Conducting Effective Performance Evaluations February 13, 2012 March 9, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Management
Advertisements

Feedback Session Supervisory Workshop
Performance Management
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY/VIMS
Nova Southeastern University Nova Southeastern University facilitated by: facilitated by: Aaron Greenberg and Maureen Simunek-Appelt Office of Human Resources.
EFFECTIVE DOCUMENTATION In Search of Improved Performance.
The University of Alabama Annual Employee Performance Evaluation Supervisor Tutorial (Length/Completion Time: 21 Slides/Approximately 10 Minutes)
1 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE Classified Staff Performance Evaluation To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Supervisors.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)
Performance Management Review FAQs
2012 Performance Evaluation System. Why An Evaluation? O Set expectations between Supervisor and the employee. O Valuable tool for an employees in their.
Performance Management 2012 Conducting Performance Evaluations Office of Human Resources UMW: “Putting U First”
Managing For Success Carnegie Mellon Human Resources Leadership Symposium 2002 Presenter: Jill Diskin Director, Human Resources Services.
Performance Evaluation/Management Training
Performance Appraisal
System Office Performance Management
PRO-FRIENDS Continuous Improvement Discussion (CID)
WHAT TO SAY AND HOW TO SAY IT. Conducting Performance Reviews.
Supervision in Organizations
Performance Appraisal in the Public Sector
 Performance Management, Performance Evaluation, and Correcting Problems  March 10, 2011.
Performance Management Webinar Thursday, March 19, 2015.
OH 9-1 Evaluating Employee Performance Human Resources Management and Supervision OH 9-1.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Writing Performance Reviews What? How Much? How?.
Hitting the Jackpot with Your Performance Review SWON Staff Symposium.
Performance Management
System Office Performance Management
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
Performance Management Training
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
United States Fire Administration Chief Officer Training Curriculum Human Resource Development Module 6: Managing the Workforce.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Performance and Career Management Process OCFO Monthly Managers Meeting May 21, 2012; June 4, 2012 Neli Lopez.
Lecture 23.
PROGRAMS MONITORING AND SUPERVISION
PROVIDED BY ORGANIZATIONAL EXCELLENCE CLASSIFIED TRAINING BRANCH Supervisor’s Handbook to Orienting New Employees (O.N.E.)
| | ©2011. All Rights Reserved. Amazon’s Management Books category.
Chapter 4 Performance Management and Appraisal
Performance Management  Performance Management Cycle  Organizational Success  Shared Responsibilities  Setting Goals and Expectations.
HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Evaluating Central Office Employees Evaluator Training for Clerical Evaluations July 2008.
Successfully Conducting Employee Performance Appraisals Wendy L. McCoy Director HR & Benefits Florida Conference of The United Methodist Church.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
Center for Learning and Professional Development Managing Your Performance Evaluation v1.3 July 31, 2013 Managing Your Performance Evaluation.
Performance Management: EPMS for Supervisors Clemson University Office of Human Resources Presented by: Joy Patton
HHHR Objective Setting and Performance Appraisal Cycle for Supervisors.
Performance Evaluation Policy Macon County. Performance Appraisal is a process... Not a form or document.
Supervisor Success Series “3S” Session 5: Performance Management.
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
Performance Management Training. ©SHRM Objectives Performance management v. performance appraisal Creating the “right” environment Learning to develop.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Preparing and Delivering Effective Performance Reviews
Department of Human Resources
Performance Management
Performance Management
Performance Appraisal Training
TOPS TRAINING.
Performance Management Training
Performance Management System
Performance Management Training
Performance Management Training
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
Human Resources & Personnel Management
How to Conduct Effectively
Presentation transcript:

Conducting Effective Performance Evaluations February 13, 2012 March 9, 2012

Performance Evaluation v. Performance Management EvaluationManagement One time eventOngoing RetrospectiveProspective Short TermLong Term Correction orientedProgress steps Completing formPlanning/goal setting

Top Five Best Practices in Performance Management Hire the Best People, Train them Well Have Clear Expectations – share them! Set Goals Communicate Give Feedback

Performance Management Process in which management and employees work together to accomplish the mission, goals and objectives of their organization More than an annual paper shuffle Few jobs remain constant, early feedback is vital

Performance Management Continuous on-going process of gathering information and communication about performance Cyclical process – planning, setting expectations, observation, evaluation Silence = approval of behaviors

Job Descriptions Foundational tool, essential to effective performance management Clarify job responsibilities and expectations In legal challenge situations, provides the supervisor with the ability to prove that the employee did know the expectations and standards

