Heidi Erstad and Peg Mazeika, Technical Assistance Coordinators Wisconsin RtI Center Bridget Blask, Rachel Blum, and Leslie Connors Franklin Elementary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Cadre 8 Training, October 9, 2012 DIETS & Drivers.
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
Maintaining & Sustaining Fidelity of Implementation in Your RtI System Maintaining & Sustaining Fidelity of Implementation in Your RtI System The Wisconsin.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
RtI Day 2 EXCEED Trainer of Trainers SDUSD October 2011 Linda Trousdale Michelle Crisci Several slides were adapted from: Washoe County School District,
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS): Overview. Objectives Become familiar with: Common language of MTSS Tier I, II, III 2.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Instructional Coaching:
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Coaching Makes a Difference Expanding and Refining the Coaches Role Oregon 1.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Fidelity Leslie Connors, Principal Rachel Blum, NXGLC Teacher Bridget Blask, School Counselor.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
Digging Deeper LKSD Principal Inservice Feb. Our approach for our time together…
Implementation Drivers March 23, 2012
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Critical Elements Effective teaching Alignment of curriculum and instruction to standards Instructional program coherence Fidelity of implementation Evaluation.
 Implementing Best Practice Strategies New Licensed Staff Induction Program.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
Using the WIKI to Support Training and Technical Assistance October 27, 2011 Susan Barrett Implementer Partner, Center on PBIS Sheppard Pratt Health System.
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Presented From the WI RtI Center Lori Cameron PBIS Technical Assistance Coordinator Sara Summ and Lynn Johnson Academic Technical Assistance Coordinators.
Response to Intervention: Core Components and Resources Related to Implementation Marie Fisher March 3, 2012.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
T ier 4 – Specially Designed Learning IN ADDITION TO TIERS 1-3, targeted students receive specialized programs, methodologies, or instruction Greater frequency.
T ier 4 – Specially Designed Learning IN ADDITION TO TIERS 1-3, targeted students receive specialized programs, methodologies, or instruction Greater frequency.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
VTPBiS Coordinators as Coaches Learning and Networking Workshop Presented by VTPBiS State Team.
We will start shortly. Feel free to relax and chat while you wait for class to begin. Our agenda for tonight’s seminar is to discuss Response to Intervention,
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Fidelity: Maximizing the Effectiveness of Tier 2 September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
Literacy Development Plan
Coaching as a Process Not a Person
ESE Blended Cafe Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) A Parent Guide
RTI: Response To Instruction
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Presentation transcript:

Heidi Erstad and Peg Mazeika, Technical Assistance Coordinators Wisconsin RtI Center Bridget Blask, Rachel Blum, and Leslie Connors Franklin Elementary School, West Allis-West Milwaukee School District 2013 PBIS Conference Fidelity of Instruction and Intervention

Wisconsin definition of RtI Is what? An organizational framework that guides implementation of a multi-level system of support Does what? to achieve academic and behavioral success for all For what?

Fidelity of Implementation

Fidelity of instruction and intervention Presentation Questions What is it and why is it important? What factors impact fidelity and what can you do to ensure fidelity? What resources are available to help you in this process? What does it look like in practice? Franklin’s story

What is Fidelity of Instruction and Intervention? Some working definitions for this presentation: Instruction : Teacher’s instructional behaviors (sounds like, looks like, feels like) Intervention: Research- or evidence-based practice or program at any tier Fidelity*: The degree to which the instruction and intervention are delivered as designed, with accuracy and consistency, and have intended results. *Adapted from National Center on RtI, n.d; Forbush, et al, 2009; Dunst, et al, 2008

ExposureAdherence Quality of Delivery Engagement Fidelity Sticking to the plan; Using “active ingredients” Frequency, dosage, duration Use of “best practices” Active participation Modified from O’Donnell, 2008

ExposureAdherence Quality of DeliveryEngagement Fidelity in Tier 1 (Universal) Instruction Teachers follow schoolwide schedule of lessons and format (Cool tools, videos). Teachers follow classroom lessons. All students introduced via ‘School- wide Kick-Off’ and building & classroom matrices. Ongoing scheduled lessons, frequency and grouping occur based on data. All students engaged in content, working toward schoolwide or classroom goals Use of student modeling, examples/non-examples, frequent positive acknowledgement, teaching/re-teaching. Culturally responsive practices used.

