I. Grigorieva, L. Vinnikov, A. Geim (Manchester) V. Oboznov, S. Dubonos (Chernogolovka)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 3 THE ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE OF THE POLYELECTRONIC ATOM. PART II
Advertisements

Two Major Open Physics Issues in RF Superconductivity H. Padamsee & J
Flux Jumps in Magnetization of HTS Tubes. Nasser S. Alzayed Physics Dept., King Saud University Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
Chapter 9 Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories CHEMISTRY The Central Science 9th Edition David P. White.
Chapter 9 Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories
Tine Porenta Mentor: prof. dr. Slobodan Žumer Januar 2010.
Microscopic time-dependent analysis of neutrons transfers at low-energy nuclear reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei V.V. Samarin.
Zero Field Superconducting Transition with Columnar Defects A. Vestergren, Mats WallinS. TeitelHans Weber KTH, StockholmUniver. RochesterLuleå Univer.
ECRYS 2011 Confinement-Induced Vortex Phases in Superconductors Institut des Nanosciences de Paris INSP, CNRS, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6,
Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter from dilatation symmetry.
Vortex pinning by a columnar defect in planar superconductors with point disorder Anatoli Polkovnikov Yariv Kafri, David Nelson Department of Physics,
Phase Diagram of a Point Disordered Model Type-II Superconductor Peter Olsson Stephen Teitel Umeå University University of Rochester IVW-10 Mumbai, India.
VORTEX MATTER IN SUPERCONDUCTORS WITH FERROMAGNETIC DOT ARRAYS Margriet J. Van Bael Martin Lange, Victor V. Moshchalkov Laboratorium voor Vaste-Stoffysica.
Vortex Dynamics in Type II Superconductors Yuri V. Artemov Yuri V. Artemov Ph.D. Student in Physics Brian B. Schwartz Mentor: Brian B. Schwartz Professor.
Quantum Numbers and Atomic Structure Refining Bohr’s Model.
Superconductivity and Superfluidity The London penetration depth but also F and H London suggested that not only To which the solution is L is known as.
Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
Grazing Incidence X-ray Scattering from Patterned Nanoscale Dot Arrays D.S. Eastwood, D. Atkinson, B.K. Tanner and T.P.A. Hase Nanoscale Science and Technology.
A image of the flux line lattice in the magnetic superconductor TmNi2B2C The hexagonal arrangement of magnetic flux lines in pure Nb imaged using neutrons.
Nucleation of Vortices in Superconductors in Confined Geometries W.M. Wu, M.B. Sobnack and F.V. Kusmartsev Department of Physics Loughborough University,
Further Covalent bonding
Studies on supercooled metastable states of vortex matter P Chaddah Cryogenics & Superconductivity Section, Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore
Fermi-Edge Singularitäten im resonanten Transport durch II-VI Quantenpunkte Universität Würzburg Am Hubland, D Michael Rüth, Anatoliy Slobodskyy,
Chapter 5 Quantum Numbers Part 2. The Third Quantum Number The third quantum number identifies the orbital that the electron is in.
The Quantum Numbers namesymbolvalues Principal Quantum Numbern any integer from 1 to infinity Angular Quantum NumberLany integer from 0 to n-1 Magnetic.
Lecture 3. Combinatorics, Probability and Multiplicity (Ch. 2 )
Lecture 3. Granular superconductors and Josephson Junction arrays Plan of the Lecture 1). Superconductivity in a single grain 2) Granular superconductors:
Superconducting vortex avalanches D. Shantsev Åge A. F. Olsen, D. Denisov, V. Yurchenko, Y. M. Galperin, T. H. Johansen AMCS (COMPLEX) group Department.
Covalent Bonding Orbitals Adapted from bobcatchemistry.
PLASMA Artificial classical atoms and molecules: from electrons to colloids and to superconducting vortices François Peeters V. Bedanov, V. Schweigert,
