AREP GAW AQ Forecasting. AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 2 What Are We Forecasting – Averaging Time (3 of 3) Air Quality Standard Level.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AREP GAW Section 3 Introduction and Overview of Course.
Advertisements

AREP GAW Section 14 – Daily Air Quality Forecast Operations 1 Overview of Course Course Content: Background –Introduction and Overview of Course –What.
AREP GAW Section 5 How Are Forecasts Used? Protect Public Health Operate Emissions Reduction Programs.
AREP GAW Section 13 Developing a Forecasting Program Understanding Users Needs Understanding the Processes that Control Air Quality Choosing Forecasting.
Heather Simon, Adam Reff, Benjamin Wells, Neil Frank Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, US EPA Ozone Trends Across the United States over a.
NASA AQAST 6th Biannual Meeting January 15-17, 2014 Heather Simon Changes in Spatial and Temporal Ozone Patterns Resulting from Emissions Reductions: Implications.
Forecasting Ozone in Treasure Valley using CART Idaho DEQ June 3,
Exceptional Events Elements of an Effective Demonstration Darren Palmer US EPA Region 4.
Unit 8.
EPA’s Lead Modeling Study at the Santa Monica Airport Kim Hoang, PhD, MPH EPA Region 9.
Decisions, uncertainty, and the law Statistical considerations of environmental risk policy Peter Guttorp
1 Modelled Meteorology - Applicability to Well-test Flaring Assessments Environment and Energy Division Alex Schutte Science & Community Environmental.
Monitoring and Pollutant Load Estimation. Load = the mass or weight of pollutant that passes a cross-section of the river in a specific amount of time.
Air Quality Monitoring In Singapore
Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.
Revisions to NAAQS –Data Handling and Interpretation NO 2 /SO 2 Update AQS Conference Colorado Springs June 2010 Rhonda Thompson US EPA, Office of Air.
1 Communicating air quality trade-offs. Module 6. Communicating Air Quality to the Public in the Mid-Atlantic United States by K.G. Paterson, Ph.D., P.E.
Air Pollution. Three Big Ideas 1.Outdoor air pollution, in the forms of industrial smog, photochemical smog, and acid deposition, and indoor air pollution.
CONFIDENTIAL Validation of Fatigue Models through Operational Research Lydia Hambour FRMS Safety Manager easyJet & Dr Arnab Majumdar, LRET TRMC Imperial.
What Does a Tribal Air Program Look Like? James Payne Morongo Band of Mission Indians Environmental Department.
Forecasting and Disseminating AQI in Delhi Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District U.S.A.
AREP GURME Section 2 Executive Overview. AREP GURME 2 Section 2 – Executive Overview Topics Why forecast air quality? What is needed? About the course.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Overview What we’ll cover: Key questions Next steps
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
Patterns of Event Causality Suggest More Effective Corrective Actions Abstract: The Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) has used a consistent.
Ideas on a Network Evaluation and Design System Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar and Stefan R. Falke Center for Air Pollution.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
Air Quality & Traffic August 25, 2015.
Overview and Status of the Emissions Data Analysis and Modeling Portions of the Virginia Mercury Study 1 st Technical Meeting Richmond, VA 31 May 2007.
P. Otorepec, M. Gregorič IVZ RS Use of rutinely collected air pollution and health data on local level for simple evaluation of health impact.
Techniques for Evaluating Wildfire Smoke Impact on Ozone for Possible Exceptional Events Daniel Alrick 1, Clinton MacDonald 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, Charles.
| Folie 1 Assessment of Representativeness of Air Quality Monitoring Stations Geneva, Wolfgang Spangl.
Ozone Update Ben Wells U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Air Quality Analysis Group February 11, 2014.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Air Quality Forecasting Program and Ozone Season 2004 COG Board of Directors May 12, 2004 Joan Rohlfs, Chief Air Quality Planning.
1 Communicating air quality trade-offs. Module 6. Communicating Air Quality to the Public in the Mid-Atlantic United States.
1 Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal General Overview March 1, 2006 US EPA.
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair Telling the OTAG Ozone Story with Data.
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM23 Spatial Patterns Urban spatial patterns: explore PM concentrations in urban settings. Urban/Rural.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Managing Smoke and Emissions. A new system for managing smoke and emissions in Victoria that will provide for coordinated: Investment Service delivery.
A N EW H AMPSHIRE G ROUND -L EVEL O ZONE P OLLUTION F ORECASTING T OOL U SING M ETEOROLOGICAL C RITERIA Northeast Regional Operational Workshop Presenter:
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
An Overview of the Objectives, Approach, and Components of ComET™ Mr. Paul Price The LifeLine Group All slides and material Copyright protected.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
Jericho Project Air Quality Assessment. TOPICS METHODOLOGY EMISSION SOURCES RESULTS AND ASSESSMENT MITIGATION AND MONITORING CONCLUSION.
Questions about SO 2 Forecasting and Messaging, a New Hampshire Case Study. Anne McWilliams EPA Region 1 U.S. EPA’s 2011 National Air Quality Conference.
CCOS TC Kickoff Meeting Cluster Analysis for CCOS Domain Ahmet Palazoglu (P.I.) Scott Beaver Swathi Pakalapati University of California, Davis Department.
Western Air Quality Issues and Photochemical Modeling - An Industrial Perspective Doug Blewitt, CCM AQRM Dana Wood, PE BP.
Ozone Data and Outreach Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Air Quality Program.
Impact of Temporal Fluctuations in Power Plant Emissions on Air Quality Forecasts Prakash Doraiswamy 1, Christian Hogrefe 1,2, Eric Zalewsky 2, Winston.
Air Quality Index How Healthy is the Air You Breathe?
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness
Clean Air Act Glossary.
WESTAR Recommendations Exceptional Events EPA response
Exposure to Air Pollution James Tate and Paul Seakins
Predicting Future-Year Ozone Concentrations: Integrated Observational-Modeling Approach for Probabilistic Evaluation of the Efficacy of Emission Control.
Forecasts and Warnings
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
Visualization and Analysis of Air Pollution in US East Coast Cities
Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal
Impact of Land use on Air pollution in Austin
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

