Presented By Dillon Savage & Crystal Green UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWO-STROKE WITH DIRECT INJECTION AND SOUND REDUCTION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2014 Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Advertisements

Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Justin Johnson.
Propane Diesel Injection  An introduction overview of the Powershot Propane Diesel Injection system (PDI) for use in medium and heavy duty vehicles.
University of Buffalo, SUNY 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Analysis of Spark Ignition Engine Management System
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
University of Minnesota – Duluth Design Presentation 2006 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
UAF Bristol Bay Campus Design of a meaningful Snuukuuq Frank Nicholson, Ryan Giordano, Tiarna Bartman, University Alaska Fairbanks - Bristol Bay Campus.
Design and Testing of a Four-Stroke Snowmobile with Catalytic Exhaust Treatment Scott Miers and Ryan Hayes.
University of New Hampshire Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2006.
Direct Solution Design review Stake Holders  Sponsor: NIATT  Client: Karen DenBraven  Customer: UI CSC Team, Competition judges,
U NIVERSITY O F W ATERLOO T EAM E CO -S NOW. T EAM B ACKGROUND Team Eco-Snow is a student organization at the University of Waterloo The project is managed.
1 Presenters: Ozzie Goodman Zak Parker. Design Objectives  Create Efficient Snowmobile Fueled by 16%-32% Isobutanol  Emissions Reductions  Noise 
Page 1 5th meeting of GRB Informal Group ‘ASEP’ Potentials of exhaust systems with valves Filip Dörge.
Design Intent  Improve upon the Best Available Technology (BAT) standard of the power sports industry to enhance fuel efficiency while reducing emissions.
North Dakota State University Ross Larson Justin Omdalen.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2014 Clean Snowmobile Team
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Maximization of Flow through Intake & Exhaust Systems
Electronic Fuel Injection Vocabulary 1.Injector (solenoid ) 9.)emission standards 2.Stoichiometric14.7 to 1 3.Throttle body of injection 4.Port injection10.)Types.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
2006 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Matt Prusak - Team Leader Wes Barrett – Vice President.
Minnesota State University, Mankato X treme  AET Program  1989  TAC-ABET Accredited  140 Majors  The Team  Seven Seniors  Ten Undergraduates 
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Kettering University Clean Snowmobile Challenge March 23 rd – April 1 st, 2001 Presented by: Kyle Schwulst and Andrew Stahr.
Technology For 2007 And Beyond Dr. Steve Charlton Executive Director – Advanced Engineering Cummins Inc.
University of Wisconsin Madison Presented by: Eric Schroeder Adam Schumacher 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation.
2005 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Greg Davis David Meyer Advisor: Dr. Bernhard Bettig Incorporation of a High Performance, Four-Cylinder, Four-Stroke.
2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Rich Stueber Pryce Nutting.
Kettering University Presenters: Chad Swartz John Stimpson.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Joe Lofgren Brandon Salaba Kyle Schroer Kyle Levanen Dylan Dahlheimer UMD University.
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Russell Schiermeier.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presented by: Dylan Dahlheimer Ryan Schefers Brenden Bungert Mark Boeckmann UMD University.
2015 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy  Develop a platform that meets competition objectives while providing a significant design challenge.
Jack Ampuja Supply Chain Optimizers Niagara University.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Mobile Source Control Division September 25, 2003 Monitoring and Laboratory Division Board Hearing California Air Resources Board Control Measure to Reduce.
2006 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Team Members: Steve Battaglia, Brian Belmont, Dan Bughbee, Kevin Gastle Mike Ide, Kelly McRory, Eric Peckham, Dan Sweeney,
Minnesota State University Mankato Dylan Brandt, Nick Perkins, Abdulsalam Hamud, Wayne Minnichsoffer, Andrew Pickle.
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2005 Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Michigan Technological University Clean Snowmobile Enterprise Adrienne PironEthan Hill Zero Emissions Team.
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Competition Presented by: Pryce McDaniel, Josh McCoy, Mike Waloch 3/7/16.
2016 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy ●Embrace design challenges ●Engage students and public through originality ●Open and safe learning.
Iowa State University Clean Snowmobile Club Iowa State University 2016 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
University of Wisconsin-Platteville
Jeff Robinson Eric Gleich
Introduction to the Clean Snowmobile Competition
University of Wisconsin Platteville 2017 CSC Diesel Team
Team Members Jacob Schofield - President Nels Eide – Driveline / Testing Mark Boeckmann - Engine Keith Propson – Sound / Exhaust.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2017 Clean Snowmobile Team
Electronic Fuel Injection
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy
Presented By Ian Sullivan
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
2018 IC Design Presentation
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Overview Project Management Base Sled Selection Engine Management
Who We Are Samuel Wick – President Blake Thurnbeck – Engine Packaging
University of Wisconsin-Platteville Clean Snowmobile
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Wisconsin-Platteville CSC CI Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
University of Wisconsin – Platteville 2019 SI Snowmobile Team
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Last Year’s Foundation
Presentation transcript:

