Elliptical SRF Cavities Mike Foley. Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review2 Elliptical SRF Cavities PREVIEW OF PRESENTATION –Brief review of established.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Continuing Role of SRF for AARD: Issues, Challenges and Benefits SRF performance has been rising every decade SRF installations for HEP (and other.
Advertisements

SRF Cryomodule Assembly Facility Plans Tug Arkan AAC, May 10-12, 2005.
Superconducting RF Cavity/Cryomodule Development at Fermilab (Industrialization) C.M. Ginsburg (FNAL) Proton Accelerators for Science and Innovation 2.
Status of the 201 MHz Cavity and Coupling Coil Module Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Video Conference March 10, 2004.
Piezo Studies and Temperature Measurements Ruben Carcagno May 11, 2005.
US Cavities Status and Plan Mark Champion 01 October 2009.
Industrial Studies of ILC Cavities & Component Production in the Americas IPAC 11 – Kyoto, Japan May 23, 2010 Science Projects Homeland Security Medical.
Latest Design of ILC ( RDR). 1.3 GHz technology developed by TESLA Collaboration, R&D from 1992 to reduce the cost per MeV by a factor of 20 from current.
Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.
ILC PM Meeting S0 Webex Global Design Effort 1 S0/S1 Next Steps Lutz Lilje GDE.
Shekhar Mishra, Fermilab Mark J. Oreglia, Univ. of Chicago
Overview of the ILC and SRF Program (With an emphasis on Px) Shekhar Mishra ILC & SRF Program Fermilab.
Jim Kerby, Fermilab for Rongli Geng and the S0 Cavity Team 23 May 2010 Current Status of SCRF Cavity Development SCRF Cavity Technology and Industrialization.
Cavity status; recent KEK activities : Hayano (1) STF CM-1 cavities are; MHI-014: 3-rd VT:36MV/m (finished) MHI-015: 3-rd VT: > 18.4MV/m.
Americas S0 Plan in USA Shekhar Mishra Fermilab/GDE US Main Linac Cavity and Cryomodule WBS.
F Status and Plans for SRF Facility Sergei Nagaitsev May 18, 2007.
Work toward Stainless Steel SRF Helium Vessels at Fermilab Tom Peterson (presenter), Information from Jeff Brandt, Serena Barbanotti, Harry Carter, Sergei.
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto ILC Cost Review, (updated for TB) and Cost Drivers  Future R & D ILC Cost Review (M. Ross,
Americas Main Linac Cavity and Cryomodule WBS X.9 Resource Proposal Shekhar Mishra (Hasan Padamsee, John Mammosser, Mike Kelly) For the WBS 9 Collaboration.
TILC09 / SCRF Session Update on S0 Work in the Americas Region Mark Champion, Fermilab With slides provided by: Zack Conway, Cornell Rongli Geng, Jefferson.
Advanced Energy Systems, Inc. Prototype Cavity Fabrication & Test Presented by Ilan Ben-Zvi, BNL for Michael Cole, AES.
Achievement of 41 MV/m Gradient by AES8 Rong-Li Geng Jefferson Lab ALCPG09, October 1, 2009.
Americas Region: T4CM Status and Plans H. Carter TD SRF Dev. Dept. July 14, 2006.
R.L. Geng, 5/27-31,2013 ECFA LC2013, DESY 1 Update on Raising Q0 at Ultra-High Gradient via Large-Grain Niobium Material Rongli Geng Jefferson Lab ECFA.
Rongli Geng March 4, th LCC ILC Cavity Group Meeting
R&D Expected in Cooperation with Vendors ILC Baseline Assessment Workshop Mark Champion September 09, 2010.
Harry Carter – LCFOA Meeting 5/1/06 1 LCFOA Technical Briefings: Cryomodules H. Carter Fermilab Technical Division.
Americas Main Linac Cavity and Cryomodule WBS X.9 Resource Proposal.
SRF Processing at ANL: Progress and Plans ANL: Mike Kelly, Scott Gerbick FNAL: Dan Olis, Allan Rowe Speaker: Mike Kelly November 17, 2008.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
ALCPG/GDE Meeting FNAL Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Work Packages Lutz Lilje GDE.