AREP GAW AQ Forecasting

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 2 What Are We Forecasting – Averaging Time (3 of 3) Air Quality Standard Level 1 Alert Level 2 Pre-Emergency Ulriksen and Merino (2003)

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 3 What Are We Forecasting – Spatial Scale (1 of 2) Scales –Regional or mesoscale (10 km – 400 km) –Urban or sub-regional (10 km) –Neighborhood or single site (< 5 km) –Forecast scale needs to match local air quality scale Forecast zone –Several may exist in an area –Areas with complex terrain, meteorology, and emission patterns are subject to multiple forecast zones Metrics –Maximum of all sites in forecast zone –Multi-site average –Others

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 4 What Are We Forecasting – Spatial Scale (2 of 2) Local forecast regions Los Angles, California, USA Forecast Regions Hourly ozone maps of Air Quality Index

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 5 Summary Pollutants of concern –Major (ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide) –Toxics Toxics are difficult to forecast because of uncertainties in emissions and their chemical change in the atmosphere What are we forecasting? –Units of measure –Averaging time –Spatial scale

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 6 Protect Public Health ● Forecast allows the public to plan –Activities to avoid exposure to unhealthy air –Outdoor activities –Health and medical care ● Forecasts are used by –Air quality agencies (communications office) –Media (television, newspaper, radio, and web) –Public (general and sensitive individuals) –Schools (scheduling outdoor activities) ● Critical forecast issues –Timeliness (when do users need it) –Localized forecasts –Multi-day (one-to-five day) forecasts are useful –Easy-to-understand format

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 7 Protect Public Health (Example) Taiwan EPA web site showing current and forecasted air quality conditions

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 8 Operate Emissions Reduction Programs (1 of 2) ● Types of programs –Voluntary (not required)—sometimes called “Action Day Programs” –Mandatory (required) ● Forecast needed for –Advanced planning to prepare for communication and taking action –Notification of stakeholders ● Critical forecast issues –Participation depends on forecast timeliness and accuracy –Emissions are affected (may affect forecast verification)

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 9 Operate Emissions Reduction Programs (2 of 2) ● Voluntary emissions reduction program –Spare The Air (STA) Program (Action Day) in Sacramento, California, USA –Objective – Seeks public involvement to voluntarily reduce emissions on forecasted Spare The Air Days ● How are forecasts used –Spare The Air Day is triggered by a one-day forecast –On Spare The Air Days Notify the public by television, public service announcements, radio, newspaper, fax, and web Ask the public to reduce emission-producing activities –Reduce driving by carpooling (several people in one vehicle) and taking public transit –Reduce use of paints, solvents, etc. Source:

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 10 How Are Forecasts Used? (1 of 4) 1.Evaluate voluntary program results –Compare driving habits on STA and non-STA (control) days –Evaluate reduction in driving –Calculate reduction in emissions Source:

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 11 How Are Forecasts Used? (2 of 4) 2.Operate mandatory emissions reduction programs (example) “Green” Scenario – on days of forecast high pollution, develop a forecast with reduced traffic that could result from public warnings, to show the improvement of air quality: Melbourne on a high smog day and with a 25% reduction in traffic.

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 12 How Are Forecasts Used? (3 of 4) 3.Conduct special sampling –Several types of programs Localized special monitoring Regional monitoring Field studies –Forecast are needed for Advanced planning to prepare monitoring or equipment (aircraft, samplers, other sensors) Sampled pre-episode conditions (day before high air quality concentrations) –Critical forecast issues Obtaining detailed forecast Allowing sufficient time to prepare monitoring equipment and personnel

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 13 How Are Forecasts Used? (4 of 4) 4.Conduct special sampling (example) Winds and air pollution forecasts are used in the design of day-by-day sampling strategies in major studies providing data for impact assessments for new industries or expansions of industrial facilities. The photo is from a study of power stations in the Latrobe Valley of Victoria

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 14 Summary Forecasts allow for planning (activities, exposure avoidance, health care) and action Forecasts are used by air quality agencies, media, public, industries, and schools Critical forecast issues include –Timeliness –Localized forecasts –Multi-day –Easy-to-understand format (Air Index)

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 15 Forecasting Tools and Methods (1 of 3) Persistence Climatology Criteria Statistical –Classification and Regression Tree (CART) –Regression Neural networks Numerical modeling Phenomenological and experience Predictor variables Fewer resources, lower accuracy More resources, potential for higher accuracy

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 16 Tool development is a function of –Amount and quality of data (air quality and meteorological) –Resources for development Human Software Computing –Resources for operations Human Software Computing Forecasting Tools and Methods (2 of 3)

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 17 Forecasting Tools and Methods (3 of 3) For each tool What is it? How does it work? Example How to develop it? Strengths Limitations Ozone = WS * …

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 18 Criteria Uses threshold values (criteria) of meteorological or air quality variables to forecast pollutant concentrations –For example, if temperature > 27 ° C and wind < 2 m/s then ozone will be in the Unhealthy AQI category Sometimes called “rules of thumb” Commonly used in many forecasting programs as a primary forecasting method or combined with other methods Best suited to help forecast high pollution or low pollution events, or pollution in a particular air quality index category range rather than an exact concentration

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 19 Criteria – Example To have a high pollution day in July –maximum temperature must be at least 33C, –temperature difference between the morning low and afternoon high must be at least 11C –average daytime wind speed must be less than 3 m/s, –afternoon wind speed must be less than 4 m/s, and –the prior day’s peak 1-hr ozone concentration must be at least 70 ppb. Month Daily Temp Max (above o C) Daily Temp Range (above o C) Daily Wind Speed (below m/s) Wind Speed UTC (below m/s) Prior Day’s Ozone 1-hr Max (above ppb) Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Lambeth, 1998 Conditions needed for high pollution by month

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 20 Classification and Regression Tree (CART) CART is a statistical procedure designed to classify data into dissimilar groups. Similar to criteria method; however, it is objectively developed. CART enables a forecaster to develop a decision tree to predict pollutant concentrations based on predictor variables (usually weather) that are well correlated with pollutant concentrations. Ozone (Low–High) Moderate to High Moderate to Low Temp low Temp high WS - strong Moderate High Low WS - calm WS -light

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 21 CART – How It Works (1 of 2) The statistical software determines the predictor variables and the threshold cutoff values by – Reading a large data set with many possible predictor variables – Identifying the variables with the highest correlation with the pollutant – Continuing the process of splitting the data set and growing the tree until the data in each group are sufficiently uniform

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 22 Summary Wide range of forecast tools Each type has advantages and disadvantages More tools result in better forecasts Consensus forecasting can produce better results