Performance Evaluation Personnel Policy 600 – evaluation policy.htm evaluation policy.htm Management Best Practice An annual performance evaluation is required for classified and contract professional employees

Performance Evaluation Management best practice; ensures unit mission, goals, and objectives are in alignment and being met A more involved feedback session, with discussion, covering many aspects of performance over a period of time Formal, written, No Surprises! Done WITH the employee, not TO the employee Communicate, communicate, communicate

Performance Evaluation Two-way communication between employee and the manager Sets clear expectations to employees Employees want to know what is expected of them Facilitates employee development and growth

Feedback One of the most effective ways to reinforce or increase productivity involves providing employees with specific feedback about their performance, at a high frequency, immediately following the desired performance

Keys to Successful Performance Evaluations Identify performance expectations Be consistent in measuring and communicating the extent to which those expectations are being met Provide opportunities for feedback and clarification

Successful Performance Evaluations Set/establish expectations and/or goals Focus on job related skills or activities – realistic and achievable Work performance and behaviors – objectively observable and measurable Reasonable indicators of successful performance are expressed in terms of quality, quantity, timeliness, cost Performance measures/indicators are subject to change, are not permanent, are not perfect

Conducting the Evaluation Plan ahead, plan for the desired outcome No Interruptions - Take the Time, Make the Time In writing, face-to face Formal official document Watch for personal biases – do not focus on personality traits No surprises!

Do’s and Don'ts Do - Establish clear performance expectations and review annually with each person Do - Focus on the employee’s behavior and job performance Do - Discuss individual instance of problem performance when it arises and how the problem should be addressed

More Do’s Do - Objectively describe what the employee did or did not do Do - Give credit where credit is due! Do - Review patterns of poor or unacceptable performance & write plan to improve performance with deadlines and milestones Do – Be discreet and follow up

The Don'ts Don’t generalize individual problems to the group Don’t ignore patterns of poor job performance Don’t become involved in personal problems Don’t recognize a “group” for an accomplishment of an individual recognize him/her!

Rating Performance Exceeds – Frequently exceeds performance standards for the position. Employee makes unique and significant contributions to the department. Meets – Meets performance standards for the position. Consistently and effectively performs job duties. Needs Improvement – Fails to meet performance standards for the position. Improvement is needed.

Common Rating Errors Halo/Horn – opinion of one quality influences opinion of other qualities. All the same rating. Central Tendency – everyone in the middle, lack of rating between employees. Leniency – avoids honest ratings to avoid conflict – everyone near the top. Recency – greater weight to recent occurrences or events Similarity/Like me – favorable rating to employees who have similar values or interests to the rater

Classified Evaluations Version 1, developed with MPEA – ad hoc labor management committee Version 2, historical form If you wish to design an alternate evaluation tool for classified employees, it must be pre-approved by Employee & Labor Relations.

Professional Evaluations Affirmative Action Website - Two options available – Word and Excel – can be edited to fit your needs Please remember the COVER SHEET on all evaluations

Procedure Rebuttal process; No grievance process An employee who disagrees with the evaluation of his or her supervisor may submit a written request for review by the supervisor’s supervisor. The written request must outline the specific areas of disagreement and the reasons the employee disagrees with the supervisor’s evaluation. The decision of the supervisor’s supervisor will be the final decision on the evaluation. The employee’s written disagreement will be included with a copy of the final performance evaluation and placed in the employee’s personnel file.

FAQ’s Should probationary employees be evaluated during the probationary period? –Conduct the discussion immediately upon conclusion of the probationary period

FAQ’s My supervisor asked me to fill out a self evaluation. Is this legit? Yes! This method may meet multiple managerial needs: Aids the face to face discussion Self evaluation by the employee may help establish the thought processes for an effective discussion May help align employee and supervisor understanding of the job duties

Tips to Remember Employee & Supervisor must sign the evaluation Send in the ORIGINAL evaluations not a copy. Complete Evaluation in Pen not pencil Please provide LEGAL name on Cover sheet –No nicknames Double check GID & Position number –Allows for tracking incoming evaluations & filing correctly Remember to include the coversheet located on the websites

More Tips to Remember If you say “see attached page” …make sure to attach the page. Self evaluation is not the Performance Evaluation that a supervisor can sign and submit without comments. Do not place comments on a post it note Wait until employee has been hired and is past their 6 month review to do a review Don’t put “jokes” on Performance Evaluations i.e. under goals - “Get fired”

Contact Info Susan Alt Director, Employee & Labor Relations Diane Letendre Interim Director, Human Resources | AA