Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Heterosis: Defined and Research Experience
Advertisements

Selection For Carcass Marbling and Muscling-- Benefits and Pitfalls Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.
Animal Breeding Systems
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Mongastric Production Swine Section Breeding and Selection of Swine.
Matt Spangler University of Nebraska- Lincoln DEVELOPMENT OF GENOMIC EPD: EXPANDING TO MULTIPLE BREEDS IN MULTIPLE WAYS.
Multiple Breed Evaluation Can MBE enhance crossbreeding? John Pollak Cornell University Director, NBCEC.
“Knowing the Growth Efficiency Potential in the Lamb Crop ” Dr. Jeff Held South Dakota State University.
Lecture 3-22 Exam 3 Breeds FineMediumCoarse Most important breeds? Why so many in US?
ROLE OF COMPOSITES IN CROSSBREEDING Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.
Carcass EPD: Where are we, and where are we going? Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Applied Beef Cattle Breeding and Selection Composite Populations Larry V. Cundiff ARS-USDA-U.S. Meat Animal Research Center 2008 Beef Cattle Production.
Making the Web equal Profit Surfing for Genetics Dorian Garrick & Mark Enns Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
Dr. John W. Mabry Iowa Pork Industry Center Iowa State University
Cow-Calf Operations Makenna Ramos April 10, 2012 Animal Science.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
By Payton Fehringer. Why Red Angus Genetics?  Superior maternal traits  Crossbreeding advantages  Promotional tools  Red Angus Association.
EPD 101 PredictingProfit… Red Angus – EPD 101. EPD 101 Members (Seedstock producers) succeed through enabling the success (profit) of their commercial.
Daryl Strohbehn, Ph.D. Emeritus Professor Iowa State University Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Ext. Cow-Calf Specialist Kansas State University.
Heterosis – The Forgotten Tool? Dr. Tom Field Colorado State University Dr. Andy Herring Texas A&M University Cattlemen’s College 2005 NCBA Meeting, San.
Principles of Selecting and Mating Farm Animals (Chapter 9) Genetic improvement of farm animals –Involves selection (choosing the best to be parents) –Involves.
Breeding and Genetics 101.
Systems of Crossbreeding – Experiences in Research & Do’s and Don’ts R. Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Dr. Gordon F. Jones Professor of Animal Science / Retired Western Kentucky University.
Jared E. Decker 1.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Tools of the Trade Tom Field, PhD Andy Herring, PhD.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
1 Application of Molecular Technologies in Beef Production Dan W. Moser, Ph.D Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
1 Multi-Breed Evaluation For Growth Traits J. Keith Bertrand University of Georgia, Athens.
Chapters 13 & 14. Objectives Understanding of the concept of genetic variation Knowledge of quantitative vs. qualitative traits Appreciation for genetic.
Multi-breed Evaluation J. Keith Bertrand University of Georgia, Athens.
Wade Shafer American Simmental Association. In the pursuit of genetic improvement all traits are antagonistically related to each other.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
Heterosis-Ignored or Forgotten? (or did we ever believe in it to start with?) D. A. Daley California State University, Chico.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Identifying Genetic Antagonisms Megan Rolf Oklahoma State University.
ACROSS BREED EPD TABLES FOR THE YEAR 2006 ADJUSTED TO THE BIRTH YEAR OF 2004 L. Dale Van Vleck and Larry V. Cundiff MARC-ARS-USDA Lincoln and Clay Center,
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
Introduction to Pork Production. Definitions Female after giving birth: Sow Young female: Gilt Having piglets: Farrowing Male: Boar Castrated Male: Barrow.
Beef Cattle Production
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Multiple Trait Selection for Maternal Productivity D. H. Crews, Jr., P. B. Mwansa.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Breeding Objectives for Terminal Sires Michael MacNeil USDA ARS Miles City, MT.
What is an EPD? Expected Progeny Difference
MANAGEMENT OF BULLS FOR REPRODUCTIVE AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS Cliff Lamb Beef Specialist University of Florida.
Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.
Advanced Animal Breeding
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
 Genes- located on chromosomes, control characteristics that are inherited from parents.  Allele- an alternative form of a gene (one member.
Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle Susan Keene A portion of these slides work of: Matthew I. Miller Extension Agent Animal Science This presentation is from.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
David L. Thomas Department of Animal Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison Basics of Sheep Breeding for Commercial Flocks.
Across Breed EPD and multi-breed genetic evaluation developments
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Joe C. Paschal Livestock Specialist Texas AgriLife Extension
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
Update on Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
Using EPDs in Selection
History of Selection From Phenotypes to Economic Indexes
Expected Progeny Differences
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Unit 4: Genetic Selection & Mating
Presentation transcript:

Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University

Outline Breed Selection Considerations Breed Selection Considerations  General  Seedstock-Specific Trait Selection Considerations Trait Selection Considerations  General  Commercial-Specific  Seedstock-Specific

Breed Selection Considerations Genetic Merit / Breeding Value Genetic Merit / Breeding Value Breed Complimentarity Breed Complimentarity Specific Heterosis (Combining Ability) Specific Heterosis (Combining Ability) Uniformity of Offspring Uniformity of Offspring Maternal/Terminal Roles Maternal/Terminal Roles Breed Direction Breed Direction

Breed Selection Considerations Genetic Antagonisms Genetic Antagonisms Genetic Evaluation Genetic Evaluation Other Breed-Specific Services Other Breed-Specific Services Market Realities and Perceptions Market Realities and Perceptions Dynamic Nature of the Industry Dynamic Nature of the Industry External Factors External Factors

Genetic Merit of Breeds Van Vleck and Cundiff, 2003

Genetic Merit of Breeds Breeds differ for: Breeds differ for:  Maintenance  Reproduction  Carcass Genetic merit must match production environment. Genetic merit must match production environment. Some economically relevant traits go unmeasured. Some economically relevant traits go unmeasured.