Americas Cavity Specification C.M. Ginsburg (Fermilab) On behalf of the Fermilab cavity crew October 20, 2010.
ILC Americas Cavity and Cryomodule R&D Shekhar Mishra ILC Program Fermilab Talk presented at DOE Annual Program Review Breakout Sessions – Wednesday, May.
F Fermilab ANL/FNAL SCPF EP/HPR Processing Status and Plan Allan Rowe TD/SRFDD.
ILC Cavity Gradient R&D Plan Proposal for Release 5 Rongli Geng for ILC Cavity Group 2jun2010 ILC SCRF WebEx Meeting 6/2/20101ILC SCRF WebEx Meeting.
FNAL efforts on LHC Crab Cavity R&D (Proposals for R&D sub-tasks, resources and schedule) Nikolay Solyak.
LASA Medium-β Cavity Progress Update Paolo Michelato 2 nd ESS Collaboration Meeting - SRF Elliptical Cavities 15 th December 2015.
E. KAKO (KEK) 2009' Oct. 26 ILC KEK Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Preparation for S1-Global Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
Accelerator/ Medium Beta Cavities Paolo Michelato INFN Milano - LASA April 21, 2015.
Medium Beta Cavities Paolo Michelato, Paolo Pierini, and Carlo Pagani INFN Milano - LASA.
Medium beta cavities Paolo Michelato, Paolo Pierini, Carlo Pagani INFN Milano - LASA.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
Update on S0 Work in the Americas Region Mark Champion 17 June 2008.
U.S. Plan for Cavity Production Bob Kephart ALCPG09/GDE Sep 30, 2009.
IHEP GHz 9-cell Cavity R&D Status and Plan The Third IHEP-KEK 1.3GHz SC Technology Collaboration Meeting Dec. 7-8, 2010, IHEP, Beijing GAO Jie,
ALCPG2011, 3/19- 23, SRF Group Institute of Heavy Ion Physics, Peking University ALCPG /3/19-23, Eugene, Oregon, USA RF superconducting Cavity.
JLab Update Rongli Geng April 30, th LCC ILC Cavity Group Meeting.
Hydroformed Multi-Cell Cavities. Update Waldemar Singer, DESY Peter Kneisel, JLab.
Niobium tube specification and procurement for seamless forming Andy Hocker & Lance Cooley SRF Development Department and Superconducting Materials Department.
W. Singer. SRF2011, July 25 ‐ 29, 2011, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. XFEL Cavity Recipe for Mechanical Fabrication and Treatment Waldemar Singer/DESY.
650 MHz Beta = 0.61 Cavity Design, Fabrication and Testing R. Rimmer for F. Marhauser Jefferson Lab, Newport News, Virginia 23606, USA Project-X Collaboration.
1 Project X Workshop November 21-22, 2008 Richard York Chris Compton Walter Hartung Xiaoyu Wu Michigan State University.
7th SRF Materials Workshop FRIB SRF Cavities 7/16/12 Chris Compton.
9-cell cavity coordination CM Ginsburg 15 Mar
Andrew BurrillFall 2011 Project X Collaboration Meeting 650 MHz Developments at JLAB Andrew Burrill for the JLab Team.
SRF Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Fermilab. Overview Charge: Does the laboratory make effective use of collaboration and existing SRF capabilities at other.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Jefferson.
650MHz Cavity, Helium Vessel, and Tuner Status at Fermilab Chuck Grimm IIFC POC 650MHz Cavities Fermilab (Avinash Puntambekar RRCAT)
Rongli Geng ILC Cavity Group Meeting October 25, 2011
Electropolishing of Dressed ILC 9-cell Cavity
ILC R&D Board Meeting: SRF Cavities Status and Plans
Energy (ILC) and Intensity (Project X) SRF Cavity Needs
New Cavity Techniques and Future Prospects
for the FNAL/ANL, JLab, and Cornell cavity teams
Activities of Cavity Fabrication Facility at KEK
ELLIPTICAL SCRF CAVITIES
Superconducting Cavities: Development/Production
Highlights from EU Global Design Effort
Nick Walker (DESY) EU GDE Meeting Oxford
Development of Large Grain Cavities at DESY
Presentation transcript:

Elliptical SRF Cavities Mike Foley

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review2 Elliptical SRF Cavities PREVIEW OF PRESENTATION –Brief review of established fabrication method for elliptical SRF cavities. –Alternative fabrication methods with the goal of reducing costs: opportunities for R & D. –Alternative cavity cell shapes to increase accelerating gradient: opportunities for R & D. –Current cavity fabrication efforts at FNAL and US vendor development. –Need for EB welding machine and support facility at FNAL: We want to be a more active participant in the SRF community. –Costs

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review3 Elliptical SRF Cavities Established Fabrication Method for Multi-cell SRF Cavities –Disks are cut from high purity niobium sheet and scanned for pits, scratches and inclusions of foreign material. Disks failing scan are rejected. –Half cells are deep drawn from disks: extra material is left at the iris and equator of each half cell to allow for weld shrinkage -- additional length retained at the equators for tuning. –Half cells are EB welded at the iris to form dumbbells: if necessary stiffening rings are EB welded to prevent Lorentz force detuning -- dumbbells are measured for frequency and equators trimmed accordingly.

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review4 Elliptical SRF Cavities –End tubes, FPCs and HOMs are formed by vendor preferred method (rolled and seam welded, back extruded, machined, etc.) -- flanges and other components are machined. –End assemblies are EB welded, measured for frequency and end half cells are trimmed accordingly. –Dumbbells are EB welded at the equators to form the cell structure: end assemblies are EB welded to the cell structure to complete the cavity. –NOTE: Each EB welding operation above requires parts to be degreased and BCP acid etched as weld preparation. There are ~ EB welds per typical nine-cell SRF cavity.

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review5 Elliptical SRF Cavities Why EB welding? EB welds produce localized heat effected zone resulting in minimum distortion (a necessity with the tight tolerances on cell profile). EB welds are fusion welds -- no secondary medium required. Depth of penetration is easy to control. Repeatability is excellent. EB welds are done in vacuum, thus reducing the potential for contamination.

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review6 Elliptical SRF Cavities

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review7 Elliptical SRF Cavities ILC cavity fabrication cost: mass production mode (DESY) ~ $60K per cavity Material 45% Machining 42% Welding 6% Other 7% Maximum gains in cost reduction achievable by reducing machining and/or material costs.

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review8 Elliptical SRF Cavities Alternative cavity fabrication methods Motivation is based on potential cost savings -- no known alternative methods claim to improve performance –Methods to reduce material costs (e.g., niobium film coating on substrate). –Methods to reduce machining costs (e.g., hydroforming or spinning of central cell structure). –Methods to further automate fabrication steps (e.g., EB welding machine configuration, innovative welding fixture design).

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review9 Elliptical SRF Cavities Hydro-forming Spinning (Singer-DESY, KEK) (Palmieri-INFN)

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review10 Elliptical SRF Cavities Hydroforming or spinning cell structure Potential advantages –Eliminate welds in high field regions of the cavity. –Eliminate machining of dumbbell equators for tuning. –If formed from niobium clad copper tubes may significantly reduce material (niobium) costs. Potential disadvantages –Seamless niobium tube production possessing uniform formability properties and sufficient length for 9-cell cavities requires further R & D. –Niobium clad copper tubes may delaminate from stresses due to thermal cycling. –Single pass EB welds required to join 9-cell structure to end assemblies will be difficult to execute.

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review11 Elliptical SRF Cavities Form end assemblies from brazed copper components followed by niobium film coating. Potential advantages –Reduce material (niobium) costs. –Eliminate some EB welding costs. Potential disadvantages –Complex internal end assembly geometry makes uniform niobium film deposition problematic. –Possibility of copper migration into critical weld joint.

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review12 Elliptical SRF Cavities Alternative cavity cell profiles Max Eacc = Hcrit/(Hpeak/Eacc) –When Hpeak on the RF surface of a cavity cell reaches Hcrit breakdown of superconductivity occurs. –Hcrit is a property of the material (niobium). –Hpeak/Eacc is determined by the geometry of the cell profile. –To increase Max Eacc: (1) Develop alternate materials with higher Hcrit, or (2) Reduce Hpeak/Eacc by changing the geometry of the cell profile (e.g., reentrant cavity or low-loss cavity).

