Comprehensive transport evaluation (2000-2011) National Development Agency Beatrix Horváth Evaluation Network Meeting, Brussels, 21 June, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

European Economic and Social Committee Consultative Committee on Industrial Change "CCMI" P r e s e n t a t i o n of J á n o s T Ó T H Member of the EESC.
N° 1 Directorate General for Energy and Transport Urban transport and Cohesion Policy Open Days 2006 Brussels, 11 October 2006 Eleni Kopanezou Head of.
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN 1 Transport and Regional Policy Transport and Regional Policy Patrick.
Central Office for Development Strategy and Coordination of EU Funds ABSORPTION CAPACITY FOR IPA COMPONENTS III AND IV IN CROATIA 19 October 2009 Zvonimir.
1 Report on the Implementation of the EUSBSR Anders Lindholm European Commission Directorate General for Regional Policy.
An accessible and attractive region: to improve internal and external transport links Aleksandrs Antonovs EU Funds Managing Authority in Latvia.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The urban dimension : State of play and perspectives Władysław Piskorz DIRECTORATE-GENERAL.
Operational Programme I – Cohesion Policy Event part-financed by the European Union European Regional Development Fund Evaluation Plan for Maltas.
1 DG Regio Evaluation Network Meeting Albert Borschette, Brussels, 14 October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Interreg III - Presentation of Final Results Pasi.
1 Ex post evaluation of Cohesion Fund (including former ISPA) Evaluation Network Meeting Brussels, February 25 th 2010.
1 Cohesion Policy Evaluation Network Meeting: Brussels, October 2010 Ex post evaluation of cohesion policy interventions financed.
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
The Cohesion Fund: Programming and link to the Structural Funds Annual Meeting of ISPA Partners 2003: From ISPA to Cohesion Fund and Structural Funds Angela.
IEE/10/380/SI CONURBANT Kick off meeting, Vicenza May 30/31, 2011 CONURBANT An inclusive peer-to-peer approach to involve EU CONURBations and wide.
Key features of the draft cohesion policy and ETC regulations
INTERMODADRIA Supporting intermodal transport solutions in the Adriatic area Kick-Off Meeting 7-8 February 2013 MARCHE REGION ROAD SYSTEM AND STATE PROPERTY.
TEN-T R EVIEW AND “C ONNECTING E UROPE F ACILITY ” CPMR PROPOSALS LISBON 6 March 2012.
Cohesion Policy and Climate Change Viktoria Bolla DG ENV Unit C.1 ‘Climate strategy, International Negotiation and Monitoring of EU Action’ Tallinn, 4.
Delegation of the European Commission Romania preparing for EU membership European Structural and Cohesion Funds.
HR 08 IB SPP 02 TWINNING PROJECT “ENHANCEMENT OF CAPACITY FOR EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF EU COHESION POLICY FUNDS” 1 The most significant results of Component.
ESPON – Open Seminar Gödöllő, 21 st June, Tamás Gordos, PhD. head of planning.
Trans-European Transport Network and the Connecting Europe Facility
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
The cohesion policy of the European Union Pelle Anita University of Szeged Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
Drinking water and urban waste water treatment development ÖKO Zrt. Evaluation tasks.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
(Dr. Peter Heil, ALTUS – Hungary)
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Value Engineering in Hungary Orlando, June Zsuzsanna Kondor Director General Coordination Managing Authority National Development Agency, HUNGARY.
JESSICA Holding Fund for Mazowieckie Voivodship Steps towards establishing Urban Development Funds Preparation of urban development projects European Investment.
Infrastructure Projects Facility Regional meeting for Senior Officials from SEE and Donor’s Community Brussels 28 November 2008 Rachele Gianfranchi.
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY CSF Promoting Regional Partnership, Networking and Cooperation between Greece & Czech Republic.
Ministry of the Environment and Territory Directorate for Development and Environmental Research Ministry of Economy and Finance Department for Development.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
OVERVIEW OF NAS PROBLEMS AND THE WAY FORWARD Dr. Katalin TÁNCZOS BUTE.
1 Workshop of the Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic How to use European funds within a PPP project? Jana Maláčová Ministry for Regional Development/
Transport Enhancing TEN-T funding Pawel Stelmaszczyk Special Envoy for European Mobility Network DG MOVE Warsaw, 18 December 2013.
Regional Policy Ex post Evaluation of the Cohesion Fund and ISPA in period Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy Evalaution network.
1 Joint Research Centre (JRC) Annual Meeting of the EGTC Platform The EGTC-ready to use - Beyond cohesion policy Ulla Engelmann Interinstitutional and.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COHESION FUND (REGULATION 1164/94) MANAGEMENT OF PROJECTS, FINANCED BY COHESION.
Lessons from Programme Evaluation in Romania First Annual Conference on Evaluation Bucharest 18 February 2008.
Progress with Priority Environmental Infrastructure Investment Projects in Croatia PEIP Regional Meeting - 26 th November 2007 Brussels MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENTAL.
1 UNEP/IETC EST Initiative Proposed Cooperation Framework 4 December 2003 Otsu, Japan.
JASPERS for CEF Stéphane OUAKI Head Of Unit
EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROPEAN UNION IPA 2010 National Programme Bosnia and Herzegovina EU Delegation to Bosnia and Herzegovina Donor Coordination Forum.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
INFRASTRUCTURE AND HUMAN SETTLEMENTS Presentation by Delegation of the European Union Consultative Group Meeting Technical Session La Palm, Accra, 23/09/2010.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
National strategic reference framework Jela Tvrdonova.
Urban development strategies and management of EU funding in Budapest Municipality of Budapest May 21, 2012.
Potentially phased TOP-projects and their impact on the next transport operational programme Beatrix Horváth Deputy Head of Department Department for Programme.
BUDAPEST DANUBE CONTACT POINT: an innovative tool to support the implementation of the Danube Strategy David Pelech Budapest Danube Contact Point 6 th.
PRE-ACCESSION PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION IN CROATIA
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
Project Cycle Management
Lithuanian Standards for Evaluation of EU Structural Funds
South-East European Space
Comprehensive transport evaluation
Workshop with the 8 PAF related Proposals & the Habitats Committee
Supporting Cities and Regions through Projects and Programmes
Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network meeting Brussels, 25 February 2010
EC approach towards financing infrastructure projects Dagmar KALJARIKOVÁ Policy Officer for Turkey, Montenegro, REC CEE and NGOs Unit for Enlargement.
David Pelech Budapest Danube Contact Point
Evaluation Network Meeting Brussels, February 2010
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