Presented By Dillon Savage & Crystal Green UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWO-STROKE WITH DIRECT INJECTION AND SOUND REDUCTION

OVERVIEW Competition Goals Design Goals and Target Audience Design Strategy Chassis and Engine Modifications Testing Results Summary and Conclusions Questions

COMPETITION GOALS Create clean, quiet and economical trail snowmobiles while maintaining or improving performance Meet EPA exhaust and noise emissions standards Build a platform capable of running percent isobutanol Provide university students with real world engineering experience

UICSC DESIGN GOALS Create a national park certified two-stroke snowmobile E-score > 170, SAE J192 score <73 dBA Produce a reliable and accurate flex fuel system Generate hp Deliver original equipment manufacturer level packaging Raise industry standard with economical solutions

CHASSIS AND ENGINE Chassis 2013 Ski-Doo MXZ-TNT Performance oriented Improved handling r-Motion suspension Engine Rotax 797cc R two-stroke E-Tec direct injection RAVE 2 variable exhaust with tuned pipe High power-to-weight ratio

DESIGN STRATEGY Clean and Efficient Injection timing and quantity optimized for reduced emissions Capability to use upwards of 40% Isobutanol DI allows reduced quantity of oil used in total loss oiling system Economy switch with reduced fuel consumption Three-way reduction exhaust catalyst after treatment Clutch was optimized for lower RPM and improved coasting Quiet Low speed 797 cc engine Selectively applied sound insulation in key areas Quarter wave resonator in exhaust system

ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Low Speed Reduction in engine RPM decreases noise levels and emissions, while increasing fuel efficiency Implemented economy switch to create a dual mode snowmobile Aristo supplied catalytic converter Reduces exhaust emissions Little impact on power

Measured Specifications 115 hp 540 lb 40 lbs less than the 2013 UICSC model Fuel Efficient 21 mpg (GGE) on B-32 Comfort Position & handling Rider-forward position r-Motion suspension RIDER VIEWPOINT

DEALER/OUTFITTER VIEWPOINT Low Maintenance Little cost and low time to maintain Low Vehicle Cost MSRP $11,765 Meets Consumer Demand High sales volume Environmentally Conscious Exceeds current emissions and noise standards* *Meets NPS noise standards under some test conditions

Continuing research was done on how different riding positions affects the body Handlebar height increased by four inches With taller risers risk of cumulative trauma disorder decreases 4% less over a 5 hour day ERGONOMICS

CALIBRATION STRATEGY

Eco-mode 2014: 204 E-score 2013: 203 E-score Passes EPA and NPS standards EPA 5-mode test used 210 is max score EMISSIONS

FLEX FUEL GM flex fuel sensor Custom analog circuit Fuel correction based on the stoichiometric AFR of isobutanol

Exhaust Quarter wave resonator Exhaust valves lowered Intake Attached sound deflectors to intake Inserted a foam pre-filter in secondary air box Mechanical Lowered engine speeds Attached sound material to panels, tunnel, and injectors NOISE REDUCTION

QUARTER WAVE RESONATOR 1 st harmonic reduces by.5 dB at 400 Hz 2 nd harmonic magnifies the sound by nearly 1 dB

Deflectors were added to redirect sound Air intake Cooling port on hood Sound is directed to the front and rear of snowmobile NOISE DEFLECTORS

SOUND DEADENING MATERIALS 2013 material was compared to many other configurations 2014 showed average reduction of 1.4 dB from 2013 Consists of melamine, plastic, and an ether type damping material

MATERIAL APPLICATION Polydamp sound material was applied to tunnel, injectors, and chain case Three layer insulation applied to side panels Applied at source to reduce weight addition Clean application looks OEM

Clean Exceeds NPS Quiet Expected to meet NPS Efficient 21 MPG GGE Affordable $11,765 Enjoyable two-stroke riding experience CONCLUSIONS

QUESTIONS?

INSERTION LOSS