Gregory Indivero 31 October 2011.  What discharge (cfs) is required to entrain the D 84 (84 th percentile of sediment size distribution) in Red Canyon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WinTR-20 Course February Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.
Advertisements

Bankfull / Effective / Dominant
San Joaquin River Bedload Sampling summary January 4 and 5, 2011 April 1 and 2, 2011 Ledger Island.
CHAPTER FOUR Stream flow measurement
Geomorphic Impacts of Dam Removal Rollin H. Hotchkiss Director, Albrook Hydraulics Laboratory Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Surface Water. WATER SEDIMENT The Lane Diagram I. Events During Precipitation A. Interception B. Stem Flow C. Depression Storage D. Hortonian Overland.
CE 515 Railroad Engineering
1 Quantifying Hydromodification Impacts and Developing Mitigation Using a Four Factor Approach Judd Goodman CASQA Conference November.
Pertemuan Open Channel 1. Bina Nusantara.
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Flood Mapping and Sediment Transport in Otsego County Streams, New York By Les Hasbargen, Tyson Robb, Anthony Grimes, and Roy Widrig Earth Sciences Department,
CHARACTER OF RIVER CHANNELS
ECOLOGICAL SERVICES RESTORATION PROJECT BLOSSOM WAY CREEK, ROGERS, ARKANSAS Morgan, R.A.; E. Cummings; S. Ekka; G. Goh; A. Ludwig; M. Matlock; A. McAllister;
1D SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MORPHODYNAMICS with applications to RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS © Gary Parker November, CHAPTER 24: APPROXIMATE FORMULATION.
HEC-RAS.
Desert Landscapes.
Part 2 Some Basic Aspects of CHANNEL HYDRAULICS. The volume of water that passes by any given point along a watercourse is called “Q”, for quantity of.
HYDRAULICS AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT: RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS
Roughness & Mannings n-value
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
Factors affecting erosion and deposition Velocity Gradient – rise over run Channel shape Channel roughness Discharge – amount of water flow per unit.
Abstract Background Conclusion Stream Bed Morphology and Discharge Rates of Deckers Creek Data was collected at 5 different points along a 100 meter transect.
Reynolds Number (Re) Re = R = A/P V = mean velocity  /  =  (which is kinematic viscosity) Re = VR(  /  ), where Driving Forces Resisting Force Re.
Stream Ecology: River Structure and Hydrology Unit 1: Module 4, Lectures 1.
Hydraulic Modelling of wetland flow Data collection and problem solving Prof. dr. ir. Ronny Verhoeven Hydraulics Laboratory Ghent University Belgium Prof.
Stream Stability and Sediment Transport Environmental Hydrology Lecture 21.
Water in Colorado: Climate, Hydrology and Uses Dr. Gigi Richard Faculty Director, Water Center at CMU Professor, Geosciences River Cañon - Nestler Water.
Methods A predictive method will be developed from NBSS measurements and vegetation/channel properties from the flume data. The predictive method will.
Emily Shimada, Environmental Science, University of Idaho Research Team B: Watershed Management in the Andean Paramo Faculty Advisors: Dr. Alex Fremier,
MA BF REFERENCE CURVES Objective Develop bankfull regional curves and equations for estimating bankfull width, mean depth, cross-sectional area, and discharge.
Big Horn Lake Sediment Management Study. US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Study Background Bureau of Reclamation and Omaha District Interagency.
Natural Riparian Resources Water Landscape & SoilVegetation.
WRU Workshop: Modeling Flow, Sediment Transport and Bed Evolution in Vietnamese Rivers October 29-30, 2008 Jonathan Nelson USGS Geomorphology and Sediment.
Morphodynamics of the North Fork Toutle River Near Mount St. Helens, Washington John Pitlick 1, Jon Major 2 and Kurt Spicer 2 1/Geography Department, University.
The use of 7 Be to quantify downstream trends in sediment transport below a flood-control dam Paper number: H53B-1237 Results 7 Be-derived transport rates.
The Power of Water: Basics of River Flow and Sediment Transport Greg Tucker Teacher Workshop August 2015.
March 2009WinTR-20 Course1 Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.
Flow Energy PE + KE = constant between any two points  PE (loss) =  KE (gain) Rivers are non-conservative; some energy is lost from the system and can.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
River Systems Earth Space Science Mr. Coyle. The Hydrologic Cycle Infiltration = Groundwater System Runoff = Surface Water System Runoff = Precipitation.
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume.
The hydrologic cycle. Running water Streamflow Two types of flow determined primarily by velocity –Laminar flow –Turbulent flow Factors that determine.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers Reference: HEC-RAS Hydraulic Reference Manual, Version 4.1, Chapters 1 and 2 Reading: HEC-RAS Manual pp. 2-1 to 2-12 Applied.
Design Guidance for Low-water Crossing in Gravel Rivers Xing Fang Lamar University.
Study Guide Chapter 17 1.Know and use the simple equation for discharge. Why is this equation important? 2.What is the gradient of a stream? 3.Describe.
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Overview
Open Channel Hydraulics
ONE-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS ON BEDEVOLUTION ACCOMPANING BANK EROSION Satoru Nakanishi Hokkaido University Graduate School Kazuyoshi Hasegawa Hokkaido University.
Natural and artificial hydromorphological changes in Norway Agnès Moquet-Stenback – Section for erosion and sediment transport – Hydrology.
Fluvial Geomorphology Environmental Hydrology Lecture 20.
Bedload transport Jens Turowski, WSL Bedload transport Lecture for Hydrological Processes and Modelling 24th June 2011 Jens M. Turowski, Swiss Federal.
Water Erosion “We’re changing Earth’s Surface!” A. Stream Erosion 1. Running Water 2. Energy 3. The water cycle -Most effective agent in wearing down.
Regional to Engineering Scale HUC8 HUC12 Catchment Engineering Hydrology Engineering Hydraulics Personal – a flooded home.
Anthony Alvarado, PE, CFM National Hydraulic Engineering Conference
Computer Aided Simulation Model for Instream Flow and Riparia
Morphodynamic and Sediment Tracers in One-Dimension
THE SEARCH FOR THE HOLY GRAIL:
4 channel types defined at reach scale, based on 3 features
Fluvial Geomorphology
Rivers.
Our Hazardous Environment GEOG 1110 Dr. Thieme
Uniform Open Channel Flow
4 channel types defined at reach scale, based on 3 features
Summary In addition to the oceans, where else is water found on Earth?
Discharge, stream flow & channel shape
Chapter 18.
The Flow of Freshwater.
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Module # 17 Overview of Geomorphic Channel Design Practice
Presentation transcript:

Gregory Indivero 31 October 2011

 What discharge (cfs) is required to entrain the D 84 (84 th percentile of sediment size distribution) in Red Canyon Wash?  What discharge was required to deposit observed flood debris from August 16, 2010 flood?

 Red & Columbus Canyons  Un-gauged, Ephemeral Wash  5 th Largest Drainage of CNM

Red Canyon Columbus Canyon Red Canyon Wash Study Reach No Thoroughfare Canyon

 Fairly Straight Alluvial Channel  300 Feet Long ≅ 20 Feet Wide

 Establish Reach & Cross Sections  Survey Thalweg, Flood Debris & Cross Sections  Conduct a Pebble Count at Cross Sections ◦ Create Grain Size Distribution Plots  Solve Shields Equation for Critical Shear Stress, τ c  Model Channel With HEC-RAS ◦ -Fluctuate Discharge In Channel Until τ c Is Achieved ◦ -Fluctuate Discharge Until Flood Debris Elevation is Achieved

 Run Tape Measure down the Thalweg  Establish Bench Mark Photo Credits: Gigi Richard

 Surveying the Thalweg o Slope = Photo Credit: Gigi Richard

 Surveying Cross Section 1  Surveying Cross Section 3 Photo Credits: Gigi Richard

o Cross Sections 1 & Feet Apart

 100 Grains Counted At Each Cross Section  Average D 84 = 24 mm

 Shields Equation ◦ τ c = τ * c (ρ s – ρ w )gD 84 Where:  τ * c = Dimensionless Shear Stress  ρ s, ρ w = Density of Sediment (Quartz) & Water Respectively  g = Gravitational Constant  D 84 = 84 th Percentile of Grain Size Distribution

 Channel Forming Discharge = 4 cubic Feet per Second  Frequency = ?? Distance From Left Bank (ft) HEC-RAS Model At Cross Section 1 Q = 4 ft 3 /s

 What was the discharge of this flow? Photo Credits: Teri Lindaur

 Surveyed High Water Mark Using Flood Debris Indicators Photo Credits: Gigi Richard

 Discharge of Flood on August 16, 2010 ≈ 200 cubic feet per second Distance From Left Bank (ft) HEC-RAS Model At Cross Section 1 Q = 200 ft 3 /s Flood Debris

Photo Credits: Greg Indivero

Video Credits: Teri Lindaur

 How often do these types of flows occur? ◦ Speculation ◦ Historical Events (September 7, 1978 ≈ 2,890 cfs) Photo Credits: Jim Johnson

 A Big Thank You Goes Out to the following: ◦ Dr. Gigi Richard ◦ Mrs. Teri Lindaur ◦ Mr. Con Trumbull ◦ Ms. HeidlHausner ◦ Mr. Frank Jacobs

 Arcement, G. J., 1989, Guide for selecting Manning's roughness co-efficients for natural channels and flood plain, USGS water-supply paper: 2339, v. 38.  Cooke, R., Warren, A., Goudie, A., 1993, Desert Geomorphology: University College London, UCL Press Limited, p  Becker, A., DiPema, L, Ladig, K, Wellik, J, and Richard, G., 2007, Channel morphology and channel-forming discharge of No Thoroughfare Canyon, Colorado, Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 306  Elliott, J.G. and Hammack, L.A., 2000, Entrainment of Riparian Gravel and Cobbles in an Alluvial Reach of a Regulated Canyon River: Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, v. 16, p  Knighton, D., 1998, Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective. London: Arnold, p. 383  Richard, G.A., 2004, Flash Flooding at the Colorado National Monument : Colorado National Monument, National Park Service, p. 21  U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), Hydrologic Engineering Center, 2010, HEC-RAS River Analysis System Hydraulic Reference Manual, Version 4.1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA, 417 pp.  Van Steeter, M. M., and J. Pitlick. 1998, Geomorphology and endangered fish habitats of the upper Colorado River: historic changes in streamflow, sediment load, and channel morphology. Water Resources Research 34:  Wilcock, P. R., 2001, Toward a practical method for estimating sediment transport rates in gravel-bed rivers, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 26, 1395 –1408.  Wilcock, P. R., Pitlick, J., Cui, Y., 2009, Sediment Transport Primer: Estimating Bed-Material Transport in Gravel-bed Rivers, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 78 pp.