LIGO-G060207-00-M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO-G M May 17, 2006 Installation (INS) Requirements and Design Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Dennis Coyne, Caltech.
Advertisements

LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
Thermal Compensation System – TCS Technical Presentation aLIGO NSF Review LIGO Livingston Observatory April LIGO-G v5.
LIGO-G A-M April 5, 2006 Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Richard.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
NSF : Nov. 10, LIGO End to End simulation overview  Time domain simulation written in C++  Like MATLAB with Interferometer toolbox  Major physics.
LIGO-G06xxxx-00-M Technical Progress Planned/Needed in FY07 Advanced LIGO Program Advisory Panel meeting, 30 November – 1 December 2006, MIT Dennis Coyne,
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
Measurement of the laser beam profile at PSL to Mode Cleaner interface for the 40 Meter Prototype Interferometer A table of contents 1. Introduction 1.1.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Facilities Modifications (FAC) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.
LIGO-G M April 5, 2006 Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Richard.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
4/25/11 G v3 1 Facility Modifications and Preparations (FMP) Technical Status Annual NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project April , 2011 John.
Intermediate review - ERC – February 9, 2009 – L. Pinard 1 Mirrors Sub-System Overview  Introduction  Scope of the subsystem, main tasks  Job done since.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 3/031 40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee LIGO-G R.
Assigning Resources A schedule is not complete until all the resources necessary to complete the project have been committed or assigned.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Development, Implementation Plan & Schedule Dennis Coyne April.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO-G Advanced LIGO Detector upgrade is planned for »Factor of 10 increase in distance probed (‘reach’) »Factor of 1000 increase in event.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
G v5 1 Core Optics Components Technical Status NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project April 2011 GariLynn Billingsley.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
LIGO-G M Management and Operation Plans/Budget Stan Whitcomb NSF Annual Review 8 November 2004 Caltech.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
Pre-stabilized laser (PSL) for AdV Scope of the system Main tasks Requirements Reference solution and status of the design Plans towards completion Technical.
Paolo La Penna Injection optics for Advanced VirgoLSC/VIRGO joint meeting, Cascina, 25/05/ Advanced VIRGO Input optics LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 eLIGO Input Optics Characterization and Performance Kate Dooley University of Florida.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
1st Advanced Virgo Review – November 3-4, 2008 – L. Pinard 1 Mirrors Sub-System Overview  Introduction  Scope of the subsystem, main tasks  Substrates.
1Page # Machine Assembly WBS 700 By: James H. Chrzanowski January 24, 2001.
Nov 3, 2008 Detection System for AdV 1/8 Detection (DET) Subsystem for AdV  Main tasks and requirements for the subsystem  DC readout  Design for: the.
Status of the Advanced LIGO PSL development LSC meeting, Baton Rouge March 2007 G Z Benno Willke for the PSL team.
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
LIGO-G M LIGO R&D1 Initial LIGO upgrade to 30 W: Implication for the Input Optics UFLIGO Group.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
Cascina, Nov. 4 th, 2008 AdV review 1 AdV Injection system E. Genin European Gravitational Observatory.
THE INPUT OPTICS OF ENHANCED AND ADVANCED LIGO D.B. Tanner, M.A. Arain, A. Lucianetti, R.M. Martin, V. Quetschke, L.F. Williams, Wan Wu, G. Mueller, and.
G R LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO August 2004.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
LIGO-G d April 24, 2007 Auxiliary Optics System (AOS) Technical Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Mike Smith, Phil Willems.
NSF Annual Review of the LIGO Laboratory
Jim Fast Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Auxiliary Optical Systems - AOS
Peter Beyersdorf TAMA300 Results from the Stanford 10m all-reflective polarization Sagnac interferometer Peter Beyersdorf TAMA300.
Thermal Compensation NSF
Main Interferometer Subsystem
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
Auxiliary Optics System (AOS)
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Update on the Advanced LIGO PSL Program
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
R&D Highlights Seismic Isolation Suspensions ISC/40m
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
40m TAC Update October 2006 The 40m Team 11 April 2019 G I.
Auxiliary Optics System (AOS)
Project Management Issues John N. Galayda, SLAC April 24, 2002
Project Management Considerations
Advanced LIGO R&D Review Input Optics
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF

LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, Input Optics Description & Deliverables The Input Optics conditions the light from the Pre-Stabilized Laser and sends it on to the main interferometer optical system Scope includes: » Power control into interferometers » Provide phase modulation of the input light –Electro-optic modulation –Routing optics, diagnostics (photodiodes, optical spectrum analyzers) » Filter spatially and temporally the light into the interferometer –transmission through the mode cleaner » Provide optical isolation as well as distribution of interferometer diagnostic signals –Faraday isolators –In vacuum non-suspended mirrors and optomechanical components » Mode match the light to the interferometer –beam-expanding telescope mirrors –CO2 laser and beam routing optics Scope also includes labor and travel for IO fabrication, assembly and testing at sites IO deliverables are met when all components are delivered to the site, assembled, tested, and past a ‘readiness’ check. $3.35 M $368k$847k$1.98 M

LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, Subsystem Work Breakdown Structure

LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, Subsystem Detailed Schedule Detailed schedule is available on Project website »

LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, Subsystem Schedule Highlights IO not on critical path

LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, Subsystem Milestones FABRICATION DEVELOPMENT

LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, Project Subsystem Interfaces Management » design and fabrication by UF –Lots of experience from initial LIGO » Oversight by Carol Wilkinson, LIGO Lab –Lab reviews of Input Optics –Travel to NSF reviews, sites, Caltech, MIT (LASTI) Optical » TO: Core Optics -IO Mirrors delivered to Core Optics for metrology » FROM: Core Optics -IO Mirrors delivered from Core Optics after metrology Mechanical » FROM: Suspensions –SUS designs and fabricates suspension and delivers to IO for assembly Electronic » FROM: ISC –ISC provides RF signals to modulators –ISC provides power control software –Mode cleaner length and alignment servo designed and built by ISC –ISC fabricated symmetric port (REFL) beam stabilization servo –ISC fabricates servo for adaptive mode matching (if needed) –ISC fabricates servo for active jitter suppression into mode cleaner (if needed)

LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, Subsystem Cost Estimating Used cost estimating approach based on initial LIGO » Capital equipment and M&S –Catalog prices for ‘off-the-shelf’ optical, mechanical, and diagnostic components Vendors: CVI Laser, New Focus, Newport, … –Vendor quotes for specialized components Suspended mirrors, beam routing (super)mirrors Vendors: Corning (blanks) Subcontracts: General Optics (polishing), REO (optical coatings), IAP (Faraday rotator), Raicol (modulator crystals) –Engineering estimates for UF ‘home-built’ opto-mechanics and electronics Escalated from LIGO 1 experience » Labor rates –Hours estimated based on LIGO 1 experience and extrapolated complexity to Advanced LIGO e. g. – 800 hrs/IFO to assemble and test mode cleaner and MMT suspensions before installation as opposed to 400 hrs in LIGO 1  triple suspension more complex » Travel –Estimated based on LIGO 1 experience and extrapolated complexity to Advanced LIGO

LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, Subsystem Cost by WBS Level 4

LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, Subsystem Staffing Profile

LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, Major Safety Issues for the Input Optics High laser power  180 W from laser » Overall Strategy: Project wide laser safety plan in place for LIGO Laboratory –under modification for Advanced LIGO Handling and transport of heavy components » e.g., Assembled mode cleaner triple suspensions » Mitigation: design robust ergonomic assembly and transportation tooling

LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, Subsystem Risks and Concerns Cost and Schedule risk: Damage to IO components during processing, metrology, and assembly » Spares built into procurement processing » Laser damage mitigated by LIGO Laser Safety Plan Schedule risk: Adaptive MMT optically complex and not prototyped at system (eg, LASTI) level » Added value, but not essential to AdvLIGO » Accelerate design; pursuing alternatives (ring heaters for MMT mirrors Schedule risk: Faraday isolator doesn’t meet vacuum requirements » Alternative vendors (Electro-optic Technologies)