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review13 Elliptical SRF Cavities SRF cavity fabrication at FNAL -- completed, in progress and planned: 3.9 GHz 3rd harmonic cavities –Cryomodule with four cavities promised to DESY –Four cavities completed (two at Jlab and two at FNAL) –Apparent problem with HOM design: cavity No. 4 with slightly modified HOM is under vertical test –Four additional cavities with new HOM design (single post Formteil) are in progress (two at Jlab and two at FNAL). –Large grain one-cell cavity in progress at FNAL. –Single grain one-cell cavity planned (Jlab). –Three one-cell cavities completed at FNAL and three one-cell cavities are in progress at Roark.

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review14 Elliptical SRF Cavities –Single-cell cavities are useful for R & D studies on cavity processing methods (EP, HPR, tumbling, etc.), as well as helping industry (Roark) perfect their fabrication and welding techniques. 3.9 GHz deflecting mode cavities –Various single-cell and three-cell cavities have been fabricated, plus one 9-cell and one 13-cell. –New design is in progress at low level of priority. 1.3 GHz ILC cavities –Four ACCEL cavities (asymmetric end tubes) received. –Four AES cavities (asymmetric end tubes) in final assembly stage.

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review15 Elliptical SRF Cavities –Two Jlab large grain cavities (symmetric end tubes) due in February. –Two Jlab fine grain cavities (asymmetric end tubes) in progress. –Eight ACCEL cavities (symmetric end tubes) on order. –Six AES cavities (symmetric end tubes) on order. –FY2007 plan is to order ~ 24 cavities

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review16 Elliptical SRF Cavities Industrialization: US vendor development The objective is to involve US industry more and utilize their expertise. –AES: experienced, but need to prove capability with ILC cavities -- awaiting test results of first four cavities at Jlab. –ROARK: appear capable, but lacking experience. Currently fabricating three 3.9 GHz 3rd harmonic single- cell cavities as Phase 1 of a potential three phase effort. Phase 2 would entail building one single-cell 1.3 GHz ILC cavity. Phase 3 would be –NIOWAVE/ROARK collaboration (complementary capabilities). Fabricate two 9-cell 1.3 GHz ILC cavities.

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review17 Elliptical SRF Cavities Need for EB welding machine and supporting infrastructure at Fermilab: Why? –Remove dependence on Sciaky. Sciaky machines in use for contract welding are always for sale. In FY2005 the machine we were using for 3rd harmonic cavity fabrication was sold, causing an eight month delay in our schedule. Transportation of parts to Sciaky and their machine shop environment increases the potential for damage and/or contamination. Scheduling welding dates is an issue, with competition from ANL, MSU and others. –It will facilitate on site investigation of alternative cavity fabrication methods so as to reduce cavity cost. –It can be used for on site investigation of experimental cavity cell shapes with the goal of improving accelerating gradient.

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review18 Elliptical SRF Cavities Need for EB welding machine and supporting infrastructure at Fermilab: Why? –It can be utilized as an integral part of a training facility to transfer welding and cavity fabrication methodology to collaborators and potential US vendors. –Supporting infrastructure will include clean room, ultrasonic cleaning tanks, UP water system and pre- weld BCP etching facilities to prepare parts for welding.

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review19 Cost Cost to establish SRF cavity fabrication infrastructure M & S SWF ____________________________________________ EB welding machine and$3000K$675K supporting infrastructure ____________________________________________

Fermilab Feb 13-14, 2007DOE SCRF Review20 Conclusions Establishment of cavity fabrication infrastructure will: (1) Provide FNAL with limited in-house cavity fabrication capability to develop and refine cavity fabrication techniques, (2) Increase throughput for current and future cavity fabrication programs, (3) Significantly increase FNAL’s capability to transfer SRF fabrication technology to US industry, and (4) Allow FNAL to become a more effective participant in SRF R & D.