IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING for Institutional Effectiveness THE REASON: Improvement of Student Learning and Institutional Support Services THE OCCASION: Regional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Advertisements

Summer Institute, May16,  Peer review process that evaluates educational programs and services for quality.  Transferability of credit hours.
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
History, Status and Challenges as of August 2010 Outcomes, Assessment and Accreditation.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
All College Day August 24, Accreditation is for everyone REAFFIRMED.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Academic Assessment Task Force Report August 15, 2013 Lori Escallier, Co-Chair Keith Sheppard, Co-Chair Chuck Taber, Co-Chair.
Accreditation, SLOs and You – What are the patient outcomes? or Will the patient survive? Facilitators: Janet Fulks and Phillip Maynard.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
FOR THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION’S ACADEMY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING YSU’s Sustainability Plan 1.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
Accreditation and Self Study Process A presentation by: Joseph Saimon Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) (Director for Development and Community Relations)
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
All College Day August 23, 2013 The Homestretch to Reaffirmation! REAFFIRMED.
SACS-COC Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Plus Q & A CCPRO Conference, Greensboro, NC September 2011 Kimberly B. Lawing, Vice President of Institutional.
SMSU University Mission Southwest Minnesota State University prepares students to meet the complex challenges of this century as engaged citizens in their.
The Accreditation Adventure Sink, Float, or Swim? Columbia College December 2009.
11/19/2004 SLOs at MJC Bill Scroggins Mike Sundquist Modesto Junior College
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
FACULTY REPORTS JANUARY 16, 2009 GEOFFREY DYER Taft College’s Progress in SLOs.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
WASC “All Hands” Meeting Overview and Update November 12, 2007 D. Jonte-Pace.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
A STUDENT’S GUIDE ACCREDITATION WHAT IS ACCREDITATION? The process by which a college is certified by a regional accrediting agency, such as the.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report January 2009 WASC Accreditation.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
Accreditation Update to ICC Student Development & Services March 16, 2015 Gohar Momjian Associate Vice Chancellor of Institutional Development Accreditation.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE Accreditation Self Study Report 2011 presented by Rebecca Teague, Accreditation Liaison Officer Steering & Standard Chair Committee.
WASC Orientation and Discussion September 2, 2009 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Facult Retreat January 2010 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
4/16/07 SACS Reaffirmation Process Susan P. Himburg SACS Director of Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Texas Woman’s University Academic Degree Program Assessment
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here
Curriculum and Accreditation
Curriculum Process now includes SLO Assessment Form
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Reaccreditation and Illinois
Accreditation & Institution Set Standards
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
District discipline lead spring meeting agenda
Brooklyn College Fall 2019 OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness August 29th 2019.
Presentation transcript:

IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING for Institutional Effectiveness THE REASON: Improvement of Student Learning and Institutional Support Services THE OCCASION: Regional Accreditation

BACKGROUND In January 2005, the ACCJC sent a letter to Saddleback College listing multiple areas relating to Program Review AND Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) as needing immediate attention in order to be in compliance with the accreditation standards. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE: CURRENTLY, SADDLEBACK COLLEGE IS IN NON- COMPLIANCE WITH THE WASC STANDARDS. This must be taken seriously and rectified.

What the Commission Expected for First Round of Accreditation Reviews: An institution will have begun identifying SLO’s, defining meaningful measures of accomplishment, measuring and evaluating the results. There will be some plan in place to extend accomplishments to all courses, programs and degrees.

1.The faculty take collective responsibility for establishing, reviewing, fostering and demonstrating the attainment of Student Learning Outcomes. Standard 2 2.The faculty take responsibility for evaluating the effectiveness of the teaching and learning process AND use the results for improvement. Standard 4.6 A Successful Response to WASC criteria means: Our most important reason to exam student learning outcomes is to improve student learning!

How does the ACCJC requirement effect me and my teaching in the classroom? Without immediate action at the division, department and program level, the college will be unable to demonstrate any intent to show progress towards meeting the stated WASC requirements. – In other words: WE (faculty, staff, administration) MUST demonstrate a commitment to this project. – We have been given a deadline and must give written and physical evidence that WE are working on SLOs.

What is the Deadline? There are TWO deadlines that the WASC letter refers to: 1. PROGRESS REPORT: ”The Commission asks that a Progress Report be submitted by OCTOBER 15, it should focus on the recommendations … :” 2. VISITATION: “… accreditation has been reaffirmed, with a requirement that the college complete a Progress Report. The report will be followed by a visit by Commission representatives... “ NOVEMBER 2005.

