WELCOME! Agenda of the workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal Basis for Management and Control Systems in INTERREG III programmes BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat Matthias Heinicke Seminar on Financial Management.
Advertisements

Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden First level controls - Certification of Expenditure INTERREG IIIC.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Financial Report BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat Rostislav Zatloukal.
Click to edit Master title style 1 In the run-up to closure Main tasks for managing authorities, paying authorities and winding-up bodies European Commission.
Introduction of participants / project ideas (PI) Presentation: What makes a good partnership? Presentation: Which projects is NWE looking for? Speed dating.
PRESAGE CTE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING PROCESURES
3 rd Financial Managers Seminar Brussels 19 May 2010 Eligibility period and reporting eligible expenditure.
Launch of the ESPON 2013 Programme Procedures for Call for Proposals under Priorities 1-3.
Subsidy Contract Lead Partner seminar October 2008, Riga Arina Andreičika Managing Authority
Maurizio Angeli Felicioni ANCI Lazio - National Association of the Italian Municipalities Lazio Main rules for the project implementation: A brief overview.
Characteristics of projects in EU research programmes
LP Seminar – Madrid – 20 October 2008 EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND REPORTING & MONITORING PROCEDURES Lead Partner Seminar Madrid, 20 October 2008.
“MED P ROGRAMME ” Z ERO C O (2) Z ERO EMISSION CO MMUNITIES F INANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM K ICK O FF M EETING J UNE 17° 18° 2010.
INTERREG IIIB CADSES NEIGHBOURHOOD PROGRAMME Transnational Training Seminar for potential Lead Partners and Partners, 3rd call November 9th-10th 2004,
Changes in the project Joint Technical Secretariat Seminar for Beneficiaries and Partners August, 2013 Rezekne, Latvia.
Financial Management and Auditing Monitoring by the JTS 3 rd round operations Rostock, Elise Oukka.
Financial Management and Auditing First Level Controls 3 rd round operations Rostock, Elise Oukka.
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 8 September 2010 How to apply – Budget and Reporting.
Financial Management and Auditing Reporting by the Lead Partner 3 rd round operations Rostock, Elise Oukka.
Large Scale Projects Aleksejs Šaforostovs LSP Project Manager Joint Technical Secretariat.
ESPON 2013 Programme 3 rd Financial Managers Seminar Brussels 19 May 2010.
Changes in the project. Joint Technical Secretariat Seminar for Beneficiaries February 2012 Narva, Estonia.
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels 10 February 2011 Application Form – Priority 1,3 How to ensure that your proposal is eligible?
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 10 May 2012 How to apply: Application Form and Eligibility A Decade of Territorial.
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 8 September 2010 How to apply: Legal Framework - Application Form ( How to ensure that your proposal is.
Project Implementation Monika Balode Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 16 October 2009, Šiauliai.
Green Partnerships Kick-off meeting Reporting procedure JTS MED Programme cofinancé par le Fonds Européen de Développement Régional Programme co-financed.
INTERREG IIIB PROGRAMME “ALPINE SPACE“ FORALPS kick-off meeting March 10th & 11th, 2005 Trento (I)
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Second level.
Green Partnerships Local Partnerships for Greener Cities and Regions 1st Reporting /Presage Other administrative issues Portugal, 8-10 July 2013.
Narrative reporting August 2013 Rezekne. …allows marketing the project to the external environment (Programme, monitoring experts, audit, EC, etc.)
Project Closure Guidelines Riga, Legal framework 2 EC Regulation 1828/2006 § 8, 9: Explanatory plaque, billboard, emblem of the EU, reference to.
Matching Grants. Address humanitarian conditions that benefit a community in need Direct Rotarian involvement Match at least two countries (host and international)
Project implementation, changes, reporting Edmunds Sniķeris Joint Technical Secretariat 16 April 2012, Kuldīga.
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Legal framework:
Implementation Section Romania-Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Operational Programme Joint Approval Committee, Bucharest, 3 April 2007.
South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme Bologna, 15° June 2009 Kick-off meeting of project SARMa SEE Joint Technical Secretariat.
Fulfillment of conditions and contracting Līga Kalvāne Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 15 October 2009, Siauliai.
IPA partners seminar Sarajevo, 18 th June 2013 Reporting procedure PRESAGE.
Audit Authority and Auditors Group of “European Territorial Cooperation” Programmes for Lessons to be learnt from the INTERREG IIIB NWE Auditors.
Part-financed by the European Union What makes final financial reporting different from regular reporting? Rostislav Zatloukal Financial Manager, BSR INTERREG.
Green Partnerships Local Partnerships for Greener Cities and Regions Study visit and 3 rd Steering Committee meeting Freiburg, 14 – 18 October 2013.
DG DEVCO, Unit B.6 Brussels, April Outline 1.Useful links 2.General conditions 3.General issues 2.
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g. BUDGET  Project Period  25th of October 2008 – 24th of January 2012  Budget and Funding  Total project budget,
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Flexibility rule.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
Paulius Baniūnas Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania EU Structural Support Management Department Monitoring and Analysis Division SYSTEM OF.
Northern Periphery Programme Advice to Lead partners for final reports Lead Partner Seminar 18th September 2013 Scandic Hotel, Skellefteå, Sweden.
Project Management Birutė Markevičiūtė Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 13 October 2008, Riga.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
INTERREG IIIB PROGRAMME “ALPINE SPACE“ ALPTER Reporting obligations and Financial control.
Technical Assistance Office 1 SOCRATES - MINERVA GRANT AGREEMENT 2004 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook.
Technical Assistance Office 1 Contract, Reports and errors to avoid! GRANT AGREEMENT 2005 Comenius coordinators’ meeting, 17/10/2005 Maryline Fiaschi,
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME PROJECT DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL ISSUES Project development seminar Prague, 1 st February 2010 Luca FERRARESE JTS CENTRAL.
Project financial reporting Linda Wormö April 20th, 2016 – Faroe Islands.
Ninth Lead Partner Information Seminar Financial requirements Project monitoring & reporting Audit & controls Communication => Practical information to.
Eligibility Rules Stefan Nyström, Managing Authority June 1, 2016 – Cork, Ireland.
WELCOME! Lead Partner Information Seminar Agenda
Transnational training seminar for potential Lead Partners and Partners to INTEREGG IIIB-CADSES procedures for 3° call for proposal CADSES implementation.
SOUTH BALTIC CROSS-BORDER CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME
PROJECT CHANGES.
PROJECT CHANGES IN EMS Implementation Seminar.
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
Kick-off meeting of the project UMBRELLA
Reporting 25 April 2018.
Eligibility Rules Stefan Nyström, Managing Authority
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
PROJECT CHANGES.
Presentation transcript:

WELCOME! Agenda of the workshop Presentation on Programme requirements and questions & answers Clustering Exercise: Speed Dating Brainstorming (Management of natural resources, Technology and knowledge transfer, Prosperous and sustainable communities )

PROGRAMME REQUIREMENTS What project promoters cannot ignore about INTERREG IVB NWE project management

Programme Requirements Table of contents The Lead Partner Principle The audit trail Reporting to the JTS: payment claims, progress reports, project modifications N+2 rule and decommitment risk

The Lead Partner Principle (LPP) article 20 (EC) 1080/2006 Programme Requirements The Lead Partner Principle (LPP) article 20 (EC) 1080/2006 One partner steps up on behalf of the whole partnership and bears responsibility for ensuring the project’s implementation. The Lead Partner is the administrative link between the programme and the project (flow of information and fund). The LP responsibilities include that all contact with the Programme takes place via the LP. It is the responsibility of the LP to pass on all relevant information to the project partners.

Differentiate flows, messages and targets Programme Requirements Differentiate flows, messages and targets Official communication JTS ERDF flow information flow LP - - - - - - - « internal cooking » Partner The JTS shall not intervene in the relationship between partners. Similarly, any potential money flow between partners or with the Lead partner is left at their discretion. Communication with the JTS should always take place via the LP (with about 1,000 expected partners, the JTS cannot address directly to partners).

Programme Requirements The audit trail Tracing expenditure from the quote to the reimbursement. Tracing expenditure from the initial quote to the ERDF reimbursement

Role of the Lead Partner controller Programme Requirements Role of the Lead Partner controller The LP controller: checks the expenditure of all partners against the approved AF checks that it fits with the budget planning verifies that all expenditure is in line with what was agreed verifies the validations by the controller verifies that the controllers are those approved by the MS verifies that the controllers’ signature is backed by checklists,… checks that all invoice copies are available at Lead Partner premises verifies that the ERDF contribution has been paid to the partners

Organise your controls Programme Requirements Organise your controls Internal controls at partner and project level Ensure smooth implementation: know what you’ve done and where you’re going, content-wise and financially. Always have a good overview! First Level Controls Controls at project level, prior to the submission of payment claims. Other controls Second level controls, DG Regio and Member States audits, Certifying Authority audits, Quality controls, etc… Every partner in every project will be controlled several times and by different bodies during the project’s lifetime. Save time and money with an efficient organisation!

