Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape Practical difficulties in actions co-financed by EU structural funds: proposals for a better management and complementariness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4 Funding for sustainable energy: Encouraging rational energy use in the EU EU funding for sustainable energy.
Advertisements

Vatican City, 14 th November 2007 Gemma Rauret Director ESG and the current QA trends in Southern Europe: Spain Current trends in the European Quality.
Evaluation Arrangements for : A Decentralized Approach Laura Tagle Evaluation Unit – Department for Development Policies – Ministry for Development.
1 Programming period Strategy and Operational programmes DG REGIO – Unit B.3.
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
1 Regional plan for using ESF for inter-regional co-operation The example of CATALONIA ESF across borders: engaging the regions Ceat per JMP – 31/01/08.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture EU rural development policy
1 The new ESF Investing in your Future -
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 EGTC regulation EGTC regulation ESF and EGTC regulations Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Opendays Brussels Caisse des Dépôts CDC as Certifying Authority Mr Albert PERY.
OPEN DAYS 2006 Workshop 12E28 – 12. October The new European Social Fund DENMARK Head of division Preben Gregersen Ministry of Economic and Business.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION The new European Regional Development Fund Brussels, 12 October 2006 Committee of the Regions N. De Michelis,
European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) Open Days 2006 Making regions work across borders October 10 th, 2006 by JAN OLBRYCHT Member of the.
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN 1 Transport and Regional Policy Transport and Regional Policy Patrick.
Improving user-friendliness of structural funds management system in Lithuania: challenges and opportunities dr. KLAUDIJUS MANIOKAS Public company European.
Planning and use of funding instruments
1 Open Days 2008 Communicating Cohesion Policy Together Bruxelles, 10/07/2008 The experience of the Italian ED network in Cohesion Policy Communication.
1 Flat-rates for indirect costs Ex-ante assessment by DG Employment, Social affairs and Equal Opportunities and DG Regional Policy Myrto Zorbala- DG Regional.
European Union Cohesion Policy
Istanbul October 2010: EastAgri Annual Meeting – RT4 – Investing across borders: The way forward for agriculture and rural development in the Balkan.
María Muñoz General Directorate for Community Funds Ministry of Economy and Finance SPAIN María Muñoz General Directorate for Community Funds Ministry.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Draft guidance on monitoring and evaluation : Concepts and recommendations.
1 DG Regio Evaluation Network Meeting Albert Borschette, Brussels, 14 October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Interreg III - Presentation of Final Results Pasi.
POLAND Development Management System in Poland Brussels, 2 July 2010.
A d d V Alue to public management Winding-up declaration Portuguese experience Carlos Trigacheiro Inspecção-Geral de Finanças (IGF) General Inspection.
The new European Regional Development Fund DG REGIO.
OPENDAYS 2011 Added value and efficiency through the use of article 37.6(b) and EGTC Cooperation in the mainstream programmes example of Limousin (France)
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
NBFSE Financial instruments and mechanisms of fund allocation to social economy Common meeting 5-6 th December, Milano.
Entrepreneurship and competitiveness for SMEs Dialogue between Brazil and the EU EU Enterprise and Innovation Initiatives Carl James.
State Budget financing to projects approved within the Latvia-Lithuania Cross Border Cooperation Programme Ministry of Regional Development and.
BLAGOEVGRAAD ELIGIBILITY OF EXPENDITURE MANAGING AUTHORITY OF EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
27th Conference of EU Paying Agency Directors Oviedo, Spain April 2010 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITY AND THE PAYING AGENCY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION.
NBFSE Financial instruments and mechanisms of fund allocation to social economy Common meeting 5-6 th December, Milano.
Luis Vives Foundation STRUCTURAL FUNDS AND SOCIAL COHESION CII – Coalition Buildings Among Third Sector Organizations Speaker: José Manuel Fresno Luis.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Opportunities for interregional cooperation in Regional Operational Programmes: Article 96.3.d) of the Common Provisions Regulation INTERACT Future Pilot.
Deprived Urban Areas and Cohesion Policy URBACT Seminar – Deprived Urban Areas Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ, Senior Policy Officer, Directorate.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
The future of Tempus in Erasmus+ Jasmina Skočilić Project LifeADA kick-off meeting, Zagreb, February
Simplified Cost Options. Organizational structure National Development Agency Internal Audit Cabinet Legal Affairs Communication HR Vice-president for.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The EU Recovery Plan and the proposal amending the European Regional Development Fund Regulation.
Cooperation in the mainstream programmes / article 37-6b example of Limousin (France) ‏ inhabitants inhabitants 43 inhab / km² 43 inhab.
TERRITORIAL COHESION AND NATIONAL-REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP for the programming period Benchmarking Seminar on The Regional Competitiveness and Employment.
WORLD TRADE GROWTH. GLOBALIZATION Way of life Way of production Keeping in touch with the universal dimension of international trade.
(Dr. Peter Heil, ALTUS – Hungary)
Cooperation in the mainstream programmes / article 37-6b example of Limousin (France) inhabitants inhabitants 43 inhabitant / km2 43 inhabitant.
1 Place of Rural Development in Regional Policies Wladyslaw Piskorz, Head of Unit Urban development and territorial cohesion, European Commission, Directorate.
Assessment of Regional Coordination Capacities Szepesi Balázs Lead Evaluator Workshop on introducing territorial development evaluations April 25, 2013.
VET GOVERNANCE Leonardo Transfer of Innovation Kick-off meeting, Palermo, 19th – 20th February 2009 LLP-LdV/TOI/08/IT/566.
European Territorial Cooperation SAWP meeting, 9 July
Ministry of the Environment and Territory Directorate for Development and Environmental Research Ministry of Economy and Finance Department for Development.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “ASTURIAS” ERDF-Cohesion Fund REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME ASTURIAS Design and Structure June 4 h,
Ministry of Economy, Energy and Tourism 1 OP Competitiveness Progress of Implementation 2010.
THE ROLE OF THE MANAGING AUTHORITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STRUCTURAL AND COHESION FUNDS AND ITS OPERATION ANDREJ ENGELMAN.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
The delivery of rural development policies: Some reflections on problems and perspectives in EU countries INEA conference: The territorial approach in.
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
How does cohesion policy support rural development Ex-post evaluation of ERDF support to rural development: Key findings (Objective 1 and 2)
PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE
NSRF and National Development Planning in Greece
ESF Committee plenary meeting in Rome
Starting implementation Embedding Macro-regional strategies
1.- THE PROJECT. NATURA 2000 NETWORK IN SPAIN
Ex ante conditionalities in cohesion policy:
REIMBURSABLE FUNDS IN JEREMIE How to manage Regional Funds
Annual meeting of managing authorities ETC programmes April 2013
H.I. Reuter – DG EUROSTAT - E4 - GISCO
Presentation transcript:

Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape Practical difficulties in actions co-financed by EU structural funds: proposals for a better management and complementariness in period Jordi Amorós Forest Technology Centre of Catalonia (CTFC) 10E10. Making management more efficient

Catalonia, the region where CTFC is located, is situated in the northeast Spain, and borders with France: inhabitants Of which: in urban area km2 of surface Objective 2 Region (00-06) Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape The CTFC is situated in Spain: Million inhabit km2 of surface Objective 1 Regions 00-06: 9 Objective 2 Regions 00-06: 7 10E10. Making management more efficient

Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape The CTFC is an applied research, technology transfer, training and rural areas planning centre. 100 staff of annual budget Situated 100 km northwest from Barcelona More than 50 international projects 10E10. Making management more efficient

Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape Other European Institutions with a similar profile, at several levels, to the CTFC, may be acting in parallel: Projects within the framework of regional operative programmes (ERDF and ESF) Projects within the framework of other territorial impact programmes (EAGGF- Guarantee) Projects within the framework of communitarian initiatives (INTERREG lll, LEADER +, EQUAL or URBAN) Projects within the framework of other instruments (SOCRATES, LdV, Vl FP, innovating actions such as art. 6 ESF) 10E10. Making management more efficient

Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape What are the real problems of present management and application? The management among programmes and projects is not homogeneous (forms, terms and individual processes for each programme). An institution conducting several projects or taking part of different programmes must have not only an individual control structure for each of them (logic) but also an individual management structure and, specially, of implementation. It is not possible results transference to add impacts among programmes (i.e. The format to count beneficiaries in an OP of the ESF is not compatible with the format of an EQUAL-ESF project ). ¿How to know if an EQUAL beneficiary may require the support of a ROP ESF action? 10E10. Making management more efficient

Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape Non existence of regional transference framework of the ex-ante and interim evaluations results of the different programmes and/or projects: projects are internally improved but there is not transversal improvement. The complexity of the documentation to analyse and consider in each action makes difficult the dedication to complementarities and coordination with other actions (EU regulations + management guidelines + eligibility documents + applicable national guidelines + regional guidelines). 10E10. Making management more efficient

Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape At regional scale, responsibilities distribution among different financing and executing organisms responds frequently to political criteria, non practical for projects executors and beneficiaries (i.e. An agricultural regional ministry carries out an EAGGF- Guarantee programme; a ministry of work carries out a ESF programme; a ministry of economy is the funding organization of the ESF programme, and simultaneously executor of the ERDF programme,...). 10E10. Making management more efficient

Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape Consequently: The management models are not harmonized, they demand an individual effort of understanding and specialization and they do not allow what we may say institutional effectiveness (N projects, 1 model). And, more important as far as results, the complementariness among programmes and projects is habitually circumstantial, derived from the will of the managers and no from a cross-sectional vision from the applied instruments. All this affects the beneficiary, who does not perceive global planning but precise actions, which are occasionally each other coordinated. 10E10. Making management more efficient

Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape Therefore the 3 key elements for a practical and acceptable process of harmonization would be: 1) A basic legal regulation common for projects and programmes It is necessary to establish unique legal mechanisms for the accomplishment of projects or programmes at the states level, since European regulation (ERDF, ESF, EARDF/ EAGGF- Guarantee or other instruments) is usually common to all the instruments (i.e. Article 4). The unification of the national legal elements that regulate the actions would allow a transversal specialization of the programmes managers in all the possibilities applicable in their territory (i.e. Regulation on the minimum number of students of ESF courses in Spanish regions). 10E10. Making management more efficient

Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape 2) A management method comparable and generic among funds. With the objective to guarantee that managers and technicians who deal with funds and, therefore, programmes or projects, must learn only a basic system of multi fund control and management. Obviously, each programme can have specificities, not in the system of handling and management, but in its typology of activities. In this way the differences between funds and programmes would be only centred in the actions and their impact. 10E10. Making management more efficient

Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape 3) A simplification of the documentation procedures to present to the regional control authorities. Creation of regional multiprogrammes units. At the moment, the documentation required for the management and control of the projects or programmes is complex and different among them. Unifying criteria and systems (i.e. A unique online form model for projects impact control) would allow the direct comparison of results among projects, specially in a same institution. At regional level, the creation of programmes management central units would allow a cross-sectional vision of the programming, being able to support improvements in the development of programmes and projects to optimise its complementariness and to increase its impact. 10E10. Making management more efficient

Open days 06. Cutting the Red Tape Thank you for your attention Jordi Amorós Director of New Markets E10. Making management more efficient