Examples of ITER CODAC requirements for diagnostics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUTFPWI Meeting 29-31/10/07 C.Lowry ITER Design Review Decisions Taken 5 Major Issues Identified 1.Blanket Redesign 2.Vertical Stability and Shape Control.
Advertisements

Progress with PWI activities at UKAEA Fusion GF Counsell, A Kirk, E Delchambre, S Lisgo, M Forrest, M Price, J Dowling, F Lott, B Dudson, A Foster,
Ideas for overseas contributions to CMSO Piero Martin Consorzio RFX Associazione Euratom-ENEA sulla fusione And Physics Dept., Univ. of Padova, Italy CMSO.
The ITER Neutral Beam injectors
ITER Organization, Cadarache, France
14th IEA RFP Workshop – Padova, April 26th-28th 2010 RFX-mod thermal measurement system: a possible diagnostic for plasma-wall interaction M. Dalla Palma.
David Johnson Diagnostics Team Leader
PPPL ST-FNSF Engineering Design Details Tom Brown TOFE Conference November 10, 2014.
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
IST, 9 th February CFNCFP Joint Ph.D Programme on Fusion Science and Engineering SECOND ADVANCED COURSE ON DIAGNOSTICS AND DATA ACQUISITION by Carlos.
PPRC PPRC IR-T1 Tokamak Experimental Programme, Plans and Recent Results IR-T1 Tokamak Experimental Programme, Plans and Recent Results Presented By P.
George Sips ITPA, active control, 14 July Real-time Control ( and development of control systems ) at ASDEX Upgrade George Sips Max-Planck-Institut.
A. Kirk, 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Vilamoura, Portugal, 2004 The structure of ELMS and the distribution of transient power loads in MAST Presented.
LH SOL generated fast particles meeting, Prague, Dec 2004 J. Mailloux JET Programme 2005 Selected issues that could affect LH experiments.
Lecture 6.1 Lecture 6.1 ADVANCED PLASMA DIAGNOSTICTECHNIQUES Fri 23 May 2008, 1 pm LT5 Presented by Dr Ian Falconer Room.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER.
Spectrometric Diagnosis Group in Plasma Chemistry and Physics 박영동 1, 오수기 2 1 Department of Chemistry, 2 Department of Physics, Ajou University, Suwon ,
Physics of fusion power
March 26, 2008Janos Marki: ELM-induced divertor heat loads1/11 ELM-induced divertor heat loads on TCV J. Marki, R. A. Pitts and TCV Team 2008 Annual Meeting.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10 : Running a discharge / diagnostics.
Imaging Diagnostics at the H-1 National Plasma Fusion Research Facility Left: The coherence tomography system Above: Plasma emission reconstructions compared.
49th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2007, Orlando, Florida Ion Temperature Measurements and Impurity Radiation in.
Octiv RF Power monitoring technology “. Talk Outline Impedans VI technology Introduction to power monitoring Need for VI Probes Why IV sensors are needed.
D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.
Measurements with the KSTAR Beam Emission Spectroscopy diagnostic system Máté Lampert Wigner Research Centre for Physics Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions G M McCracken Hefei, October 2007.
F P Orsitto ENEA1 Diagnostics for hybrid reactors Francesco Paolo Orsitto ENEA FUSION Technical Unit C R Frascati(Italy) FUNFI VARENNA 2011.
Nils P. Basse Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA USA ABB seminar November 7th, 2005 Measurements.
1 Applications of ADAS to ITER Diagnostics Robin Barnsley and ITER Diagnostics Division Martin O’Mullane, Strathclyde University ADAS Workshop, Cadarache,
2D Position Sensitive Detector for Plasma diagnosis
Kaschuck Yu.A., Krasilnikov A.V., Prosvirin D.V., Tsutskikh A.Yu. SRC RF TRINITI, Troitsk, Russia Status of the divertor neutron flux monitor design and.
Edge Localized Modes propagation and fluctuations in the JET SOL region presented by Bruno Gonçalves EURATOM/IST, Portugal.
1 CHI Summary Transient CHI (XP606) –All systems operated reliably without any faults Edge Current drive (XP533)
Remote operation of the GOLEM tokamak Gent University, December 14, 2009 Jan Stockel Institute of Plasma Physics, Prague Vojta Svoboda.
12/03/2013, Praga 1 Plasma MHD Activity Observations via Magnetics Diagnostics: Magnetic island Analysis Magnetic island Analysis Frederik Ostyn (UGent)
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10: tokamak – continued.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
Characterization of core and edge turbulence in L- and H-mode Alcator C-Mod plasmas Outline: Alcator C-Mod tokamak Fluctuation diagnostics Low to high.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 9 : The tokamak continued.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
PPPL International Collaboration Activities J. R. Wilson Head Off-site Research Department Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 4th US-PRC Magnetic Fusion.
Brent Stratton for the NCSX Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Oak Ridge National Laboratory NCSX Program Advisory Committee Meeting #8 Princeton.
17 th ADAS Workshop, Cadarache, France 2012 Page 1 Progress in ITER Diagnostics Michael Walsh and the ITER Diagnostics Team (IO Diagnostics, all DAs and.
Study of NSTX Electron Density and Magnetic Field Fluctuation using the FIReTIP System K.C. Lee, C.W. Domier, M. Johnson, N.C. Luhmann, Jr. University.
Measurements of plasma turbulence by laser scattering in the Wendelstein 7-AS stellarator Nils P. Basse 1,2, S. Zoletnik, M. Saffman, P. K. Michelsen and.
GOLEM operation based on some results from CASTOR
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
ASIPP Magnetic Diagnostics of HT-7U Tokamak Shen Biao Wan Baonian Institute of Plasma Physics, CAS P.O.Box 1126, Hefei, Anhui , P.R.China (e_mail:
Edge Turbulence in High Density Ohmic Plasmas on NSTX K.M. Williams, S.J. Zweben, J. Boedo, R. Maingi, C.E. Bush NSTX XP Presentation Draft 5/25/06.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.
The mass of the nuclei produced is less than the mass of the original two nuclei The mass deficit is changed into energy We can calculate the energy released.
Measurements of Magnetic Fluctuations in HSX S. Oh, A.F. Almagri, D.T. Anderson, C. Deng, C. Lechte, K.M. Likin, J.N. Talmadge, J. Schmitt HSX Plasma Laboratory,
51st Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 2 - 6, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia ∆I BS = 170 Amps J BS e-root J BS i-root Multiple ambipolar.
= 2·10 18 m -3 T e (0) = 0.4 keV ECH and ECE on HSX Stellarator K.M.Likin, A.F.Almagri, D.T.Anderson, F.S.B.Anderson, C.Deng 1, C.W.Domier 2, R.W.Harvey.
57th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , Savannah, Georgia Equilibrium Reconstruction Theory and Modeling Optimized.
1st Int. Conference on Frontiers in Diagnostic Technologies, Frascati, Italy, Page 1 Measurements of Temperature and Density in Magnetic.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Gamma Ray Spectrometry System Design for ITER Plasma Diagnostics
OVERVIEW OF THE DIII–D PROGRAM AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS
KAI ZHANG Nuclear Fusion Power KAI ZHANG Oct
S. N. Simrock, A. Aallekar, L. Abadie, L. Bertalot, M. Cheon, C
in tokamaks and stellarators
M4 m4 WHAT IS A TOKAMAK? Graphic: EUROfusion, Reinald Fenke, CC BY 4.0,
Application to the VIS/IR Imaging System of ITER
Automatic Analysis of Edge Pedestal Gradient Degradation during ELMs
MTF Power Plant Concept MTF Power Plant Concept Key Features Low cost compressed gas driver Thick liquid metal blanket Shields structure Extracts.
Presentation transcript:

Examples of ITER CODAC requirements for diagnostics S. Arshad Colloquium on ITER-CODAC Plant Control Design Handbook and EU Procurement of Control and Instrumentation for ITER 28 October 2008

Hot fusion plasma can be contained in a magnetic field

New engineering and physics challenges for measurement and control Containment improves with size – ITER will be much larger than today’s machines JET: World’s largest tokamak ITER R (m) 6.2 a (m) 2 IP (MA) 16 Bt (T) 5.3 Paux (MW) 40 – 90 Pa (MW) 80+ Q (Pfus/Pin) 10 Prad (MW) 48 tpulse (s) 400+ R a New engineering and physics challenges for measurement and control

Wide range of diagnostics needed to diagnose fusion plasma Port type No. used Equatorial 9 Upper 12 Lower 9 Additionally many measurements inside vessel UPPER PORT 10 X-Ray Survey Imaging VUV Spectroscopy UPPER PORT 11 Edge Thomson EQUATORIAL PORT 11 X-Ray Crystal Spectroscopy, array Divertor VUV Spectroscopy X-Ray Survey Core VUV Monitor Neutral Particle Analyser Reflectometry EQUATORIAL PORT 9 MSE Toroidal Interferometer / Polarimeter ECE Wide Angle TV/IR DIVERTOR PORT 10 X-point LIDAR Divertor Thomson Scattering H-Alpha Spectroscopy DIVERTOR PORT 8 Divertor Reflectometry