ExposureAdherence Quality of DeliveryEngagement Fidelity in Tier 2 (Selected) Interventions Staff implement core components of interventions according to design and data based need. Staff implement intervention based on re-teaching Schoolwide Matrix or identified skills. Duration and time frame defined by research, student response data. Students attend sessions. Students actively engaged throughout interventions working toward group or individual goals Staff deliver planned content according to age and needs of students with progress monitoring.

ExposureAdherence Quality of DeliveryEngagement Fidelity in Tier 3 (Intensive) Interventions Staff adhere to individualized student plan and collect data to determine effectiveness Staff follow predetermined duration and frequency based on team-developed individualized student plan to address student’s needs Student actively engaged throughout interventions working on individualized goals Staff adjust instruction based on student responsiveness to plan / according to student data

Why is fidelity important? “Only when effective practices are fully implemented should we expect positive outcomes. Implementation matters. Blasé & Fixsen, 2005

Fidelity of instruction and intervention Presentation Questions What is it and why is it important? What factors impact fidelity and what can you do to ensure fidelity? What resources are available to help you in this process? What does it look like in practice? Franklin’s story

What factors impact fidelity? Match to student / school need Accessibility of resources Training, feedback, and support Perceived effectiveness Clarity of core components Complexity of new skill or practice Number of competing priorities Accountability Professional culture of school (Protheroe, N., 2008)

Consider this… Research-based practices inform when and how they interact with students and stakeholders, but it is the person who delivers the intervention through words and actions. Your staff are the intervention! Wallace, et al, 2008

What can you do to ensure fidelity? Accountability Support Quality control Quality assurance

What can you do to ensure fidelity? Be clear about and build deep understanding of “active ingredients” of instruction and intervention Over-estimate time, training, & support needed to develop fluency with new practices Know that change occurs at the individual level; one size won’t fit all! SUPPORT Don’t skimp on professional learning!

OUTCOMES: Percentage of Participants Who… TRAINING COMPONENTS Demonstrated Knowledge Demonstrated Skill Used Skill in Context Theory and Discussion 10%5%0% PLUS Demonstration in Training 30%20%0% PLUS Practice & Feedback in Training 60% 5% PLUS Coaching in Context 95% Joyce & Showers, 2002 What can you do to ensure fidelity? SUPPORT Add coaching!

What can you do to ensure fidelity? Anticipate difficulties with implementation of new practices Provide and co-create staff manuals, checklists, “calibration checks,’ and guidelines Create feedback loops SUPPORT Don’t skimp on supportive structures!

What can you do to ensure fidelity? Continued monitoring is critical to success Create a plan to monitor implementation Analyze data to identify possible reasons for programs not performing as expected and action plan ACCOUNTABILITY

Fidelity of instruction and intervention Presentation Questions What is it and why is it important? What factors impact fidelity and what can you do to ensure fidelity? What resources are available to help you in this process? What does it look like in practice? Franklin’s story

What resources are available to help? HANDOUT Resources to Support and Measure Fidelity of Instruction and Intervention

What Does It Look Like in Practice? Franklin Elementary School, West Allis-West Milwaukee School District: Bridget Blask, School Counselor Rachel Blum, NxGLC, grades 1-3 Leslie Connors, principal

References Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., McInerney, M., Holland-Coviello, R., Masiello, T., Helsel, F., & Robyak, A. (2008). Measuring training and practice fidelity in capacity-building scaling-up initiatives. CELLpapers, 3(1), Available Forbus, D., Milbank C., & Hughes, J. (2011). Maximizing Student Outcomes – What does Instructional fidelity have To Do With It? EssentialEducator.org Johnson, E., Mellard, D., Fuchs, D. & McKnight, M. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention (RTI): How to do it. Lawrence, KS: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Leonard-Barton, D. & Kraus, W. (1985). Implementing new technology. Harvard Business Review. 6, 102 – 110. Mellard, D., (2010). Fidelity of implementation within a Response to Intervention (RtI) framework: Tools for schools. National Center on Response to Intervention. National Center on RtI. (2009). Fidelity of implementation within an RtI framework. Available

References National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. (August, 2006). RtI manual: Fidelity of implementation. Available North Dakota Department of Public Instruction. (n.d.). Fidelity of Implementation. Available Protheroe, N., (2008). The impact of fidelity of implementation in effective standards-based instruction. Principal, 38 – 42. SCRED. (2011). Implementation integrity within an RtI framework: Critical roles and tools for school psychologists. Available