Project modifications Programme Requirements Project modifications

Project modifications Programme Requirements Project modifications Partnership amendment, revised budget line split, new project end date, etc.: these changes are allowed 3 times in total, no later than 6 months before the end date of the project and only upon formal request and approval by the Secretariat or the Programme’s Steering Committee – depending on the significance of the changes. The “request for changes” form must be used. The Secretariat should be notified of minor changes (change of bank account, new contact person, change of address…) as soon as possible by official letter from the Lead Partner.

Project modifications Programme Requirements Project modifications Budget Line Modifications (BLM) Increases of more than 20% on individual budget lines. Other financial changes Ex: a reduction of grant rate at partner level or a decrease in the overall budget -> use the request for changes form. Note: it is not possible to increase the project’s total ERDF amount. Activities/output The Lead Partner must inform the Secretariat about any changes to the Application Form and use the request for changes form. In some cases (the drop-out of a partner, unexpected results preventing the project from further advancing in the direction originally planned, unforeseen administrative delays, etc.), projects may notice that they cannot successfully implement all actions of the approved Application Form and / or that they wish to implement other or additional actions.

Programme Requirements Reporting and payment procedure

Programme Requirements Some basic rules Payment will be made only if both the Progress Report and Payment Claims are deemed acceptable. Payment Claims and Progress Reports must be filled out in English, submitted together, twice a year (end of April and end of October). “First come, first served” applies. Plan your cash flow as the reimbursement can take from one month to several months. Once the claim and progress report are approved, the JTS sends an email to the LP with the monitoring report and the templates for the next period. The Certifying Authority emails a letter confirming payment. A maximum of 85% of the ERDF project budget can be paid before the submission of the final claim.

Main issues in payment claims Programme Requirements Main issues in payment claims Staff costs: use of contractual data rather than effective figures (e.g. number of working hours or days must come from timesheets). External Experts & Consultants: lack of public procurement procedure Travel costs: outside the eligible area without any prior request to the JTS Publicity: missing logo and lack of call for tender Equipment: depreciation and pro rata are sometimes forgotten Investments: changes, public procurement rules Administration costs: no link with project, random calculation method, thresholds

Main comments in progress reports Programme Requirements Main comments in progress reports Give a clear overview of what happened in the reporting period. Answer questions of each section exhaustively within the given limit of space. Give a joint picture on the progress and not a catalogue of individual actions for each single partner. In progress reports due in April, inform about developments in the last 12 months as opposed to October reports for the last 6-month reporting period. For April progress reports attach annexes that link to relevant actions and are labelled properly. Discuss values of indicators with the project partners to obtain views of the whole partnership. Use comment boxes when reporting on individual indicators. Fill in only the priority specific indicators that are relevant to your project’s priority. Avoid jargon in the description of the activities. Do not mention names of persons with no reference to the organisation/partner they represent.

How to speed up the process? Programme Requirements How to speed up the process? Check that both the Payment Claim and the Progress Report are correct before you submit them. They must bear all the required dates and signatures and be supported by a full set of verification sheets and annexes. Fill in the comment sections as much as possible. Answer the JTS queries as soon and as accurately as possible. Circulate the assessment report to all partners and find ways to implement the recommendations for improvement that will be listed. Be proactive and communicate with the JTS: inform us of any delay or project modification since these may have substantial consequences. If the controllers’ names do not match the approbation certificates, the payment claim will be rejected.

The decommitment situation Programme Requirements The decommitment situation

The Programme expects a decommitment of €5-8 million in 2009. Programme Requirements The decommitment situation The Programme expects a decommitment of €5-8 million in 2009. Subsidy Contract, art. 8 (10) reads: “In the case that the annual contribution from the ERDF for the INTERREG IVB NWE Programme is automatically decommitted by the European Commission […], the Authorities of this Programme reserve the right to consider the possibility of reducing the approved ERDF budget of the project with respect to expenditure not carried out in accordance with the stipulated timetable.” Implement on time Submit your expenditure on time

N+2 risks countermeasures at project level (by LP): Programme Requirements Transfer of information plays a vital role in avoiding loss of funds as a result of decommitment. N+2 risks countermeasures at project level (by LP): Remind all partners to ensure that the project does not deviate significantly from the spending plan; refer to applicable procedures in the project's Partnership Agreement and project handbook. Enforce stringent reporting procedures and have a strict budgetary control; Set up a realistic spending plan together = basis for the LP's monitoring of project expenditures; Anticipate future bottlenecks through frequent updates on forecasts of expenditure by partners.

Thank you very much for your attention! Programme Requirements Thank you very much for your attention!

Speed Dating Name, country and institution Project name and role in the project Previous experience in INTERREG projects

Brainstorming Spend the same but do more! Exchange contact! Get to know each other!   Thematic complementarities? Similar actions? Common communication activities?