AREP GAW Section 13 Developing a Forecasting Program Understanding Users’ Needs Understanding the Processes that Control Air Quality Choosing Forecasting Tools Data Types, Sources, and Issues Forecasting Protocol Forecast Verification

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 24 Understanding Users’ Needs Success depends on forecast –Accuracy –Meeting the users’ needs Three main uses (Section 5) –Protect public health –Operate emissions reduction programs –Conduct special monitoring Consider these issues –Size of forecast domain –Population affected –Pollutants to forecast –Industries to be controlled –Smog transport Process –Gather stakeholders –List of questions (next three slides)

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 25 Who will use the forecast? For how many months are forecasts needed? –Certain season (summer and fall) What periods should a forecast cover? –Current and next day –1-5 days Are multi-day forecasts needed for weekend/holiday periods? Understanding Users’ Needs – Forecast Specification Questions (1 of 3)

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 26 Understanding Users’ Needs – Forecast Specification Questions (2 of 3) What are the accuracy requirements? –Define target first –Make sure it is reasonable What area do the air quality forecasts cover? –Regional maximum –Sub-regions or monitoring sites Are written forecast discussions of predicted weather and air quality conditions needed?

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 27 Understanding Users’ Needs – Forecast Specification Questions (3 of 3) How should forecasts be disseminated? – , fax, phone –Web site When should forecasts be issued to meet deadlines? Should forecasts be re-issued? If so, under what conditions? Should forecasts be made for specific concentrations or concentration ranges (e.g., AQI or API categories)? How should missed forecasts be handled?

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 28 Choosing Forecasting Tools (1 of 3) General guidelines –Start with simple tools and add complex tools later –Consensus approach to forecasting works best –Establish a reliable product (not necessarily the most accurate) –Persistence, time series, and climatology tools will never identify a significant change in air quality –Regression, CART, and neural networks require time to develop and validate, but are usually more accurate than persistence –Photochemical modeling can be more accurate, but requires significant resources Resource considerations –Development costs vs. operational costs –Time needed to forecast

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 29 Choosing Forecasting Tools (2 of 3) Severity of problem –Seasons, number of pollutants to forecast –Limited problem – use simple methods –Severe problem – use many forecasting methods Consensus forecasting works best –More tools provide a better forecast –Cumulative knowledge of all forecasting tools is greater than using a single tool –As the pollution problem becomes more complex, no single forecasting tool can reliably predict all relevant factors

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 30 Choosing Forecasting Tools (3 of 3) Experience –Some forecasting tools require extensive experience –Working with a local university/firms to develop tools can be beneficial –No tool can replace forecaster experience

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 31 Forecast Verification Overview Comparing forecasts to actual observations to quantify success of forecasting program Topics –Why verify air quality forecasts? –Schedule –Types of verification: categorical and discrete –Contingency table and examples –Performance targets –Forecast retrospective

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 32 Forecast Verification Why verify air quality forecasts? –Quantify the performance of forecasters and/or the forecast program –Identify trends in forecast performance over time –Quantify improvements from new (or changes in) forecasting methods/tools –Compare verification statistics to those from other agencies that forecast air pollution –Demonstrate the performance of forecasts to program participants, stakeholders, and the media

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 33 Forecast Verification Schedule (1 of 4) Daily verification – Can identify systematic problems – Can identify mistaken analysis of events – Can identify problems with data – Provides opportunity for mid-season procedure corrections Seasonal verification – Identifies if model/methodology is appropriate – Benchmarks performance of models and forecasters

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 34 Forecast Verification Schedule (2 of 4) Daily –Each morning, review prior day observations and forecasts. –Keep a log book of performance and problems encountered. Courtesy of Doc Taylor, NYDEC

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 35 Summary (1 of 2) Understanding users’ needs –Size of forecast domain –Population affected –Pollutants to forecast –Industries to be controlled –Smog transport Understanding the processes that control air quality –Literature reviews –Data analysis Choosing forecasting tools –Start with simple methods –Use more than one method –Forecaster experience is critical

AREP GAW Section 4 – What Are We Forecasting? 36 Summary (2 of 2) Data types, sources, and issues –Standardize units –Continuously evaluate data quality Forecasting protocol –Written procedures for forecasting –Saves time and improves quality of forecast Forecast verification –Evaluate daily, monthly, seasonally –Categorical and discrete statistics –Set realistic goals –Some misses will occur