Encouraging Transportation Investment Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce Percolator Breakfast May 2, 2013 Horizons Conference Center Rich Studley, President.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michigan Department of Transportation Michigans Infrastructure Needs and Funding 2013.
Advertisements

Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Freight Rail Day 2012 October 26, 2012.
Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance Act 374 of 2009.
An Update on Critical Funding for SC’s Roads and Bridges.
CONNECTICUT FY FY 2017 BIENNIUM GOVERNOR’S BUDGET DANNEL P. MALLOY, GOVERNOR February 26, 2015.
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION August 2012 The Honorable Larry Phillips Chairman, House Committee on Transportation.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Current as of: Feb.06, New Economic Recovery Package: Not the Cure Federal government is working on a one-time economic recovery package Package.
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Texas has a long legacy of good roads Symbol of our economic prosperity, attracting jobs and people to the State Our roads are used by you to get to work,
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
California’sInfrastructureCrisis February 5, 2012.
The Promise of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Thoughts on US Highway Authorization Transportation Border Working Group Plenary Meeting—Chicago April.
August 2, 2013 Kirk T. Steudle, Director Michigan Department of Transportation Mayors & Managers Forum: A Bumpy Road Customer Survey:
Michigan’s Proposal 1 What every citizen should know.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Highway Funding 2009 and Beyond: The States’ Perspective AASHTO Executive Director John Horsley Pacific Northwest Waterways Association Washington, D.C.
April 1, UPDATE Texas Business Leadership Council John A. Barton, P.E. – Deputy Executive Director.
1 AASHTO/SCOHT Subcommittee on Highway Transport Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Presented by: Jack Van Steenburg Chief Safety Officer Federal.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Howard Glassman Executive Director MPOAC.
International Partnership Meeting Thursday, January 17, 2013 Washington D.C. 1.
Transportation Funding Challenges Jason Segedy, Director Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study May 2010.
Texas has a long legacy of good roads Symbol of our economic prosperity, attracting jobs and people to the State Our roads are used by you to get to work,
Study conducted for the Coalition of Alabama Waterway Associations by Troy University Center for International Business and Economic Development.
The Recovery Act in Michigan June Michigan Recovery and Reinvestment Plan 2 The American Recovery and Reinvestment.
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE How Do We Adequately Finance Our System?
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Presenter’s Name Organization.
California’sInfrastructureCrisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment 2011 “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
1 THE FACE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION. 2 Public Transportation in the U.S. Today Transit in every state in the Union Of the 464 urbanized areas, all but.
U.S./Canada Transportation Border Working group April 9, 2014 Roger Petzold Office of Planning Federal Highway Administration.
MML Capital Conference MML Capital Conference Director Kirk T. Steudle, P.E. Michigan Department of Transportation March 4, 2009.
The Road to New Hampshire's Future. Transportation Funding Overview/summary Operational deficit Preservation and Maintenance Capital needs.
Construction Conference Construction Conference NDDOT’s: NDDOT’s: Future Federal Funding Future Federal Funding State Legislative & Budget issues.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
Special Committee on Intermodal Transportation and Economic Expansion Workshop October 23, 2009 Patrick E. Quinn Co-Chairman & President U.S. Xpress Enterprises.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
“People should have transportation options.” TRANSPORTATION MOVING PEOPLE AND COMMERCE WHERE THEY WANT AND NEED TO GO.
Michigan Road Funding Bhavdeep Singh
Keeping Texas in Business. Texas has a long legacy of good roads Symbol of our economic prosperity, attracting jobs and people to the State In part, our.
Economic Significance of the Border: A Perspective at the Regional and National Levels for both Passenger and Freight Movements Bruno Penet HDR | Decision.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on ITS Cross Regional Cooperation and Freight and Logistics Applications June 22, 2010 I ntelligent.
The “TEA” Party is over… National Transportation Policies Must Change Gregory Cohen, President American Highway Users Alliance Presentation for The American.
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce, Critical Issues Forum Charlie Zelle, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
O hio C ontractors A ssociation Jana Cassidy Administrator, Budget & Forecasting October 2015.
House Transportation Policy and Finance April 13, 2016 Tracy Hatch Deputy Commissioner Chief Financial Officer / Chief Operating Officer.
In Numbers Strength COLORADO TRANSPORTATION FUNDING.
The Transportation Logistics Company Indiana Logistics Summit Infrastructure Needs and Opportunities September 26, 2007.
Transportation Management and Policy Spring Colloquium.
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
State of the Chemical Industry & Legislative Priorities
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Transportation Funding
Efforts to Pass Prop 69 & Protect SB 1
STIP Development OTO Board Meeting
Efforts to Pass Prop 69 & Protect SB 1
Comprehensive and Dependable Transportation Plan
MoDOT: Year In Review Ed Hassinger Deputy Director/Chief Engineer.
Presentation transcript:

Encouraging Transportation Investment Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce Percolator Breakfast May 2, 2013 Horizons Conference Center Rich Studley, President & CEO Michigan Chamber of Commerce By:

Michigan Chamber Legislative Priorities: Transportation GOAL: Encourage Transportation Investment Chamber Members Advocate: Increasing state & local investment in roads and public transportation by at least $1.6 billion per year by revising and modernizing the method of funding in a way that ensures costs are borne primarily by users of the system.

Transportation Is The Backbone of Michigan’s Economy  35% of US/Canada trade flows through Michigan  $520 billion in freight is moved each year on Michigan’s highways, rail and water ports  Trucking accounts for 67% of all freight tonnage moved in Michigan

 Operation of bus transit systems contribute an estimated $740 million to the economy each year  Passenger rail is expected to generate between $ billion in net economic benefit annually  Aviation contributes more than $20 billion/year  80% of Michigan tourism is auto-based - $17.7 billion in total visitor spending in 2011 Transportation Is The Backbone of Michigan’s Economy

Innovation and Efficiency MDOT has saved an average of $63M/year since 2009 on efficiencies & innovations. Examples include: – $48M: staff reductions & closed facilities – $71M in one-time savings by bonding and process improvements – $4M/year using electronic signatures for construction documents – $22M in 2012 & 2013 by partnering with businesses & local governments & improving maintenance practices – $4M/year in energy savings

Trunkline Pavement Condition has Peaked

Transportation Funding  Roads and Bridges  Federal funds: $1 billion  Includes $250 m to local agencies  State motor fuel taxes: $946 million  State registration fees: $876 million

Conditions are Getting Worse

The Cost of Doing Nothing Costs of an inadequate system – $11.6 billion annually – lost time, wasted fuel, crashes, etc. $3,014 annually per driver – $370 per driver per year for auto repairs due to poor roads Safety impacts of an inadequate system – Total crashes in 2011: 284,049 – Total cost of crashes : $8.25 billion – Total fatalities: 889 – Total injuries: 71,796

Benefits of Acting Now The economic impacts in the first two years: – 12,000 jobs each year – $1.598 B in personal income – $2.92 B in Gross State Product In the next 10 years, this $1.2 billion/year investment will generate: – Over $10 billion in real personal income – More than $24 billion in Gross State Product PLUS, better roads & transit, greater efficiency, improved safety

12

Impact Could Be Felt in 2013 If action is swift, work can begin this summer – If not, real progress will be delayed to next summer Transportation agencies and contractors are eager to do the work – MDOT’s program and lettings are 1/3 less in 2013 than what they were 4-5 years ago ($650M vs. $930M)

Making investments to improve our state’s roads and bridges is sound economic policy. The conditions of Michigan’s roads and bridges continue to deteriorate. There is not enough money being generated to support our infrastructure system.

The average Michigan citizen pays $357 annually in unnecessary repairs to their vehicles due to poor roads. If we fix the roads, 1,000 lives over the next 10 years could be saved. Investing in our roads now benefits everyone in the state.

Leading businesses. Moving Michigan forward. Any Questions?