Comprehensive transport evaluation ( ) National Development Agency Beatrix Horváth Evaluation Network Meeting, Brussels, 21 June, 2012

The aim of the evaluation is to show comprehensively the contribution of EU support between to the Hungarian transport development and to the overall and specific objectives laid down in transport development strategies and in the EU support programmes. According to the comprehensive approach the projects supported by EU funds have been examined in the context of the Hungarian transport development. Main objective of the evaluation: To formulate proposals for policy planning in , for the programming and the programme management connected to the implementation. Evaluation objective

Groups of tasks: (1) Strategic context analysis (2) Financial analysis of the period (3) Direct effectiveness assessment (4) Programme management evaluation (5) Financial and environmental sustainability assessment Content of the evaluation

Comprehensive evaluation of EU supports for transport developments in the period of : (Covering projects contracted till 1 July 2011): ISPA, CF ( ), EIOP, ROP TOP, ROPs PHARE and cross-border cooperation programmes In some parts with an overview on developments financed from national sources: National resources, EIB loan, PPP Content of the evaluation

Transport development projects in the period of : 1,308 transport development projects co-financed by the EU (pre- accession funds, Cohesion and Structural Funds) 954 projects financed from other resources (national + EIB loan + PPP) The total cost of investments: HUF 5,024 billion % (HUF 2,385 billion) of the projects was co-financed by the EU, with HUF 2,068 billion awarded (EUR 6.8 billion). Analyzed projects

Results – Public road developments

Results – Railway and urban railway developments

Results – Accessibility of Budapest

Results – Public road accessibility

CorridorBorder crossing at departure Border crossing at arrival Access time, 2000 (minute) Access time, 2011 (minute) Improvement (minute) Improve- ment (%) IVHegyeshalom (A) Nagylak (RO) IV-VHegyeshalom (A) Beregsurány (UKR) IV-X/BHegyeshalom (A) Röszke (SRB) VTornyiszentmiklós (SLO) Beregsurány (UKR) VLetenye (CRO) Beregsurány (UKR) Results – Public road accessibility

Results – railway accessibility

Recommendations for the content requirements of the strategy: Not all types of infrastructure have to be built out everywhere, and not the most expensive and state-of-the-art infrastructure should by all means developed on every level. development directions should be determined on the basis of social demands Integrated developments in focus emphasizing urban (intermodal centres, community transport) and rural development (areas left out from public road developments) aspects in transport projects Strengthening the role of the feasibility studies, Establishment of a transport development monitoring system. Strategic context

Aspects to be considered in the strategy planning Principles of planning: need for a change in approach, to enhance the role of professional considerations in the decision making process Definition of the goal, the function and the role of the strategy Relation with other strategies Needs and limiting factors Minimum expectations and requirements Definition of types of task for preparation and implementation Definitions of tools for preparation and implementation Structural conditions of the planning process Establishment of a criteria system for project selection and prioritization (application, institutional conditions, monitoring system)

Every fifth project serves the construction of new infrastructural element, Exaggerated social expectations decision-makers want to fulfil, not considering its significant costs, During the selection of projects for EU financing the short, medium and long term burdens on the budget should be considered. Importance of the operation and the maintanence of the existing infrastructure beside developments. The maintanance and operation should be handled not after the implementation, but during the planning, project preparation phase. Polluter pays principle into the practice introduction of the eletronic distance related road toll system Sustainability

Thank you for your attention National Development Agency, Coordination Managing Authority, Evaluation Unit Beatrix Horváth, senior advisor