Unmeasured/Unreported Traits Mature cow size Mature cow size Reproductive data Reproductive data Feed intake Feed intake Shear force Shear force

Specific Heterosis A “Lost Science”? A “Lost Science”? Not all heterosis is created equally Not all heterosis is created equally Depends on the genetic similarity of the breeds being crossed Depends on the genetic similarity of the breeds being crossed Just as traits vary in heritability, traits also vary in effects of heterosis Just as traits vary in heritability, traits also vary in effects of heterosis

Specific Heterosis Survival to Weaning, Direct, % ANCHGVHHLM CH2.01 GV HH LM SM Roughsedge et al., 2001

Specific Heterosis Post Weaning Gain, % ANCHGVHHLM CH4.64 GV HH LM SM Roughsedge et al., 2001

Specific Heterosis Cow Fertility, % ANCHGVHHLM CH7.74 GV HH LM SM Roughsedge et al., 2001

Breed Complimentarity Combine breeds to overcome antagonisms Combine breeds to overcome antagonisms Not the best of both, but the average of both, plus heterosis Not the best of both, but the average of both, plus heterosis

Breed Complimentarity Van Vleck and Cundiff, 2003

Breed Complimentarity Rotational crossing using purebred sires that differ in biological type: Rotational crossing using purebred sires that differ in biological type:  benefits from complimentarity  reduces uniformity (across the calf crop)

Breed Complimentarity Crossing purebred sires of different breeds but similar biological type: Crossing purebred sires of different breeds but similar biological type:  improves uniformity  reduces complimentarity  may reduce effects of heterosis

Breed Complimentarity Hybrids and composites have the ability to offer both complimentarity and uniformity Hybrids and composites have the ability to offer both complimentarity and uniformity  Only a slight reduction in heterosis compared to using purebred sires  All calves are same breed composition  Also simplifies execution of the crossbreeding system

Breed Selection: Seedstock Rarely do seedstock operators completely change breeds. Rarely do seedstock operators completely change breeds. Opportunities exist to: Opportunities exist to:  Add breeds  Add F 1 ’s  Add composites

Evolution of Seedstock Production Purebred, Single Breed Purebred, Multi-Breed Purebred (Multi-Breed) and F 1 Purebred (Multi- Breed), F 1, and Composite

Weaning Weight Genetic Trend

Maternal Milk Genetic Trend

Trait Selection Considerations Economic Importance Economic Importance Heritability and Heterosis Heritability and Heterosis Method of Multiple Trait Selection Method of Multiple Trait Selection Genetic Antagonisms Genetic Antagonisms Maternal/Terminal Roles Maternal/Terminal Roles Market Realities and Perceptions Market Realities and Perceptions Dynamic Nature of the Industry Dynamic Nature of the Industry

Heritability Portion of a trait’s variation attributable to additive genetics Portion of a trait’s variation attributable to additive genetics In general, heritability is: In general, heritability is:  High for carcass traits and mature size  Moderate for growth rate and milk production  Low for reproductive traits

Heritability Highly heritable traits are the easiest to change with selection Highly heritable traits are the easiest to change with selection Traits that are low in heritability can be changed with selection, but change is slower Traits that are low in heritability can be changed with selection, but change is slower Heritability of a trait is reflected in the range of EPD across a population Heritability of a trait is reflected in the range of EPD across a population

Heterosis Trait %HV I %HV M %HV P Birth Weight Weaning Weight Calves weaned/cow exp Lbs. weaned/cow exp Feed Conversion (F/G) -- Age at Puberty Bourdon, 2000

Heritability vs. Heterosis Logical for commercial producers to: Logical for commercial producers to:  Select mainly for moderate and highly heritable traits  Depend on heterosis to ensure adequate levels of traits low in heritability Seedstock producers cannot ignore traits that are low in heritability Seedstock producers cannot ignore traits that are low in heritability

Methods of Multiple-Trait Selection Independent Culling Levels Independent Culling Levels  Most commonly used  Set min/max levels for each trait (EPD) Selection Index Selection Index  Most effective for overcoming antagonisms  Weight traits (EPD) on economic importance

Independent Culling Levels Possible to “just miss” some bulls that offer superior genetic combinations Possible to “just miss” some bulls that offer superior genetic combinations Limit the ability to overcome antagonisms Limit the ability to overcome antagonisms

Selection Index Fairly straightforward for terminal sires Fairly straightforward for terminal sires Much more complex for maternal lines Much more complex for maternal lines Currently applied in other species, and for beef on other continents Currently applied in other species, and for beef on other continents

Selection Index Selection Index is fairly robust. Selection Index is fairly robust. Need the ability to enter index weights into sire sort web pages… Need the ability to enter index weights into sire sort web pages…  Or at least download sire summaries in a spreadsheet format. Precise economic weights are under development, are we ready to apply them? Precise economic weights are under development, are we ready to apply them?