MECH 322 Instrumentation Sinan Ozcan: I believe, I performed 50% of the work. Soma : I believe, I performed 50% of the work. Transient Thermocouple Response.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture Notes Part 4 ET 483b Sequential Control and Data Acquisition
Advertisements

COOKING CHICKEN Andrew Davidson April 4, 2014 ME 340 – Heat Transfer Winter 2014.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 35 April 18, 2014 Professor Miles Greiner.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 33 April 14, 2014 Professor Miles Greiner.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 24 March 23, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Lab 9 calculations.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 32 April 10, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 21
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 18 March 2, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner TC signal conditioner, Computer data acquisition introduction, Lab 7, myDAQ, LabVIEW.
ME 388 – Applied Instrumentation Laboratory Temperature Measurement Lab.
UNSTEADY-STATE HEAT CONDUCTION
Physics 1.2.
High Accuracy Differentiation Formulas
Paul Kendall Alex Perez.  Virtually all of a cars linear energy is transferred to the brakes as thermal energy.  The faster the car stops, the less.
Applications Team Sensing Products
Chapter 7 Introduction to Sampling Distributions
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 40 April 29, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Review Labs 10 and 11.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 39
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 10 – SPECIFIC TRANSIENT CONDUCTION MODELS.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 20 March 6, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner myDAQ A/D converter, temperature uncertainty, First-order, centered numerical.
Engineering 80 – Spring 2015 Temperature Measurements
Introduction to Thermodynamics
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 25 March 25, 2014 Professor Miles Greiner Thermocouple response to sinusoidally varying temperature, radiation and conduction.
Chapter 3: Unsteady State [ Transient ] Heat Conduction
Chapter 4 TRANSIENT HEAT CONDUCTION
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 23 March 13, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Transient TC response, Modeling, Expected and observed behaviors, Lab 9, Plot.
Introduction to Thermodynamics
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 22 March 11, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outline Chapter 16 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker.
Analyzing Data Chapter 2.
Introduction to Thermodynamics
Chapter 2: Analyzing Data
What happens when we place a hot bowl of soup in a cool room? ice water at 5 o C air trapped from outside at 25 0 C water at 15 0 C air at 15 0 C Why.
Chapters Thermodynamics Introduction 1. Equilibrium of mechanical systems: the concept of temperature Three parameters were needed to describe the.
MECH 322 Instrumentation Feedback Temperature Control Performed: 04/20/06 Pablo Araya : I believe I performed 100% of this lab Participation (__/50 points)
2-D Heat Transfer Model of A Horizontal U-Tube M. S. Islam 1, A. Fujimoto 2, A. Saida 2 and T. Fukuhara 2 2-D Heat Transfer Model of A Horizontal U-Tube.
1 CHAPTER 6 HEAT TRANSFER IN CHANNEL FLOW 6.1 Introduction (1) Laminar vs. turbulent flow transition Reynolds number is where  D tube diameter  u mean.
MECH 322 Instrumentation Lab 7 Computer Data Acquisition System for Steady Thermocouple Signals Performed: March 6, 2007 Group 0 Miles Greiner Lab Instructors:
Calibration and Static Response Measurement systems and each of their individual components ‘respond’ to inputs by producing a unique output for a given.
MECH 391 Instrumentation Lab 9 Vibration Analysis of an Aluminum Cantilever Beam Performed: 03/15/04 Sinan Ozcan : I believe I performed 100% of this lab.
MECH 322 Instrumentation Lab 5 Elastic Modulus of an Aluminum Beam Performed: February 9, 2004 Sinan Ozcan: I believe I performed 50% of the work for this.
MECH 322 Instrumentation Performed: 03/15/06 Differentiation and Spectral Analysis of Discretely Sampled Signals Group 0 Pablo Araya Lab Instructors: Mithun.
Unsteady State Heat Conduction
Convection in Flat Plate Boundary Layers P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi A Universal Similarity Law ……
MECH 322 Instrumentation Lab 9 Transient Thermocouple Response in Water and Air Performed: 03/23/07 Group 0 Miles Greiner Lab Instructors: Mithun Gudipati,
ME 322 LAB 7 Computer Data Acquisition System for Steady Thermocouple Signals Performed : 02/13/2004 Sinan Ozcan : I believe I performed 50% of this lab.
Performance Analysis of Heat Exchangers P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi A First Step in Techno-Economics of HXs?!?!?!
MECH 322 Instrumentation Lab 10 Damped Vibration of a Weighted Cantilever Beam Performed: 4/1/15 Group 0 Miles Greiner Lab Instructors: Marissa Tsugawa.
Introduction:- If the temperature of the body does not very with time it said to be in steady state. if there is an abrupt change in its surface temperature.
Engineering 80 – Spring 2016 Temperature Measurements 1 SOURCE: 3_standardbody__to-226_straightlead.jpg SOURCE:
Heat. Nature of Heat Heat is the transfer of energy (every in transit) from one body to another due to the temperature difference between the two bodies.
MECH 391 Instrumentation Lab 11 Unsteady Velocity in a Karman Vortex Street Performed: 04/07/05 Sinan Ozcan: I believe I performed 50% of this lab Participation.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Convective Motion and Heat Transfer in a Slowly Rotating Fluid Quasi-Sphere With.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 35
Lumped Capacitance Calculator
High Accuracy Differentiation Formulas
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 41
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 34
Mithun Gudipati, Venkata Venigalla
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 23
ME 391 LAB#5 Construction of a Computer Data Acquisition System for Measuring Steady Thermocouple Signals Performed : 02/13/2004 Sinan Ozcan : I believe.
Spencer Ferguson and Natalie Siddoway April 7, 2014
Chapter 23.
Figure 20.1  Joule’s experiment for determining the mechanical equivalent of heat. The falling blocks rotate the paddles, causing the temperature of the.
Transient Heat Conduction
Effects of Free and Forced Convection on the Convection Coefficient and Time to Steady State for Various Objects Christian Roys, Jon Zywusko, and Julie.
Lesson 10: Sensor and Transducer Electrical Characteristics
HEAT TRANSFER Transient Conduction.
Transient Heat Conduction
UNIT 3 MEASUREMENT AND DATA PROCESSING
Heat Transfer in common Configuration
Presentation transcript:

MECH 322 Instrumentation Sinan Ozcan: I believe, I performed 50% of the work. Soma : I believe, I performed 50% of the work. Transient Thermocouple Response in Boiling Water, Air and Room- Temperature Water Performed: 04/10/04

ABSTRACT The goal of this lab demonstrates errors that can occur when measuring time-dependent temperature A computer data acquisition system and signal conditioner were used to measure the temperature of a thermocouple as it was plunged into boiling water, air, and room temperature water. The thermocouple approached the environment temperature more quickly in the water environments than in air Effective mean heat transfer coefficients were determined for time periods when the measured temperature decayed exponentially to the environment temperature. The heat transfer for the water environments were significantly higher than for air. Numerically differentiating the measured thermocouple temperature is not an accurate method for determining the initial heat transfer rate to it from boiling water.

Fig. 1 Sensed Temperature versus Type-J Thermocouple Output Voltage The third order polynomial appears to accurately represent the data. The Relation between signal conditioner output V OUT and the thermocouple voltage V TC is V TC = (V OUT /G) + V ZERO, where V ZERO = mV and G = V/mV These relations are used to interpret the voltage measured by the data acquisition system in terms of the temperature of the thermocouple bead.

Figure 2 VI Front Panel

Figure 3 VI Block Diagram Formula This Express VI is configured as follows: Formula: Vout/ Formula This Express VI is configured as follows: Formula: 1.049E-02*X1** E-01*X1** E+01*X E-04 Convert from Dynamic Data Converts the dynamic data type to numeric, Boolean, waveform, and array data types for use with other VIs and functions.

Thermocouple material properties are based on the average values of Iron and Constantan (A.J. Wheeler and A.R. Gangi, Introduction to Engineering Experimentation, 2nd Ed., Pearson Education Inc., 2004, page 431) The approximate time for a temperature front to reach the thermocouple center is t T = D 2  c/4k Table 1 Thermocouple Properties

The slope exhibits a continuous variation (not a step change) when it is placed in the boiling water at time t = 1.55 sec. The measured temperature slope may respond slowly at first because the TC interior temperature does not change immediately after it is placed in the hot environment. The thermocouple reaches its final temperature at around t = 1.9 sec The dimensionless temperature error is  = (T-T F )/(T I -T F ) Fig. 4 Thermocouple temperature versus Time in Boiling Water

Fig. 5 Dimensionless Temperature Error versus Time in Boiling Water The dimensionless temperature error decays exponentially during the time period t = to sec with time constant b = /sec. The effective heat transfer coef. is determined from h = -  cDb/6

Fig. 6 Dimensionless Temperature Error versus Time t for Room Temperature Air and Water The initial and final TC temperatures were T i = 91.1°C and T F = 19.7°C. The dimensionless temperature error decays exponentially during the time periods t = to sec (in air) and t = to sec (in water). TC in air TC in water

Table 2 Effective Mean Heat Transfer Coefficients The dimensional heat transfer coefficients are higher in the water than in air due to its higher thermal conductivity The Nusselt numbers Nu D (dimensionless heat transfer coefficient) in the three different environments are more nearly equal than the dimensional heat transfer coefficients, h. The Biot Bi number characterizes the temperature differences within the thermocouple divided by the difference between the thermocouple surface temperature and its surroundings The thermocouple is not a uniform temperature body in the water environments

Fig. 7 The Heat Transfer Rate to TC in Boiling Water versus Time Calculated based on Q = (  c  D 3 /6)(dT/dt), with three finite difference time steps  t = 0.001, 0.01 and 0.1 s.  t = 0.01 sec is the best compromise between noise and responsiveness The heat transfer is significant between t = 1.55 and 1.9 sec The heat transfer rate to the TC actually peaks at t = 1.55 sec when it is first placed in the boiling water, and then decrease. The measured heat transfer appears to increase for 0.13 sec before decreasing because the slope of the curve in Fig. 4 increases at a finite rate when the TC is placed in boiling water. This delay is 4 times larger than the initial transient time t T = sec. This difference may be because the TC is not a lumped body (Bi > 0.1)

Extra Figures (not part of report)

Summary of 2006 Data Air has consistently lowest h h increases with D?

Fig. 6 Thermocouple Temperature versus Time for Room Temperature Air and Water There are two periods of significant temperature change when the TC is first place in the air and water.

Calculated from h = (  cD/6)[(dT/dt)/(T F – T)] = Q/[  D 2 (T F – T)] It appears to increase after then thermocouple is plunged into the boiling water at t = 1.55 sec. This may be because the heat transfer rate Q is calculated based on the slope of the temperature versus time data, and this is not an accurate method. (horizontal line calculated from curve fit in Fig. 5) appears to accurately represent the mean value of the time dependent heat transfer coefficient for the time period t = to sec. Fig. 9 Heat Transfer Coefficient versus Time for Boiling Water