or 4 time better. Reflectance at the few % in sunlit and permanent shadow regions. Global coordinate system providing locations of features.