The EU will supply a range of diagnostics to ITER Ports for diagnostics & heating systems General scheme for processing of diagnostic data Physics studies Analog processing Off-line processing ADC Real-time processing Controller Machine protection & plasma control Processed data from diagnostics (Courtesy of EFDA-JET) About 40 diagnostic systems installed in ports and inside / outside the toroidal chamber; 13 to be supplied by the EU: Plasma wall interaction Plasma shape & neutron profile Temperature & density profiles Wide-angle viewing system Magnetics Radial neutron camera Core Thomson scattering Bolometers Core charge exchange recombination spectrometer Hard X-ray monitor Plasma position reflectometer Pressure gauges Thermocouples LFS collective Thomson scattering High-resolution neutron spectrometer Gamma-ray spectrometers

The magnetics diagnostic is a large system for basic plasma control, machine protection and physics studies Purpose Prototype magnetics sensors Control Protection Physics Determine plasma current, shape and movement Measure thermal energy of plasma Detect and quantify plasma instabilities Reconstruct magnetic flux surfaces (equilibrium) Detect and quantify any current flowing from plasma into vessel          In-vessel pick-up coil   In-vessel pick-up coil Ex-vessel pick-up coil Diagnostic comprises pick-up coils, flux loops, Rogowski coils ~1050 sensors inside the vessel (shown in figure) ~600 additional sensors outside vessel Hall probe External rogowski coil

Overview of magnetics signal processing Event triggers dB/dt B Int Off-line processing Physics studies ADC Amp Real-time processing Control & protection dB/dt Around 1650 sensors in total Digital or analogue integrators Amplifiers Slow (4kHz) ADCs for basic equilibrium Fast (1 MHz) ADCs for instabilities Typically with optical isolation Data stored for specialist off-line studies Real-time signals distributed to other plant systems (power amplifiers for tokamak magnets, machine protection systems) ALL NUMBERS ARE INDICATIVE

Plasma current and shape (1/2) Plasma current measured by integrating magnetic field over poloidal contour (Ampere’s law) Plasma shape characterised by gap between plasma boundary (solid red line) and first wall Shape controlled by changing current in tokamak coils

Plasma current and shape Similar arrangement for 410 in-vessel Rogowski coils feeding vessel current reconstruction code Event triggers dB/dt B Int Off-line processing Physics studies ADC Amp Real-time processing Control & protection dB/dt Around 750 sensors (of which 380 in-vessel) Typical raw signal from 0.05m2 pick-up coil in +/-60mV range under normal operation; +/-5V at disruptions Individual signals integrated (typical time constant 100ms; output +/-5V) and digitised separately Integrated signal in range of 0.06Vs; frequency response ~10kHz; drift <0.35mVs after pulse of 3600s Summing integrator for ‘hardware’ calculation of plasma current (10kA-15MA range, 1% accuracy) Integrated signals typically sampled at 4kHz (20kHz at events) Typically 16 bit ADC with dithering, 25 bits without) Calibration of signals On-line data validation checks and corrective actions (e.g. voting system with 3 toroidal positions) Second plasma current calculation from individual signals Plasma boundary and plasma-wall gaps determined (1-2cm accuracy) 100k FLOP/cycle (10ms cycle time  0.01GFLOPS) Control signals generated for gap control and distributed to power amplifiers for tokamak coils Data stored for specialist off-line studies including full equilibrium reconstruction combining data from other diagnostics (20GB per pulse) ALL NUMBERS ARE INDICATIVE

High frequency instabilities – analysis & control Event triggers dB/dt B Int Off-line processing Physics studies ADC Amp Real-time processing Control & protection dB/dt Around 270 high frequency sensors (with response up to 100kHz) High frequency results in relatively strong (voltage-range) signals which can be recorded directly with low gain Frequency response up to 300kHz RMS signals from summing amplifiers may for rapid overview of instabilities or for event triggering 16 bit resolution likely to be adequate Sampling rates up to 1 MHz Event triggering to manage data quantities Data stored for specialist off-line studies; of order 50GB per pulse Real-time signals for feedback control (resistive-wall modes) Additional, more specialised, event triggers Similar arrangement for around 380 in-vessel sensors for plasma vertical speed control; 10kHz sampling; 30GB storage; 1GFLOPS ALL NUMBERS ARE INDICATIVE

Overview of requirements for some diagnostics System Electronics ADCs Storage (per pulse) Magnetics 1200 integrators 650 amplifiers 1600 slow ADC channels (20kHz) 270 fast ADC channels (1 MHz) 110GB Bolometry 500 lock-in amplifiers (50kHz) 500 ADC channels 360MB Charge Exchange Read-out from up to 75 CCD cameras (100 spectra/sec. 560 pixels each) N/A 30GB Core LIDAR TS 150 ADC channels at 20GSa/S; 10-bit samples 100MB ALL NUMBERS ARE INDICATIVE