Peak RCCo Performance Metrics Draft –November 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2004 NERC, NPCC & New England Compliance Programs John Norden Manager, Operations Training, Documentation & Compliance August 31, 2003 RC Meeting.
Advertisements

The Midwest ISO from a Transmission Owner Perspective.
Parallel Flow Visualization Data Requirements Parallel Flow Visualization Data Requirements NERC ORS Meeting Toronto, Ontario September 23-24, 2009 Jim.
Parallel Flow Visualization/Mitigation Proposal
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update IDCWG October 12 th, 2011.
Briefing on California ISO Dynamic Transfers Stakeholder Process For WECC Seams Issues Subcommittee Meeting May 4, 2010 Jim Price, Lead Engineering Specialist.
NERC TPL Standard Issues TSS Meeting #146 Seattle, WA August 15-17, 2007 Chifong Thomas.
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC) Task Force Joint Guidance Committee Presentation and Motion to the OC & MIC Standing Committee Meetings March 27-29,
Phase II – Analyze the Identified Issues from Perspectives of Alternative Approaches Determine which of the identified issues remain under alternate approaches.
Brenda Ambrosi ISAS Chair OC Update August 2012 Salt Lake City, UT.
PER
1 PER-005 Update Impact on Operators System Operator Conference April and May 1-3, 2012 Columbia, SC Margaret Stambach Manager, Training Services.
Outage Cost Study Market Analysis and Design Outage Coordination Improvement Task Force 3/23/2015.
Goshen Area Bus Reconfiguration
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC) Jeremy West Sr. Operations Engineer.
August 14, 2003 Blackout Final Report
PacifiCorp-CAISO EIM Initiative Overview
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
Real-Time Transmission Congestion Management & Market Effects
Supervisory Systems.
June 6, 2007 TAC Meeting NERC Registration Issues Andrew Gallo, Assistant General Counsel, Litigation and Business Operations ERCOT Legal Dept.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Transmission planning in Vermont Past, present and future Docket 7081 workshop By Dean LaForest 9/19/05.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
FRCC Seasonal Transmission Assessment & Operational Seasonal Study Winter 2012.
Determine Facility Ratings, SOLs and Transfer Capabilities Paul Johnson Chair of the Determine Facility Ratings Standard Drafting Team An Overview of the.
ERCOT SOL Methodology for the Planning and Operations Horizons Stephen Solis 2014 OTS 1.
Recommendations from 2011 Southwest Outage Heather Polzin, FERC Office of Enforcement Dave Nevius, Senior Vice President, NERC Member Representatives Committee.
System Operations Staffing Request Presented to the ERCOT Board Of Directors By Sam Jones, COO November 16, 2004.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
Reliability Requirements Bill Blevins Manager of Operations Support ERCOT.
Project System Protection Coordination Requirement revisions to PRC (ii) Texas Reliability Entity NERC Standards Reliability Subcommittee.
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Review and Request for Approval May 2007 John Webb.
©2004 PJMwww.pjm.com 1 PJM's Perspective on Reliability – Summer 2004 and Beyond Karl Pfirrmann President -- PJM Western Region FERC Summer Reliability.
© Property of ERCOT /17/20041 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Adams November 17, 2004.
TOP and BA Responsibilities SPP Wind Workshop May 30, 2013.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
2013 Wind Conference. Congestion Management & Communication Processes CJ Brown.
Loss of EMS Events 2015 System Operator Seminar. Training Objectives 2 System Operators will be able to identify the ERO Event Analysis Process Category.
Operating Guide and Planning Guide Revision Requests Blake Williams, ROS Chair September 13, 2012.
Loss of EMS Events 2015 System Operator Seminar. Training Objectives 2 System Operators will be able to identify the ERO Event Analysis Process Category.
Current Operational Challenges Computing the West – North Limits Potential IROLs Local Voltage & Thermal issue (OOME) High Voltage Outages.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
ESI Alternate Economic Study Process E-RSC Meeting October 21, 2010.
January 14, 2016 PacifiCorp-CAISO-NVE EIM Initiative Overview.
Coordinated Planning Concept (For Discussion Only) revised 11/30/04 07/01/04.
ERCOT Transmission Planning Process Overview and Recommendations November 6, 2002.
09/20/20061 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Dumas September 20, 2006.
2006 Reliability Study James Manning Bryan Guy May 12, 2006.
1 Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EIPC Roll-Up Powerflow Model Zach Smith Director,
Reliability Must Run Workshop RMR Study Process May 24, 2016.
RELIABILITY COORDINATOR TOPICS 2006 FRCC SYSTEM OPERATOR SEMINAR.
Bert Peters Chair, Path Operator Task Force
Wind Management at MISO
Phase Angle Limitations
ERCOT – Southern Cross Transmission ROS/WMS Working Group Assignments
Brett Wangen Director of Engineering, Peak Reliability
Grid Integration of Intermittent Resources
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
ISO New England System R&D Needs
CEO/Co-founder, SOS Intl
Solar Eclipse Overview August 2017
Mgr. Interconnection Reliability Initiatives
“TOP-010-1: Data Quality, Analysis Quality, and Alarm Process Monitor”
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC)
PacifiCorp-CAISO-NVE EIM Initiative Overview
Bert Peters Chair, Path Operator Task Force
Presentation transcript:

Peak RCCo Performance Metrics Draft –November 2013

CategoryObjectiveMeasure 1.Constraint Management – Reliability Coordination Mitigate Transmission constraints in a timely manner in line with NERC standards and MISO Goals Duration in which a Transmission Element (constraint) is over its System Operating Limit (SOL). A constraint normally consists of a monitored element for the loss of contingent element (OTDF), but also includes base case constraints (i.e. PTDFs, Interfaces, IROLs, etc.) 2. Constraint Management – Reliability Coordination Effectively commit/de-commit units to mitigate a constraint When necessary to provide relief for transmission constraint relief purposes, determine if the correct number of minimum cost units were committed to provide necessary, effective relief and whether those units were also taken off line in a timely manner. 3. Constraint Management – Reliability Coordination Effectively manage constraints using Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Calculate the Average Percentage of State Estimator Flow on the constraint vs. State Estimator Limit on the constraint. Each constraint is individually scored, with the category score based on an average. 4. Constraint Management – Reliability CoordinationEffectively manage Market Flow Relief Obligations and Market to Market constraints All Market Flow Relief obligations received via TLR are acknowledged in a timely manner in accordance with NERC Standards, and relief is provided via the market dispatch. Market to Market constraints are managed in accordance with their respective Joint Operating Agreement. 5. Network Applications – EMS Engineering M onitor the performance of the State Estimator solution and unsolved contingencies in the Real Time Contingency Analysis Number of instances State Estimator solutions outside of performance index measures, number of unsolved contingencies, high availability and completeness of Real Time Contingency Analysis solutions, and response time of the EMS engineer to address above measures. 6. Engineering Studies (current day) – Regional Engineering Deliver accurate study cases and results for the morning and afternoon peak conditions to the operators in a timely manner Measure engineering study cases for accuracy and delivery with in targeted time. MISO R.C. Measures

CategoryObjectiveMeasure 7. General – Real Time Operations Effective management of event/issue which is not identified in any other category and which has significant impact on the network and/or participants. Measure the proactive/positive steps taken by Real Time Ops to mitigate the impact of an event/issue that is not measured in any of above performance criteria. 8. Outage Coordination – Forward OperationsEffectively study adverse impacts of Planned Outages on the System. Measure of Transmission constraints identified by the studies have an operating guide or a constraint mitigation plan to manage the constraint that’s caused by the planned outage. 9. Next-Day Studies – Forward OperationsEffectively identify Real Time constraints in Next- Day Studies Measure of Real Time Transmission constraints identified in the study. 10. Load and Wind Forecasting – Application Information Services 11. Tool and Application Availability – Application Information Services 12. Forward Operations and Application Information Services Measure how effectively Forward Ops and AIS managed an event/issue which is not identified in any other category and which has significant impact on the network and/or participants Capture the "impact" to MISO Systems and Operations MISO R.C. Measures

FERC Considerations 1. Percentage of RC directives issued correctly and when needed. 2. Availability/correctness of day ahead operating studies. a. IROL/SOL defined 3. Availability/correctness of real-time studies a. IROL/SOL defined 4. Availability/correctness of monitoring tools. a. IROL/SOL defined 5. Up to date and effective operating procedures regarding a. Balancing Operations b. Transmission Operations i. Identification of specific generation dispatch to resolve WECC Path overloads in real time. ii. Identification of specific operating contacts to develop, agree upon, and implement procedures. iii. Detailed Restoration procedures of lines that have potential phase angle issues when opened and identification of generation resources that are effective in facilitating restoration. Supported with operating studies. iv. Identification and resolution of voltage issues c. System Restoration d. Operations Planning e. Emergency Operations f. Generator Operational Requirements g. Certification and Training Requirements h. Operating agreements 6. Implementation/resolution of Recommendations (pertaining to the RC) from the Arizona-Southern California September 8, 2011 outages. 7. Availability of support staff (on-site or remote).