RECOMMENDATION #2: The College fully develop, implement, and coordinate an integrated college planning and evaluation structure by: C. Identifying intended institutional and student learning outcomes, coordinated with the college mission statement, and measuring progress towards accomplishment: (Standards I.A.1, 1.B.I,I.B.2, I.B.2, I.B.3, and II.A.1) D. Coordinating program review more thoroughly with the educational master plan, department plans, and decision-making processes (Standards I.B.I,I.B.4), E. Requiring and implementing program review for all departments... (Standards II.A.1, IIA.2, II.B.3, II.B.4) ACCREDITATION REPORT AREAS OF CONCERN

RECOMMENDATION #3: The College develop and implement student learning outcomes across the college by: Developing measurable learning outcome for all courses, degrees, certificates, programs, and services (Standards I.A.1, 1.B.I,I.B.2, I.B.2, I.B.3, and II.A.1) Defining and instituting research, procedures for measuring, assessing, and tracking learning outcomes); (Standards I.B.I,I.B.4), AND Creating a staff development program to educate and train all pertinent faculty and staff members in the identification, assessment, and evaluation of student learning outcomes.” (Standards I.B.I,I.B.4), ACCREDITATION REPORT AREAS OF CONCERN

ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION?

WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO? 1. The college now plans to establish a multi-year foundational project which will include training of faculty and staff, the implementation of SLO assessment across the campus, and the integration of SLOs into the Program Review process. 2. This project is designed to institutionalize an assessment process that will lead to: – continual improvement of instruction and student services – address the standards set by WASC for our November 2005 site visitation from the Accreditation Team.

Now you ask, what exactly are SLOs? S tudent L earning O utcomes are formal written statements to determine what students know, think, feel or do as a result of a given learning experience. O utcomes are determined by the members of a particular department or program. A ssessment of the outcomes allows faculty to make a connection between what students are expected to learn and if the students are learning. A ssessment results stimulate discussion and direct activities that can improve instructional delivery and/ or student support systems.

Based on the new WASC Standards a “transformational change is necessary to ensure that the entire campus community begins to assess student learning. This will require a consistent, coherent plan and a unified effort.” Student Learning Outcomes Steering Committee, Mt. SAC What needs to be addressed?

The Saddleback Proposal C urrently, a variety of SLO models are utilized across the campus, many with excellent results. H owever, for all areas of the campus to work towards the same goal effectively, a common vocabulary and standard of practice must been established. This has now been done through the creation of: SLO Process and Procedures New Program Review process with outcomes assessment at its core SLO Implementation Team An Institutional Effectiveness Office – located in the Library - room 321K. Institutional Effectiveness website:

Overview of the Implementation Process A successful transition to the use of the SLO process at Saddleback College requires a structured plan for both training and support. To meet this goal, the SLO Implementation Team has been established as a committee of the Academic Senate in Spring 2005.

Organization and Leadership:  SLO Coordinator – responsible for supervising the campus- wide training and implementation efforts.  Works closely with Curriculum Chair & the Program Review Chair in the implementation of the process, particularly as they apply to curriculum issues, the program review process and accreditation.  Faculty Facilitators – responsible for conducting the initial departmental/program training, which will lead to the creation and utilization of SLOs, and work directly with individual departments and programs in ongoing implementation.  Educational Assessment Analyst Assistant – responsible for providing guidance and expertise regarding selection of assessment tools and analysis of resulting data.

DEVELOPING A PLAN FOR ASSESSMENT : Using the Five Column Model IIIIIIIVV Expanded Statement of Institutional Purpose Program: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Method & Criteria for Success Assessment Results Use of Results

Getting started: 1. Begin at the Department/Program level. 2. Create a Short List (to look at now) and Long List (to look at later) of learning objectives for your program/department. 3. Consider only 3-5 SLOs for your program on the Short List. 4. Rotate learning outcomes after each one is addressed.

W ho Should Write the SLOs? Those who are experts and in direct involvement with the discipline: The Chair and Faculty.

SLO IMPLEMENTATION TEAM : IN-SERVICE TRAINING SCHEDULE Monday: 8/15 2:30-3pm Chair’s Meeting – Presentation on Program Review and SLOs Tuesday: 8/16 8:30-11:00am President’s Breakfast 8/16 12:30 - 1:20pm MSE Division Meeting Howard Adams, Carmen Dominguez, Wendy Gordon 8/16 1:00 - 1:50 pm LA/LR Division Meeting Cheryl Altman, Claire Cesareo-Silva 8/16 1:30 - 2:20 pm ATAS Division Meeting Howard Adams, Carmen Dominguez, Wendy Gordon 8/ :50 pm SBS Division Meeting Cheryl Altman, Claire Cesareo-Silva 8/ :50 pm BS Division Meeting Cheryl Altman, Claire Cesareo 8/ :30 pm HSHSEI Dept. Chair Mtg. Howard Adams, Carmen Dominguez, Wendy Gordon

WHAT WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED THIS SUMMER: PROPOSAL FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS FORMATION OF AN SLO TEAM WORKSHOP FOR FACULTY TRAINING WITH THE INSTITUTE OF EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS CREATION OF A WEBSITE PREPARATION OF A GUIDE BOOK ON SLOs REVISION OF PROGRAM REVIEW GUIDELINES LOCATION OF AN OFFICE FOR INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS

GO TO YOUR DIVISION MEETINGS! GET THE SCOOP ON SLOs!!!!!