A Landmark Initiative of Higher Education Commission (HEC) for Quality Assurance in Teaching and Research at Higher Degree Level Quality Enhancement Cell (QEC) A Landmark Initiative of Higher Education Commission (HEC) for Quality Assurance in Teaching and Research at Higher Degree Level Fatima Jinnah Women University (FJWU) Rawalpindi

Establishment July 2007

HR: Budgeted Posts Director: Prof. Dr. Naheed Zia Khan Supervision, planning & technical advice Deputy Director: Ms. Fareena Iqbal Liaison with academic Departments Assistant Director: Ms. Nosheen Naz Data processing and statistical output Data Analyst: Vacant Assistant: Mr. Ayaz Ahmed Khan General and technical logistics Naib Qasid: Mr. Adnan

Update on QEC Progress Assessment Teams (AT) for all 16 academic depts. formed Schedule chalked out for AT visit of the depts. Evaluation of courses offered in Summer 2009 SAR of Model Department, Computer Sciences, in the 11 th Meeting of QECs AT visit of the Model Department, Computer Sciences, on August minutes sent

Continued… Proforma 1, 10, 3, 4, & 5, submitted, for all courses for Winter/Spring Semester 2009 SARs of all degree programs, 16 years of schooling, completed and reviewed Proforma 11, added: to proformas provided by QAA for review of working of different Administrative Departments

Continued… Evaluation shifted to machine readable Proforma, scanned by Scranton ES 2800: economizing on paper, HR and making the data more error free Comprehensive Evaluation Report in the next quarter would be compiled and circulated in four weeks FJWU joined World Higher Education Database 2009: info can be accessed via WHED 2009 Criteria referenced Self Assessment Proforma circulated in all 16 Academic Departments Four Proforma have been received, analyzed and compiled

Dept. of Business Administration Crit. Poor Performance in most Fair Performance in most Good Performance for most Good to Excellent Performance in all Excellent Performance in all Score

Continued… Overall Assessment Score = S1+ S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 + S6 + S7 + S8 = = 65

Dept. of Public Administration Crit. Poor Performance in most Fair Performance in most Good Performanc e for most Good to Excellent Performance in all Excellent Performance in all Score

Continued… Overall Assessment Score = S1 + S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 + S6 + S7+ S8 = = 73

Dept. of Computer Sciences Crit. Poor Performance in most Fair Performance in most Good Performance for most Good to Excellent Performance in all Excellent Performance in all Score

Continued… Overall Assessment Score = S1 + S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 + S6 + S7 + S8 = = 70

Dept. of Education Crit. Poor Performance in most Fair Performance in most Good Performanc e for most Good to Excellent Performance in all Excellent Performance in all Score

Continued… Overall Assessment Score = S1+ S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 + S6 + S7 + S8 = = 83

Implementation Plan Assessment Team visit of Public Administration, August ; and minutes of AT Corrective action - Implementation Plan

Corrective Actions on Assessment FindingsActionDateResponsibleResources Lack of highly qualified senior faculty Positions advertised in past; general dearth of HR; positions to be advertised in near future Sep on- wards Selection Committee, Registrar Office Increase in FJWU budget for FY No Linkages with International Universities Links being established with Jon Koping U., Sweden for PA Sep Department of MPA Experienced faculty from reputable foreign universities

Continued… FindingsActionDateResponsibleResources Weak publication record of students and faculty Award of HRD scholarships to faculty for Ph.D. abroad Septemb er 2009 onwards FJWUTuition fee and maintenance while abroad No independent Computer lab Facilities More covered area needed for labs New Campus in 5years FJWUContinued release of funds under PSDP

FindingsActionDateResponsibleResources Insufficient Administrat ive Staff reported to relevant quarters Indeterm inate FJWUCovered area for office space MS program Plan in progress 2011 tentative FJWUHighly qualified faculty Department al Library Departmenta l library at Chakri 2014 tentative FJWUSmooth flow of PSDP releases for Chakri Continued…

Workshops held by QEC for Revisiting the Grading Spread, implementation has taken place in this quarter. Standard Normal Distribution Continued…

Action Plan for Next Quarter AT visit for Business Administration, Communication Sciences and Education - for next quarter Comprehensive Report for Summer Semester 2009 Pro forma 1 & 10 - planned for Fall all courses except of Ph.D. Pro forma 7 & 8, Alumni and Employer - for Fall 2009, (better response?)

Proposal for collaboration with Dept. of Quality Assurance, NUST, in progress: One day workshop on Teacher Performance Evaluation: Significance and Constraints Need Assessment for Teachers’ Performance Evaluation Group Work on Constraints Panelists: Eminent Teachers, QEC heads Invitees: QAA reps, QEC reps & eminent teachers Initiating evaluation for semester Fall 2009 Continued…

Submitted: Annexure Copy of the letter sent to the Vice Chancellor for approval of the Assessment Team for Model Department, Department of Computer Sciences (Annex. 1); Copy of the letter sent to the external member of Assessment Team, Dr. Younis Javed (Annex. 2); Copy of the minutes of Assessment Team visit and meeting (Annex. 3); Copy of the letter sent to the Vice Chancellor for approval of the Assessment Team for Model Department, Department of Public Administration (Annex. 4); Copy of the letter sent to the external member of Assessment Team, Mr. Imran Hameed (Annex. 5);

Copy of IOMs for Assessment Teams from all Departments (Annex. 6); Copy of suggested Schedule for Assessment Teams for the next Quarter (Annex. 7); Copy of Schedule of Summer Semester 2009 Evaluation (Annex. 8); Copy of Performa 11, Employer Survey (Annex. 9) Copy of filled Criteria Referenced Self Assessment proforma from four Departments; (Annex. 10); Copy of Machine Readable proforma 1and 10 (Annex. 11); Copy of letter to Air Commodore Ismail for Collaborative Activity with NUST (Annex. 12); Copy of letter of Implementation of Revisited Grading Spread (Annex. 13); Copy of Implementation plan of Department of Public Administration (Annex. 14); Continued…

Submitted: Compiled Reports SAR: Dept. of PA Survey: Comprehensive Evaluation Report for Winter/Spring, 2009: – Proforma 1 – Proforma 10 – Proforma 3 – Proforma 4 – Proforma 5

Thank You