New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC Mathematics Summative Assessment March 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC ELA/Literacy Summative Assessment.
Advertisements

Madison School District Governing Board Meeting March 19, 2013.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision of Assessment: Texts Worth Reading Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking November, 2013.
Smarter Balanced Assessment a Closer Look Level 1 Part 6.
Ohio Department of Education OCTEO Conference March 23,
What’s New in PARCC: What ELC Members Need to Know … and Share with You.
CCSS/SBAC Update Sara Shore 1. SBAC Pilot Test Feb 20- May 10 Volunteer window closes Jan BalancedPilothttps://
Parent Information Spring EBR Office of Professional Development and Instruction
A Look at the Future of Assessments - ELA Ron Bauman · January 29, 2014.
PARCC: An Educator’s Assessment December By Educators for Students 2 Thousands of K-12 educators are leading test development More than 1,000.
Classroom Assessment: Performance Based Math in Middle and High School. Understanding and Using the PARCC documents. Ted Coe, Ph.D. Grand Canyon University.
PARCC Grade- and Subject-Specific Performance Level Descriptors Presented to the PARCC Governing Board and Advisory Committee on College Readiness June.
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Why move to Common Core?  Preparation: The standards are college- and career-ready. They will help prepare students with the knowledge and skills they.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking October, 2013.
Governing Board & Advisory Committee on College Readiness Special Joint Session College- and Career-Ready Determination Policy and Policy-Level Performance.
PARCC Update Mathematics NCSM Presentation April 25, 2012 Carrie Piper Senior Adviser, PARCC Mathematics Achieve.
Aspen Institute/Urban District Leaders Network May 21, 2013 Tampa, FL PARCC: Aligning Assessment Practices.
1. Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including Common Core 2 The Oklahoma C 3 Standards, including the Common Core, lay the foundation toward ensuring that students.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers PARCC 1.
Sub-claim A: Students solve problems involving the major content for their grade level with connections to practices Sub-Claim B: Students solve problems.
PARCC Assessment Math Shifts Becky Justus Math Teacher Greene County Tech Junior High PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member.
SMARTER BALANCED QUESTION TYPES OVERVIEW TEXT TXT EXT Assess a broad range of content. Scoring is objective, fast, and inexpensive to score. Difficult.
1 Instructional Data Division. 2 3 Outcome Outcome: Participants will be able to: understand PARCC’s historical context define PARCC’s components communicate.
PARCC WORKSHOP Preparing Students for the Call to be College and Career Ready.
Understanding the Evidence Statement Tables for the PARCC Summative Assessments in Mathematics Welcome to the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision of Assessment: Texts Worth Reading, Problems Worth Solving, Tests Worth Taking Overview Presented by:
PARCC Overview Lee County School District January 2013.
A Look at the Future of Assessments Brian Bickley · January 29, 2014.
New Jersey Principals and Supervisors Association Legislative Conference March 21, 2014 New Jersey Department of Education.
College-Ready Determination Policy and Performance Level Descriptors July
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium A Peek at the Assessment System 1 Rachel Eifler January 30, 2014.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. Today’s Agenda Stipends SCECH’s Sign-in and out! Moodle
The Importance of Coherent Lessons in Elementary Mathematics Linda Schoenbrodt, MSDE, Elementary Programs Specialist October, 2014.
Overview Dr. Karen Russo 1 As of October 1, 2014.
Ohio’s New Learning Standards English Language Arts Math Science Social Studies Fine Arts World Language Financial Literacy Physical Education Entrepreneurship.
Ensuring State Assessments Match the Rigor, Depth and Breadth of College- and Career- Ready Standards Student Achievement Partners Spring 2014.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) January 2013.
By Raani Agrawal 1 PARCC Assessment: ELA/Literacy and Math Grades 6-8.
Getting to Know the PARCC Assessment: A Workshop for Parents January, 2015.
Common Core and the Community College May 20, 2014.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) December
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Higher Education Update State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) Annual.
EHS and EMS Presentation 11/12/10 With thanks to Lucille E. Davy, Senior Advisor, James B. Hunt, Jr. Institute.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards March 2012 These slides were taken from: and I have deleted.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Factors that determine the Cognitive Complexity of PARCC Mathematics Items Cognitive Complexity Mathematical Content Mathematical Practices Stimulus Material.
. Do one problem “Meal Out” or “Security Camera”.
PARCC Performance Level Setting
WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL CAASPP INFORMATION NIGHT How to Understand Your Child’s report
Family Presentation Hamilton Public Schools February 24,
PARCC Assessments- What Do The Tasks Require Students To Do?
ACTion for Mathematics-ASPIRE. Background The math assessment was developed to reflect students’ knowledge and skill accumulation over time; capturing.
The PARCC assessments for mathematics will involve three primary types of tasks: Type I, II, and III. Each task type is described on the basis of several.
Rhode Island Department of Education Diane Girard & Colleen O’Brien.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision of Assessment: Texts Worth Reading, Problems Worth Solving, Tests Worth Taking Overview Presented by:
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking November, 2013.
Illinois State Board of Education A Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking.
MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT A Student Focused Community.
A Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving
New Teacher Orientation August 25, 2016
Analyzing PARCC Results to Inform Instruction
NEA and AFT Item Review Boot Camp Working Session: Mathematics
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
Presentation transcript:

New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC Mathematics Summative Assessment March 2013

What are Performance Level Descriptors? 2 Performance Level Descriptors or PLDs describe what students at each performance level know and can do relative to the grade- level or course content standards assessed.

Building on Work to Date 3 In October 2012 PARCC established 5 performance levels Level 5: Students performing at this level demonstrate a distinguished command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the Common Core State Standards assessed at their grade level. Level 4: Solid command… Level 3: Moderate command… Level 2: Partial command… Level 1: Minimal command…

Factors that determine the performance levels (Cognitive Complexity) Cognitive Complexity Mathematical Content Mathematical Practices Stimulus Material Response Mode Processing Demand 1.Mathematical Content 2.Mathematical Practices 3.Stimulus Material 4.Response Mode 5.Processing Demand 4 For more information on the PARCC Cognitive Complexity Framework see, “Proposed Sources of Cognitive Complexity in PARCC Items and Tasks: Mathematics” Aug. 31, 2012

Sub-claim A: Students solve problems involving the major content* for their grade level with connections to practices Sub-Claim B: Students solve problems involving the additional and supporting content* for their grade level with connections to practices Sub-claim C: Students express mathematical reasoning by constructing mathematical arguments and critiques Sub-Claim D: Students solve real world problems engaging particularly in the modeling practice Sub-Claim E: Students demonstrate fluency in areas set forth in the Standards for Content in grades 3-6 Claims Driving Design: Mathematics Master Claim: Students are “on track” or ready for college and careers 5 *Major content and additional and supporting content for each grade level are outlined in the PARCC Model Content Frameworks, available at

Looking at the PLDs 6 Gives the Sub-Claim that the PLD is written for (A-Major Content) Gives the PLD by performance level ranging from 2-5. Level 1 indicates a range from no work shown to Minimal command Gives the Concept the PLD is based on

PARCC’s Process in Developing Performance Level Descriptors PLD Grade Band Meetings Final PLDs Draft PLDs reviewed by College Board and Educational Testing Service (ETS) Mathematics Operational Working Group (OWG) refined PLDs Draft Math PLDs presented to the PARCC Executive Committee for approval Draft PLDs released for public comment 7

Capturing What Students Can Do PLDs capture how all students perform show understandings and skill development across the spectrum of standards and complexity levels assessed 8

New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC Mathematics Summative Assessment 9