Lewis Symbols and the Octet Rule Electron Dot Symbols convenient way of showing the valence electrons of atoms. Consists of the chemical symbol and one.
L.Ya. Vinnikov   L.A, Emelchenko ISSP RAS, Chernogolovka, RUSSIA
Phase transitions in Hubbard Model. Anti-ferromagnetic and superconducting order in the Hubbard model A functional renormalization group study T.Baier,
Molecular Geometries and Bonding Chapter Bonding Theory Valence Bond Theory Molecular Orbital Theory Complete Ch 9 problems # 29, 36, 38, 39, 42,
RF breakdown in multilayer coatings: a possibility to break the Nb monopoly Alex Gurevich National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University.
Numerical Ginzburg-Landau studies of J c in 2D and 3D polycrystalline superconductors G.J.Carty and D P Hampshire Superconductivity Group, Department of.
Peak effect in Superconductors - Experimental aspects G. Ravikumar Technical Physics & Prototype Engineering Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai.
Single Electron Transistor (SET)
Chapter 5 Quantum Numbers Part 1. Quantum Numbers There are four quantum numbers that describe the properties of an electron and the “orbital” that it.
VORTEX PHASES IN PERIODIC PLUS RANDOM PINNING POTENTIAL Walter Pogosov, Institute for Theoretical and Applied Electrodynamics, Russian Academy of Sciences,
Electrical Transport in Thin Film Nanostructures Hanno H. Weitering, The University of Tennessee, DMR Understanding and control of electrical conductivity.
Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals Chapter 10 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required.
Switching with Ultrafast Magnetic Field Pulses Ioan Tudosa.
1 Non-uniform superconductivity in superconductor/ferromagnet nanostructures A. Buzdin Institut Universitaire de France, Paris and Condensed Matter Theory.
Why Make Holes in Superconductors? Saturday Morning Physics December 6, 2003 Dr. Sa-Lin Cheng Bernstein.
Superconductivity and Superfluidity The Pippard coherence length In 1953 Sir Brian Pippard considered 1. N/S boundaries have positive surface energy 2.
Pinning Effect on Niobium Superconducting Thin Films with Artificial Pinning Centers. Lance Horng, J. C. Wu, B. H. Lin, P. C. Kang, J. C. Wang, and C.
Grid computing simulation of superconducting vortex lattice in superconducting magnetic nanostructures M. Rodríguez-Pascual 1, D. Pérez de Lara 2, E.M.
Prentice Hall © 2003Chapter 9 Chapter 9 Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories CHEMISTRY The Central Science 9th Edition David P. White.
Study of a Superconducting Shield for a Transverse Polarized Target for PANDA 2012 Paris Helmholtz Institut Mainz Bertalan Feher, PANDA EMP Session Status.
G. R. Berdiyorov and F. M. Peeters University of Antwerp, Belgium
Chapter 5 Quantum Numbers.
Chemistry 141 Monday, November 27, 2017 Lecture 33 Pi bonding and MOs
Scientific Achievement
Topic 2 Atomic Structure
QHE discovered by Von Klitzing in 1980
Electron Configuration
FAM Mirko Rehmann March
Abstract We simulate the twisting of an initially potential coronal flux tube by photospheric vortex motions. The flux tube starts to evolve slowly(quasi-statically)
Phase diagram of s-wave SC Introduction
Chapter 5 Quantum Numbers Part 1.
Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals Chapter 10 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  Permission required.
Section 5.2 The Quantum Theory and the Atom
Atomic Orbitals and Electron Arrangement
Thermodynamics of a Type I superconductor
Topic 2 Atomic Structure
Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals Chapter 10.
Determining superconducting vortices configurations with stochastic processes in a GPU-based code N. Molero Puerto1, R. Mayo García2 1 URJC 2 CIEMAT.
Electron Configuration Number of Protons = Number of Electrons
Presentation transcript:

I. Grigorieva, L. Vinnikov, A. Geim (Manchester) V. Oboznov, S. Dubonos (Chernogolovka)

Vortices in small superconductors (size R ~ ξ,λ) expected to behave similar to electrons in artificial atoms, i.e. obey specific rules for shell filling, exhibit magic numbers, etc. In confined geometries, superconducting wave function must obey boundary conditions which determine total vorticity L Vortex states are further influenced by vortex interactions with screening currents (for R > λ) Numerical studies of vortex states exist but so far no direct observations We present direct observations of vortex states in small superconducting dots by magnetic decoration Motivation

Starting Nb films: λ(0)  90 nm; ξ(0)  15 nm; H c2 (0)  1.5 T;   6; T c =9.1 K; thickness d = 150 nm > ξ, λ Vortex structure in a macroscopic Nb film. External field H ext = 80 Oe

200 µm 20 µm 5 µm Each structure contained circular disks, squares and triangles of four different sizes:  1µm;  2 µm;  3µm;  5 µm Over 500 dots decorated in each experiment (same field, temperature, decoration conditions)

field-cooling in perpendicular magnetic field external magnetic field varying between 20 and 160 Oe, i.e., H/H c2 = – 0.016, where H c2 (3.5 K)  1 T; experimental details H decoration captures snapshots of vortex states at T  3.5 K =0.4T c ; thickness of all nanostructured samples d = 150 nm > ξ, λ

L = 9 L = 25 (3,8,14) L = 94  despite strong pinning, confinement has dominating effect on vortex states: well defined shell structures observed for L  35 in circular disks; a variety of states with triangular / square symmetries observed for L  15 for triangular and square dots  for larger L (L>30-35), vortex arrangements are less well defined and for L > 50 become disordered, similar to macroscopic films  due to many different combinations of H ext values and dot sizes, almost all possible vorticities between L=0 and L  50 were observed (L = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,…)

for all values of vorticity L, external filed (total flux) required for nucleation of L vorticies significantly exceeds corresponding field for a macroscopic film Vorticity vs field

B.J. Baelus and F.M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 65, , 2002 experiment, disk size R  100ξ nucleation of the first vortex requires magnetic flux corresponding to over 3  0 states with small vorticities are stable over appreciable field intervals, e.g. for a 2µm disk,  H  20 Oe for transition to L=1;  H  10 Oe for transition to L=2 numerical study, R = 6ξ Vorticity vs field

(2,7) (2,8)(3,3,3)(1,8)(3,7) (2,8)(2,7)(3,7)(3,3,3)(1,8) at least two or three different states observed in every experiment in dots of nominally the same size  2  m dots, H ext = 80 Oe  3  m dots, H ext = 60 Oe Multiplicity of vortex arrangements variations in dot sizes, shape irregularities lead to variations in flux up to  0 small differences in energy of different states with same L implied

 0.5  0 Multiplicity of vortex arrangements

(0) (1) (2) (3) (5) (1,5) (6) (4) (1,6) (1,7) (1,8) (2,7) (2,8) (3,7) (3,8) Evolution of vortex states

Comparison with theory B.J. Baelus, L.R.E. Cabral, F.M. Peeters, Phys.Rev.B 69, (2004) observed vortex states in good agreement with numerical simulations

Magic numbers we are able to identify magic numbers (maximum numbers of vortices in each shell before the next shell nucleates) identify shell filling rules … L = 5 L = 6 L = 7 L = 8

…after that new vortices appear in either the first or second shell: L=11 (3,8)L=10 (3,7) L=10 (2,8) L=9 (2,7) Magic numbers … and this continues until the total vorticity reaches L=14 (L 1 =4; L 2 =10)

Magic numbers … third shell appears at L>14 in the form of one vortex in the centre … L=17 (1,5,11)L=18 (1,6,11) … after that additional vortices nucleate in either first, second or third shell until L 3 reaches 16… L=22 (2,7,13) L=24 (3,7,14)

Magic numbers … fourth shell appears at L 3 >18 in the form of one vortex in the centre, and so on … L=35 (1,5,11,18) rules of shell filling similar to electrons in artificial atoms ( V.M. Bedanov and F.M. Peeters, Phys. Rev.B 49,667, 1994 ) magic numbers: one shell  L 1 =6 two shells  L 2 =10 three shells  L 3 =18 …..

Vortex states in triangular dots

Vortex states in square dots

Conclusions direct observations of multiple vortex states in confined geometry low-vorticity states (L<4) are stable over surprisingly large intervals of magnetic field well defined shell structures in circular geometry magic numbers for vortex shell filling

L=20 (1,6,13) H ext =160 Oe L=18 (1,6,11) H ext = 30 Oe L=21 (1,7,13) H ext =160 Oe vortex configurations do not change with increasing external field