1 APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting Special Interest Group Session March 2nd, Korea, Seoul.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E APNIC Members Meeting 27 October 2000 Brisbane, Australia.
Advertisements

ARIN IP Address Stewardship 3 February About ARIN Regional Internet Registry (RIR) – Established December 1997 by Internet community 100% community.
APNIC Open Policy Meeting: August 2001 IP Addressing Policy for GPRS Mobile Terminals On behalf of GSM Association By: Kim Fullbrook, 3G & GPRS Network.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting Address Policy SIG October 26th, Brisbane.
Draft Policy Clarifying Requirements for IPv4 Transfers.
Password?. Project CLASP: Common Login and Access rights across Services Plan
Secure Data Transmission James Matheke Information Security Architect Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.
1 Internet Networking Spring 2004 Tutorial 13 LSNAT - Load Sharing NAT (RFC 2391)
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E 36th RIPE Meeting Budapest 2000 APNIC Certificate Authority Status Report.
1 Spring Semester 2007, Dept. of Computer Science, Technion Internet Networking recitation #12 LSNAT - Load Sharing NAT (RFC 2391)
Website Publishing. Publishing Basics Early Web Sites Obtain a Domain Name IP Address (Internet Protocol Address) – A number that uniquely identifies.
Overview What are the provisioning methods used in the Australian registry system? How are these provisioning systems secured?
Making You Explore the Potential of Online Business Web E-Commerce Solution.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Database SIG APNIC Database Privacy Issues 1 March 2001 APRICOT, Malaysia Fabrina.
Proposal of “Time-Limited” IPv4 Address Allocation Policy Project leader : Jun Murai Project officiers: –Hiroshi Esaki –Akira Kato –Osamu Nakamura –Masaki.
AussieISP Fall ‘99 Sydney, 9 April 1999 Overview and Status Report.
The Internet COM 366 Web Design & Production. Brief history Internet began as nationwide network for Department of Defense in 1960s –Expanded to universities.
POLICY EXPERIENCE REPORT Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
IT:Network:Apps.  Microsoft Web Server ◦ Used by ~ 50% of Fortune 500 companies  Comes with Server OS  Expandable  Easy to use.
The Internet  Internet Hardware connected together Creates a massive worldwide network  Hardware Computers Communication lines  Interlinked collection.
University of Murcia 8 June 2011 IPv6 in Europe Jacques Babot European Commission - DG INFSO Directorate, Emerging Technologies and Infrastructures.
Standardize IP Reassignment Registration Requirements Draft Policy
Simplify and Strengthen Security with Oracle Application Server Allan L Haensgen Senior Principal Instructor Oracle Corporation Session id:
Copyright © 2007 Japan Network Information Center Global Policy for the Allocation of the remaining IPv4 Address Space  Japan Network Information Center.
Sustainability: Web Site Statistics Marieke Napier UKOLN University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN is supported by: URL
1 FAQ’S ABOUT WAP Presented By Abhilash Pillai CSCI 5939-Independent Study.
GEMINI Re-platforming Project September 2012 GRP External User Changes and Key Messages ahead of seeking approval.
1 APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting Special Interest Group Session March 2nd, Korea, Seoul.
ARIN Policy and You What’s relevant (and what’s not!) to hosting providers.
Anne Lord & Mirjam Kühne. AfNOG Workshop, 10 May IP Address Management AfNOG Workshop, 11 May 2001 Accra, Ghana presented by:
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E APNIC Status Report ARIN VI Public Policy Meeting 2-4 October 2000.
IP Addressing and ICT Development in the Pacific Islands Anne Lord and Save Vocea, APNIC ICT Workshop, Fiji, November, 2002.
Purpose Present Drivers and Context for Firewalls Define Firewall Technology Present examples of Firewall Technology Discuss Design Issues Discuss Service.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting DSL/Cable Modem procedures/practices March 1st,
IEPG November 1999 APNIC Status Report. Membership Resource Status Recent Developments Future Plans Questions?
Family Connection Collaborative Webs A Tool for Creating and Managing Web sites.
CNNIC UPDATE NIR SIG, 26 th APNIC, Christchurch, New Zealand.
APNIC Status Report ARIN XII October, 2003 Chicago.
IPv4 IXP Address Policy APNIC Policy SIG Meeting Taipei, August 2001 Philip Smith.
17 th APNIC Open Policy Meeting APNIC IPv6 Address Guidelines Akira Nakagawa )/ POWEREDCOM Billy MH Cheon / KRNIC Toshiyuki.
APNIC IPv6 Allocation Update IPv6 SIG APNIC 14, Kitakyushu, Japan 4 September 2002.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E APNIC Status Report ARIN Meeting, April 2000.
Nurani Nimpuno. APRICOT 2001, 26 February - 2 March CATV/xDSL Address policy SIG APRICOT 2001 Nurani Nimpuno Registration Services.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E RIPE 35 Local IR WG APNIC Member Services Report.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E IP Addresses: A critical resource for Asia-Pacific Internet development China Inet.
1 HD Ratio for IPv4 RIPE 48 May 2004 Amsterdam. 2 Current status APNIC Informational presentation at APNIC 16 Well supported, pending presentation at.
Securing Access to Data Using IPsec Josh Jones Cosc352.
Website Design and Construction Services and Standards.
A proposal for ….. Proposer name APNIC 39 Open Policy Meeting Fukuoka, Japan Thursday, 5 March 2015.
Copyright (c) 2002 Japan Network Information Center Proposal for IPv6 Policy for Essential Infrastructure in the AP region Izumi Okutani IP Address Section.
Whois & Data Accuracy Across the RIRs. Terms ISP – An Internet Service Provider is allocated address space by an RIR for the purpose of providing connectivity.
IPv6 Adoption Status and Scheduling for Sustainable Development 24 July 2012 Nate Davis Chief Operating Officer, ARIN.
1 APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting Special Interest Group Session March 2nd, Korea, Seoul.
© Copyright 2008 Elluminate, Inc. Elluminate SAS and ELM Comparison Marc Stringer Sr. Systems Engineer.
APNIC Open Policy Meeting: August 2001
Regional Internet Registries An Overview
IEPG Minneapolis, March 1999
Best Current Practice Assignments based on requirements
APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting
ما هي خدمة بروتوكول نقل الملفات؟
A Proposal for IPv4 Essential Infrastructure
Downstream Allocations by LIRs A Proposal
System Administration Homework 4 – Web Server
APACHE WEB SERVER.
MyAPNIC Project Update
IPv6 Allocation Status Report
Computer Networks Protocols
Supporting Historical Resource Transfers
Privacy of Customer Assignment Records
APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting
Presentation transcript:

1 APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting Special Interest Group Session March 2nd, Korea, Seoul

2 Problem Definition Should it be mandatory to use name-based web hosting where technically feasible?

3 Motivation and Background Rapid growth of web hosting “Virtual web” or “virtual domain” services now common Impact on free pool Potential to rapidly affect rates of IP address consumption

4 Motivation and Background Implementations of hosting Name based hosting Single IP address assigned to physical server that hosts several virtual hosts IP based hosting Single unique IP address assigned to each virtual host

5 Motivation and Background Name based hosting Conserves address space Requires Support of “Host:” headers in HTTP requests eg. HTTP1.1 compliant browsers, and some earlier versions eg. IE3+, Netscape 2.0+ Technical exceptions SSL certificates Virtual ftp domains with anonymous login Others?

6 Current Status APNIC IP based hosting Use of > /22 requires submission of URL and IP address list OR registration in APNIC database Use of < /22 verification in infrastructure Name-based hosting Verification in infrastructure (APNIC-065) APNIC does not require name-based hosting, but strongly encourages it

7 Current Status ARIN Both IP and name-based hosting List of IP addresses and corresponding URL RIPE NCC Similar to APNIC but Need to renumber to name-based when capable browsers widely deployed After community feedback considering to promote name-based hosting as requirement

8 Discussion Most APNIC members Do name-based hosting Rarely use more than a /22 for IP based Limitation for name-based E-commerce/SSL increase May change with new HTTP/1.1 upgrades to TLS draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade-05.txt E-commerce is increasing with virtually hosted sites

9 Recommendations Monitor Growth of IP-based hosting and SSL usage Technical developments through community feedback No change Name-based hosting not mandatory May need to redefine current policy regarding acceptable threshold (/22)